Want ONE simple law to help curb mass-shootings?

Well, right wingers.....You should be proud of your contributions to this thread..

You've admitted that you have NO ideas on how to stop the carnage which is UNIQUE to this country (American "exceptional-ism", right?)

You have shown your abject stupidity when you state that if one is against the very loose practices that anyone can own a gun......then one must be "defending" the murderers.

...and you have shown that you rather protect gun manufacturers (who fund more than 50% of the NRA budget) than defending those babies in Newtown (and, according, to the illustrious Ben Carson, those 7 year old should "have rushed the gunman")
And all you can do is lie.
Huh.
 
And finally--as usual--a pathological denial of reality.
What....EXACTLY....was "delusional" about that statement?
The NRA DOES get 50% (or more) of its budget from gun manufacturers -FACT
Another lie.
Ben Carson DOES urge victims to attack the shooter=FACT
Of course he does -- in the situation presented, his is the only sound course of action.
 
You consider pounding you with facts 'bullying'?
The only "facts" you've contributed to this thread came out of your rectum.
Come up with ONE.....just one.....proposal from the right that does NOT include arming every single American with assault weapons........
Straw, man - you know you cannot show that anyone has proposed " arming every single American with assault weapons"
 
Your entire argument for gun control is delusional.
Inane response...as expected from a moral-less right winger.....
ALL manufacturers CAN be sued for producing dangerous and hazardous products.
No manufacturer can be sued for the intentional criminal misuse of his product after said product was illegally acquired by the perpetrator(s) of said crime..
Not one.
 
No one on the right has recommended arming every single American with assault weapons, that's another 'fact' you pulled out of your ass.

Arming school employees, having armed guards around schools, increasing access to mental health records for background checks. (yes, moron, and that was suggested by the NRA).

Need more, or has your head exploded?
Well, thank the NRA for THAT great suggestion of making schools into armed compounds...
Another lie.
 
Inane response? No, it's a accurate description as well as an intelligent opinion.
Do knife manufactures get sued when one of the products is used in a murder?
You are as delusional as it gets.
IDIOT....knives are NOT manufactured to be used as WEAPONS.......Conversely, assault rifles certainly are !!!

Irrelevant.
No manufacturer can be sued for the intentional criminal misuse of his product after said product was illegally acquired by the perpetrator(s) of said crime..
Not one.
 
The NRA doesn't make a dime from gun sales
How STUPID........Check out the NRA own budget and even an idiot.....like you....would see that the NRA is almost wholly OWNED by gun manufacturers who funnel tons of money to AVOID ANY restrictions or LIABILITY for manufacturing lethal weapons.
Another lie.
 
The NRA doesn't make a dime from gun sales.

Since 2005, the gun industry and its corporate allies have given between $20 million and $52.6 million to it through the NRA Ring of Freedom sponsor program. Donors include firearm companies like Midway USA, Springfield Armory Inc, Pierce Bullet Seal Target Systems, and Beretta USA Corporation. Other supporters from the gun industry include Cabala's, Sturm Rugar & Co, and Smith & Wesson.

The NRA also made
$20.9 million — about 10 percent of its revenue — from selling advertising to industry companies marketing products in its many publications in 2010, according to the IRS Form 990.
Nothing here proves your claim.
Of course, your claim, being false, cannot be proven so...
 
bd-gun-nuts.jpg


So…the only one in that room that had a gun was the murderer…everyone else was completely unarmed…..for the anti gun extremists out there that means they didn't have a gun……..

And your solution is to not allow the good people to have a gun to stop the bad guy who is murdering them.

you guys are fucked in the head.
 
more guns we need more guns ...we desperately need guns...Only More Guns can solve the problem of frequent periodic gun slaughters ...we need more guns ...we need every Black American with a gun
 
No reason to believe such law would do any such thing. Very likely unconstitutional. And would create far more problems than any possible benefit. In short: FAIL.


Yet another nitwit chimes in.......

A SPECIAL law was passed just to protect gun manufacturers from liability...
WHY was that?

An industry does NOT bribe congress to protect them UNLESS they know that they are peddling death.
 
No reason to believe such law would do any such thing. Very likely unconstitutional. And would create far more problems than any possible benefit. In short: FAIL.


Yet another nitwit chimes in.......

A SPECIAL law was passed just to protect gun manufacturers from liability...
WHY was that?

An industry does NOT bribe congress to protect them UNLESS they know that they are peddling death.

Stop beating a dead horse. You lost this debate 14 pages ago.
 
And your solution is to not allow the good people to have a gun to stop the bad guy who is murdering them.

you guys are fucked in the head.


Great scenario you created to boost your half brain into thinking you're correct. What a scum bag.
 
Stop beating a dead horse. You lost this debate 14 pages ago.


I posed a POSSIBLE solution to curb the carnage......YOU, on the other hand want te killings to continue....as long as it is not your own children, I guess.
 
And your solution is to not allow the good people to have a gun to stop the bad guy who is murdering them.

you guys are fucked in the head.


Great scenario you created to boost your half brain into thinking you're correct. What a scum bag.

That scenario is pretty much what happened in Oregon. It took a good guy with a gun to stop a bad guy with a gun.
 
No reason to believe such law would do any such thing. Very likely unconstitutional. And would create far more problems than any possible benefit. In short: FAIL.


Yet another nitwit chimes in.......

A SPECIAL law was passed just to protect gun manufacturers from liability...
WHY was that?

An industry does NOT bribe congress to protect them UNLESS they know that they are peddling death.


Because of retards like you….who would sue them for something they didn't do…….
 
No reason to believe such law would do any such thing. Very likely unconstitutional. And would create far more problems than any possible benefit. In short: FAIL.
Yet another nitwit chimes in.......
No manufacturer can be sued for the intentional criminal misuse of his product after said product was illegally acquired by the perpetrator(s) of said crime..
Not one.
 
Stop beating a dead horse. You lost this debate 14 pages ago.


I posed a POSSIBLE solution to curb the carnage......YOU, on the other hand want te killings to continue....as long as it is not your own children, I guess.

That's not a solution. How would being able to sue gun manufacturers stop idiots from killing people with guns?

Do you actually think they would stop and say "huh, I better not do this or Glock will be sued"?
 
Back
Top Bottom