Zone1 Video: 12 Year Old Girl Protects Black Man, They Brought Oprah to Tears (Goalcast)

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

That is intense…no words. In my lifetime too.

That time was full of so much bravery, fear, hate, love, sorrow, pain…just so people could have have the same simple basic rights.

Sometimes music defines it best…

Thank you Coyote

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

It’s in the living memory of many Americans.

Exactly

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Because they have nothing, just a Hate Whitey mentality. Never mind white people started the anti-slavery movements, Christians in fact, and white people passed the Civil Rights Acts. These gimos come along 50 years later and then pretend they know something and snivel and whine more than black people did back then. Just look at the morons like Spike Lee and Maxine Waters.

You know you're not a "white people" right?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

They carry that flag in protest of losing the war? Is that the dumbshit idea youre trying to push on me?

What does her sign say? Doesn't that equate to "the south will rise again"?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Newsvine and Im2 are both successful American Black people, yet all they do is post thread after thread of "Whitey was Bad, therefore Whitey is Bad". Now why do you suppose they do this? I don't get it.

Here let me fix that for you - "Racism was bad, therefore Racism [today] continues to be bad".

No wonder you don't "get it", you all have a reading comprehension problem as well as in all likelihood, a deficit in certain aspects of American history particularly the parts that when fully revealed make the white racists of this country - then and now - look bad.

That is assuming that it's just a lack of knowledge and not willful ignorance that is the problem.

 

[MarathonMike]

Here let me fix that for you - "Racism was bad, therefore Racism [today] continues to be bad".

No wonder you don't "get it", you all have a reading comprehension problem as well as in all likelihood, a deficit in certain aspects of American history particularly the parts that when fully revealed make the white racists of this country - then and now - look bad.

That is assuming that it's just a lack of knowledge and not willful ignorance that is the problem.

As usual you had to "fix" what I wrote to fit your delicate sensibilities. The logical explanation for your continually BORING, REPETITIVE posts on Reparations and 'Whitey is bad' is this: You want to perpetuate the hate that you have to the next generation of American Black people.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

No, they didn't, and they didn't fight for shit, it was all white people all the time. In fact the biggest slave traders in South Carolina and Lousianna were black traders. Free blacks were slave owners as well.

What were they supposed to fight with? United States gun control laws made it unlawful for Black people, freedmen or slaves, to own or handle firearms even in their own defense. Any excuse to return Black people to bondage - violate the gun laws and you lose your freedom, if you are unarmed and cannot defend your own life or the life of your family members, they you possibly could lose your lives altogether. Both are fucked up choices and up until less than a year ago states such as California, and New Jersey, Maryland and a handful of others were still imposing these laws on residents however they were created specifically to target Black people and that's how they were applied for the most part.

The racist roots of gun control: Gun control and its racist roots

I guess you've never heard of the underground railroad huh? Grandma Moses? Harriet Tubman? Your ignorance is appalling and the reason we post American history, policies, case law, etc. and how they have negatively impacted the lives of Black Americans both then and now.

We know none of you care about this stuff, so we have to do the work ourselves. Try learning something for once instead of pedantically labeling everything as fake news simply because you don't possess the brain power to do anything else.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

As usual you had to "fix" what I wrote to fit your delicate sensibilities. The logical explanation for your continually BORING, REPETITIVE posts on Reparations and 'Whitey is bad' is this: You want to perpetuate the hate that you have to the next generation of American Black people.

What are you feeling guilty about? There is absolutely no reason for you to react the way you do if our words didn't have the ability to irritate you. People who are guilty often respond that way and contrary to your claim that my posts are boring and repetitive (because sometimes repetition is what is required when individuals, particularly children, are exposed to the same materials over and over again until the light comes on), you keep reading them and bitching about them. That is an aspect of your personality and your gender that you cannot fake. Men don't spend time anywhere on anything that doesn't hold their attention.

