We must restore constitutional government

[JoeB131]

Well, one small step towards restoring constitutional government (giving the people back the right to private property)

Yeah. HOw dare those unions organize people!!!

We didn't need a middle class in this country. We should all be happy with what the rich give us.

Look how well that worked out for rich people in France.

 

[Kondor3]

The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....

Beyond the controversial ways stingray technology works, the secrecy and deception law enforcement agencies use to cloak their use of the devices is also troubling. Law enforcement agencies around the country have routinely used the devices without obtaining a warrant from judges. In cases where they did obtain a warrant, they often deceived judges about the nature of the technology they planned to use. Instead of telling judges that they intended to use a stingray or cell site simulator, they have often mischaracterized the technology, describing it as a pen register device instead.

Hacker Lexicon: Stingrays, the Spy Tool the Government Tried, and Failed, to Hide

Want to restore Constitutional government?

Try fielding a better candidate next time that a majority of The People will vote for.

Considering the walking talking piece-of-$hit you fielded LAST time, that should not prove too difficult.

 

[P@triot]

Considering the walking talking piece-of-$hit you fielded LAST time, that should not prove too difficult.

1. President Trump was the most constitutional president we've had in the past 150 years (which is why you low-IQ fascists hated him)
2. You pieces of shit elected Barack Obama - who had a deep contempt for the US Constitution and thus wiped his ass with it just to show everyone how much he hated it

Just STFU already. Every time you post, you show the world that your a typical low-IQ leftist who needs government to provide the basics for him just so he can survive.

 

[P@triot]

Well someone needs to explain to the "White House" that no such authority exists for them.

White House weighs cracking down on secret ransomware payments, pursuing hackers

But Anne Neuberger said she was less sure about banning ransomware payments.

www.cyberscoop.com

 

[P@triot]

Now remember folks, after WikiLeaks published the Snowden dump (which showed unimaginable levels of criminal activity by the federal government), asshat C_Clayton_Jones insisted that the United States was "operating under constitutional government". Just let that sink in for a moment.

The latest from the NSA (which is not permitted by law to operate domestically) is that their TAO (Tailored Access Operations) has been targeting completely innocent Americans under the orders of Obama (and now Biden).

If that were Nazi Germany enough, they been engaged in "Traffic Shaping" - the act of literally hacking all domestic servers, routers, etc. and routing the traffic overseas so that if they are ever finally bought to justice, these fuck'n assholes can state under oath "but the traffic came through foreign resources". Yeah, because you fucking routed it there to begin with via illegal hacking.

This is some of the most egregious crimes ever committed by the United States government, and this fuck'n clown CCJ will try to convince everyone we are "still operating under constitutional government". We haven't been for decades.

 

[JoeB131]

Now remember folks, after WikiLeaks published the Snowden dump (which showed unimaginable levels of criminal activity by the federal government), asshat C_Clayton_Jones insisted that the United States was "operating under constitutional government". Just let that sink in for a moment.

The latest from the NSA (which is not permitted by law to operate domestically) is that their TAO (Tailored Access Operations) has been targeting completely innocent Americans under the orders of Obama (and now Biden).

If that were Nazi Germany enough, they been engaged in "Traffic Shaping" - the act of literally hacking all domestic servers, routers, etc. and routing the traffic overseas so that if they are ever finally bought to justice, these fuck'n assholes can state under oath "but the traffic came through foreign resources". Yeah, because you fucking routed it there to begin with via illegal hacking.

This is some of the most egregious crimes ever committed by the United States government, and this fuck'n clown CCJ will try to convince everyone we are "still operating under constitutional government". We haven't been for decades.

Poodle whines that Obama actually kept America safe from Terrorism. Too funny.

 

[P@triot]

I screamed it was unconstitutional back in November 2014 when Dictator MaObama did it and it’s still unconstitutional 7 years later. A member of the Executive Branch cannot make, alter, or abolish law. And that’s exactly what D.A.C.A. does.

Federal Judge Stops Biden White House’s Authoritarian Move on Amnesty

This important federal court decision will help slow the nation's trend toward an authoritarian chief executive.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[JoeB131]

I screamed it was unconstitutional back in November 2014 when Dictator MaObama did it and it’s still unconstitutional 7 years later. A member of the Executive Branch cannot make, alter, or abolish law. And that’s exactly what D.A.C.A. does.

Actually, the law gives the Executive a lot of authority in how to 'execute" a law.

The reality- we have 11 million undocumented immigrants living here, mostly because Americans WANT someone to do the crappy jobs. (They just don't want them dating their daughters.) DACA was a recognition of how unworkable the law is.

The reality- we have a bunch of laws on the books that are effectively unworkable because too many people don't follow them. That's when you go back and fix them.

 

[P@triot]

Who is going to tell the low-IQ left that this egregiously violates the US Constitution? You don’t have to take my word for it - just check the 10th Amendment. The federal government is explicitly restricted to 18 enumerated powers and abortion isn’t one of them.

House Democrats Pass Bill Aiming to Codify Roe v. Wade

House Democrats pass a bill that would codify Roe v. Wade and massively expand abortions in the United States.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[Rigby5]

Well someone needs to explain to the "White House" that no such authority exists for them.

White House weighs cracking down on secret ransomware payments, pursuing hackers

But Anne Neuberger said she was less sure about banning ransomware payments.

www.cyberscoop.com

Hmm, I think they do.
Ransomware is internet commerce, which is interstate and under FCC jurisdiction.

 

[Rigby5]

Now remember folks, after WikiLeaks published the Snowden dump (which showed unimaginable levels of criminal activity by the federal government), asshat C_Clayton_Jones insisted that the United States was "operating under constitutional government". Just let that sink in for a moment.

The latest from the NSA (which is not permitted by law to operate domestically) is that their TAO (Tailored Access Operations) has been targeting completely innocent Americans under the orders of Obama (and now Biden).

If that were Nazi Germany enough, they been engaged in "Traffic Shaping" - the act of literally hacking all domestic servers, routers, etc. and routing the traffic overseas so that if they are ever finally bought to justice, these fuck'n assholes can state under oath "but the traffic came through foreign resources". Yeah, because you fucking routed it there to begin with via illegal hacking.

This is some of the most egregious crimes ever committed by the United States government, and this fuck'n clown CCJ will try to convince everyone we are "still operating under constitutional government". We haven't been for decades.

I agree privacy is an inherent individual right, and actually it is illegal to listen in to Merkel, like Obama did.

 

[Rigby5]

Poodle whines that Obama actually kept America safe from Terrorism. Too funny.

The way to keep the US safe is to stop violating rights all over the world.
The argument can be made that is they are not doing anything illegal, then why should anyone care if their privacy is violated?
And the answer to that is that the US is doing too many illegal things, like the War on Drugs.

 

[Rigby5]

I screamed it was unconstitutional back in November 2014 when Dictator MaObama did it and it’s still unconstitutional 7 years later. A member of the Executive Branch cannot make, alter, or abolish law. And that’s exactly what D.A.C.A. does.

Federal Judge Stops Biden White House’s Authoritarian Move on Amnesty

This important federal court decision will help slow the nation's trend toward an authoritarian chief executive.

www.dailysignal.com

DACA us different because the president is allowed leeway for refugees.

{...
“The Refugee Act of 1980” allowed the President the authority to admit refugees on an annual basis, in consultation with Congress in response to United Nations protocols in 1967 and 1969, derived from the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention. This new legislation was the first time that our country used international standards and definitions for our immigration policies. “The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986” addressed unauthorized immigration creating two amnesty programs “legalizing” about 2.7 million people who illegally entered the country. Because illegal immigration remained a problem, “The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996” was passed to provide greater controls on the borders and reduced benefits. The last change occurred with “The Homeland Security Act of 2002” which now has consolidated authority for border protection, naturalization, customs and immigration.
...}

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration?

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration? Answer – The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of...

theamericanview.com

 

[Rigby5]

Who is going to tell the low-IQ left that this egregiously violates the US Constitution? You don’t have to take my word for it - just check the 10th Amendment. The federal government is explicitly restricted to 18 enumerated powers and abortion isn’t one of them.

House Democrats Pass Bill Aiming to Codify Roe v. Wade

House Democrats pass a bill that would codify Roe v. Wade and massively expand abortions in the United States.

www.dailysignal.com

The 14th amendment ensures individual rights, so then the federal government DOES have jurisdiction over states violating individual rights.
Abortion is one of them.

{...

Amendment XIV​

Section 1.​

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2.​

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

Section 3.​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4.​

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5.​

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
...}

 

[P@triot]

Ransomware is internet commerce, which is interstate and under FCC jurisdiction.

Since when is crime “commerce”? Is bank robbery also “commerce” in your mind?

 

[P@triot]

DACA us different because

Not it’s not

the president is allowed leeway for refugees.

No they are not. Nowhere in the US Constitution does it grant the President of the United States “leeway” for “refugees”.

Furthermore, none of these are “refugees”. Not one. So your own argument doesn’t even hold up against itself.

 

[P@triot]

The 14th amendment ensures individual rights,

Like the right to life. Thank you for reminding me that the 14th Amended outlaws abortion.

so then the federal government DOES have jurisdiction over states violating individual rights. Abortion is one of them.

Except that abortion isn’t a “right” and never was. There is no “right” to take a life. #YouTried

 

[Markle]

The 14th amendment ensures individual rights, so then the federal government DOES have jurisdiction over states violating individual rights.
Abortion is one of them.

{...

Amendment XIV​

Section 1.​

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2.​

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

Section 3.​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4.​

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5.​

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
...}

Wrong

 

[JoeB131]

The way to keep the US safe is to stop violating rights all over the world.
The argument can be made that is they are not doing anything illegal, then why should anyone care if their privacy is violated?
And the answer to that is that the US is doing too many illegal things, like the War on Drugs.

I don't disagree. Our middle east policy has been to fuck a hornet's nest and complain about getting stung.

But as long as we let the Zionists and Oil Companies and War Profiteers dictate what our middle east policy is, we are going to keep pissing those people off and some of them are going to blow themselves up over it.

Sadly, this kind of stupidity is where we have bipartisan agreement. It won't change no matter who is president. Obama got a lot of shit for merely asking the Zionists to be less dickish about stuff.

 

[JoeB131]

Like the right to life. Thank you for reminding me that the 14th Amended outlaws abortion.

Except that abortion isn’t a “right” and never was. There is no “right” to take a life. #YouTried

Fetuses aren't people, Poodle.

If they were, women could be charged with child abuse for smoking, drinking or even having a crappy diet during Pregnancy.