Watch this video and then consider Kim Davis....

[mudwhistle]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

Any Christian that supports Democrats is a hypocrite.

It's true.

 

[Nosmo King]

Why the first amendment then? Why start out the very first amendment with a protection against kim davis?

Kim Davis was elected to uphold the law and she did uphold the Law. Kentucky Law is marriage is between a man and a woman. Even if it were the laws were changed that was not the law of the land when she was elected into office. Her job cannot force her to deny her own faith.

She imposed her narrow faith on others who she was elected to serve.

The wide road leads to hell, Nosmo King. Where would you go if you died in your sleep tonight? Heaven or hell? The answer depends upon whether or not you have received Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior according to Romans 10:9,10 and whether you are on the narrow path obeying Him as it is written in Matthew 7:12,13,14. Is Jesus Christ Lord over your life or are you on your way to hell today?

It is written:

Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.

Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:

Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
Matthew 7:12,13,14

I do not fear Hell, nor do I embrace the notion of heaven. My conscious is clear and pure and not manipulated by dogma.

Your conscience is clear and pure? Have you ever told a lie? Ever taken a pencil or a pen from work and failed to return it? Ever looked at a woman with lust in your heart? Ever taken God's name in vain? If you have? The Word of God says you are a liar, a thief, an adulterer and a blasphemer of God and without repentance and receiving the pardon of Christ according to Romans 10:9,10 you'll be in hell the moment you die. Something to think about.

Bear this in mind: I'm not rejecting salvation. I'm rejecting your narrow dogmatic view of salvation.

 

[Nosmo King]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

Any Christian that supports Democrats is a hypocrite.

It's true.

You have managed to politicize faith. I, as a Christian and a Democrat reject your narrow, dogmatic assertions of politics=faith and faith=politics.

 

[Penelope]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

I am reminded of what Jesus said....Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

God's law trumps human law

Really? Whose interpretation of God's Law is correct? The Amish interpretation? The Orthodox Jewish interpretation? The Sunni Muslim interpretation? The Baptist interpretation? The Methodist interpretation?

When you say something as patently stupid as God's law trumps human law, you reveal a deeper lack of intellect than you may wish to.

The authorized King James Bible is the Word of God and the final authority.

The KJ bible is not the US constitution.

 

[mudwhistle]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

Any Christian that supports Democrats is a hypocrite.

It's true.

You have managed to politicize faith. I, as a Christian and a Democrat reject your narrow, dogmatic assertions of politics=faith and faith=politics.

No......Democrats politicized religion by attacking it over the last 20 years, give or take.

 

[Penelope]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

I am reminded of what Jesus said....Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

God's law trumps human law

Really? Whose interpretation of God's Law is correct? The Amish interpretation? The Orthodox Jewish interpretation? The Sunni Muslim interpretation? The Baptist interpretation? The Methodist interpretation?

When you say something as patently stupid as God's law trumps human law, you reveal a deeper lack of intellect than you may wish to.

The authorized King James Bible is the Word of God and the final authority.

Really? tell that to the Amish, the Orthodox Jews, the Sunni Muslims, the Taoists, the Hindus, Shiite Muslims and every other faith on this planet. Oh, don't forget to tell that to those who defend the constitution of the United states.

Here's a news flash: we live in a secular nation the constitution, not the King James Bible.

While the Bible is a compendium of beautiful poetry, unbridled spirituality, parable, full of sex violence and war, it is not a book of laws applicable to the United States of America.

I am wearing a shirt made of both cotton fibers and polyester fibers. According to the King James Bible, I'm breaking the law. If you look out back in the vegetable garden, you will find tomatoes and peppers growing side by side. I'm breaking God's law. Today for lunch, I'll have a cheeseburger. That too is breaking God's law.

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

Any Christian that supports Democrats is a hypocrite.

It's true.

I disagree. The NT is full of socialism.

