Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[theHawk]

So, I did a little digging, and oswald shot a 212 after three weeks of intensive training. That's two points above the minimum for Sharp Shooter Which is less than Expert for those who don't know. It is the middle level of accuracy, that was in December of 1956. Then, in May 1959 he barely qualified as Marksman as in he made it by a single point. Marksmanship is a very perishable skill. If you're not practicing, you're losing it. So, by the time of the kennedy job, he was probably back down to where he would normally be...able to hit the side of a barn from the inside.

212 is sharpshooter.

I never claimed it was expert. The fact is he was not a poor shot.

HE did in fact conduct a lot of practice as his wife testified to.

The shooting itself was not difficult and the average deer hunter who shoots two or three times a year.

It is BARELY Sharpshooter. Under exceptionally controlled conditions and with a SGT at your elbow helping you do your best. The 1959 score is far more indicative of his actual ability. Your argument is specious at best.

Still sharpshooter and still USMC standards which are higher. Than any other,

My argument is sound. He had the skill to do it which is plain and simple he was no poor shot.

The standards are the same as for any branch of service. He lacked the skill, the target was moving away and lower than the shooter, which makes the shot far more difficult. Add to that the oak tree that obscured the target for a significant period of time, and the fact that he had to make all three shots that we know for certain were fired within a very short span of time and yet again, you help the CT people and not you.

THAT and this back up that post of yours that oswald could not have done it.


Once one admits that there is compelling evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill JFK, one is free to open ones eyes to the truth. The compelling evidence includes eyewitness accounts of him in the lunchroom shortly before and after the shooting, a rifle with a misaligned sight no self-respecting sniper would have used, poor marksmanship reviews from the Marines, and lots of evidence mob hitmen were responsible. Given the compelling evidence that Oswald was a patsy, we can easily consider alternate theories without feeling like a conspiracy theorist, especially in light of mob guy Marcelo's admission of guilt and complicity in the murders.

There is no compelling evidence that Oswald wasn’t the shooter. He was a deranged left wing lunatic, period. No one would had used him for any big conspiracy. The rifle was good enough for the range it was used.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No they are not the same,

They vary from branch to branch and the USMC training program is the best out of all of them.

He had more than enough skill.

The target was moving very slowly and yes away from him which only limited the amount of time he had. Limited but not unreasonably so. The target was very close which eliminates the downward problem,

The Oak tree did not obscure the target during the actual shooting which is all that matters,

I debunk the CT people you help them.

HE had the skill that is proven fact you had to backpedal on it and try to marginalize the facts proving he did in fact have the skill.

The Corps definitely has the best training, but the scores needed to qualify are the same from service to service. You're simply wrong. Hell ROTC has the same qualifications. I shoot with a man who won the Walsh Trophy (USMC Individual Pistol) TWICE in a row which no one has done before or since, so actively know real USMC Presidents 100 shooters, you don't. I actively shoot every week to maintain my skills, oswald didn't. He was a marginal shot, and his ability to manipulate the bolt on the Carcano in a timely fashion is questionable.

The target was 90 yards away, in a poor quality scope, with crap mounts, that is a hard shot. You see, the closer you are, the HARDER it becomes to hit when you are using a scope. Especially a scope that hinders the ability to manipulate the bolt of the rifle you're firing.

And no, you are not debunking them. You are tossing out long tired tropes that confuse people who don't know anything, but your rifle knowledge is a joke. The Carcano isn't a bad rifle as the CT people claim, but nor is it a great rifle as you would have everyone believe. Shooting a moving target that is below you, and that you are trying to pick up in a poorly mounted scope is not anywhere near as easy as you would like to make it out to be.

In fact the target was less than 90 yards for all three shots.

He di not need to use the scope and used the iron sites especially for the second and third shots.

The scope did not hinder the action it was mounted on the leftside while the bolt was on the right side.

It is you tossing out tropes and backpedaling when faced with facts you do not like. You hated being wrong about his score of sharpshooter which you had to admit was true so you tried to strawman it and failed,

The facts do not support any of your claims or any CT claim.

I did not make it out that he tried to shoot through the scope all three times it is in fact very easy to pick out a target at less than 100 yards over open sites.

He probably tried the scope on the first shot which is why he missed the first shot. After that he would almost certainly have fallen back on his training and used the mounted sites.

I said that from the beginning. The failed premise is that he had a scope and therefore HAD to use scope which would have made it impossible

That would be possible, but very difficult. Here is a reconstruction of the scope and mount as used on the rifle. It is offset so interferes with the sights. Yes, they can still be used, but with difficulty. And thanks to the scope the field of view is drastically reduced which against a moving target is very bad.

Wrong the scope is canted to the left leaving the sites unobscured making it not difficult at all to see them

Feel free to zoom in on the image and you will see that in fact it is the exact OPPOSITE of what you claim.

No it is not in fact.

Your picture is taken from the left side and does not show the detail you claim.

This one shows the shooters POV and proves you wrong.

The iron sites are clearly visible and unobstructed.

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

In a word: "ridiculous".

I hope this is a satire thread.

How is it ridiculous when it is supported by evidence?

 

[Soupnazi630]

..

DO not dodge I asked you first.

You made a claim which you cannot support and are lying about having evidence.

You never even read the damn thing. You are an ignorant fool who knows nothing about it except what a few cartoons told you.

But here you go.
Page 1.

"The Assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22 1963 was a cruel and shocking act of violence directed against a man, a family, a nation and against all mankind."

Now prove it happened on a different day or that it was not a cruel and shocking act of violence.

Cite a passage which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

I remember hearing about it when I was in 2nd grade lunch period.
My teacher came running in screaming about it.

What was really cruel was we had to watch the Black & White coverage of it all weekend. They canceled Bugs Bunny because of it on Saturday morning.

....and yet Poppy Bush (well know CIA **********) couldn't remember where he was, when he was asked.

I was in first grade, and remember it clearly. That whole holiday weekend I remember. We watched on the b&w TV when the CIA, FBI, Dallas PD, Texas SP, all allowed Ruby to waltz right up to the patsy Oswald and murder him.

You did not see it because the CIA and FBI were not there dumbass.

See what?

Were you on the grassy knoll?

love how the shill has to LIE and say the CIA was not there when a former CIA operative on his deathbed confession confessed he WAS there as part of a CIA operation to kill Kennedy after denying it for years that he was there in dallas. doesnt he ever get tired of ending up with shit on his face?

so since ti has been established the CIA WAS there now,the next question you got to ask is WHY? Is it to protect the president? the guy is dead so now so what was the sense in the CIA being there then in the first place if that was their apparent job we are assuming was? they sure were incompetent if that was the job yet nobody got fired for their alleged incompetence like WE do if we dont do our jobs at work,which proves the SS was not just merely incopetant that day,that they were IN on it.

They were not there and no evidence exists of such a confession or evidence to support it if he did confess it.

Besides I was referring to the shooting of Oswald not the shooting of Kennedy.

Do try to keep up dunce.

It has never been established that the CIA was there. You have yet to prove they were.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.

Oswald was not a poor shot he was a Marine Sharpshooter and therefore by definition skilled with a rifle. At least relatively skilled compared to the average person who never learns how to shoot a rifle.

Kennedy was in fact shot twice not at LEAST twice as there is no ambiguity in how many times he was shot.

The scope was found to be misaligned after multiple law enforcement agencies dis assembled and re assembled it. It was probably misaligned when he fired the shots but that is not an argument in favor of a conspiracy . The reason for this is we know he missed the first shot and hit with the second and third shots. The misaligned scope is a very good reason why he missed the first one. However since he probably knew he missed it it is obvious and simple that he likely ignored the scope for the second and third shots and instead used the iron sites mounted on the rifle which he was well trained to use by the Marine Corps.

There were not 4 shots fired there were 3. All of the physical evidence and the vast majority of witnesses prove this.

Not really damned good shooting for anyone as Oswald only hit two out of three and in fact even the first hit may technically be a miss. This is because the second shot was the first one to hit Kennedy but it hit on his upper back. Oswald was most likely trying for head shots all three times as the head was clearly visible above the seat back and of course the most likely target to aim at.

Yes the carcano is a potentially deadly weapon but he is correct. All things considered it is a cheap junky weapon. Even in 63 there were far better weapons out there of many types and varieties.

That's a joke. oswald barely qualified as Marksman. And he probably had help to do that. I haven't looked into the history for over twenty years so my memory is hazy, but I thought that two hit Kennedy, one hit Connally (possibly went through kennedy first which would drop it down to three.), and one hit the car.

No it is not a joke he in fact qualified as sharpshooter in basic training which is documented fact in his Marne corps record. His record as a Marksman came later as he was about to be discharged and probably did not care to try very hard since he was getting out anyways.

