We are NOT all at risk of AIDS

[William Joyce]

But it's obvious to see why the gay lobby would want us to think that. If "we" are all at risk of AIDS, then it's everyone's issue, and the government should fund it, and it's morally legimitized.

But that's a fat lie. Nuns are not at risk of contracting AIDS. Those who are careful and use protection are not. Those who don't jam needles into their bodies are not. Married people are not at risk of AIDS. Kids are not at risk of AIDS. Grandparents are not. Those who do what God meant with their bodies are not at risk of AIDS.

The truth is, degenerate freaks who behave badly are the ones most likely to get AIDS. But the freaks want to feel good about themselves, so they cook up the lie because it makes them look as righteous as the Pope.

 

[DKSuddeth]

But that's a fat lie. Nuns are not at risk of contracting AIDS. Those who are careful and use protection are not. Those who don't jam needles into their bodies are not. Married people are not at risk of AIDS. Kids are not at risk of AIDS. Grandparents are not. Those who do what God meant with their bodies are not at risk of AIDS.

William, you truly have no clue about reality here, do you?

ANYBODY is at risk of aids simply because of the way that its transmitted. Anyone who receives a transfusion is at risk of aids and its documented that it has actually happened. HIV/AIDS can be transmitted from mother to child in the womb. sharing a lemonade with grandma can put you at risk of aids.

Maybe you should crawl out of your cave and read some medical books.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
William, you truly have no clue about reality here, do you?

ANYBODY is at risk of aids simply because of the way that its transmitted. Anyone who receives a transfusion is at risk of aids and its documented that it has actually happened. HIV/AIDS can be transmitted from mother to child in the womb. sharing a lemonade with grandma can put you at risk of aids.

Maybe you should crawl out of your cave and read some medical books.

DK, that is a cool avatar.

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by NewGuy
DK, that is a cool avatar.

Thank you. I've got a handful more that I've got to size then put em up (with Jim's permission of course) so people can pick and choose.

 

[William Joyce]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
ANYBODY is at risk of aids simply because of the way that its transmitted. Anyone who receives a transfusion is at risk of aids and its documented that it has actually happened. HIV/AIDS can be transmitted from mother to child in the womb. sharing a lemonade with grandma can put you at risk of aids.

1. Blood has been screened for AIDS for a very, very long time now. Incidences of transmission by transfusion are non-existent today.

2. A fetus in utero is not meant to be receiving political messages, so that doesn't count.

3. Sharing a lemonade with grandma can put you at risk of AIDS? AIDS is not transmitted through the air or through saliva, so unless you and grandma are doing something really, really weird, no.

I think the person who needs to check into the medicals is you. Anal sex causes AIDS because the cells of the rectum are columnar and more prone to tearing (and thus transmission of fluids), while vaginal sex does not pose the same level of risk, because the cells are plate-like and meant to stretch. Homos want us all to think that sticking things where they don't belong is "OK." But it's not. It could kill you.

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by William Joyce
1. Blood has been screened for AIDS for a very, very long time now. Incidences of transmission by transfusion are non-existent today.

not non-existent, as mistakes do still happen, but it is extremely minimal. nonetheless, it still happens.

2. A fetus in utero is not meant to be receiving political messages, so that doesn't count.

tell that to the child that is slowly dying whether it counts or not.

3. Sharing a lemonade with grandma can put you at risk of AIDS? AIDS is not transmitted through the air or through saliva, so unless you and grandma are doing something really, really weird, no.

Aids is transmitted through body fluid transfers, hence having a simple mouth sore, canker sore, open wound from tooth extractions, etc. can transmit the virus

I think the person who needs to check into the medicals is you. Anal sex causes AIDS because the cells of the rectum are columnar and more prone to tearing (and thus transmission of fluids), while vaginal sex does not pose the same level of risk, because the cells are plate-like and meant to stretch.

The threat still exists moron. all it takes is one simple little microscopic tear in the vaginal wall.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by William Joyce
1. Blood has been screened for AIDS for a very, very long time now. Incidences of transmission by transfusion are non-existent today.

