Want ONE simple law to help curb mass-shootings?

[M14 Shooter]

Hey MORON, the suit is about whether a WAR-gun should be sold to insane idiots....like you and your ilk.

More lies.

 

[nat4900]

Gasoline…more than a few people have been killed by arsonists…..did they sue the oil company?

Yet another, dumb straw man 'argument"......How's about suing schools for spewing out imbeciles like you?

 

[nat4900]

Another example of an anti-gun loon arguing from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

Should we wait until the law suit is adjudicated?

 

[nat4900]

Another example of an anti-gun loon arguing from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

Not to interfere with your stupidity.....but

The families [of those BABIES in Newtown, CT] filed suit against the manufacturer of the gun Lanza used, a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, as well as the shop that sold the gun. In their complaint, they accused the maker and seller of choosing “to disregard the unreasonable risks the rifle posed outside of specialized, highly regulated institutions like the armed forces and law enforcement.”

 

[M14 Shooter]

Another example of an anti-gun loon arguing from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

Should we wait until the law suit is adjudicated?

For what?
To determine your claim of "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting" is a lie?
No need. It's a lie.

 

[nat4900]

Failed. Just like the Colorado families who tried to sue the ammo manufacturers for the Colorado shooter.

I bet that the decision gave you some form of sexual gratification.

 

[nat4900]

For what?
To determine your claim of "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting" is a lie?
No need. It's a lie.

AGAIN......The families filed suit against the manufacturer of the gun Lanza used, a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, as well as the shop that sold the gun. In their complaint, they accused the maker and seller of choosing “to disregard the unreasonable risks the rifle posed outside of specialized, highly regulated institutions like the armed forces and law enforcement.”

 

[M14 Shooter]

The families filed suit against the manufacturer of the gun Lanza used, a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle,...

Which is not "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting"
Thank you for admitting your lie.

 

[M14 Shooter]

For what?
To determine your claim of "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting" is a lie?
No need. It's a lie.

AGAIN......The families filed suit against the manufacturer of the gun Lanza used, a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle,

Which is not "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting"
Thank you for admitting your lie.

 

[nat4900]

Which is not "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting"
Thank you for admitting your lie.

Reading comprehension issues???????

Look, I don't give a flying fuck if most of you right wingers walk around with guns up your rectum to compensate for your other flaws.

Go on and keep the massacres coming.....while bitching about abortions..

 

[M14 Shooter]

Which is not "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting"
Thank you for admitting your lie.

Reading comprehension issues???????

None whatsoever
The Bushmaster AR-15 (or any other AR-15) is not "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting," as per your claim.
Thus, you lied.
Several times.
At the top of your lungs.

 

[OKTexas]

I asked two questions, where's the answer to the other?

You're kidding, right?

No I'm not, you give them the responsibility to make these decisions, how can you deny them the information required to make them? Also you want to tell them who they can and can't deny based on your victim classes, but you still want to hold them responsible if one of your victims misuses their product. You can't have it both ways, if you give them the responsibility, you have to give them unfettered power and access to make those decisions how THEY see fit. Not so comfortable with it when it comes out of the hypothetical, are ya?

Where did ya go baby, got no response?

 

[2aguy]

It isn't solely for the use of soldiers. In fact, it is barely passable for that purpose, it is again a poor quality rifle for that purpose…of course you don't realize that because you are an ignorant gun grabber. And the 2nd Amendment specifically protects all military rifles since they are need to deal with the government.

Hey MORON, the suit is about whether a WAR-gun should be sold to insane idiots....like you and your ilk.

It is not a War gun...it isn't suitable for war...that it is used for war is a problem with government contracts. Moron.

And if the U.S. military can have it...then it is a weapon that citizens should have complete access to....we are not their subjects or their servants moron....they work for us, they don't rule over us. Now is a great time for that photo of Schindlers list......

 

[2aguy]

Gasoline…more than a few people have been killed by arsonists…..did they sue the oil company?