The fact that you interpret what we're doing as spreading hate says way more about you than it ever will about me, but keep it up. Or better yet, just go away, put me on Ignore.

 

[DudleySmith]

What were they supposed to fight with? United States gun control laws made it unlawful for Black people, freedmen or slaves, to own or handle firearms even in their own defense. Any excuse to return Black people to bondage - violate the gun laws and you lose your freedom, if you are unarmed and cannot defend your own life or the life of your family members, they you possibly could lose your lives altogether. Both are fucked up choices and up until less than a year ago states such as California, and New Jersey, Maryland and a handful of others were still imposing these laws on residents however they were created specifically to target Black people and that's how they were applied for the most part.

The racist roots of gun control: Gun control and its racist roots

I guess you've never heard of the underground railroad huh? Grandma Moses? Harriet Tubman? Your ignorance is appalling and the reason we post American history, policies, case law, etc. and how they have negatively impacted the lives of Black Americans both then and now.

We know none of you care about this stuff, so we have to do the work ourselves. Try learning something for once instead of pedantically labeling everything as fake news simply because you don't possess the brain power to do anything else.

I know all about the history of gin control, and in fact posted about it many times, and have been linking to Clayton Cramer's excellent site for years, dumbass. The 'Underground Railroad' was mostly white people as well. You're just a late comer with scant real knowledge and lot of ideological bullshit you like to parrot. Almost everyone here who considers gun control an issue knows about this guy's home page; he's been writing on it for decades now dufus.

My Law Review and Other Referreed Journal Articles

www.claytoncramer.com

Primary Historical Sources

www.claytoncramer.com

Your link probably got his info from Cramer's articles. And lol at your stupid assertions of being 'educated'; you don't know hardly anything and are merely another blowhard racist moron yourself. You were obviously a socially promoted quota baby.

The first anti-slavery groups were formed by whites.

The First National Anti-Slavery Organization

The American Anti-Slavery society was founded in Philadelphia on December 1833.

teachingamericanhistory.org

The American Anti-Slavery society was founded in Philadelphia 180 years ago, in December of 1833. The group agreed to a simple “constitution,” prefaced by a brief but eloquent “manifesto” that quoted both the Biblical commandment to love one’s neighbor as oneself and the central idea of the Declaration of Independence, that “all men are created equal.” Arthur Tappan became the society’s first president, while William Lloyd Garrison, who had already founded his abolitionist weekly The Liberator, was asked to write a “Declaration of Sentiments” expressing the organization’s aims.

Although the American Anti-Slavery Society was the first national organization of its kind, similar state organizations had already formed. Most of the earliest of these were organized by the Society of Friends, or Quakers. The very first one, The Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, had formed in 1774 and helped to pass Pennsylvania’s Gradual Abolition Act of 1780, the first anti-slavery legislation in the United States.

These early organizations began to split off and some of its members went on to set up the Underground railroad and other organizations. Also see William Lloyd Garrison and his organizations. Then people can look of the British efforts to abolish slavery worldwide, and they con look the League of Nations resolutions on slavery Black racists of course make up a lot of fake history to over up the overwhelming lack of interest among blacks in resisting, and greatly exaggerate the tiny handful who ever actually did anything.

Blacks were still in the slave business into the 20th century, and many African countries sniveled about the League Of Nations requiring signing anti-slavery resolutions as a condition of membership.

The League of Nations and Slavery, 1919–1926

Abstract. Chapter 2 explores the multilateral space opened up by the League of Nations in Geneva and the competitive environment it provided for humanitarian pr

academic.oup.com

Abstract​

Chapter 2 explores the multilateral space opened up by the League of Nations in Geneva and the competitive environment it provided for humanitarian pressure groups. British activists played a key role in using the League as a forum to circulate information on slavery, thus pressurizing civil servants to devise an international response. The exposure of the continued existence of slave-trading in Ethiopia served as a catalyst for the creation of a League commission on slavery in the early 1920s. In 1926, with the drafting of the Slavery Convention, the League produced a global definition of slavery, thus advancing the potential for international action. But celebrations quickly turned into disillusionment as the League’s powerlessness to impose effective measures against slavery was exposed.