2. A fetus in utero is not meant to be receiving political messages, so that doesn't count.

3. Sharing a lemonade with grandma can put you at risk of AIDS? AIDS is not transmitted through the air or through saliva, so unless you and grandma are doing something really, really weird, no.

I think the person who needs to check into the medicals is you. Anal sex causes AIDS because the cells of the rectum are columnar and more prone to tearing (and thus transmission of fluids), while vaginal sex does not pose the same level of risk, because the cells are plate-like and meant to stretch. Homos want us all to think that sticking things where they don't belong is "OK." But it's not. It could kill you.

1. Wrong, they mislabel things and break protocol all the time by accident.

2. Dunno what you are talking about there....

3. I guess someone having a cut and leaving blood on the container while you pick it up and drink from it while YOU have bleeding gums is incomprehensible?

I think you define risk much more liberally than most.
The only reason your final paragraph here makes any sense at all is because you are right in the contrast of openings and possibilities of tearing. That doesn't make it a digital risk factor, though. It makes it a ratio of potential still.

Health isn't something to play with. AIDS is simply a BEHAVIORAL disease. Anyone engaging in a risk factor opening themselves up to the disease is then the cause for recieving it. This includes recieving blood. The people who need blood and get AIDS by the transmission, or babies unborn are probably the only innocent victims paying for the immorality or bad behavior of another.

 

[Aquarian]

Truthfully, some groups of people are not threatened by aids.

The truly celibate who never get a blood transfusion or share needles are not very likely to get aids.

Truly monogamous relationships between individuals who were free of the disease when the period of monogamy began are not at risk with the same exceptions for other behavior as above(gay or straight). This means NO cheating by either partner.

The blood supply here is almost completely safe, but only almost, not 100% (Not just for aids but other bloodborne pathogens as well, still I'd rather get blood in this country than elsewhere...)

every other group has the potential to become infected with varying odds based on activities engaged in and with whom. Men, women, black, white, straight, gay, single, married, nuns, kids, grandparents etc.

 

[DKSuddeth]

the only group who has zero risk to contracting aids is that group that shuts themselves in a cave and has no contact with the outside. Everyone else runs the risk of contraction, albeit at varying degrees and odds, depending upon their social behaviors.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
the only group who has zero risk to contracting aids is that group that shuts themselves in a cave and has no contact with the outside. Everyone else runs the risk of contraction, albeit at varying degrees and odds, depending upon their social behaviors.

OK. So my replies are too lengthy.

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by NewGuy
OK. So my replies are too lengthy.

but more detailed, its all good.

 

[Bullypulpit]

Originally posted by William Joyce
But it's obvious to see why the gay lobby would want us to think that. If "we" are all at risk of AIDS, then it's everyone's issue, and the government should fund it, and it's morally legimitized.

But that's a fat lie. Nuns are not at risk of contracting AIDS. Those who are careful and use protection are not. Those who don't jam needles into their bodies are not. Married people are not at risk of AIDS. Kids are not at risk of AIDS. Grandparents are not. Those who do what God meant with their bodies are not at risk of AIDS.

The truth is, degenerate freaks who behave badly are the ones most likely to get AIDS. But the freaks want to feel good about themselves, so they cook up the lie because it makes them look as righteous as the Pope.

Sweet William...If anyone is a degenerate, you are. Your racism is, proof of that. And BTW, just how do YOU know what God wants? Perhaps the finger of God writes messages on the inside of your forehead in big neon letters that only you can see...

 

[Big D]

Being involved sexually with a black male will give you the best odds of being infected with the aids virus.

Another local woman thinks she's just been given a death sentence.
She's afraid she's been deliberately infected with HIV.
http://www.komotv.com/news/story_m.asp?ID=30572

1 in 40 black males have aids in the U.S.
1 in 300 white males have aids in the U.S.

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by Big D
Being involved sexually with a black male will give you the best odds of being infected with the aids virus.

1 in 40 black males have aids in the U.S.
1 in 300 white males have aids in the U.S.

Do you have scientific evidence to support these two statements?

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
Do you have scientific evidence to support these two statements?

Forget that, I want the genius to tell me how he thinks AIDS works.

