Wrong.
On the one hand you say a trained sniper was recruited and hired for the murder but then you argue that such a person would have motive to kill. That is contradictory. Such a hired shooter would care nothing except surviving and getting paid.
You cannot have it both ways that it was a hired hitman and also motivated to by politics or hatred that he WANTED to kill Kennedy. Furthermore you ignore that hiring a hitman would have made said hitman scared as he would have logically known that the conspirators would want him dead after the fact.
Yes Oswald had motives as well and like Oswald we do not know precisely what Boothe's motives were because he died before he could explain the motives.
In both cases we cannot ever know for sure but we can make educated guesses about the motives and they are good guesses based on evidence.
IN the end motive is often guessed at. When lawyers present motive in court it is usually inferred rather than proven because the accused typically does not confess and therefore does not express a motive.
This is why the evidence of motive is not as important as the evidence proving who did it. We have evidence OSwald did it. We have no evidence anyone else was involved. Therefore since his motive can only be inferred it is more valid than your pure speculation.
A hired killer is still a human being.
They tend to rationalize their motivations.
Some feel they're doing a service, or some just enjoy killing. If you're the kind of sick **** who likes watching heads explode then you have the right type of personality.
Oswald, to me, didn't seem to me to be a nutcase. He was just a loser, possibly picked as a fall-guy. He said he was a patsy because he had lived in Russia.
Hired killers do not grow on trees. Contrary to what Hollywood presents there are few such people and the selection would be small. Usually in fact they ARE just sociopaths and thugs with no motive other than getting paid and often not even paid well.
A real example would be Frank Netty who was a semi famous underline of Al Capone. He did many criminal jobs for Capone including murder but worked exclusively for Capone because that was who paid him. He needed no other rationalization.
In fact a hired killer is unlikely simply because you may be able to find people to commit murder for money but committing a spectacular murder such as JFK for money would be far less likely. Few would be killers would agree to such a job because they would no the massive dangers involved. Finding a military trained sniper to kill Kennedy would have been next to impossible especially as the military was actually supportive of Kennedy especially the special operations community. They considered Kennedy to be their patron.
Oswald said was a patsy because accused criminals TYPICALLY deny their guilt and claim to be set up or framed or the fall guy or whatever. His choice of words was just a little odd.
We can in fact show Oswald was a deranged nut job. He had a proven history of attempted political assassination before Kennedy when he tried to kill General Edwin Walker with the same rifle he used on Kennedy. He often spoke to his wife about being the first prime minister of the United Socialist States of America. He read a lot of spy novels and often hinted to others that he was such a spy involved in the same plot as what he read about in a book.
As a Child he and his mother lived briefly in New York. HE was arrested for attempting to stab his mother with a knife. The judge ordered him to be examined by a child psychologist who diagnosed him as a paranoid sociopath. The judge ordered him to be given therapy on an outpatient basis at a mental hospital. Oswald's mother was having none of this and skipped town returning to New Orleans.
So we know Oswald was a nut who suffered from mental illness as a child. That mental illness went untreated which means chances are it only got worse. Such issues do not tend to fix themselves.
