was there a conspiracy to kill John F Kennedy?

what do you think?

  • no, Oswald acted alone

  • maybe

  • yes


Results are only viewable after voting.
FACT physics proves conclusively that your claim is false.
That’s a claim. Can you support it?
No bullet pushed kennedy back or to the left for the simple reason that bullets do not have the mass to push an adult around that way
Another claim. And again, not supported (except by yet another claim that “mass” alone is the proof). Try proving it.
FACT he was shot from behind and above
I gotta give you that one. President Kennedy was certainly shot in the back. But that does NOT mean that the fatal head shot also came from behind.
You have nothing whatsoever to dispute that
Not only do I, but I have already stated it.
I know I know you will say UNN UN
Nope. I will again disagree. But, unlike you, I can (and have) said why I disagree.
Which is all you have posted
Another SoupNutsy lie. Smh.
All you have done is loop the same post over and oover lying like a ***** and denying fact
False. As you know.

But I have replied to your endless looping of “I’m right and you’re wrong” with the same casual disregard as your looping nonsense.
 
That’s a claim. Can you support it?

Another claim. And again, not supported (except by yet another claim that “mass” alone is the proof). Try proving it.

I gotta give you that one. President Kennedy was certainly shot in the back. But that does NOT mean that the fatal head shot also came from behind.

Not only do I, but I have already stated it.

Nope. I will again disagree. But, unlike you, I can (and have) said why I disagree.

Another SoupNutsy lie. Smh.

False. As you know.

But I have replied to your endless looping of “I’m right and you’re wrong” with the same casual disregard as your looping nonsense.
It is a fact

Not a claim

You have replied but been proven wrong.

The fata headshot was proven to have come from behind by the experts who performed the autopsy. And before you start they were not controlled by shadowy generals nor were they inexperienced.


It is a simple matter to determine where bullets enter and exit the skull by the cratering caused by the bullet.

They documented where the bullet entered his sckull FROM behind and where it exited on the side

Yes you are proven wrong by facts
 
It is a fact

Not a claim

You have replied but been proven wrong.

The fata headshot was proven to have come from behind by the experts who performed the autopsy. And before you start they were not controlled by shadowy generals nor were they inexperienced.


It is a simple matter to determine where bullets enter and exit the skull by the cratering caused by the bullet.

They documented where the bullet entered his sckull FROM behind and where it exited on the side

Yes you are proven wrong by facts
You’re a liar and a ***** and it was clear that you’d ignore the challenge again.

We all know why you run away, too. 😎
 
You’re a liar and a ***** and it was clear that you’d ignore the challenge again.

We all know why you run away, too. 😎
I am a truth teller you are a liar.

I am what I eat which is ***** whereas you are a dickhead,

I met your challenge and destroyed you with facts
 
Both of those ^ claims are false.

If you are what you eat, then you’re shit.

You failed to meet my challenge and you have only destroyed any hope you may ever have had of being persuasive.
Both those claims are true and it is you eating shit and crow because you have been owned

I met yoru challenge and CRUSHED IT

i have proven you are a fool and liar

I nebver try to persuade anyone. I expose people like you as frauds

You HATE that but it is true and you know it
 
Both those claims are true and it is you eating shit and crow because you have been owned

I met yoru challenge and CRUSHED IT

i have proven you are a fool and liar

I nebver try to persuade anyone. I expose people like you as frauds

You HATE that but it is true and you know it
Your entire post is the lie.

Muddle on.
 
For those who are fans of the 2, 3, 4, or even 5 snipers being present...can anyone account for Conally getting hit in the back if Oswald wasn't the shooter?
 
None so far have been.

Not at all.

Nope. You are.

Child, feel free to put me on ignore. I’ll pretend to care. :abgg2q.jpg:
Yes all of them have been and you are a liar



No I have proven you a liar

I ignore no one I am in your face forever proving with facts and evidence that you are a coward and liar
 
For those who are fans of the 2, 3, 4, or even 5 snipers being present...can anyone account for Conally getting hit in the back if Oswald wasn't the shooter?
No takers?

Perhaps one of you guys can answer why there were 3 shell casings found in he TSBD if Oswald didn't fire 3 shots....


GO!
 
Think about what you are asking for a minute. You obviously haven't done any real evaluating at all.
No takers?

Perhaps one of you guys can answer why there were 3 shell casings found in he TSBD if Oswald didn't fire 3 shots....


GO!
 
For those who are fans of the 2, 3, 4, or even 5 snipers being present...can anyone account for Conally getting hit in the back if Oswald wasn't the shooter?
Do you read what you write? Why do you think only Oswald could have shot from the rear? Do you think that is the only explanation? Did you know that the Dallas police sent the rifle to the fbi for forensics and they took it apart and couldn't find a fingerprint on it until a couple of people went to the funeral home, took Oswald's fingerprints, and then they found a thumbprint on the barrel after that. It was his rifle, fingerprints. even if that is not suspect, would be on it. Any competent lawyer would have destroyed this case if it would have went to trial. PARAFFIN TEST
 
Do you read what you write? Why do you think only Oswald could have shot from the rear? Do you think that is the only explanation? Did you know that the Dallas police sent the rifle to the fbi for forensics and they took it apart and couldn't find a fingerprint on it until a couple of people went to the funeral home, took Oswald's fingerprints, and then they found a thumbprint on the barrel after that. It was his rifle, fingerprints. even if that is not suspect, would be on it. Any competent lawyer would have destroyed this case if it would have went to trial. PARAFFIN TEST
Wrong

There is no evidence that anyone went to the funeral home and took his prints and THEN found them on the gun. That little detail about the funeral home is made up from thin air

They found a palm print on the under side of the barrel. Which they were not looking for at first. This is not suspicious or unusual as he simply wipe the exteriror down right before stashing it.

They simply need to look closer to find something. The under side of the barrel would have been protected by the stock leaving an old print there.

The paraffin tests was INCONCLUSIVE evidence and that is all. Even today tests for gun powder residue are not court room evidence as they can easily be negated by simply washing ones hands. In other words a negative test proves nothing.


The fact is had Oswald survived there was no defense attorney alive at the time who could have won the case. Today with changes that have taken place over the years he would have stood only a slightly better chance but not a good one.

You still have not answered the basic questions
 
15th post
Do you read what you write?
Sure. But I do confess...what you write (when not addressed to me) makes me chuckle.
Why do you think only Oswald could have shot from the rear?
So you think there were more than one sniper? Please explain how there were only two people who were hit (one twice, one once). They weren't very good snipers.
Do you think that is the only explanation?
Its the only one that makes sense when you live in reality. Your address is probably out by Neptune somewhere.
Did you know that the Dallas police sent the rifle to the fbi for forensics and they took it apart and couldn't find a fingerprint on it until a couple of people went to the funeral home, took Oswald's fingerprints, and then they found a thumbprint on the barrel after that. It was his rifle, fingerprints. even if that is not suspect, would be on it. Any competent lawyer would have destroyed this case if it would have went to trial. PARAFFIN TEST
LOL...
 
It has La Cosa Nostra written all over it. Sam Giancarlo derived the votes Kennedy needed to win. In return Kennedy was screwing Giancarlos girlfriend and Robert Kennedy was prosecuting organized crime with a vengeance. Both were killed. Oswald was patsy easily manipulated and was killed by Jack Ruby who had ties to organized crime. He had terminal cancer
Cosa Nostra?
 
Whatever really happened, it has put a shadow over the US and a blight that we have never really recovered from. Nothing has been the same since then, we have lost our confidence in government, and nothing can change that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom