Watching Right-wingers Melt Down...Again

[BertramN]

.
The latest non-issue conservatives are treating as a crisis is San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s remaining seated during the national anthem.



He stated his reason for his actions, that his stand “Is for People that don't have the voice,” and it is totally understandable and acceptable, to people of reason and conscience. However, to most conservatives, failure to stand for the national anthem is equal to an act of treason.



Of course, the same right-wingers view corporate America’s polluting of our air and water as acceptable because Big Business does it for profit. The right-wingers consider it to be the fat cats’ right to screw workers and consumers because that is the way of U.S. free market capitalism.



Yes, righties are up in arms over Colin Kaepernick, but when it comes to environmental destruction, needless wars, runaway defense spending, growing poverty, mass shootings, and a host of other issues truly detrimental to public interest, conservatives have no worries at all.



Kaepernick Says His Stand 'Is for People That Don't Have the Voice'





.

 

[Auld Phart]

.
The latest non-issue conservatives are treating as a crisis is San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s remaining seated during the national anthem.



He stated his reason for his actions, that his stand “Is for People that don't have the voice,” and it is totally understandable and acceptable, to people of reason and conscience. However, to most conservatives, failure to stand for the national anthem is equal to an act of treason.



Of course, the same right-wingers view corporate America’s polluting of our air and water as acceptable because Big Business does it for profit. The right-wingers consider it to be the fat cats’ right to screw workers and consumers because that is the way of U.S. free market capitalism.



Yes, righties are up in arms over Colin Kaepernick, but when it comes to environmental destruction, needless wars, runaway defense spending, growing poverty, mass shootings, and a host of other issues truly detrimental to public interest, conservatives have no worries at all.



Kaepernick Says His Stand 'Is for People That Don't Have the Voice'





.

His teammates are rightwingers?

 

[BettyYeti]

Reactionaries hate liberty.

 

[Auld Phart]

BTW,

 

[Grandma]

....and the OP's point flies over WillHaftawaite's head at mach 5

 

[BettyYeti]

BTW,

Standing or sitting, both are liberty. That is what he lost his legs fighting for, right?

That's not actually true BTW.

 

[Auld Phart]

Hilarious


Y'all drink from the same pitcher, or the same glass?

 

[Pilate]

This is a really lame straw man argument that totally fails to recognize the large variety of right wing ideas. This would be as if I said "left wingers are all seeking to abolish the concept of private property." No. Communists seek to do that, not liberal democrats. In the same fashion, if he wishes to sit, I find it unsavory but legal, I am not "outraged" or "up in arms" nor am I "having a meltdown" or "freaking out" or "losing it" or "going nuts."

 

[Dale Smith]

.
The latest non-issue conservatives are treating as a crisis is San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s remaining seated during the national anthem.



He stated his reason for his actions, that his stand “Is for People that don't have the voice,” and it is totally understandable and acceptable, to people of reason and conscience. However, to most conservatives, failure to stand for the national anthem is equal to an act of treason.



Of course, the same right-wingers view corporate America’s polluting of our air and water as acceptable because Big Business does it for profit. The right-wingers consider it to be the fat cats’ right to screw workers and consumers because that is the way of U.S. free market capitalism.



Yes, righties are up in arms over Colin Kaepernick, but when it comes to environmental destruction, needless wars, runaway defense spending, growing poverty, mass shootings, and a host of other issues truly detrimental to public interest, conservatives have no worries at all.



Kaepernick Says His Stand 'Is for People That Don't Have the Voice'





.

Your beloved "gubermint" is the biggest corporate entity of all that controls the behavior of the multi-national corporations and collects dividends. They get a huge leash but mom and pop shops and small manufacturing operations that they don't own are beaten down with licenses, taxes, acts, statutes and codes to follow. So much that you don't know. I wouldn't stand for the corporate banner and anthem either but not for the reasons that a bi-racial millionaire athlete won't.....

 

[Dale Smith]

Reactionaries hate liberty.

Liberty? Like speaking out against gay organizations like GLSEN and the LGBTQ?...oh wait, to a leftard that's just "hate speech"....(snicker)

 

[BettyYeti]

Reactionaries hate liberty.

