Want ONE simple law to help curb mass-shootings?

And if you sell your car to some clown who later drives drunk and kills someone, the victim's family should be able to sue YOU for millions in damages, right???

Pretty dumb response (as always)......Name another manufacturer...beside gun ones......who CANNOT be sued by consumers?

No, it was a very appropriate and relevant response to your asinine idea, which by the way, would never get passed into law.
 
Just about every hammer, knife, 2x4 manufacturer. Need more names?


More stupid than usual response (not an easy task for you...but, congrats)

When was the last time you heard of mass-murders....like the babies in Newtown...committed with a hammer?


Gasoline…more than a few people have been killed by arsonists…..did they sue the oil company?

Don't give them ideas. They hate oil as much as guns
 
Basically right wingers on this thread are just fine with the carnage that goes on every single month with mass murders of children and innocent adults.....

Guns MUST be sold to whomever and whenever possible....Everyone should be armed, state the dimwitted, gun loving, idiots.

The fact that even babies get slaughtered is the PRICE for the right to choose to carry whatever weapon one may wish (notice that I used the phrase "right to choose"???)

So, ANY proposal to CURB the carnage will be labeled Anti-American, right?


No moron...we aren't ....but you guys have made gun free zones in all of our schools...so good people can't stop these nuts.....

and we know that guns are used at least 1.5 million times a year, according to bill clinton, to stop violent criminal attack........

Mass shooting deaths....less than 75 on a really bad year.....
 
If you are so mind fucked about the children at Sandy Hook keep in mind that if we are talking about GRADE SCHOOL children there have been less than ONE a year over the last thirty years.

Sure.......and we can always "comfort those parents of kids that were ripped apart in 20 or more pieces at Sandy Hook......"....hey, your kids would probably be dead in 80 years or so anyway..."

What a scum bucket !!!
 
And if you sell your car to some clown who later drives drunk and kills someone, the victim's family should be able to sue YOU for millions in damages, right???

Nope. Liability works best when it starts with the proximate cause of the harm, i.e., the driver, or, by analogy, the shooter.

Since guns like cars have the uniquely high potential to cause death to others, they both should carry similar liability insurance.

In order to operate a car, you need a minimum level of liability insurance. This lets the market - not government - play the primary role in determining who can drive or shoot a fire arm. And don't tell me that no limits can be placed on gun ownership, because prisoners are not allowed to possess weapons in their cell. There are plenty of instances where your right to use a gun is outweighed by other factors.

Listen son. Insurance companies weigh many factors when providing auto insurance. They consider age, driving history, etc. Same for owning a gun. The insurance companies could weigh medical history (mental illness), etc., before determining the correct cost for a given individual's insurance. And if you can't get insurance because you robbed one too many liquor stores at gunpoint, than your beef is with the market.
So, your for legalized extortion of the second admendment??
 
Passing sweeping laws that only MIGHT THEORETICALLY protect a handful of people per year and endanger a constitutional right is idiotic.

From your own link:

8. States with stricter gun control laws have fewer deaths from gun-related violence.
preventionEDIT.jpg

So what? A handful fewer deaths by one reason or another DOES NOT MATTER. People DIE! Get used to it.
 
If you are so mind fucked about the children at Sandy Hook keep in mind that if we are talking about GRADE SCHOOL children there have been less than ONE a year over the last thirty years.

Sure.......and we can always "comfort those parents of kids that were ripped apart in 20 or more pieces at Sandy Hook......"....hey, your kids would probably be dead in 80 years or so anyway..."

What a scum bucket !!!

What a naive pussy!
 
Gasoline…more than a few people have been killed by arsonists…..did they sue the oil company?

Yet another, dumb straw man 'argument"......How's about suing schools for spewing out imbeciles like you?

You so don't know what a straw man is. nor what an analogy is.

Just because you can't counter your stupid reasoning being completely destroyed doesn't make it a straw man.
 
If you are so mind fucked about the children at Sandy Hook keep in mind that if we are talking about GRADE SCHOOL children there have been less than ONE a year over the last thirty years.

Sure.......and we can always "comfort those parents of kids that were ripped apart in 20 or more pieces at Sandy Hook......"....hey, your kids would probably be dead in 80 years or so anyway..."

What a scum bucket !!!

What a naive pussy!

If huggy is agreeing with the right on this you are way off the reservation Nat.
 
It isn't solely for the use of soldiers. In fact, it is barely passable for that purpose, it is again a poor quality rifle for that purpose…of course you don't realize that because you are an ignorant gun grabber. And the 2nd Amendment specifically protects all military rifles since they are need to deal with the government.


