Video from ICE Officer who Rene Good tried to Run Down

[buttercup]

Except officers are specifically trained not to go in front of the vehicle in situations like these. You cannot execute someone for fleeing.

The officer had room to step out the way of the vehicle. If the officer has the ability to get out of the way of the car, and there is no justified reason they would have to think she posed a continued threat, then why shoot? If in that moment he was fearing for his life, wouldn't it make more sense to immediately get out of the way of the car that is turning away from him? why continue standing in front of the car while drawing his weapon? Usually the immediate threat is for things like if someone is posing a threat such as they have a knife and they keep walking towards you and ignoring your commands. In this case, whether he discharges his weapon or not makes no difference to the immediate threat. If he steps out of the way, the immediate threat is gone, if he stays his ground and discharges his weapon, it makes no difference to his immediate safety. In both cases, it does nothing to stop whatever actual threat he is facing, and in both cases, once the car is past him, any immediate threat is gone.

And why on earth is this been classified as serious enough to class Good a domestic terrorist? And why is the President saying that Good violenty, willfully and viciously ran over the ICE Officer? And that's it's hard to believe that the ICE officer is alive? Do you think it's weird that the administration is pushing such an unhinged narrative?

I don't want to state a firm conclusion...since none of us are omniscient, we can't say we know for sure what was going on in either of their minds.

But in the recent clip with audio, it's clear that he was pissed. You can hear him say "fuckin *****" right after he shot her in the face. Just my opinion, but I think he knew full well she wasn't trying to intentionally run him over, she was trying to flee.

So based on all the evidence I've seen so far, I'm leaning toward this take:

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

• Tennessee v. Garner (1985): This landmark case established that it is unconstitutional to use deadly force to stop an unarmed, non-dangerous fleeing felony suspect. The Court held that human life is valuable and should not be taken simply to prevent a non-violent escape.
• Graham v. Connor (1989): This decision established the standard of "objective reasonableness" for all police use-of-force cases. The use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene at the time, considering the facts and circumstances without the benefit of hindsight.
• Imminent Threat Requirement: An officer can use deadly force against a fleeing suspect ONLY IF the suspect is believed to be an imminent danger to the public or the officer, such as an armed murderer attempting to escape into a crowded area. The danger must be immediate, not a hypothetical future threat.

I highlighted the applicable portion of your comment by placing it between ***. Law enforcement officers are not allowed to shoot a person, in this case a U.S. citizen, merely to keep them from fleeing.

ICE agents have no authority over U.S. citizens, so he had no right to attempt to open her vehicle doors, detain her, or attempt to prevent her from leaving.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I highlighted the applicable portion of your comment by placing it between ***. Law enforcement officers are not allowed to shoot a person, in this case a U.S. citizen, merely to keep them from fleeing.

It was not merely to keep her from fleeing. She tried to murder him, so why would she not have murdered his partners as well?

ICE agents have no authority over U.S. citizens, so he had no right to attempt to open her vehicle doors, detain her, or attempt to prevent her from leaving.

I sure hope you are only playing dumb, not really that dumb:

Its agents have the power to stop, detain and arrest people they suspect of being in the US illegally. They can detain US citizens in limited circumstances, such as if a person interferes with an arrest, assaults an officer, or ICE suspect the person of being in the US illegally.1 day ago

What is ICE and what powers do its agents have to use force?​

BBC
https://www.bbc.com › news › articles

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

He only said that after she tried to kill him.

He said it after he shot her three times. <--- You left that part out.

 

[Seymour Flops]

He said it after he shot her three times. <--- You left that part out.

Yes, after she tried to kill him and he was forced to defend himself, his partners, and everyone else within driving distance of Crazy Lady, he said "******* *****."

Is that really what you're all wee-wee'd up about?

Imagine if he had said "******* lesbo *****?" That would really have frosted your cornflakes!

 

[marvin martian]

I'm surprised this isn't a Thread Already.



I doubt she intended to kill the man. more likely she saw it as a game of chicken that sure was sure to win since the man she drove toward was so vulnerable. She was allegedly trained by an anti-Ice activist group. If so, they did a very poor job.

As happens so often with Democrats, she assumed that the armed person would not stand his ground. Her biggest mistake was not giving him a chance to get out of the way. By sprinting so quickly with her vehicle, he had no chance to avoid being hit.

Anyway, so much for the left "story of the century."

Renee Good-riddance. Dead terrorist.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

It was not merely to keep her from fleeing. She tried to murder him, so why would she not have murdered his partners as well?

You're reacting a bit hysterically. What evidence do you have that she tried but did not succeed to murder him? I would understand if in your opinion you believe that she may have committed vehicular assault, however the penalty for vehicular assault is NOT summary execution.

Bumping him with her car may have pissed him off but it seems as if he was already in the shooter ready position when her vehicle made contact with him versus drawing his weapon AFTER she bumped him with her vehicle.

 

[yidnar]

I think the video you are showing me is not of the event where Ms. Good was shot. You're showing us a video of a previous event that happened to this officer in 2025

Here's what happened the other day

Good was trying to leave. Her red SUV was turning away. An agent approached the passenger side, phone in hand, moved toward the front of the vehicle, and fired four shots as the car pulled off. Good crashed moments later. She never made it home to her children.
And here’s what court records reveal.
Ross was previously involved in a violent 2025 arrest in Bloomington in which an agent was dragged by a fleeing suspect — an incident now being used to justify killing a woman who was not accused of any violent crime. Even then, the administration can’t keep its story straight: Vance claimed the agent suffered “33 stitches in his leg.” Court documents show the injuries were to Ross’s arms and hand.
Details matter when someone is dead.
Instead of accountability, we’re watching a full-scale federal defense campaign: misstatements, fearmongering, and character assassination of a woman who cannot defend herself. Good is branded a terrorist. Ross is framed as a hero. And local officials are warned to stand down.

its not the previous event .. you just admitted that you think its a previous event where he was dragged ! proof that you recognize he was in danger .. you actually said this is from a previous vid where he was injured ! but its the video of the woman he fired on when she hit him with her car ! here's what you posted ..

I think the video you are showing me is not of the event where Ms. Good was shot. You're showing us a video of a previous event that happened to this officer in 2025

 

[yidnar]

Nobody tried to run that officer over.

he was struck by the car ..

 

[yidnar]

Merely fleeing is not a felony, especially from someone who has no authority over you.

she was told to get out of the car because she was purposefully blocking and impeding officers of the law ! that's what shes known for ! that's what she trained for ! she was breaking the law ! she gunned the accelerator with the officer in front of her car ! those are the facts ! its a tragedy ... but those are the facts ..

 

[yidnar]

I think you wouldn't stand a chance of proving that this was attempted murder. It's pretty clear this was not attempted murder, but rather her fleeing. She had the wheels turned to the right, which is not straight at the officer, and the officer literally had put himself in front of her vehicle. I don't there is any reason to suspect that she might have tried to run over other agents had he just moved out the way.

if she was not breaking the law why was she fleeing ?

 

[Failzero]

The shots were a bit muffled by the noise of her hitting him with the car.

Because they don't give ICE bodycams. Yet.

He had a Body Cam

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Where was the gunfire? And why did he have his phone out recording?

The shots were a bit muffled by the noise of her hitting him with the car.

Because they don't give ICE bodycams. Yet.

I found this copy of the same video except you can hear the gunshots and as you stated the first one is muffled by the sound of the impact of the vehicle with the agent, but that last two shoots can be clearly heard.

Something of note, the first shot sounds as if it was fired simultaneously to Good's vehicle bumping the agent. I use the term "bumping" because it clearly was not enough of an impact to knock him off of his feet if he was able to fire 3 rounds at her without missing.

This again raises the question of why he had his firearm in hand and was able to fire it as soon as the vehicle came in contact with him versus in firing his weapon in response to the vehicle coming in contact with him.

