2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,988
- 52,279
- 2,290
Yes...the anti gunners lose one...
McAuliffe Surrenders, Restores Concealed Carry Reciprocity in Virginia
McAuliffe Surrenders, Restores Concealed Carry Reciprocity in Virginia
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So the Virginia GOP is as gutless as the national GOP is?Democrat carpetbagging politician McAuliffe also restored voting rights to ex convicts without consulting the senate or the house of delegates.
Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
sometimes, you know, context can be EVERYTHING?He is a communist douche bag.
Make it illegal to murder someone? That's stupid. They will murder them anyways if they really want to.Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
That is stupid. They got a piece of paper that says "you can't do it", huh? Yeah, that's gonna stop them. Why not go one step more and make it illegal to murder someone?
Well we all know such laws have zero impact on criminals, but to the law abiding citizen who just went through a nasty divorce, it sux.Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
That is stupid. They got a piece of paper that says "you can't do it", huh? Yeah, that's gonna stop them. Why not go one step more and make it illegal to murder someone?
What context are you speaking of? Could you be a bit more specific?sometimes, you know, context can be EVERYTHING?He is a communist douche bag.
Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
It's crazy that it had to be a concession. It seems like commonsense.Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
That is a major concession.
It's crazy that it had to be a concession. It seems like commonsense.Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
That is a major concession.
It's crazy that it had to be a concession. It seems like commonsense.Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
That is a major concession.
Protection from Abuse is sometimes abused in divorce proceedings.
You could easily see people denied their Rights for years, for little reason.
Protection Order, doesn't mean Guilty of a crime.
Whatever. It's irrelevant now.It's crazy that it had to be a concession. It seems like commonsense.Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
That is a major concession.
Protection from Abuse is sometimes abused in divorce proceedings.
You could easily see people denied their Rights for years, for little reason.
Protection Order, doesn't mean Guilty of a crime.
yepSeems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
That is a major concession.
Whatever. It's irrelevant now.It's crazy that it had to be a concession. It seems like commonsense.Seems like a good deal to me:
In exchange, Republicans will agree to a major concession: Anyone subject to a permanent protective order for a domestic violence offense will be prohibited from carrying a firearm for the two-year life of the order. The issue had been a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
That is a major concession.
Protection from Abuse is sometimes abused in divorce proceedings.
You could easily see people denied their Rights for years, for little reason.
Protection Order, doesn't mean Guilty of a crime.
Yes...the anti gunners lose one...
McAuliffe Surrenders, Restores Concealed Carry Reciprocity in Virginia