Liberty? Like speaking out against gay organizations like GLSEN and the LGBTQ?...oh wait, to a leftard that's just "hate speech"....(snicker)

All liberty so just deal with it. No one ever said you would approve of what someone does, says, or does or does not do.

 

[Dale Smith]

Reactionaries hate liberty.

Liberty? Like speaking out against gay organizations like GLSEN and the LGBTQ?...oh wait, to a leftard that's just "hate speech"....(snicker)

All liberty so just deal with it. No one ever said you would approve of what someone does, says, or does or does not do.

No, apparently the fabian socialists that run the leftard clown posse have a real problem with those that are not "on board" with them.

 

[BettyYeti]

Reactionaries hate liberty.

Liberty? Like speaking out against gay organizations like GLSEN and the LGBTQ?...oh wait, to a leftard that's just "hate speech"....(snicker)

All liberty so just deal with it. No one ever said you would approve of what someone does, says, or does or does not do.

No, apparently the fabian socialists that run the leftard clown posse have a real problem with those that are not "on board" with them.

And you have a problem with him not standing? Both of you need to just STFU.

 

[Auld Phart]

$19,000,000 per year?

That could give a lot of the people that dont' have a voice something to say.

(wonder how many houses and cars he has?)

 

[BettyYeti]

$19,000,000 per year?

That could give a lot of the people that dont' have a voice something to say.

(wonder how many houses and cars he has?)

Why do you hate the rich?

 

[Auld Phart]

$19,000,000 per year?

That could give a lot of the people that dont' have a voice something to say.

(wonder how many houses and cars he has?)

Why do you hate the rich?

Why don't you answer the question?

He won't stand for the flag, does he stand for equality?

Does he share with those less fortunate.

How much would half of his annual salary do for a ghetto?

How many disadvantaged children could he put thru college?

 

[BettyYeti]

$19,000,000 per year?

That could give a lot of the people that dont' have a voice something to say.

(wonder how many houses and cars he has?)

Why do you hate the rich?

Why don't you answer the question?

He won't stand for the flag, does he stand for equality?

Does he share with those less fortunate.

How much would half of his annual salary do for a ghetto?

How many disadvantaged children could he put thru college?

Who the fuck cares? That has nothing at all to do with the issue, which is liberty - stand or not, not your call.

 

[Auld Phart]

$19,000,000 per year?

That could give a lot of the people that dont' have a voice something to say.

(wonder how many houses and cars he has?)

Why do you hate the rich?

Why don't you answer the question?

He won't stand for the flag, does he stand for equality?

Does he share with those less fortunate.

How much would half of his annual salary do for a ghetto?

How many disadvantaged children could he put thru college?

Who the fuck cares? That has nothing at all to do with the issue, which is liberty - stand or not, your call.

I'm just curious how much of a hypocrite he is.

If the only help he is giving those without a voice is sitting during the National Anthem....

He's a MAJOR LEAGUE hypocrite

 

[BettyYeti]

$19,000,000 per year?

That could give a lot of the people that dont' have a voice something to say.

(wonder how many houses and cars he has?)

Why do you hate the rich?

Why don't you answer the question?

He won't stand for the flag, does he stand for equality?

Does he share with those less fortunate.

How much would half of his annual salary do for a ghetto?

How many disadvantaged children could he put thru college?

Who the fuck cares? That has nothing at all to do with the issue, which is liberty - stand or not, your call.

I'm just curious how much of a hypocrite he is.

If the only help he is giving those without a voice is sitting during the National Anthem....

He's a MAJOR LEAGUE hypocrite

Well you just worry your pretty little head about that. I'll stick with the principle of liberty which say that in this case what he does is none of your fucking business.

 

[Dale Smith]

Reactionaries hate liberty.

Liberty? Like speaking out against gay organizations like GLSEN and the LGBTQ?...oh wait, to a leftard that's just "hate speech"....(snicker)

All liberty so just deal with it. No one ever said you would approve of what someone does, says, or does or does not do.

No, apparently the fabian socialists that run the leftard clown posse have a real problem with those that are not "on board" with them.

And you have a problem with him not standing? Both of you need to just STFU.

Did I say that I did, dumb ass? You have piss poor reading comprehension skills but I chalk that up to the fact that you are one ignorant piece of filth...now YOU "STFU"....you've got nothing.