 

[BlueGin]

It's also quite possible that she panicked when the ICE agents began swarming her vehicle and yanking on her vehicle doors.

Doubtful since she and her wife had been following and taunting them all day.

 

[BlueGin]

I don't want to state a firm conclusion...since none of us are omniscient, we can't say we know for sure what was going on in either of their minds.

But in the recent clip with audio, it's clear that he was pissed. You can hear him say "fuckin *****" right after he shot her in the face. Just my opinion, but I think he knew full well she wasn't trying to intentionally run him over, she was trying to flee.

So based on all the evidence I've seen so far, I'm leaning toward this take:

He probably called her a ***** for purposely hitting him with her car.

 

[marvin martian]

I'm surprised this isn't a Thread Already.



I doubt she intended to kill the man. more likely she saw it as a game of chicken that sure was sure to win since the man she drove toward was so vulnerable. She was allegedly trained by an anti-Ice activist group. If so, they did a very poor job.

As happens so often with Democrats, she assumed that the armed person would not stand his ground. Her biggest mistake was not giving him a chance to get out of the way. By sprinting so quickly with her vehicle, he had no chance to avoid being hit.

Anyway, so much for the left "story of the century."

I'm surprised the mods let this thread title stand.

They changed mine to a CNN headline, probably because my thread is the most popular one on the board right now.

The advertisers on this board should know about this.

 

[Failzero]

He said it after he shot her three times. <--- You left that part out.

It was a double tap ( Not three shots fired in incident )

 

[Rawley]

I found this copy of the same video except you can hear the gunshots and as you stated the first one is muffled by the sound of the impact of the vehicle with the agent, but that last two shoots can be clearly heard.

Something of note, the first shot sounds as if it was fired simultaneously to Good's vehicle bumping the agent. I use the term "bumping" because it clearly was not enough of an impact to knock him off of his feet if he was able to fire 3 rounds at her without missing.

This again raises the question of why he had his firearm in hand and was able to fire it as soon as the vehicle came in contact with him versus in firing his weapon in response to the vehicle coming in contact with him.

If you look close enough, he unholstered his weapon when she put her truck in drive and hit the gas directly toward him. COmpletely justified.

 

[sealybobo]

its not the previous event .. you just admitted that you think its a previous event where he was dragged ! proof that you recognize he was in danger .. you actually said this is from a previous vid where he was injured ! but its the video of the woman he fired on when she hit him with her car ! here's what you posted ..

I think the video you are showing me is not of the event where Ms. Good was shot. You're showing us a video of a previous event that happened to this officer in 2025

Whatever dude. I see what you Notsees are doing because I have lots of Notsee friends. That woman got what she deserved. Would you **** with a cop like that? Nope. Then why does she think she can? You know you'd get thumped right? Got what she had coming. She asked for it. In a way I get it but at least let's make it known. Fleeing from the cops is now a crime punishable by death. Even if it doesn't look like the officers life was being threatened.

If a cop says stop and you drive away, cop can shoot you. Got it. New America. Very gestapo of you.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Whatever dude. I see what you Notsees are doing because I have lots of Notsee friends. That woman got what she deserved. Would you **** with a cop like that? Nope. Then why does she think she can? You know you'd get thumped right? Got what she had coming. She asked for it. In a way I get it but at least let's make it known. Fleeing from the cops is now a crime punishable by death. Even if it doesn't look like the officers life was being threatened.

She did not "deserve" it, but she absolutely brought it on herself. Kid gets high before woodshop class, he doesn't "deserve" to lose some fingers to the power miter saw, but that is a predictible outcome.

If a cop says stop and you drive away, cop can shoot you. Got it. New America. Very gestapo of you.

If you drive toward the LEO standing in front of your vehicle and put his life and the lives of other bystanders at risk, yes they can (and will) shoot you.

Should they do nothing and hope you run out of gas before you run over more than a few cops?

You don't like an LEO detaining you, make a complaint, sue his department, write an op-ed. You may not get the outcome you want, but you'll be alive.