Want ONE simple law to help curb mass-shootings?

[g5000]

Hitler was not the first German anti-semite. It was a big movement long before he came along. And the mass murder of Jews was quite common up to that point in time.

So, yes, I think they knew exactly where they were headed.

Just as I think, if given the chance, a lot of the Gnu Right on this forum would go along with gassing Muslims, gays, and Mexicans.

All it will take is one more big domestic terror attack.

Wrong......they had no idea that they were going to be mass murdered...they had always been persecuted and attacked and forced out of countries...but the German people never saw this coming.

The ones who murdered peole with poison gas were left wing socialists asshole...your ideological brothers....

Sorry, but Nazis were and are right wing. It takes a very special kind of retard to think otherwise.

HONK IF YOU LOVE OBAMA!

It takes a very special kind of retard to think otherwise.

Tell that to this Nobel Prize winning Economist who said the nazis were socialists....

Friedrich Hayek - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nazism is Socialism

The persecution of the Marxists, and of democrats in general, tends to obscure the fundamental fact that National "Socialism" is a genuine socialist movement, whose leading ideas are the final fruit of the anti-liberal tendencies which have been steadily gaining ground in Germany since the later part of the Bismarckian era, and which led the majority of the German intelligentsia first to "socialism of the chair" and later to Marxism in its social-democratic or communist form.

Socialists? Yes.

Left wing? No.

Dumbass.

Dumb fuck...socialism is left wing.....moron.

National Socialism is not. Moron. The evidence is right in front of your face, and you are willfully blinding yourself to it, because then you would have to admit it is leaking through into the Gnu Right's rhetoric.

 

[nat4900]

No, the nazis were left wing socialists....you can't lie about that anymore......

Where most idiots try to hide their stupidity, 2morons FLAUNTS it:

Hitler and the Nazis outlawed socialism, and executed socialists and communists en masse, even before they started rounding up Jews. In 1933, the Dachau concentration camp held socialists and leftists exclusively. The Nazis arrested more than 11,000 Germans for "illegal socialist activity" in 1936.

 

[nat4900]

So if we enacted ALL of their legislation on the table, we would still have mass shootings. At that point, instead of admitting they were retards for thinking that would stop mass shootings,

Moronic.......From the O/P I stated that NOTHING short of revising the Constitution's greatest flaw (the 2nd amendment) would stop mass murdering.

My intent was and is to CURB the slaughtering and massacres.

 

[nat4900]

Unlike you, I don't wear panties. But no, I use a holster like most sensible men do and wear it at about 4 o'clock.

FTR I do co-own a gun store and I am quite knowledgeable on a variety of firearms.

What a hero !!!!! LOL

 

[HUGGY]

Actually, we should always follow what lobbyists push (aka, BRIBE) congress to do (and in some instance, NOT to do) when searching for legislation to curb an abuse of the common welfare and good.

Regarding mass murders, we know that gun manufacturers (and their bought puppet, the NRA) fought and won the right to NOT be sued for the misuse of their deadly products.

If we wanted to make a substantial dent with mass shootings (almost impossible to eliminate without reversing the Constitution's 2nd amendment) pass a law that gun manufacturers AND gun vendors can be sued when their product is sold WITHOUT a thorough background and psychological clean bill of health.

Less than 20 people die in the U S A from these types of "mass shootings". Almost twice that number die from lightning.

Passing sweeping laws that only MIGHT THEORETICALLY protect a handful of people per year and endanger a constitutional right is idiotic.

Funny how these proposed laws come just right after the media gets it's pound of flesh and gold from publicizing the HORROR!!!

If it BLEEDS...It LEADS!!!

You people are saps. The TV has turned you into simpletons. I'll tell you how to prevent the horror of these infrequent events from affecting your daily lives.

TURN OFF YOUR TV AND LEAVE IT OFF.

You are simply not capable of dealing with occasional bad news.

11 essential facts about guns and mass shootings in America

Lightning strike - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Unlike you, I don't wear panties. But no, I use a holster like most sensible men do and wear it at about 4 o'clock.

FTR I do co-own a gun store and I am quite knowledgeable on a variety of firearms.

What a hero !!!!! LOL

Being honest doesn't make one a hero, you should give it a try sometime.

 

[Avatar4321]

And if you sell your car to some clown who later drives drunk and kills someone, the victim's family should be able to sue YOU for millions in damages, right???

Pretty dumb response (as always)......Name another manufacturer...beside gun ones......who CANNOT be sued by consumers?

Any one that isn't responsible for the damages.

And if you don't think his analogy is spot on you need to go back to school.

 

[nat4900]

Any one that isn't responsible for the damages.

And if you don't think his analogy is spot on you need to go back to school.

Morons need to support other morons.....otherwise you'd feel lonely.

 

[nat4900]

Less than 20 people die in the U S A from these types of "mass shootings". Almost twice that number die from lightning.

WOW.....then the mass murders in Newtown with 26 victims 20 of which were UNDER 8 years old was a "record-breaker"?????

The fact that many die from lightning should make those parents in Newtown feel a bit better?

 

[Avatar4321]

So you want to give these manufacturers and vendors access to your life history, including all medical records? What if they decide that women who have had an abortion is not responsible enough to own a gun?

Yeah, really "brilliant"...now we are concerned about gun manufacturers NOT selling enough guns?

I don't say this lightly. You're stupid. Stop pretending you have any ability to reason and take some logic and persuasion classes

 

[Avatar4321]

Any one that isn't responsible for the damages.

And if you don't think his analogy is spot on you need to go back to school.

Morons need to support other morons.....otherwise you'd feel lonely.

Actually, no. You could easily stop supporting the left and start making choices in your life that are informed. The fact that you support morons and remain one is totally up to you.

 

[nat4900]

Passing sweeping laws that only MIGHT THEORETICALLY protect a handful of people per year and endanger a constitutional right is idiotic.

From your own link:

8. States with stricter gun control laws have fewer deaths from gun-related violence.

 

[Avatar4321]

So you want to give these manufacturers and vendors access to your life history, including all medical records? What if they decide that women who have had an abortion is not responsible enough to own a gun?

Yeah, really "brilliant"...now we are concerned about gun manufacturers NOT selling enough guns?

Answer my questions.

You're showing your stupidity instead of trying to hide it......ABORTION IS LEGAL....Gun manufacturers (who now, according to you are concerned about fetuses but don't mind when babies are killed by an assault weapon) could NOT refuse a woman who had an abortion because abortion is NOT a crime.

Why do I even bother answering idiots?

People can and should be able to refuse business to anyone they choose because of the first amendment. We have the right to associate or not associate with whomever we choose. No one can force someone to sell them a gun.

 

[Avatar4321]

Gun manufacturers can still be sued for selling defective product, fraud, etc.,,, just like every other manufacturer in the country, your assertion relative to this law is clearly false.

There comes a time when you need to just admit you're wrong and that time has come for you in thread...

Have you even remotely "wondered" WHY a special law had to be passed JUST for gun manufacturers????

Because idiots want to extort money from gun manufacturers by suing them for the bad actions of others.

Not exactly rocket science.

 

[nat4900]

Basically right wingers on this thread are just fine with the carnage that goes on every single month with mass murders of children and innocent adults.....

Guns MUST be sold to whomever and whenever possible....Everyone should be armed, state the dimwitted, gun loving, idiots.

The fact that even babies get slaughtered is the PRICE for the right to choose to carry whatever weapon one may wish (notice that I used the phrase "right to choose"???)

So, ANY proposal to CURB the carnage will be labeled Anti-American, right?

 

[Avatar4321]

Unfortunately, the technology is still pretty lame on fingerprint security for gun users. If technology could work out the bugs and make it at least 97% fail safe, it could be one alternative.
Intelligun - Fingerprint security - The Firearm Blog

You need your gun,.
Your gun goes down,.
Your wife has a gun but you do not have her fingerprints.
What then?

Have your own back-up weapon........duh!!!

Intelligun will never be anything but a conversation piece.

Reliable biometrics with guns is still in the early stages. When it is worked out, and it will be, should be the way to go.

So much for partners, good Samaritans, team members, etc. being able to use your firearm to end a threat should you become incapacitated. Indeed, imagine you finding your wife being raped, you unarmed, her handgun sitting there on the floor....useless to you because it only works in her hand.

That's when you break the perpetrators neck with your bare hands.

 

[HUGGY]

Less than 20 people die in the U S A from these types of "mass shootings". Almost twice that number die from lightning.

WOW.....then the mass murders in Newtown with 26 victims 20 of which were UNDER 8 years old was a "record-breaker"?????

The fact that many die from lightning should make those parents in Newtown feel a bit better?

I don't want to change the U S Constitution to make those few parents feel better.

ALL surviving parents of dead children feel horrible. That includes the THOUSANDS of parents of children that die every year in car crashes.

Why is a death by bullet more horrible than one in a twisted smashed up car frame?

How do you know that what little you can do with legislation is going to make it safer for children or young adults in school.

If you are so mind fucked about the children at Sandy Hook keep in mind that if we are talking about GRADE SCHOOL children there have been less than ONE a year over the last thirty years.

How many GRADE SCHOOL children have been killed in school playgrounds?

Don't their deaths matter as much as the kids at Sandy Hook?

Don't THEIR parents feelings matter?

The TRUTH is that it is EASY to make a gunshot death SOUND horrible. It sells TV advertising. You people watch it over and over as if with every viewing it happened all over again.

Grow up. Dying is part of living. If you live long enough your feelings will be hurt because of someone else dying. It won't matter ANY more to lose someone from a gun shot than from a CANCER.

 

[nat4900]

Because idiots want to extort money from gun manufacturers by suing them for the bad actions of others.

Not exactly rocket science.

A few more brain cells to add to your half brain, and you TOO would realize what an idiot you must be in stating the above.....But, don't worry, your precious gun manufacturers made sure to pass a law JUST to protect them by bribing congress to do their bidding.....Nice, right?

 

[2aguy]

Passing sweeping laws that only MIGHT THEORETICALLY protect a handful of people per year and endanger a constitutional right is idiotic.

From your own link:

8. States with stricter gun control laws have fewer deaths from gun-related violence.

sorry, these maps have been shown to be a lie....they use suicide to increase their homicide numbers...

gun murders in the United States have gone down again as more Americans own and carry guns for self defense.

total number of accidental deaths of children 14 and under by gunin 2013....69.

In a country of over 320 million people with 12.8 million people carrying guns for self defense.

 

[nat4900]

Why is a death by bullet more horrible than one in a twisted smashed up car frame?

I'll let others judge your moronic "rationale"......