Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, my grandmother is 72, and at least she acts her age and doesn't give in to these sordid standards women set for themselves or other women. She's lived too long to be taken in by that garbage. She's mature enough not to use her gender as a weapon. The last time she voted Democrat was in 1996 because she saw where the Democrats were headed, and she views this war on women as offensive. She was a farm hand on her father's farm, working with two of her eldest sisters, and he worked her like a dog; but she earned her keep and was better off for it. She never molded herself to the stereotypes of women then, and she most certainly does not now.
Disir is one of those women who are told what to think, and she projects that behavior onto others. Her precepts of women aren't the status quo, they are a rarity. In reality there are plenty of women who willingly defy the picture the Democratic party paints of women to their base and to prospective voters. It is a form of base identity politics where the Democrats get women into apoplectics over supposed advancements on their rights (contraception, pay, abortion, etc). It's as if Democrats like Disir believe that's all women care about. Newsflash, not all women are Democrats. And no, not all women are concerned about pay equality, abortion, or contraception. A lot of them care about the economy, are military wives worrying for their husbands fighting overseas, and work multiple jobs to raise children.
Give it a break with your phony twist, You attacked women on the board with your sexist remarks.
71 and still immature.
Being a mother is the most awesome and beautiful thing in the world.
Maybe some of the women who don't want this experience could put their baby up for adoption for all the newly married gay couples.
Yes more mothers are custodial parents, but a non custodial father is more likely to pay his child support, Proven fact.
The term "dead beat dad" is hateful and ignores a real problem.
Oh, and do you really think that 82% of the mother is really the best parent? I don't.
I'm not interested in how you feel about the best parent.
It goes back to what I said. I underlined and bolded it for you, in case you forgot.
I didn't tell you what I felt about the best parent ma'am. I asked if you believed that in 83% of the cases the woman was the best parent?You may be 71 but you are ignorant and immature with your thinking of women.
So go find a popsicle for your enjoyment.
You are the most immature fool.
With your response its so evident that there is only one thought going on in your mind about women.
Hence, you prove the point about someone like you.
Stupidity and sexist.
I object! Have you really looked at any Liberal women? Yuk!! Look at Michelle Obama. No wonder Barry spends his time on the golf course and attending fund raisers. Look at Roseanne Barr, Nancy Poloski, etc. Now turn your television over to Fox News. That Megan Kelly could curl any man's toes. So could Shannon Bream and all the others. It's all that bottled up rejection and sexual frustration and hate that makes Liberal women so ugly.
Ok. I'll defer that you have a thing for ugly women. Some guys have a thing for fat women. I don't. To each his own. I am immature though as you say. I'm only 71. Give me a chance to grow up.
You are immature in that you make no argument only attacks. Typical low-info Liberal. Goes to MSNBC for his thesis.
Well, my grandmother is 72, and at least she acts her age and doesn't give in to these sordid standards women set for themselves or other women. She's lived too long to be taken in by that garbage. She's mature enough not to use her gender as a weapon. The last time she voted Democrat was in 1996 because she saw where the Democrats were headed, and she views this war on women as offensive. She was a farm hand on her father's farm, working with two of her eldest sisters, and he worked her like a dog; but she earned her keep and was better off for it. She never molded herself to the stereotypes of women then, and she most certainly does not now.
Disir is one of those women who are told what to think, and she projects that behavior onto others. Her precepts of women aren't the status quo, they are a rarity. In reality there are plenty of women who willingly defy the picture the Democratic party paints of women to their base and to prospective voters. It is a form of base identity politics where the Democrats get women into apoplectics over supposed advancements on their rights (contraception, pay, abortion, etc). It's as if Democrats like Disir believe that's all women care about. Newsflash, not all women are Democrats. And no, not all women are concerned about pay equality, abortion, or contraception. A lot of them care about the economy, are military wives worrying for their husbands fighting overseas, and work multiple jobs to raise children.
It became a huge fail for the GOP when he women started shooting back.
332-206...thanks to the women's vote.
You got exactly what you deserved for you vote. Strong evidence that the people opposed to women's sufferage were correct.
Well, you win the popular votes in these states and by doing such, you are awarded their electoral votes. Do I need to explain how elections work to you?It became a huge fail for the GOP when he women started shooting back.
332-206...thanks to the women's vote.
LOL you think the electoral vote had anything to do with the popular vote?
How cute.
@candycorn, why did you tag me?
What post?
Have you seen me defend anything, or even post in this thread?
Decaf, seriously.
.
@candycorn, why did you tag me?
What post?
Have you seen me defend anything, or even post in this thread?
Decaf, seriously.
.
Gee, sounds like me a week ago....
Still no denouncement. Interesting.
@candycorn, why did you tag me?
What post?
Have you seen me defend anything, or even post in this thread?
Decaf, seriously.
.
Gee, sounds like me a week ago....
Still no denouncement. Interesting.
So I tagged you a week ago in a thread to which you had not responded?
Dafuq? What in the world are you talking about?
.
@candycorn, why did you tag me?
What post?
Have you seen me defend anything, or even post in this thread?
Decaf, seriously.
.
Gee, sounds like me a week ago....
Still no denouncement. Interesting.
So I tagged you a week ago in a thread to which you had not responded?
Dafuq? What in the world are you talking about?
.
Still no denouncement....Interesting.
@Mac1958@candycorn, why did you tag me?
What post?
Have you seen me defend anything, or even post in this thread?
Decaf, seriously.
.
Gee, sounds like me a week ago....
Still no denouncement. Interesting.
So I tagged you a week ago in a thread to which you had not responded?
Dafuq? What in the world are you talking about?
.
Still no denouncement....Interesting.
Wow, very butt hurt.
I asked you "what post", and you're still playing games.
I have no idea what you talking about.
Just the latest example of why it's impossible to communicate with partisan ideologues.
Unsubscribe.
.
@Mac1958@candycorn, why did you tag me?
What post?
Have you seen me defend anything, or even post in this thread?
Decaf, seriously.
.
Gee, sounds like me a week ago....
Still no denouncement. Interesting.
So I tagged you a week ago in a thread to which you had not responded?
Dafuq? What in the world are you talking about?
.
Still no denouncement....Interesting.
Wow, very butt hurt.
I asked you "what post", and you're still playing games.
I have no idea what you talking about.
Just the latest example of why it's impossible to communicate with partisan ideologues.
Unsubscribe.
.
Gee, are you that unsophisticated to not be able to scroll up to see in which post you are tagged (324)? I understand that it would be very uncomfortable for you to disagree with anyone who shares your political viewpoints but maybe I overestimated you. I tend to do that when I give partisans the benefit of the doubt.
Still no denouncement.
The War on Women predates Obama. Whether you choose to acknowledge it or not. Further, Obama is not up for reelection and the Republicans still don't have a plan and since they are the ones that are a part of the problem then it doesn't look good for them either.
The War on Women predates Obama. Whether you choose to acknowledge it or not. Further, Obama is not up for reelection and the Republicans still don't have a plan and since they are the ones that are a part of the problem then it doesn't look good for them either.
The war on women and womanhood was initiated in the 1960s by groups such as NOW and scum, such as Gloria Steinhem, Bella Abzug,
Don't interrupt them when they are calling women scum. They may catch on to how impotent they look (and probably are).The War on Women predates Obama. Whether you choose to acknowledge it or not. Further, Obama is not up for reelection and the Republicans still don't have a plan and since they are the ones that are a part of the problem then it doesn't look good for them either.
The war on women and womanhood was initiated in the 1960s by groups such as NOW and scum, such as Gloria Steinhem, Bella Abzug,
Try again.
Don't interrupt them when they are calling women scum. They may catch on to how impotent they look (and probably are).The War on Women predates Obama. Whether you choose to acknowledge it or not. Further, Obama is not up for reelection and the Republicans still don't have a plan and since they are the ones that are a part of the problem then it doesn't look good for them either.
The war on women and womanhood was initiated in the 1960s by groups such as NOW and scum, such as Gloria Steinhem, Bella Abzug,
Try again.
Part of the war on women, a big part, is the constant assault on women's reproduction rights, while legislatures do little to force men into paying there fair share when the women produces a child instead of obtaining an abortion. Republicans want to pressure the women into having the child not only don't want to pay for the child when it is born, they continue to protect the fathers from having to be more responsible. They don't want to pay for abortions, but they are willing to subsidize the fathers.
Not at all. Deadbeat Dads are contemptible. I don't know of anyone who's trying to protect them.Ya, a lot of men think like you. That's why tax payers have to pay for the kids of irresponsible fathers. And very few would agree that contributing to the cost of raising a child is indentured servitude. Most fathers in this country who pay child support pay a pitiful small amount. The medicaid and food stamp rolls are loaded with kids whose fathers pay only a fraction of what it cost to maintain them in shelter, health care, food and clothing. If fathers were made to pay the actual cost of those things the welfare rolls would be reduced by huge numbers.But they CAN for forced into indentured servitude for the next 18 years, on the whim of the woman.
Therein lies the rub. Yes, raising a child IS terrifically expensive. I know, I've raised two. In addition, any man who walks, runs, or slithers away from a child that he helped create is at best a contemptible human being. I champion efforts to make men assume their responsibilities in regard to their children. That being said, I believe that both the man AND the woman should lose their reproductive freedom if their sexual activity results in a pregnancy. At that point, there is a third human in the equation whose right to life should be accounted for.
The problem is, however, that as the law stands today, a man not only loses his reproductive freedom, but the woman can legally deny him fatherhood or legally force him to pay for the child's support until he/she reaches independence. That's not right.
The problem is that they do slither away.
Most women (because some are really not worth a damn) are the caregivers for kids. And there are many women that don't even try to get them to pay child support. And men are not prevented from seeing their children if they don't pay child support.
And it is women that will not be able to go out when they want or where they want or do what they want because they will be the primary care givers. So, it is the woman that has to make the choice. But, you know this.
This is the responsibility factor involved.
Then don't claim you support full reproductive freedom for all, because you basically don't. You support freedom for the woman to either deny a man fatherhood or force it on him. I maintain that BOTH should lose that "freedom" once pregnancy occurs. That's fair and equitable.
Cut the bullshit.
When men become the custodial parent 82.2% of the time then it would make sense. As it stands, you don't.
Anyone that still supports Bill Clinton shows that they truly hate women..
Thus in turn, the far left hates women.