 

[Care4all]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

I am reminded of what Jesus said....Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

so far-----having read the NT------I am not convinced that Jesus actually said that.
It is out of character -------it suggests that he advocated submission to roman
authority. If Jesus actually advocated submission to Roman authority---he would not have chased the money changers from the temple courtyard. Which is it-----
"pay your unjust tax tribute to rome" ----or "resist roman corruption in Jerusalem"??????

We are taught the temple tax was for the Jewish priesthood, not the Romans.... the money changers were Jewish.

Pharisees were trying to trick Jesus in to supporting a war against the ruling Romans and Jesus would have no part of it....thus keep a separation of church and state...render unto Caesar what is Caesar's....

 

[aris2chat]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

I am reminded of what Jesus said....Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

so far-----having read the NT------I am not convinced that Jesus actually said that.
It is out of character -------it suggests that he advocated submission to roman
authority. If Jesus actually advocated submission to Roman authority---he would not have chased the money changers from the temple courtyard. Which is it-----
"pay your unjust tax tribute to rome" ----or "resist roman corruption in Jerusalem"??????

We are taught the temple tax was for the Jewish priesthood, not the Romans.... the money changers were Jewish.

Pharisees were trying to trick Jesus in to supporting a war against the ruling Romans and Jesus would have no part of it....thus keep a separation of church and state...render unto Caesar what is Caesar's....

Taxes were for the romans. The temple had money changers to change roman coin temple tokens to buy sacrifices and pay for the ritual baths, etc.

 

[Sallow]

Sharia Law is not in the Koran.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Sharia Law is not in the Koran.

Yeah it is....all over it, it's Islam's Devine law

 

[irosie91]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

I am reminded of what Jesus said....Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

so far-----having read the NT------I am not convinced that Jesus actually said that.
It is out of character -------it suggests that he advocated submission to roman
authority. If Jesus actually advocated submission to Roman authority---he would not have chased the money changers from the temple courtyard. Which is it-----
"pay your unjust tax tribute to rome" ----or "resist roman corruption in Jerusalem"??????

We are taught the temple tax was for the Jewish priesthood, not the Romans.... the money changers were Jewish.

Pharisees were trying to trick Jesus in to supporting a war against the ruling Romans and Jesus would have no part of it....thus keep a separation of church and state...render unto Caesar what is Caesar's....

yes-----you learned that in either a catholic school or protestant sunday school.
You were interpreting the words of people who never met jesus. The temple tax
was extremely trivial and no one objected to it -----I believe that it was something
like half of a shekel and was supposed to support the Jerusalem temple. -----it has
nothing to do with the "render unto ceasar" putative incident. The money changers were jewish ROMAN SHILLS. They were something like "kapos"--
that were despised by the general population and by the Pharisees ------because of
their cooperation with the roman authority There is actually no indication in the
NT that Jesus advocated non-resistence against roman incursion-----the action
in the temple courtyard was very clear resistence to roman incursion. Sorry----but that is history-------a written history of those times does exist----The problem that your "teachers" face is that Pharisees have been generally literate since about 500 BC-------Literacy was not confined to the authority figures as it was in the
"holy" roman empire until very recently. The roman empire promoted general illiteracy for centuries. When you see the word PHARISEE--it is actually correct to replace it with the word "jew"-------Jesus was a Pharisee------like all Pharisees -----he despised the ROMAN SHILLS of the temple courtyard and the SADDUCEES from whose ranks the romans APPOINTED the temple priests. For the jews of that time ----the temple priests were something like the KGB.

 

[Care4all]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

I am reminded of what Jesus said....Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

so far-----having read the NT------I am not convinced that Jesus actually said that.
It is out of character -------it suggests that he advocated submission to roman
authority. If Jesus actually advocated submission to Roman authority---he would not have chased the money changers from the temple courtyard. Which is it-----
"pay your unjust tax tribute to rome" ----or "resist roman corruption in Jerusalem"??????

We are taught the temple tax was for the Jewish priesthood, not the Romans.... the money changers were Jewish.

Pharisees were trying to trick Jesus in to supporting a war against the ruling Romans and Jesus would have no part of it....thus keep a separation of church and state...render unto Caesar what is Caesar's....

Taxes were for the romans. The temple had money changers to change roman coin temple tokens to buy sacrifices and pay for the ritual baths, etc.

tithes, were taxes for their theocratic rulers....

On top of these tithes, the Jews were having to give Rome more money, they did not like it.

The temple fees, where the money changers worked, were ripping off in exchange rates the Jews coming to the Temple to worship. The money changers worked for the high priests.

 

[irosie91]

Sharia Law is not in the Koran.

It is clear that you never read the koran and hadiths-----lots of sharia law IS in the koran and hadiths----including lots of elements of the filth of dhimmia ----and also ---specifically JIZYA. Try not to swallow Islamic propaganda WHOLE

 

[Sallow]

Sharia Law is not in the Koran.

It is clear that you never read the koran and hadiths-----lots of sharia law IS in the koran and hadiths----including lots of elements of the filth of dhimmia ----and also ---specifically JIZYA. Try not to swallow Islamic propaganda WHOLE

Well no..it's not.

It's an extrapolation based on the Koran.

But it's not in there.

 

[irosie91]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

I am reminded of what Jesus said....Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

so far-----having read the NT------I am not convinced that Jesus actually said that.
It is out of character -------it suggests that he advocated submission to roman
authority. If Jesus actually advocated submission to Roman authority---he would not have chased the money changers from the temple courtyard. Which is it-----
"pay your unjust tax tribute to rome" ----or "resist roman corruption in Jerusalem"??????

We are taught the temple tax was for the Jewish priesthood, not the Romans.... the money changers were Jewish.

Pharisees were trying to trick Jesus in to supporting a war against the ruling Romans and Jesus would have no part of it....thus keep a separation of church and state...render unto Caesar what is Caesar's....

Taxes were for the romans. The temple had money changers to change roman coin temple tokens to buy sacrifices and pay for the ritual baths, etc.

tithes, were taxes for their theocratic rulers....

On top of these tithes, the Jews were having to give Rome more money, they did not like it.

The temple fees, where the money changers worked, were ripping off in exchange rates the Jews coming to the Temple to worship. The money changers worked for the high priests.

The key question which I like to ask the SUNDAY SCHOOL set-----is "who were the 'high priests' " working for? Another key question----"what were the money changers"?? At the time of the roman control of Judea----there were lots of
little "sects" and various "movements" amongst jews-------in Jerusalem that would
be mostly Pharicees and Sadducees----more accurately ---SADDUCEES VS PHARISEES --------now for the easter bunny set--------to what sect were the money changers affiliated ------Pharisees or Sadducees? (a little extra question is-----
what evidence do you have that the money changers were "ripping people off"?)

 

[irosie91]

Sharia Law is not in the Koran.

It is clear that you never read the koran and hadiths-----lots of sharia law IS in the koran and hadiths----including lots of elements of the filth of dhimmia ----and also ---specifically JIZYA. Try not to swallow Islamic propaganda WHOLE

Well no..it's not.

It's an extrapolation based on the Koran.

But it's not in there.

your answer is silly------it is an INTERPRETATION of the putative directives of
AL NABI--------ie KORANIC LAW ---------United States law is also an interpretation based on "principles of the constitution" etc etc etc

 

[Nosmo King]

Player Page : Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution? : CenturyLink

I am a Christian and, while I understand her faith and her stance, we have to also consider whether she is putting her faith and responsibility as a government official above the US Constitution AND I she is, is she correct

What is different from what she did with a Muslim that says Sharia law is above the US Constitution? FOX never went there, as long as I watched the video. What do you think?

Any Christian that supports Democrats is a hypocrite.

It's true.

You have managed to politicize faith. I, as a Christian and a Democrat reject your narrow, dogmatic assertions of politics=faith and faith=politics.

No......Democrats politicized religion by attacking it over the last 20 years, give or take.

What are the manners of these "attacks"? Where have Democrats, or any political party said members of any faith are prohibited from worshipping as they choose?

For all the bellyaching Conservatives make about how they perceive Liberal causes as claims of 'victimhood', this meme of 'attacks' on religion, specifically Christianity smacks more of irony than truth.

 

[Care4all]

I am reminded of what Jesus said....Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

so far-----having read the NT------I am not convinced that Jesus actually said that.
It is out of character -------it suggests that he advocated submission to roman
authority. If Jesus actually advocated submission to Roman authority---he would not have chased the money changers from the temple courtyard. Which is it-----
"pay your unjust tax tribute to rome" ----or "resist roman corruption in Jerusalem"??????

We are taught the temple tax was for the Jewish priesthood, not the Romans.... the money changers were Jewish.

Pharisees were trying to trick Jesus in to supporting a war against the ruling Romans and Jesus would have no part of it....thus keep a separation of church and state...render unto Caesar what is Caesar's....

Taxes were for the romans. The temple had money changers to change roman coin temple tokens to buy sacrifices and pay for the ritual baths, etc.

tithes, were taxes for their theocratic rulers....

On top of these tithes, the Jews were having to give Rome more money, they did not like it.

The temple fees, where the money changers worked, were ripping off in exchange rates the Jews coming to the Temple to worship. The money changers worked for the high priests.

The key question which I like to ask the SUNDAY SCHOOL set-----is "who were the 'high priests' " working for? Another key question----"what were the money changers"?? At the time of the roman control of Judea----there were lots of
little "sects" and various "movements" amongst jews-------in Jerusalem that would
be mostly Pharicees and Sadducees----more accurately ---SADDUCEES VS PHARISEES --------now for the easter bunny set--------to what sect were the money changers affiliated ------Pharisees or Sadducees? (a little extra question is-----
what evidence do you have that the money changers were "ripping people off"?)

It would be no surprise to me if the high priests were Saduccees and working with the Romans, since they were the ones who turned Jesus over to Pontius Pilot.

 

[irosie91]

so far-----having read the NT------I am not convinced that Jesus actually said that.
It is out of character -------it suggests that he advocated submission to roman
authority. If Jesus actually advocated submission to Roman authority---he would not have chased the money changers from the temple courtyard. Which is it-----
"pay your unjust tax tribute to rome" ----or "resist roman corruption in Jerusalem"??????

We are taught the temple tax was for the Jewish priesthood, not the Romans.... the money changers were Jewish.

Pharisees were trying to trick Jesus in to supporting a war against the ruling Romans and Jesus would have no part of it....thus keep a separation of church and state...render unto Caesar what is Caesar's....

Taxes were for the romans. The temple had money changers to change roman coin temple tokens to buy sacrifices and pay for the ritual baths, etc.

tithes, were taxes for their theocratic rulers....

On top of these tithes, the Jews were having to give Rome more money, they did not like it.

The temple fees, where the money changers worked, were ripping off in exchange rates the Jews coming to the Temple to worship. The money changers worked for the high priests.

The key question which I like to ask the SUNDAY SCHOOL set-----is "who were the 'high priests' " working for? Another key question----"what were the money changers"?? At the time of the roman control of Judea----there were lots of
little "sects" and various "movements" amongst jews-------in Jerusalem that would
be mostly Pharicees and Sadducees----more accurately ---SADDUCEES VS PHARISEES --------now for the easter bunny set--------to what sect were the money changers affiliated ------Pharisees or Sadducees? (a little extra question is-----
what evidence do you have that the money changers were "ripping people off"?)

It would be no surprise to me if the high priests were Saduccees and working with the Romans, since they were the ones who turned Jesus over to Pontius Pilot.

you did not learn that in the Methodist sunday school or the Lutheran sunday school or----catholic grammar school

 

[Pop23]

How's the Kim Davis recall petition coming?