Video from ICE Officer who Rene Good tried to Run Down

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2021
Messages
26,551
Reaction score
23,161
Points
2,288
Location
Texas
I'm surprised this isn't a Thread Already.



I doubt she intended to kill the man. more likely she saw it as a game of chicken that sure was sure to win since the man she drove toward was so vulnerable. She was allegedly trained by an anti-Ice activist group. If so, they did a very poor job.

As happens so often with Democrats, she assumed that the armed person would not stand his ground. Her biggest mistake was not giving him a chance to get out of the way. By sprinting so quickly with her vehicle, he had no chance to avoid being hit.

Anyway, so much for the left "story of the century."
 
I'm surprised this isn't a Thread Already.



I doubt she intended to kill the man. more likely she saw it as a game of chicken that sure was sure to win since the man she drove toward was so vulnerable. She was allegedly trained by an anti-Ice activist group. If so, they did a very poor job.

As happens so often with Democrats, she assumed that the armed person would not stand his ground. Her biggest mistake was not giving him a chance to get out of the way. By sprinting so quickly with her vehicle, he had no chance to avoid being hit.

Anyway, so much for the left "story of the century."

1767990433165.webp
 
I'm surprised this isn't a Thread Already.



I doubt she intended to kill the man. more likely she saw it as a game of chicken that sure was sure to win since the man she drove toward was so vulnerable. She was allegedly trained by an anti-Ice activist group. If so, they did a very poor job.

As happens so often with Democrats, she assumed that the armed person would not stand his ground. Her biggest mistake was not giving him a chance to get out of the way. By sprinting so quickly with her vehicle, he had no chance to avoid being hit.

Anyway, so much for the left "story of the century."

Where was the gunfire? And why did he have his phone out recording?
 
Where was the gunfire? And why did he have his phone out recording?
I'm sure that he had it in his shirt pocket recording to protect himself from exactly these kind of false allegations.

It appears that his phone stopped recording on impact. Then, there were the gunshots so that there would not be a second time.

EDIT on a closer look, it did continue to record. I guess the poster above was correct that her car impacting his body made a louder noise on his cell phone than the gunshot.

"I"m not mad at you dude." Then tries to kill him.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised this isn't a Thread Already.



I doubt she intended to kill the man. more likely she saw it as a game of chicken that sure was sure to win since the man she drove toward was so vulnerable. She was allegedly trained by an anti-Ice activist group. If so, they did a very poor job.

As happens so often with Democrats, she assumed that the armed person would not stand his ground. Her biggest mistake was not giving him a chance to get out of the way. By sprinting so quickly with her vehicle, he had no chance to avoid being hit.

Anyway, so much for the left "story of the century."

I don't hear the shot. When did he shoot? So ICE agents don't have body cams on? Instead they record themselves with gopro's?

This video doesn't show shit. Why was he asking her to get out of the car? What did the lady do? OMG he murdered that woman? Now is when you attack them for being lesbians.

I guess it's okay because it's liberals in liberal cities. You notsees.
 
I don't hear the shot. When did he shoot? So ICE agents don't have body cams on? Instead they record themselves with gopro's?
Okay you don't hear the shot in that video. Does that make you think there was no shot?
This video doesn't show shit. Why was he asking her to get out of the car?
She had deliberately pulled her car across the lanes to block travel. She and her friends were being assholes by harassing law enforcement.

Should they have ignored that?
What did the lady do?
She tried to run over a federal law enforcement officer and struck him with her truck.
OMG he murdered that woman? Now is when you attack them for being lesbians.

I guess it's okay because it's liberals in liberal cities. You notsees.
You're the one bringing up her being a lesbian.
 
Okay you don't hear the shot in that video. Does that make you think there was no shot?

She had deliberately pulled her car across the lanes to block travel. She and her friends were being assholes by harassing law enforcement.

Should they have ignored that?

She tried to run over a federal law enforcement officer and struck him with her truck.

You're the one bringing up her being a lesbian.
I think the video you are showing me is not of the event where Ms. Good was shot. You're showing us a video of a previous event that happened to this officer in 2025

Here's what happened the other day

Good was trying to leave. Her red SUV was turning away. An agent approached the passenger side, phone in hand, moved toward the front of the vehicle, and fired four shots as the car pulled off. Good crashed moments later. She never made it home to her children.
And here’s what court records reveal.
Ross was previously involved in a violent 2025 arrest in Bloomington in which an agent was dragged by a fleeing suspect — an incident now being used to justify killing a woman who was not accused of any violent crime. Even then, the administration can’t keep its story straight: Vance claimed the agent suffered “33 stitches in his leg.” Court documents show the injuries were to Ross’s arms and hand.
Details matter when someone is dead.
Instead of accountability, we’re watching a full-scale federal defense campaign: misstatements, fearmongering, and character assassination of a woman who cannot defend herself. Good is branded a terrorist. Ross is framed as a hero. And local officials are warned to stand down.
 
I'm surprised this isn't a Thread Already.



I doubt she intended to kill the man. more likely she saw it as a game of chicken that sure was sure to win since the man she drove toward was so vulnerable. She was allegedly trained by an anti-Ice activist group. If so, they did a very poor job.

As happens so often with Democrats, she assumed that the armed person would not stand his ground. Her biggest mistake was not giving him a chance to get out of the way. By sprinting so quickly with her vehicle, he had no chance to avoid being hit.

Anyway, so much for the left "story of the century."

The car kept going even after she was shot so evidently he did have a chance to avoid it. Otherwise he would have been hit. However, with that said she obviously had no real concern for his safety and gambled with his safety. So I don't really condemn his action. This incident took place on a razors-edge between right and wrong for both parties.
 
I think the video you are showing me is not of the event where Ms. Good was shot. You're showing us a video of a previous event that happened to this officer in 2025

Here's what happened the other day

Good was trying to leave. Her red SUV was turning away. An agent approached the passenger side, phone in hand, moved toward the front of the vehicle, and fired four shots as the car pulled off. Good crashed moments later. She never made it home to her children.
And here’s what court records reveal.
Ross was previously involved in a violent 2025 arrest in Bloomington in which an agent was dragged by a fleeing suspect — an incident now being used to justify killing a woman who was not accused of any violent crime. Even then, the administration can’t keep its story straight: Vance claimed the agent suffered “33 stitches in his leg.” Court documents show the injuries were to Ross’s arms and hand.
Details matter when someone is dead.
Instead of accountability, we’re watching a full-scale federal defense campaign: misstatements, fearmongering, and character assassination of a woman who cannot defend herself. Good is branded a terrorist. Ross is framed as a hero. And local officials are warned to stand down.
Was it Good who tried to kill him both times?
 
15th post
The car kept going even after she was shot so evidently he did have a chance to avoid it. Otherwise he would have been hit. However, with that said she obviously had no real concern for his safety and gambled with his safety. So I don't really condemn his action. This incident took place on a razors-edge between right and wrong for both parties.
It's time to stop giving criminal acts committed by law enforcement the benefit of the doubt. This man was not in danger. The car kept going because she was unconscious and the car was turned on.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom