was there a conspiracy to kill John F Kennedy?

[Soupnazi630]

No. It wasn’t.

Repeating that claim establishes that you are a liar.​

Wrong

It was and your consistent denial of facts proves that you are the liar

 

[BackAgain]

Your sentence fragments are as looney as you are.

Which is not at all. You, though? Quite certifiably stupid.

When you have multiple snipers, you expect there to be multiple hits...if not multiple deaths. Its sort of sniper school 101. In you case, you flunked kindergarten so you wouldn't know anything about that.

You don’t know **** all about what happens with multiple snipers.

What was your other sniper doing during this?

One was firing a rifle. The other was firing a rifle. You truly are an imbecile.

Thanks for the chuckle. Your posts are always good for a laugh sock boy.

You’re so dull you make dirty dishwater seem like an epic movie. Try to focus on the topic, you simpleton.

The same bullet that hit JFK hit Conally.

Yeah sure. The one that changed direction a couple of times in mid flight. Your abysmal ignorance is showing yet again.

The sniper was aiming for the curb?

Hey, moron. It’s called a miss. It’s akin to you trying to make a point. You tried. But you didn’t hit the target.

But there were only 3 shots.

So you claim. As I noted, there was pretty clearly a fourth shot.

Not sure about the whole "drawers" phenomenon except you're shitting in yours.

Wrong again. Maggie’s drawers was a Marine Corps term for a shooter who can’t hit the target. No bullseye. Kind of the opposite. Even your skull is full of shit.

Oswald fired 3 shots. Hit Potus twice. It has been proven time and again.

It hasn’t been proved. It’s been claimed and it has been maintained. But it was never proved. The physical evidence makes the claim simply absurd.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Which is not at all. You, though? Quite certifiably stupid.

You don’t know **** all about what happens with multiple snipers.

One was firing a rifle. The other was firing a rifle. You truly are an imbecile.

You’re so dull you make dirty dishwater seem like an epic movie. Try to focus on the topic, you simpleton.

Yeah sure. The one that changed direction a couple of times in mid flight. Your abysmal ignorance is showing yet again.

Hey, moron. It’s called a miss. It’s akin to you trying to make a point. You tried. But you didn’t hit the target.

So you claim. As I noted, there was pretty clearly a fourth shot.

Wrong again. Maggie’s drawers was a Marine Corps term for a shooter who can’t hit the target. No bullseye. Kind of the opposite. Even your skull is full of shit.

It hasn’t been proved. It’s been claimed and it has been maintained. But it was never proved. The physical evidence makes the claim simply absurd.

There was never a bullet which changed direction in mid flight. That myth was invented by conspiracy theorists

There was no fourth shot.

Maggies drawers was no such thing it was actually a red flag waved to show that a shooter missed the target with ONE shot which anyone can do in training.

Oswald was rated a sharpshooter by the Marines which by definition proves he was a good shot

Your claim is once again a lie

yes it is absolutely prove with hardcore evidence that Oswald fired three shots.

YOU cannot and will not present any evidence to the contrary

You claimed physical evidence makes it absurd but that is a bald faced lie

there is no such physical evidence

 

[rightwinger]

After over 60 years, no trace of a Conspiracy has been found

If there was a conspiracy…

Why did Oswald do the shooting with a $19.95 surplus bolt action rifle?

Why did Oswald not have a car waiting for him rather than having to take the bus?

Why did Oswald only have $200 to his name?

 

[BackAgain]

Wrong

No. I’m still right.

It was and your consistent denial of facts proves that you are the liar

Your consistent claims of what you said being “facts” is what proves that you are pitiably ignorant or a liar.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No. I’m still right.

Your consistent claims of what you said being “facts” is what proves that you are pitiably ignorant or a liar.

You are wrong

I stated facts and you deny them because they prove you wrong

You are a proven liar fraud and coward

 

[BackAgain]

You are wrong

I am right. You are wrong.

I stated facts and you deny them because they prove you wrong

False. You failed to state “facts.”

I do deny some of your mere claims, which is what you offered

You are a proven liar fraud and coward

Wrong. So, stop lying.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I am right. You are wrong.


False. You failed to state “facts.”

I do deny some of your mere claims, which is what you offered

Wrong. So, stop lying.

You are proven wrong in multiple posts and on multiple levels

Sorry kiddoe but I cited facts not cvlaim and they proved you wrong

You deny facts

You are a liar

 

[BackAgain]

You are proven wrong in multiple posts and on multiple levels

Sorry kiddoe but I cited facts not cvlaim and they proved you wrong

You deny facts

You are a liar

I think I’ve toyed with you and your idiotic non arguments enough.

Stop being a liar.

Start, for the very first time, to state some actual facts and then support those claims with other “facts.”

You indeed haven’t done so yet. And that’s why you evaded my challenge to you to show us the “facts” which you claim to have presented.

SoupNutsy is

 

[Soupnazi630]

I think I’ve toyed with you and your idiotic non arguments enough.

Stop being a liar.

Start, for the very first time, to state some actual facts and then support those claims with other “facts.”

You indeed haven’t done so yet. And that’s why you evaded my challenge to you to show us the “facts” which you claim to have presented.