The Marines have the best basic rifle markmanship training program in the military and even a poor marine shot is a good shot compared to most others.

The first shot missed entirely. The second shot Hit Kennedy and continued on to hit Connally. The third took Kennedy in the head and those are the only shots we have evidence of.

I see our favorite CIA officer has been busy. Funny...our Langley sycophant never posts in any other threads, but is extremely active in ANY thread regarding his agency's assassination of JFK...the ensuing Coup de' tat and 54 years of cover up...and millions of deaths in Southeast Asia as a consequence.

Dear CIA Agent (aka Sloppynazi630),

Do you think when your beloved Poppy Bushy bites the dust, the CIA will come clean on it's murder of JFK?

Your Dearest Friend
Gipper


Hey Sloppy...I found this on your agency's website and had to laugh. Seems at least one of the ten should be promoting disinformation and misinformation about the CIA killings of JFK, Oswald, and so many others.


Top 10 Reasons for Working at the CIA

• 1. You’ll feel good about making a difference for your country.
• 2. You’ll be on the leading edge of your career specialty.
• 3. You’ll get to work with really, really smart people.
• 4. No day will be the same. Ever.
• 5. You’ll be at the forefront of global events.
• 6. Your career can go in many directions without switching employers.
• 7. You’ll work with a diversity of people with many different interests.
• 8. You’ll contribute to the work of a nation at the center of intelligence.
• 9. You never have to talk about your work while away from the job.
• 10. Federal benefits programs are highly competitive.

Top 10 Reasons for Working at the CIA — Central Intelligence Agency

I wouldn't work for the CIA for all the tea in China.

as any sane person would not.that propaganda piece by the CIA that Gipper posted conveintly leaves out how they murder innocent civilans around the world all the time and when they hire one of their lower level assassins,they take them out later after the job is done so there are no loose ends left. I wouldnt work for them for all the money in the world. why bother,i cant take the money with me to my grave.

You have yet to offer any evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

A conspiracy means just that....a conspiracy

It means careful plans are made by multiple parties to execute a plot. It is not some spontaneous act

There was NO serious planning of the JFK assassination
There was a single shot bolt action rifle
Oswald just happened to work at the Depository
Oswald had no plan for escape
Oswald did not even have a car

Some conspiracy

Which again, begs the question…if you do have no plan for escape…why not bring your pistol? Why in the world would you purposely set it up to where you have to go home and get your gun if you have no escape plan?

The Motorcade route was announced on a days or a few days before the actual arrival of kennedy depending on which newspaper one read. Oswald was in the habit of reading old newspapers he found lying on the floor of the break room of the texas TSBD.

HE had no chance to retrieve the pistol because he had to bum a ride from a co worker named Wesley Frazier to get to Irving Texas.

Oh…so he had a means to get the gun at 12:30PM on the day of the assassination but not at 12:30PM on the day before the assassination? I don’t recall him having to “bum a ride” to get the pistol.

Next!

Yes.

On the day OF the assassination he had no problem retrieving it because by definition he was running away never to return to work. On the day BEFORE he needed to return to work in order to shoot Kennedy from the building.

You keep trying and keep failing.

He did not bum a ride to get the pistol he took a cab but he could not leave work and do the same thing if he wished to remain gainfully employed. He was stuck at work. He was not stuck at work after committing the crime.

 

[mudwhistle]

Take a break from the dooby.

it is clearly the same guy driving.

Clearly not.
Your credibility is really going to shit now.

He never had any credibility.

I have more than you. Anyone who claims CIA agents are hanging out in chat rooms as you do ruins any credibility they may have had,

It proves you are a mindless brat and chump to even believe such nonsense. Your whole ego is wrapped up in this and you cannot stand the fact that your beliefs are proven false,



I have evidence you do not.

Cite some evidence.

Funny you should mention that.

Cass Sunstein, former Obama Administration Czar believed in the following :

Cass Sunstein - Wikipedia

"...... they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."[36] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."​

One of the mods at USMB claims to be a former White House lawyer, FYI.​

Which Mod is that? I have never heard that claim.

Doctorisin.....he mentioned it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

He was backed up by the CIA for the bay of pigs. Mafia for the Bay of pigs. The Rothstiens for changes in the Fed reserve. Johnson for a promotion, FBI for putting his brother in-charge, DOD because they did not like him. I can live with the fact that he was shot by Oswald

shot by oswald? wow the ONLY research you have obviously done in your life on this subject is reading the propaganda taught in our textbooks from our corrupt school system charlie.

Yes by Oswald despite what your cartoons tell you which is the only research you have ever done.

You have been schooled and proven ignorant on this before so deal with the fact that you are wrong

 

[Soupnazi630]

Clearly not.
Your credibility is really going to shit now.

He never had any credibility.

I have more than you. Anyone who claims CIA agents are hanging out in chat rooms as you do ruins any credibility they may have had,

It proves you are a mindless brat and chump to even believe such nonsense. Your whole ego is wrapped up in this and you cannot stand the fact that your beliefs are proven false,



I have evidence you do not.

Cite some evidence.

Funny you should mention that.

Cass Sunstein, former Obama Administration Czar believed in the following :

Cass Sunstein - Wikipedia

"...... they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."[36] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."​

One of the mods at USMB claims to be a former White House lawyer, FYI.​

Which Mod is that? I have never heard that claim.

Doctorisin.....he mentioned it.

None of which proves a damn thing about government agents occupying chatrooms. The very thought is ludicrously stupid.

The claim is nothing more than evasion and deflection from those who lose arguments.

 

[mudwhistle]

Agreed. Oswald was a left wing lunatic (the most dangerous kind) and he murdered the President for not being left wing enough.

Conspiracy theories deflect from the very real dangers of unhinged leftwing lunatics, especially in this day and age.

Funny that you're willing to swallow the dreaded 'liburrul media' line hook line and sinker THIS time. Whatever's convenient huh?

Oswald was a CIA flunky, a schlub manipulated to take the heat off the action. In all likelihood he had no idea what the overall operation was and once the Big Event (Howard Hunt's term) happened figured out that he was being set up, and fled.

For one obvious example -- the movie theater. Armed cops had been set up outside by the exit door, the way to which was left wide open for him while the Dallas cops took their time questioning irrelevant people, giving him plenty of chance to bolt for the door, upon opening which he'd be met with a shower of bullets, preventing him from saying anything and leaving the System with a dead body to pin any story they'd like on it, including the "leftwing lunatic" one you already bought. But Oswald sniffed it out and didn't take the bait, requiring Ruby to be sent in to finish the job.

Speaking of Ruby.....

That's Sen. Prescott Bush, father of George and grandfather of Dubya, tweaking his pet turtle Richard Nixon, who he set up to be Eisenhower's running mate. Who do you think that is in the middle behind them?

Jack Ruby had a cleft chin. That guy doesn't have one.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Agreed. Oswald was a left wing lunatic (the most dangerous kind) and he murdered the President for not being left wing enough.

Conspiracy theories deflect from the very real dangers of unhinged leftwing lunatics, especially in this day and age.

Funny that you're willing to swallow the dreaded 'liburrul media' line hook line and sinker THIS time. Whatever's convenient huh?

Oswald was a CIA flunky, a schlub manipulated to take the heat off the action. In all likelihood he had no idea what the overall operation was and once the Big Event (Howard Hunt's term) happened figured out that he was being set up, and fled.

For one obvious example -- the movie theater. Armed cops had been set up outside by the exit door, the way to which was left wide open for him while the Dallas cops took their time questioning irrelevant people, giving him plenty of chance to bolt for the door, upon opening which he'd be met with a shower of bullets, preventing him from saying anything and leaving the System with a dead body to pin any story they'd like on it, including the "leftwing lunatic" one you already bought. But Oswald sniffed it out and didn't take the bait, requiring Ruby to be sent in to finish the job.

Speaking of Ruby.....

That's Sen. Prescott Bush, father of George and grandfather of Dubya, tweaking his pet turtle Richard Nixon, who he set up to be Eisenhower's running mate. Who do you think that is in the middle behind them?

Jack Ruby had a cleft chin. That guy doesn't have one.

I thought he was going to say it was a CIA operative of Nixons in the middle .I did not know he was saying that was Ruby which obviously that guy is not as this photo of yours proves.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Agreed. Oswald was a left wing lunatic (the most dangerous kind) and he murdered the President for not being left wing enough.

Conspiracy theories deflect from the very real dangers of unhinged leftwing lunatics, especially in this day and age.

Funny that you're willing to swallow the dreaded 'liburrul media' line hook line and sinker THIS time. Whatever's convenient huh?

Oswald was a CIA flunky, a schlub manipulated to take the heat off the action. In all likelihood he had no idea what the overall operation was and once the Big Event (Howard Hunt's term) happened figured out that he was being set up, and fled.

For one obvious example -- the movie theater. Armed cops had been set up outside by the exit door, the way to which was left wide open for him while the Dallas cops took their time questioning irrelevant people, giving him plenty of chance to bolt for the door, upon opening which he'd be met with a shower of bullets, preventing him from saying anything and leaving the System with a dead body to pin any story they'd like on it, including the "leftwing lunatic" one you already bought. But Oswald sniffed it out and didn't take the bait, requiring Ruby to be sent in to finish the job.

Speaking of Ruby.....

That's Sen. Prescott Bush, father of George and grandfather of Dubya, tweaking his pet turtle Richard Nixon, who he set up to be Eisenhower's running mate. Who do you think that is in the middle behind them?

Oswald was not CIA. The claim he was is fictional and unsupported by evidence and in fact it is a stupid claim as a high school drop out and committed marxist and loser is not CIA material.

Ruby acted on his own and adamantly stated as much until the day he died.

The rest is pure fiction and the guy in the picture is unknown it is certainly not Jack Ruby.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

the CIA obviously instructed wrongwinger to make this thread the fact so many fellow Langley residents of WRONGWINGERS as the hawk-err the idiot and candyass are farting in this thread with their usual lies.more and more shills keep trolling this thread,they are so desperate to try and debunk any truth discussion from truthers here.

 

[candycorn]

A conspiracy means just that....a conspiracy

It means careful plans are made by multiple parties to execute a plot. It is not some spontaneous act

There was NO serious planning of the JFK assassination
There was a single shot bolt action rifle
Oswald just happened to work at the Depository
Oswald had no plan for escape
Oswald did not even have a car

Some conspiracy

Which again, begs the question…if you do have no plan for escape…why not bring your pistol? Why in the world would you purposely set it up to where you have to go home and get your gun if you have no escape plan?

The Motorcade route was announced on a days or a few days before the actual arrival of kennedy depending on which newspaper one read. Oswald was in the habit of reading old newspapers he found lying on the floor of the break room of the texas TSBD.

HE had no chance to retrieve the pistol because he had to bum a ride from a co worker named Wesley Frazier to get to Irving Texas.

Oh…so he had a means to get the gun at 12:30PM on the day of the assassination but not at 12:30PM on the day before the assassination? I don’t recall him having to “bum a ride” to get the pistol.

Next!

Yes.

On the day OF the assassination he had no problem retrieving it because by definition he was running away never to return to work. On the day BEFORE he needed to return to work in order to shoot Kennedy from the building.

You keep trying and keep failing.

He did not bum a ride to get the pistol he took a cab but he could not leave work and do the same thing if he wished to remain gainfully employed. He was stuck at work. He was not stuck at work after committing the crime.

Yeah soup…I know he didn’t have to bum a ride to to retrive a pistol on the day of the assassination. He had means to get there. Just like he had the day before the assassination…..

You argued he couldn’t get there. I demonstrated (and you just proved) he did.

 

[Soupnazi630]

the CIA obviously instructed wrongwinger to make this thread the fact so many fellow Langley residents of WRONGWINGERS as the hawk-err the idiot and candyass are farting in this thread with their usual lies.more and more shills keep trolling this thread,they are so desperate to try and debunk any truth discussion from truthers here.

The only trolls in here are you and gipper who pollute the place with your crap

People were actually having a conversation until you came running in here posting idiotic memes and emojis everywhere which is all you ever post.

 

[Soupnazi630]

A conspiracy means just that....a conspiracy

It means careful plans are made by multiple parties to execute a plot. It is not some spontaneous act

There was NO serious planning of the JFK assassination
There was a single shot bolt action rifle
Oswald just happened to work at the Depository
Oswald had no plan for escape
Oswald did not even have a car

Some conspiracy

Which again, begs the question…if you do have no plan for escape…why not bring your pistol? Why in the world would you purposely set it up to where you have to go home and get your gun if you have no escape plan?

The Motorcade route was announced on a days or a few days before the actual arrival of kennedy depending on which newspaper one read. Oswald was in the habit of reading old newspapers he found lying on the floor of the break room of the texas TSBD.

HE had no chance to retrieve the pistol because he had to bum a ride from a co worker named Wesley Frazier to get to Irving Texas.

Oh…so he had a means to get the gun at 12:30PM on the day of the assassination but not at 12:30PM on the day before the assassination? I don’t recall him having to “bum a ride” to get the pistol.

Next!

Yes.

On the day OF the assassination he had no problem retrieving it because by definition he was running away never to return to work. On the day BEFORE he needed to return to work in order to shoot Kennedy from the building.

You keep trying and keep failing.

He did not bum a ride to get the pistol he took a cab but he could not leave work and do the same thing if he wished to remain gainfully employed. He was stuck at work. He was not stuck at work after committing the crime.

Yeah soup…I know he didn’t have to bum a ride to to retrive a pistol on the day of the assassination. He had means to get there. Just like he had the day before the assassination…..

You argued he couldn’t get there. I demonstrated (and you just proved) he did.

No you did not.

The fact is that the day before he was WORKING. The day of the assassination he was at work but not working. He was committing murder and then running away.

The little details get you every time and you willfully ignore them.

 

[westwall]

Clearly not.
Your credibility is really going to shit now.

He never had any credibility.

I have more than you. Anyone who claims CIA agents are hanging out in chat rooms as you do ruins any credibility they may have had,

It proves you are a mindless brat and chump to even believe such nonsense. Your whole ego is wrapped up in this and you cannot stand the fact that your beliefs are proven false,



I have evidence you do not.

Cite some evidence.

Funny you should mention that.

Cass Sunstein, former Obama Administration Czar believed in the following :

Cass Sunstein - Wikipedia

"...... they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."[36] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."​

One of the mods at USMB claims to be a former White House lawyer, FYI.​

Which Mod is that? I have never heard that claim.

Doctorisin.....he mentioned it.

I think you misheard. he is only now enrolled in Law School.

 

[westwall]

the CIA obviously instructed wrongwinger to make this thread the fact so many fellow Langley residents of WRONGWINGERS as the hawk-err the idiot and candyass are farting in this thread with their usual lies.more and more shills keep trolling this thread,they are so desperate to try and debunk any truth discussion from truthers here.

The only trolls in here are you and gipper who pollute the place with your crap

People were actually having a conversation until you came running in here posting idiotic memes and emojis everywhere which is all you ever post.

And yet the evidence of a conspiracy is well documented, AND supported by Congress. Must suck to be you.

Summary of Findings
Summary of Findings and Recommendations

• Findings in the Assassination of President Kennedy
• Findings in the Assassination of Reverend King
• Recommendations of the Select Committee on Assassinations

I. Findings of the Select Committee on Assassinations in the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Tex., November 22, 1963

1. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.
   1. President Kennedy was struck by two rifle shots fired from behind him.
   2. The shots that struck President Kennedy from behind him were fired from the sixth floor window of the southeast corner of the Texas School Book Depository building.
   3. Lee Harvey Oswald owned the rifle that was used to fire the shots from the sixth floor window of the southeast comer of the Texas School Book Depository building.
   4. Lee Harvey Oswald, shortly before the assassination, had access to and was present on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository building.
   5. Lee Harvey Oswald's other actions tend to support the conclusion that he assassinated President Kennedy.
2. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.
3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

Summary of Findings

 

[mudwhistle]

He never had any credibility.

I have more than you. Anyone who claims CIA agents are hanging out in chat rooms as you do ruins any credibility they may have had,

It proves you are a mindless brat and chump to even believe such nonsense. Your whole ego is wrapped up in this and you cannot stand the fact that your beliefs are proven false,



I have evidence you do not.

Cite some evidence.

Funny you should mention that.

Cass Sunstein, former Obama Administration Czar believed in the following :

Cass Sunstein - Wikipedia

"...... they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."[36] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."​

One of the mods at USMB claims to be a former White House lawyer, FYI.​

Which Mod is that? I have never heard that claim.

Doctorisin.....he mentioned it.

I think you misheard. he is only now enrolled in Law School.

Perhaps.
Maybe he was lying.

 

[westwall]

I have more than you. Anyone who claims CIA agents are hanging out in chat rooms as you do ruins any credibility they may have had,

It proves you are a mindless brat and chump to even believe such nonsense. Your whole ego is wrapped up in this and you cannot stand the fact that your beliefs are proven false,



I have evidence you do not.

Cite some evidence.

Funny you should mention that.

Cass Sunstein, former Obama Administration Czar believed in the following :

Cass Sunstein - Wikipedia

"...... they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."[36] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."​

One of the mods at USMB claims to be a former White House lawyer, FYI.​

Which Mod is that? I have never heard that claim.

Doctorisin.....he mentioned it.

I think you misheard. he is only now enrolled in Law School.

Perhaps.
Maybe he was lying.

No, we know this to factual.