War Crimes for Trump and Hegseth?

Pearl clutching and couch fainting all for the wrong subhuman party
 
Anyway, it's not like Bradley didn't know whom he was getting in bed with. I'd be surprised if there's any shortage of ambitious officers.
 
Anyway, it's not like Bradley didn't know whom he was getting in bed with. I'd be surprised if there's any shortage of ambitious officers.
Admirals have immense authority.
 
Never occurs to you sorts that perhaps the USA has inside intel sources that tip off on these boats and that to give out too much detail would close those sources and/or cause their "disappearance". :rolleyes:;):cool:
You have to excuse White6. Judging from his comments, his military experience consisted of remembering how much cream and sugar the general or colonel took in his coffee. He apparently has no experience with any intelligence, including his own lack thereof!
 
Trump is breaking the law what he is doing. You are assuming they are drug boats. I ******* thought the USA had the best stuff. We can't catch them and prove they are smuggling drugs?

And, once you blow up their boat and two guys are swimming, you do not drop another bomb on those two men. It's just not done. It's murder. This is the USA not Iran. Not Saudi Arabia.
Actually, it sounds more like they were eliminating witnesses...
 
Pete Hegseth is about to deny that he gave orders for the recent boat strike and subsequent killing of survivors and is now trying to blame Admiral Bradley for acting independently.

Hegseth Sets Up Admiral Bradley As 'Fall Guy' For His Alleged War Crime​

The US military's strike on a suspected drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean on 2 September 2025 has ignited a fierce debate over accountability, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly positioning Frank M. Bradley, then head of the elite Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), as the sole decision-maker responsible for the deadly follow-up attack that killed survivors.

In a blunt statement, Hegseth hailed Bradley as 'an American hero ... a true professional' with 'my 100% support', while the administration insisted the strike was lawful.

But internal legal memos, expert reaction, and early congressional signals suggest the administration may have attempted to shift blame, raising urgent questions about command responsibility and potentially exposing Bradley to the role of a scapegoat.

It's always someone else's fault. That's the way these tRumpling operate.

They babble endlessly about "personal responsibility" and have none at ll.
 
Link to the bogus story you claimed butt munch. Do you have one or are you going to admit you pulled it out of your ass?

Wow, you are a clueless muppet of the Left.

Rather than instilling confidence that its attacks are lawful and adhere to US policy, the silence of the Obama administration on strikes such as the one on the December 12 wedding procession instead magnifies the concerns. The failure to publicly acknowledge and investigate attacks causing civilian casualties not only violates the international legal obligations of the United States, it also shows an unwillingness to address the harms inflicted on Yemen’s civilian population.




 
15th post
Wow, you are a clueless muppet of the Left.





And where were liberals cheering him on w/that?
 
Back
Top Bottom