Since he doesn't know that, he will dream up anything.

 

[Big D]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
Do you have scientific evidence to support these two statements?

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/graphics/images/l238/l238-3.htm

 

[NewGuy]

To all of the racists:

The reality is that the disease spreads by behavioral transmission.

Therefore, fix the behavior. -Don't nuke people just because of their skin.

That said, the minority population, having more ghetto like environments in the US than whites, having less money per capita, having less education per capita, are more at RISK of this disease.

It makes perfect sense.

Therefore these people need to stop the bad behavior, and all will fix its self.

Killing, blaming, or accusing them won't solve anything. It isn't the skin that is the problem.

Blame your own ethics because YOU arent part of the solution, you are part of the problem. As soon as YOU take a direct hand in HELPING educate and coordinate better living and health conditions, then you can restate the situation. You will find you have a new point of view.

 

[William Joyce]

Yeah? It's my job to make sure blacks don't get AIDS? You can "fix" behavior? I've got several decades of absolute and total liberal policy failure that says otherwise.

For anyone keeping score, I tried my dam-nabbedest to start a non-racial thread, but D is correct: blacks have wildly higher rates of STDs than whites. That is caused by their position on the r-K scale: higher reproductive strategy v. higher investment parenting per child strategy. As they evolved, blacks kept up their numbers by squeezing out lots of kids and writing off the ones who didn't make it. Whites had only a few kids and poured all their effort into them. This was because of the varying levels of resources in their respective climates. This in turn led to different sex drives: blacks' are much higher.

 

[Big D]

Originally posted by NewGuy
As soon as YOU take a direct hand in HELPING educate and coordinate better living and health conditions, then you can restate the situation. You will find you have a new point of view.

Could there be a more racist thought then this?

New Guy belives it is the responsablity of whites to teach blacks how to behave.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by William Joyce
Yeah? It's my job to make sure blacks don't get AIDS? You can "fix" behavior? I've got several decades of absolute and total liberal policy failure that says otherwise.

It is your job as a human being to love your fellow human being and hate the behavior its self, not the person. If you don't like the results, this dictates helping curb the behavior.

Several decades of LIBERAL policy failure is because liberals are not logical and have a flawed socialistic view of economics that doesn't work. Bring your information. Maybe we can have a nice schooling on economic and political policy both. I hope you have books. I have a few myself.

For anyone keeping score, I tried my dam-nabbedest to start a non-racial thread, but D is correct: blacks have wildly higher rates of STDs than whites. That is caused by their position on the r-K scale: higher reproductive strategy v. higher investment parenting per child strategy.

A strategy requires a collective effort. How many blacks do you know?

As they evolved, blacks kept up their numbers by squeezing out lots of kids and writing off the ones who didn't make it. Whites had only a few kids and poured all their effort into them. This was because of the varying levels of resources in their respective climates. This in turn led to different sex drives: blacks' are much higher. [/B]

The numbers are the way they are because whites tend to chase the dollar more, capture power more, and be more career oriented with passion. This leads to incredible stress, short life expectancy and impotence, heart attack, contaminated toxified blood supply, deterioration of tendons, tissues, and ligaments and less oxygen to the brain.

Blacks have been fed copious amounts of tobacco and alcohol products through strategic marketing and liquor store placement for decades. This, coupled with a nice liberal philosophy of handing all the blacks money and programs take away incentives for reaching above and beyond what they already have.

It takes a person of considerable desire to pull themselves up by their bootstraps to get ahead in life at whatever the cost and succeed.

Let's feed YOU handouts, alcohol and cigarettes and see where YOU go. And by the way, the only reason these two racial groupings can be made is because we are talking about collective time frames of decades and the majorities of each group as dictated by averages. Marketing and strategy was implemented by whites.

Plain and simple:

Blame yourself for the constant reprogramming of your dark brother's lack of general desire to go forward when he doesn't need to and doesn't want to any more, and blame your other lighter one for causing that situation and killing his own by overstressing and chasing the almighty buck.

This is a problem of morals and ethics that works through abused money and power and knows no racial bounds for either side.