WaPo going down, not so sad. It has been engaged in non-truth for too long

Thethingsz

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2025
Messages
966
Reaction score
683
Points
873
This just a recap of what WaPo has been doing in recent years.
_

Don’t cry for The Washington Post; it helped destroy media.
The Post has been one of the leading culprits in the collapse of public trust in journalism
February 13, 2026.
[...]
Over the past decade, the Post has been one of the leading culprits in the collapse of public trust in journalism. The once-venerable outlet has spent the past 10 years participating in virtually every dishonest left-wing operation, including giving legitimacy to the Brett Kavanaugh group rape accusations, delegitimizing the Hunter Biden laptop story, spreading the Gaza “genocide” lie, covering up Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, sliming the Covington children and countless others.

You could write a book listing the Post pieces that were so biased as to be basically fictional.

The Washington Post has also been one of the worst offenders of the unsound journalistic practice in which reporters handpick useful partisan “experts” or “scholars” to act as opinion-writing proxies.

One memorable example carried the headline: “Vote to oust McCarthy is a warning sign for democracy, scholars say.”

To understand the activist mission of the Post, note that it fired 13 climate change reporters and one reporter whose only job was covering “race disparity.”

Let’s not forget, either, that contemporary “fact-checking” ruse, wherein left-wing opinion columnists playact as arbiters of truth and offer partisan arguments and value judgments under a patina of impartiality, was basically invented by the Post.

The newspaper was one of the few media outlets that could still afford much-needed on-the-ground coverage of the world. A few years ago, however, the paper turned into a propaganda outfit for Arab sheikhs. Forget the opinion side. At least six members of the Post’s foreign desk previously wrote for Qatari state-run media outfit Al Jazeera, including the Middle East editor, Jesse Mesner-Hage.

Needless to say, the Post’s coverage of the Middle East in recent years was rife with disinformation, necessitating retractions and editor’s notes when they were caught — usually long after the damage was done..
 
I used to pay for The Washington Post digital version. There was a story about how few blacks were in professional and mangegerial positions in high tech firms.

In a comment I pointed out that the average black IQ is 85, and the average white IQ is 100. I added that consequently few blacks have the intelligence for professional and managerial positions.

The Washington Post blocked me from posting any more comments.
 
In a comment I pointed out that the average black IQ is 85, and the average white IQ is 100. I added that consequently few blacks have the intelligence for professional and managerial positions.

The Washington Post blocked me from posting any more comments.

As well they should have.
 
I used to pay for The Washington Post digital version. There was a story about how few blacks were in professional and mangegerial positions in high tech firms.

In a comment I pointed out that the average black IQ is 85, and the average white IQ is 100. I added that consequently few blacks have the intelligence for professional and managerial positions.

The Washington Post blocked me from posting any more comments.
Research has shown that average IQ levels vary from one ethnic group to another.
 
Research has shown that average IQ levels vary from one ethnic group to another.
Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average with 115. East Asians come next with 106. White Gentiless tip the scales with 100. Hispanics are about 89. Blacks have 85. These are averages and tendencies, not absolute differences. Once I read about a Nigerian immigrant in England who scored 162 on an IQ test. That gives him two more points than Bill Gates. That happens, but it is so rare as to be statistically insignificant.
 
This just a recap of what WaPo has been doing in recent years.

I know, but I really blame the government more than WaPo, they are only doing what they are allowed to get away with. The 1st Amendment guarantees the freedom of the Press, but that was under the assumption that the Press' job would be as a watchdog over government to hold their feet to the fire, it was never expected nor intended they be taken over by partisans of one political party to spread lies to effect political outcomes. In effect, the Press has become the OPPOSITE of what the Founders intended, to instead of calling out any efforts by the government to silence criticism (which it still did anyway under Biden and Obumma), the government now USES the media as its proxy to silence its opponents through lies and misinformation. Same thing just done differently. Had the government been on its toes and uncorrupted, it would have snipped this behavior long ago.
  1. For instance, requiring anything not overtly FACTUAL (pure reporting of happenings) to be clearly labelled as just someone's OPINIONS.
  2. Just the other night, I watched a little news on PBS and the lady made reference to the 2020 election, and mentioned Trump or someone saying how it was rigged, but instead, the lady claimed that Trump had FALSELY claimed the election rigged.
Falsely? What is the source of her proof? WHO proved that 2020 was NOT rigged? Fact is, there is no proof. Proof of the rigging is as spotty and circumstantial as are claims it was 100% legit. So, the reporter has no basis upon which to label Trump's assertion as False. At best, the honest and fair thing to say is that the claim of rigging is hotly debated, remains disputed or is disagreed with by many, but she lied saying the claim was FALSE, as if there had been some formal fact-based ruling on the matter. To be sure, the whole matter of the 2020 election was swerpt under the rug quickly and all questions and doubts were immediately clamped down on and suppressed, then J6 conveniently came along right after that and was used as an immediate diversion to never go back and consider the legality of the 2020 election ever again.
 
That is because they cannot defend their opinions from relevant challenges.
Democrats have a history of refusing to even debate issues they themselves cannot defend.

Youtube

WATCH: Ilhan Omar Refuses to Answer $9B Minnesota Fraud Questions​

 
15th post
Is Pete Buttiplug posting here?
The entire left are butt plugs.

1778115189440.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom