War Crimes for Trump and Hegseth?

So, put you down for blowing up any suspected boat on the water, no matter how little the cargo, and obviously whether known or proven to be drugs or not, right?
So, is it something about the sea in Venezuelan waters, or would you approve rocket attacks in Mexico on tractor trailers, to stop drugs, after finding 1,100 plus pound in the lettuce truck? Are you in for a penny. in for a pound ore would you require some kind of proof, if on dry land?
Never occurs to you sorts that perhaps the USA has inside intel sources that tip off on these boats and that to give out too much detail would close those sources and/or cause their "disappearance". :rolleyes:;):cool:
 
I do not believe those words were ever uttered by him. Of course, truth matters not one smidgeon to you. For you guys (the left), only "troof" matters.
Of course you don't believe, because it makes your piece of shit guy look like, well, a goddamn piece of shit.

Where did that quote come from if he did not utter those words then?
 
Pete Hegseth is about to deny that he gave orders for the recent boat strike and subsequent killing of survivors and is now trying to blame Admiral Bradley for acting independently.

Hegseth Sets Up Admiral Bradley As 'Fall Guy' For His Alleged War Crime​

The US military's strike on a suspected drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean on 2 September 2025 has ignited a fierce debate over accountability, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly positioning Frank M. Bradley, then head of the elite Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), as the sole decision-maker responsible for the deadly follow-up attack that killed survivors.

In a blunt statement, Hegseth hailed Bradley as 'an American hero ... a true professional' with 'my 100% support', while the administration insisted the strike was lawful.

But internal legal memos, expert reaction, and early congressional signals suggest the administration may have attempted to shift blame, raising urgent questions about command responsibility and potentially exposing Bradley to the role of a scapegoat.

It was not and never will be a war crime.
 
Sound out the big words- narco = narcotics. Terrorist- someone who uses violence to influence politics and oppose gov'ts.


Now, why didn't the Democrats prosecute Obama for blowing up weddings and US citizens?
Are you telling me that those dingy boats w/Trinidadian fishermen were not only peddling major drugs, but were attempting to influence US politics?

af25Awf9_400x400
 
"Kill them all" is the latest phony scandal being promoted by the Democrats, but do they have any logical basis? Obviously, this applies to killing identified narco terrorists who are transporting illegal and dangerous drugs to the U.S. If the Dems oppose this policy why don't they say so and seek to change it?

Instead, they ignore this fundamental point and are focusing on obscure rules of naval engagement which pertain to sinking ships. Obviously, this does not apply when the people operating a drug boat are themselves the military targets to be eliminated. Just as a condemned criminal is not reprieved by an insufficient initial lethal injection, neither is a narco terrorist operating in international waters absolved just because his boat was sunk.
A few hours ago they were denying it happened. Then they started saying they had no idea it happened. Now they are saying it happened but it wasnt my fault.

Trump confirmed it happened and said quite frankly when asked about the second strike on the survivors who were clinging to the burning wreckage, Mr. Trump said: “I wouldn’t have wanted that. Not a second strike.”
 
Pete Hegseth is about to deny that he gave orders for the recent boat strike and subsequent killing of survivors and is now trying to blame Admiral Bradley for acting independently.

Hegseth Sets Up Admiral Bradley As 'Fall Guy' For His Alleged War Crime​

The US military's strike on a suspected drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean on 2 September 2025 has ignited a fierce debate over accountability, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly positioning Frank M. Bradley, then head of the elite Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), as the sole decision-maker responsible for the deadly follow-up attack that killed survivors.

In a blunt statement, Hegseth hailed Bradley as 'an American hero ... a true professional' with 'my 100% support', while the administration insisted the strike was lawful.

But internal legal memos, expert reaction, and early congressional signals suggest the administration may have attempted to shift blame, raising urgent questions about command responsibility and potentially exposing Bradley to the role of a scapegoat.

Of course that sniveling little piss aunt is going to run from his words.

Where's all his "lethality" tough talk now, huh?

That ************ is going to face some serious consequences when law and order returns to the US.
 
Of course that sniveling little piss aunt is going to run from his words.

Where's all his "lethality" tough talk now, huh?

That ************ is going to face some serious consequences when law and order returns to the US.
He watched too many tough-guy movies.
 
Are you telling me that those dingy boats w/Trinidadian fishermen were not only peddling major drugs, but were attempting to influence US politics?

af25Awf9_400x400
Now, why didn't the Democrats prosecute Obama for blowing up weddings and US citizens?
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom