Vote...are you for the USA attacking Iran or not?

[skye]

Thats why your not a leader

I don't want to be a leader, I just tell what I think

 

[Ringo]

 

[westwall]

An attack is contingent on us working with the resistance so they know it is coming, not exactly when, but in a time frame.

Get the Shah ready to become a caretaker and have him establish a Constitutional Monarchy.

A ban on theological parties might be needed for a decade or so to weed out the revanchists.

Removing the Mullahs and installing a free government would do wonders for stability in the region.

The entire WORLD

 

[Lockback]

I voted No but it's contingent upon one thing: if they're still building a nuclear threat, take it out.
Regime change? No. Let them figure it out (with some help from our CIA, of course).

 

[Thinker101]

Vote...are you for attacking Iran or not...


View attachment 1218802

Not for attacking Iran but may be necessary. Besides they are "south" of the equator.

 

[westwall]

I voted No but it's contingent upon one thing: if they're still building a nuclear threat, take it out.
Regime change? No. Let them figure it out (with some help from our CIA, of course).

I disagree. The best, most humane thing to do is destroy the IRGC and the mad mullahs, then the Iranian people can do exactly that.

Iran is a view of what the globalists want fir the world.

No number of people can overthrow a government that corrupt and willing to murder its way out of trouble.

You will stack the bodies a hundred feet high and the regime will still have enough bullets to keep killing.

Just like we needed help in our Revolution, so do they.

 

[Lockback]

I disagree. The best, most humane thing to do is destroy the IRGC and the mad mullahs, then the Iranian people can do exactly that.

Iran is a view of what the globalists want fir the world.

No number of people can overthrow a government that corrupt and willing to murder its way out of trouble.

You will stack the bodies a hundred feet high and the regime will still have enough bullets to keep killing.

Just like we needed help in our Revolution, so do they.

Well, you did a nice job of making some sense of it.

 

[Dorian Mode]

I understand all the emotional reasons for attacking Iran, but we should also ask why we have to do this unilaterally. Europe doesn't seem to give a shit, all Iran's neighbors don't give a shit, why should we? It makes me think the US hasn't learned anything from Iraq and Afghanistan. Whether we like it or not, we are no longer the world police and we can't afford to try and regain the title. It is foolish to spend money on something the world doesn't care about when we desperately need to work on America First. Trump should stop trying to please the warmongers and get back to pleasing the people and fixing our country.

 

[JWBooth]

**** no.
Iran hasn’t stolen any of my freedoms.
Iran didn’t run up $38 trillion in national debt.
Iran didn’t pass the Patriot Act to spy on Americans.
Iran didn’t pass the income tax.
Iran didn’t establish the IRS.

 

[westwall]

I voted no, sick and tired of wars.

Fight the fight now, and we won't have to fight on our soil, which is Iran's goal.

 

[JWBooth]

Fight the fight now, and we won't have to fight on our soil, which is Iran's goal.

That canard was sold to a credulous people twenty five years ago. It remains to be seen what the credulity level will be this time around. It was a lie then, and it is a lie now.

 

[MisterBeale]

What if they are needed to free people and save lives

If those people are not our people, not our problem.

I'm pretty sure this will cost more American lives, than the foreigners whose lives, "need saving."

 

[JWBooth]

If those people are not our people, not our problem.

I'm pretty sure this will cost more American lives, than the foreigners whose lives, "need saving."

You are right and those US lives will have voluntarily signed up to be cannon fodder for a bunch of ***** that’ll shed a crocodile tear or two over sacrificing them. It’ll never happen to me syndrome.
When it starts, I’m not gonna be angry at anybody but the fucksticks that sent them and retarded vermin that supported sending them. Neither having any skin in the game.

 

[Bleipriester]

Could be true, somehow. But then, the henchman was Trump, somehow.

 

[Oddball]

Fight the fight now, and we won't have to fight on our soil, which is Iran's goal.

 

[Hafar1014]

I understand all the emotional reasons for attacking Iran, but we should also ask why we have to do this unilaterally. Europe doesn't seem to give a shit, all Iran's neighbors don't give a shit, why should we? It makes me think the US hasn't learned anything from Iraq and Afghanistan. Whether we like it or not, we are no longer the world police and we can't afford to try and regain the title. It is foolish to spend money on something the world doesn't care about when we desperately need to work on America First. Trump should stop trying to please the warmongers and get back to pleasing the people and fixing our country.

Irans neighbors are all in on removing the regime. Iran plans to explode a nuke in Israel and New York if we allow them to keep building one. They can do it easily by smuggling them in a suitcase. The Iran Mullahs believe that after the apocalypse they will create with nukes, the great prophet will come and covert the world to Islam. You want to give them the chance to do it or we can stop them now

 

[westwall]

View attachment 1220991

Yeah, it might, but I am tired of Iranian funded terrorists attacking Americans throughout the world, and working on attacking us here in the US.

**** that, chop the head off of the snake.

And dickie boy wouldn't have wanted the war to ever stop. He would have wanted a never ending war that he could profit from.

I don't believe that Trump does. I think they are going to go in and eliminate every one of the evil fuckers they can find, then turn it over to the locals.

Persians are vastly different from the Bedouin's running the rest of the middle east.

Tehran was a great place to visit in the 1960's and early 70's.

 

[Ringo]

**** that, chop the head off of the snake.

You know, the US has already chopped off enough heads from Libya to Iraq, giving rise to ISIS and other delights of chaos and terrorism. Maybe that's enough?
Maybe it's time to admit that the US is incapable of improving anything in the world, since it only cares about corporate profits.

 

[westwall]

You know, the US has already chopped off enough heads from Libya to Iraq, giving rise to ISIS and other delights of chaos and terrorism. Maybe that's enough?
Maybe it's time to admit that the US is incapable of improving anything in the world, since it only cares about corporate profits.

No, no we haven't. Not really. The politicians never follow through on the military victories.

Read Charlie Wilson's War for an example of how the US government pissed away the victory in Afghanistan against the Soviets.

 

[JWBooth]

No, no we haven't. Not really. The politicians never follow through on the military victories.

Read Charlie Wilson's War for an example of how the US government pissed away the victory in Afghanistan against the Soviets.

Be the first on your block to sign yourself and your issue up to be the first to sacrifice yourselves in this war of choice or shut the **** up.