Hey MORON, the suit is about whether a WAR-gun should be sold to insane idiots....like you and your ilk.
You don't have any idea the difference between a so called "WAR-gun" and any other firearm... Because there is no difference.
Please educate yourself you inbred yuppie...
 
Which is not "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting"
Thank you for admitting your lie.


Reading comprehension issues???????

Look, I don't give a flying fuck if most of you right wingers walk around with guns up your rectum to compensate for your other flaws.

Go on and keep the massacres coming.....while bitching about abortions..

You really shouldn't be accusing others of reading comprehension issues.
 
Another example of an anti-gun loon arguing from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.


Not to interfere with your stupidity.....but

The families [of those BABIES in Newtown, CT] filed suit against the manufacturer of the gun Lanza used, a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, as well as the shop that sold the gun. In their complaint, they accused the maker and seller of choosing “to disregard the unreasonable risks the rifle posed outside of specialized, highly regulated institutions like the armed forces and law enforcement.”
The most frivolous type of lawsuits...
 
There is ONE and only ONE way to stop mass shooters: Ban and confiscate all guns.

Not gonna happen.

Even that won't stop mass shooting. Some killers can use a bow.
 
Actually, we should always follow what lobbyists push (aka, BRIBE) congress to do (and in some instance, NOT to do) when searching for legislation to curb an abuse of the common welfare and good.

Regarding mass murders, we know that gun manufacturers (and their bought puppet, the NRA) fought and won the right to NOT be sued for the misuse of their deadly products.

If we wanted to make a substantial dent with mass shootings (almost impossible to eliminate without reversing the Constitution's 2nd amendment) pass a law that gun manufacturers AND gun vendors can be sued when their product is sold WITHOUT a thorough background and psychological clean bill of health.
And if you sell your car to some clown who later drives drunk and kills someone, the victim's family should be able to sue YOU for millions in damages, right???

Except cars are for driving and guns are for killing.

Which means it makes even less sense to sue a gun manufacturer for designing a product that does what it was intended to do.
 
There is ONE and only ONE way to stop mass shooters: Ban and confiscate all guns.

Not gonna happen.
That didn't work for Australia... Look it up.
 
Guns are made to save the life of the user moron. And it doesn't matter if gasoline is made to decorate cakes...it is still used in mass murder so according to your stupid thread the oil companies should be sued..and the knife company as well....


Forums like this are NOT for educating complete imbeciles like you...So, stay as dumb as you are now ......I really don't give a fuck.

In order to educate someone you need to understand something they don't
 
And if you sell your car to some clown who later drives drunk and kills someone, the victim's family should be able to sue YOU for millions in damages, right???

Pretty dumb response (as always)......Name another manufacturer...beside gun ones......who CANNOT be sued by consumers?
Gun manufacturers can most CERTAINLY be sued by consumers.

You are just making this shit up from nothing.
 
If you are so mind fucked about the children at Sandy Hook keep in mind that if we are talking about GRADE SCHOOL children there have been less than ONE a year over the last thirty years.

Sure.......and we can always "comfort those parents of kids that were ripped apart in 20 or more pieces at Sandy Hook......"....hey, your kids would probably be dead in 80 years or so anyway..."

What a scum bucket !!!

What a naive pussy!

If huggy is agreeing with the right on this you are way off the reservation Nat.

Just because I don't believe in any god including yours does not mean I don't have truly conservative political leanings.

Dwight David Eisenhower was responsible for killing many thousands of Germans with guns and bombs and hand to hand with bayonets.

It is sad for EVERYONE when someone dies ahead of their time. EVEN when a murderer gets shot and killed his or her parents cry.

Do we really want to make new laws just because it is in the news THIS WEEK?

That is one of MY tenants of being essentially CONSERVATIVE. I don't let myself get jerked around by what is on the news today or even as FAR AWAY as last week.

It IS one of the less admirable traits of a true liberal to be whipped around by today's headlines.
 
There is ONE and only ONE way to stop mass shooters: Ban and confiscate all guns.

Not gonna happen.


How is that going to solve anything..they banned guns in Britain and Australia...last week in Britain a 19 year old was going to shoot up his university with a gun, bullets and pipe bombs he got on the dark web. Also last week, in Australia where they confiscated their guns a 15 year old immigrant murdered a police officer with a gun.

Guns are a way for bad guys to exert power...they will always get them.
Neither Australia nor Britain have anywhere near the rate of mass shootings we do.
Who cares? Those countries have much different populations, cultures, economic systems, founding documents, political systems, diversity and history... So that argument is irrelevant should net even be brought up.

White people left Europe 200+ years ago for all the right reasons...
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom