the watcher
Diamond Member
I would not want you in a duck blind near me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What if the duck could see?I would not want you in a duck blind near me.
False. Since I haven’t lied.reapeating a lie does not make it true yet you keep repeating it
Yes I have and everyone saw it
You stated a claim. Not a fact. And you supported it not at. That’s what I know. And, I’m not the one in denial. Also, I’m not crying. So, you’re entirely wrong.I stated fact proven by evidence. you know this and are simply in denial and crying like a girl
Nope. Not at all, much less “entirely.”yes I have absolutely proven you wrong
Nope. It may be that you are intentionally lying. You seem cowardly for failing to offer the proof you falsely claimed you had provided. And I guess you are lying for a reason. But, in any case, you’re still wrong.Yes you are flat out a coward and liar
No. You did neither.I stated facs and logic
The next time you offer evidence will be the first time.and evidence
So, now you’re repeating your lies again. Pretty cowardly of you.and you simply spout lies like a coward
Yes you haveFalse. Since I haven’t lied.
No. You haven’t, so of course nobody saw it.
You stated a claim. Not a fact. And you supported it not at. That’s what I know. And, I’m not the one in denial. Also, I’m not crying. So, you’re entirely wrong.
Nope. Not at all, much less “entirely.”
Nope. It may be that you are intentionally lying. You seem cowardly for failing to offer the proof you falsely claimed you had provided. And I guess you are lying for a reason. But, in any case, you’re still wrong.
No. You did neither.
The next time you offer evidence will be the first time.
So, now you’re repeating your lies again. Pretty cowardly of you.
No one hunts ducks with a rifleI would not want you in a duck blind near me.
Yes you have
I stytated fact not a claim and backed up with evidence
Wrong. You are lying your ass off in ^ that very post.YOU are the only one here his lying and your argument has been massively proven wrong
yes I certianly didNo. You sure didn’t.
Wrong. You are lying your ass off in ^ that very post.
yes I certianly did
Nope. You are reiterating opinions. Not facts. And I’m not lying. You seem to be.nope I am stating proven fact which you are lying about
yes I didNo. You certainly did not.
Nope. You are reiterating opinions. Not facts. And I’m not lying. You seem to be.
yes I did
No. You stated no “facts.” You offered your unsupported opinion.Nope I am stating facts and yes you are lying
yes I didNo. You didn’t.
No. You stated no “facts.” You offered your unsupported opinion.
And pointing these things out to you every time you lie about it, is not me lying. It’s you lying each time you spew that nonsense.
No. You didn’t.yes I did
Evertyyone knows it
You don’t lay a glove or a finger on anything I’ve said. And you’re cowardly and a liar for claiming that you had.I destroyed yoour idiotic claim with absolute facts and you are a cowatrdly liar denying it
Nope, it is you. And I suspect almost everyone here knows it.It is only YOU lying here and you know it
Yes I sure didNo. You didn’t.
Nope. Only you may believe it. But nobody “knows it” since it just ain’t so.
You don’t lay a glove or a finger on anything I’ve said. And you’re cowardly and a liar for claiming that you had.
Nope, it is you. And I suspect almost everyone here knows it.
If you had posted a “fact” rather than a mere claim or an opinion, you could quote that alleged “fact” from your post. And you could distinguish it from an opinion or mere claim.
But, you can’t do that. And it’s no mystery why.
Yes I sure did
Everyone knows it
Nope. But you’ve been exposed as a dishonest and ignorant Simpleton.You have been exposed as a liar fraud and fool
No. You didn’t.I posted FACT and backed it with evidence.
What you posted was mere opinion and it was never supported by any “facts” from you. This is why you simply keep repeating that lie.This of course made you look like a fool now you are simply lying like a weasel
Yes I didNo. You sure didn’t.
Nobody knows it. It ain’t true.
Nope. But you’ve been exposed as a dishonest and ignorant Simpleton.
No. You didn’t.
What you posted was mere opinion and it was never supported by any “facts” from you. This is why you simply keep repeating that lie.
Yes I did
Everyone knows Its true
Yes i owned your ass with facts and proved you are a liar and fraud
What I posted was fact youngster learn the difference
You are a liar and denying those facts
Yes I sure did
Everyone knows it
Nope. But you’ve been exposed as a dishonest and ignorant Simpleton.You have been exposed as a liar fraud and fool
No. You didn’t.I posted FACT and backed it with evidence.
What you posted was mere opinion and it was never supported by any “facts” from you. This is why you simply keep repeating that lie.This of course made you look like a fool now you are simply lying like a weasel
What i posted was fact proving you wrongYes I sure did
No. You sure didn’t.
Everyone knows it
Nobody knows it. It ain’t true.
Nope. But you’ve been exposed as a dishonest and ignorant Simpleton.You have been exposed as a liar fraud and fool
No. You didn’t.I posted FACT and backed it with evidence.
What you posted was mere opinion and it was never supported by any “facts” from you. This is why you simply keep repeating that lie.This of course made you look like a fool now you are simply lying like a weasel
Your sentence fragments are as looney as you are.Yes.
A silly pointless. And piss poor logic.
What was your other sniper doing during this?So you claim.
President Kennedy was indeed struck twice as far as we can tell. Once in the back (first shot that caused him to put his hands up to his throat) and the second shot to his head which sent a portion of his skull/brain flying backwards onto the rear of the vehicle. The second shot also forces him backwards and to his left.
Thanks for the chuckle. Your posts are always good for a laugh sock boy.If Oswald killed the President then he had to have been in front of President Kennedy and to the President’s right. Neat trick since he was seen moments later AT the book depository.
The same bullet that hit JFK hit Conally.The Governor was also struck. So, so far, that was at least three shots.
The sniper was aiming for the curb?A fourth shot took a chunk out of the curb not too far ahead of the motorcade.
But there were only 3 shots.With that 4th shot, we also see that there had to have been at least two shooters.
Not sure about the whole "drawers" phenomenon except you're shitting in yours.Oswald’s rifle (bolt action) could barely be fired three times at all in the established time frame. But Oswald, who had gotten “Maggie’s drawers” while in the Marines (meaning he had missed a stationary target, entirely, in several shots), wasn’t likely to do that kind of shooting especially in that time frame.