Yet another, dumb straw man 'argument"......How's about suing schools for spewing out imbeciles like you?

How is that any different asshole. In Australia, their greatest mass murders happen with gasoline...they have arsonists who murder people with gasoline...so according to your stupid post, that means the oil company that sold the gas is also responsible for the deaths of those people...right moron.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Intelligun will never be anything but a conversation piece.

Reliable biometrics with guns is still in the early stages. When it is worked out, and it will be, should be the way to go.

Intelligun isn't biometric.

I have a biometric safe and it takes about three tries before I can successfully swipe my finger to open it. If it was a gun and needed in a split second, I'd been dead.

It's good idea, just not practical and no one would rely on it to save their life.

As for intelligun, did you know if the battery goes dead, your gun locks up. it essentially becomes a club.

I never advocated using intelligun because it is below the curve in reliability. All I am suggesting is that if and when biometrics becomes reliable, it could be a viable alternative to putting gun control into the hands of big Gov't.

I understand you're banking on "ifs". I deal in reality. In reality, biometrics are not 100% reliable. I would never have a gun for defense that was anything less than 100% reliable. What needs to be done is get big Gov't to stop stepping on our God given rights.

The best gun control advice is, use both hands.

Good advice if you're living in Juarez, MX. All I can say, is that the kind of country you want to live in? Because, in enough of our cities, we are almost there.

It's good advice any where in the world. To think that you're totally safe all the time is naïve.

 

[2aguy]

Which is not "a weapon that was SOLELY intended to be used by soldiers in a war setting"
Thank you for admitting your lie.

Reading comprehension issues???????

Look, I don't give a flying fuck if most of you right wingers walk around with guns up your rectum to compensate for your other flaws.

Go on and keep the massacres coming.....while bitching about abortions..

It is you assholes that let the massacres happen, you force the good guys to be unarmed and slaughtered by the monsters your entertainment industry helped to create.

 

[g5000]

There is ONE and only ONE way to stop mass shooters: Ban and confiscate all guns.

Not gonna happen.

 

[2aguy]

There is ONE and only ONE way to stop mass shooters: Ban and confiscate all guns.

Not gonna happen.

How is that going to solve anything..they banned guns in Britain and Australia...last week in Britain a 19 year old was going to shoot up his university with a gun, bullets and pipe bombs he got on the dark web. Also last week, in Australia where they confiscated their guns a 15 year old immigrant murdered a police officer with a gun.

Guns are a way for bad guys to exert power...they will always get them.

 

[2aguy]

So according to this stupid thread, the oil companies need to be held accountable for the arson deaths of these people and the knife company for the stabbing death of these 8 children..right?

List of massacres in Australia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arsonattack by Robert Paul Long, which killed 15 international backpackers

Sue the oil company.

Arsonattack by Brendan Sokaluk that killed 10 people, during the Black Saturday bushfires period

Sue the oil company.

Arsonattack by Roger Kingsley Dean, a nurse, which killed 11 people

Sue the oil company.

Stabbingattack. 8 children aged 18 months to 15 years killed. Thirty-seven-year-old woman also found injured. The woman, Raina Mersane Ina Thaiday, was later charged with the murder of the children, 7 of whom were hers, plus her niece.[8]

Sue the knife company........

Right....since they provided the tool, 3rd party to the killers...right? You are such a moron.

 

[g5000]

There is ONE and only ONE way to stop mass shooters: Ban and confiscate all guns.

Not gonna happen.

How is that going to solve anything..they banned guns in Britain and Australia...last week in Britain a 19 year old was going to shoot up his university with a gun, bullets and pipe bombs he got on the dark web. Also last week, in Australia where they confiscated their guns a 15 year old immigrant murdered a police officer with a gun.

Guns are a way for bad guys to exert power...they will always get them.

Neither Australia nor Britain have anywhere near the rate of mass shootings we do.