SoupNutsy is

You havent toyed you have whined andbitched because you are proven wrong

i stated harcore irrefutable FACTS in your face and all you could do is whine like a child saying " unnnh unnh "

I met and destroyed your chelleneg. But since you are a childish ***** you had to lie about it

you aere a fol and liar

 

[BackAgain]

You havent toyed you have whined andbitched because you are proven wrong

i stated harcore irrefutable FACTS in your face and all you could do is whine like a child saying " unnnh unnh "

I met and destroyed your chelleneg. But since you are a childish ***** you had to lie about it

you aere a fol and liar

You are silly and wrong.

Your overall ability to engage in any meaningful debate or discussion is as pitiful as your spelling.

You presented no facts, hardcore or otherwise. And you cannot support you claims. And you don’t.

Stop lying.

Accept my challenge: link to a quote of yours (on the actual topic here) in which you claim to have offered any “facts” or about which you supported any of your claims with facts.

Prediction: you’ll refuse to do so and revert, instead, to just mindlessly, ignorantly and unpersuasively repeating yourself.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You are silly and wrong.

Your overall ability to engage in any meaningful debate or discussion is as pitiful as your spelling.

You presented no facts, hardcore or otherwise. And you cannot support you claims. And you don’t.

Stop lying.

Accept my challenge: link to a quote of yours (on the actual topic here) in which you claim to have offered any “facts” or about which you supported any of your claims with facts.

Prediction: you’ll refuse to do so and revert, instead, to just mindlessly, ignorantly and unpersuasively repeating yourself.

I am correct and proven so

You are lying I stated fact and you know i did

I did meet your challenge and destroyed you boy

 

[BackAgain]

I am correct and proven so

You are lying I stated fact and you know i did

I did meet your challenge and destroyed you boy

My prediction is thus confirmed.

And no. You didn’t destroy me nor did you ever support your mere claims and opinions.

To be blunt: this surprises me about you because you normally don’t behave like a libtard. But you’ve lost your shit, here, child.

 

[Soupnazi630]

My prediction is thus confirmed.

And no. You didn’t destroy me nor did you ever support your mere claims and opinions.

To be blunt: this surprises me about you because you normally don’t behave like a libtard. But you’ve lost your shit, here, child.

Your prediction is a failure

Yes I destroyed your claims with factual evidence

I met and destroyed your challlenge and proved you wronjg so that is settled BOY

 

[BackAgain]

Your prediction is a failure

Obviously ^ untrue. You did fail to quote and cite to ANY post in which you stated a “facts,” as opposed to a mere opinion or belief or claim.

Yes I destroyed your claims with factual evidence

Yet ANOTHER ^ unsupported and erroneous mere claim.

I met and destroyed your challlenge and proved you wronjg so that is settled BOY

Sorry kid. You are lying again and doing exactly what I accurately predicted you’d do.

Sucks to be you.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Obviously ^ untrue. You did fail to quote and cite to ANY post in which you stated a “facts,” as opposed to a mere opinion or belief or claim.

Yet ANOTHER ^ unsupported and erroneous mere claim.

Sorry kid. You are lying again and doing exactly what I accurately predicted you’d do.

Sucks to be you.

Wrong

I met and destroyed your challenge with my first post where i owned you and proved you wrong with simple physics


That is fact not a claim and proves you are a cartooonish fool

Yoou are proven a liar and fool of low integrity

Just grow up boy you do not save face by repeating a proven lie and that is what you are doing

 

[BackAgain]

Wrong

I met and destroyed your challenge with my first post where i owned you and proved you wrong with simple physics


That is fact not a claim and proves you are a cartooonish fool

Yoou are proven a liar and fool of low integrity

Just grow up boy you do not save face by repeating a proven lie and that is what you are doing

And you’re still to cowardly and dishonest to step up to the fair challenge.

Sorry, kid. You really do suck at this.

 

[Soupnazi630]

And you’re still to cowardly and dishonest to step up to the fair challenge.

Sorry, kid. You really do suck at this.

I did step up and proved you wrong

I demolish you at this kiddoe you are losing to your better

 

[BackAgain]

I did step up and proved you wrong

I demolish you at this kiddoe you are losing to your better

Still false. Look at your post #72. Which of the claims in that post of yours do you claim as being “a fact?”

Perhaps you imagine that a second claim about “physics” is also a “fact?”

And where did you support any of those assertions?

I know I know. You will simply repeat your petty little mantra again (in which you falsely claim that you somehow “destroyed” me) and loop your previous half dozen or more posts.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Still false. Look at your post #72. Which of the claims in that post of yours do you claim as being “a fact?”

Perhaps you imagine that a second claim about “physics” is also a “fact?”

And where did you support any of those assertions?

I know I know. You will simply repeat your petty little mantra again (in which you falsely claim that you somehow “destroyed” me) and loop your previous half dozen or more posts.

FACT physics proves conclusively that your claim is false. No bullet pushed kennedy back or to the left for the simple reason that bullets do not have the mass to push an adult around that way


FACT he was shot from behind and above

You have nothing whatsoever to dispute that

I know I know you will say UNN UNN

Which is all you have posted

All you have done is loop the same post over and oover lying like a ***** and denying fact