Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wrongabsolutely correct. the kraken lawyers face sanctions for not doing even minimal due diligence.
Prove it.Nope, he is 100% correct. Go check. The judge admonished the slimy Kraken for not having even read the affidavits, as the couple that were randomly pulled by the judge were just so fucking ridiculous.
Maybe for you but not for me. Democracy is doing better than ever and seeing what happened on January 6th proves it. The "insurrection" didn't happen, wasn't close to being completed and our nation is now stronger because of it.Thats nice. But Trump the mentally ill slob is still harming our democracy.
There's no reality here. Crime families don't have anything to offer to replace the due process of law and government which the Democrats have abdicated to Mob rule.So focus on what you don't want and I'll focus on reality.
Lol.. one of many sites.
“Rudy Guiliani is nearly 'broke' as he confronts a potentially long legal following an FBI raid on his home and office – and his aides are astonished that his longtime client former President Trump isn't contributing despite Trump's own massive fundraising haul.”
Giuliani allies are stunned Trump won't help with legal fees
Allies of former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani are claiming he is 'almost broke' and are shocked that Donald Trump isn't aiding his legal battle with his own $100 million warchest.www.dailymail.co.uk
that turd demands proof. lol. another concept he struggles with..Prove it.
To whom? You? Haha...now bripat, we have been over this.Prove it.
How stupid. The thread is literally abput a mob of unqualified Trump cult frauds trying to affect our election after the fact.There's no reality here. Crime families don't have anything to offer to replace the due process of law and government which the Democrats have abdicated to Mob rule
And that is your reality, thanks.There's no reality here. Crime families don't have anything to offer to replace the due process of law and government which the Democrats have abdicated to Mob rule.
It wasn't just Trump he threw his esteemed career out the window on...he sold his soul to a lot of creeps and crooks for money.Guiliani won’t sing. He will cry and whimper. The moron threw away his reputation for an admitted pussygrabber. How tragically sad.
that turd demands proof. lol. another concept he struggles with..
‘Kraken’ Sanctions Hearing: Lin Wood Blames Sidney Powell In Attempt To Evade Punishment As Judge Expresses Skepticism
“I don't think I've ever seen an affidavit that makes so many leaps,” the judge said of one court filing, and criticized another as based on "levels of hearsay."www.forbes.com
During a hearing Monday over the sanctions request, U.S. District Judge Linda Parker repeatedly expressed skepticism of the pro-Trump attorneys’ evidence of election fraud in the case, criticizing one affidavit as being based on “levels of hearsay” and another as so “speculative” as to be “fantastical.”
Parker suggested she believed the right-wing attorneys filed their affidavits without doing the “due diligence” to determine whether they were actually true, saying she had “heard nothing” to suggest the lawyers had done their “minimal duty that any attorney has in presenting a sworn affidavit.”
“I don't think I've ever seen an affidavit that makes so many leaps,” Parker said about one affidavit presented as evidence of election fraud. “This is really fantastical. So my question to counsel here is: How could any of you as officers of the court present this affidavit?”
i provided proof that what i posted is correct. bullshit that was apparently considered court worthy evidence was filed, looked at by the court, rightfully disregarded, and consequently the lawsuits were tossed. you being always wrong is hilarious. the "evidence" was so shitty that the lawyers face sanctions.Your article was published July 12, eight months after the election. So no judge who actually presided over any of the hearings immediately after the election has said anything about the evidence.
Your judge is also an Obama appointee.
Hmmm . . . . no, you didn't. You claimed that the judges who held hearings immediately after the election, but before the results were accepted by congress looked at the evidence.i provided proof that what i posted is correct. bullshit that was apparently considered court worthy evidence was filed, looked at by the court, rightfully disregarded, and consequently the lawsuits were tossed. you being always wrong is hilarious. the "evidence" was so shitty that the lawyers face sanctions.
now, throw another tantrum.
Not one court looked "into" it they looked at it and dismissed it....
Bevause there ismt any. None in court, none given to the authorities. Zilch. Nada. Go sit in the corner with the spoonbenders.So no judge who actually presided over any of the hearings immediately after the election has said anything about the evidence
Obvious bullshit. How can you make that claim when no judge even looked at the evidence?Bevause there ismt any. None in court, none given to the authorities. Zilch. Nada. Go sit in the corner with the spoonbenders.
Your article was published July 12, eight months after the election. So no judge who actually presided over any of the hearings immediately after the election has said anything about the evidence.
Your judge is also an Obama appointee.
You really aren't very good at this are you?I have only gotten emails and robo calls from Trump. He's using you all which is what Trump does. He has huge legal fees and notes due from foreign bankers.