The lack of 'effective measures' was of course the resistance of black countries to abolishing slavery. African countries are still the world's biggest slave trading region, as always throughout its history.

Also see slavery in modern Africa.

Slavery in contemporary Africa - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

These losers like Newsvine wouldn't be caught dead doing anything about that stuff; no money in it for them, no rich white leftwingers to hide behind, no Bling awards.

 

[Godboy]

What does her sign say? Doesn't that equate to "the south will rise again"?
View attachment 780655

No, it doesnt have those words anywhere on that sign.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Slight correction here. Black people started the anti-slavery movement from their first day in bondage. You act as if they were passive observers as others fought for their rights.

Wrong, the anti-slavery movement actually started in Great Britain with William Wilberforce leading it in 1787. The Royal Navy and the infant US Navy were instrumental in suppressing the maritime slave trade. Slaves did almost nothing to stop slavery. But then, unarmed and treated like animals there wasn’t much they could do but quietly complain to each other. On the very rare occasions they revolted, they were savagely put down.

 

[Coyote]

Wrong, the anti-slavery movement actually started in Great Britain with William Wilberforce leading it in 1787. The Royal Navy and the infant US Navy were instrumental in suppressing the maritime slave trade.

The movement from those in power started then. While slaves lacked the power to do much to bring down the institution and faced far more severe consequences, that doesn’t mean they did nothing.

Slaves did almost nothing to stop slavery. But then, unarmed and treated like animals there wasn’t much they could do but quietly complain to each other. On the very rare occasions they revolted, they were savagely put down.

I agree and disagree to a certain extent. In my opinion, every slave rebellion was an attempt to stop slavery. While the most were deliberately illiterate (teaching them to read was a crime), others did learn to read, organize rebellions and become part of the larger abolition movement. Frederick Douglas is one example.

What I find both offensive and inaccurate is this idea some promote that they sat around doing nothing, while the People who enslaved them worked to free them.

 

[IM2]

lol says you. The fact is most black pols don;t give a rat's ass about 'Hope and Change', they peddle racism, scams, and hate crimes; like Patrick Moynihan said, the black middle class just uses hood rats to extort bennies for themselves, and have zero incentives to actually help their own out in any way. They all flee to the White Burbs the second they scam enough money to move.

You are white, shut up trying to tell people what blacks want. Patrick Moynihan was wrong and whites run from rual slums to suburbs in higher numbers than blacks do. You are an example of the continuing problem. Apparently racism is a mental disorder that allows people like you to post racist beliefs while declaring racism by whites is not a problem anymore..

 

[IM2]

No, they didn't, and they didn't fight for shit, it was all white people all the time. In fact the biggest slave traders in South Carolina and Lousianna were black traders. Free blacks were slave owners as well.

No, the biggest slave traders were white and very few blacks owned slaves. You see, a person can make such comments but when one looks at the actual numbers, your comments are disingenuous.

In 1830 over 2 million blacks were in slavery. Blacks owned 13,000. In 1830 3,776 free blacks owned those 13,000 slaves. Thats an average of just over 3 slaves each. Out of those 3,776 blacks, 54 owned between 20-84 slaves.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

For those who are wondering about the retro title of this black history series, please take a moment to learn about historian Joel A. Rogers

www.theroot.com

No matter how much blame shifting and victim shaming you try in order to virtue signal white innocence relative to slavery, the facts are that blacks owned very few slaves, blacks didn't make slavery legal, and the OP was about events that happened to blacks about 100 years after slavery ended.

Blacks did indeed fight.

On September 11, 1851, a federal marshal led a raid into the home of William Parker. Parker was an escaped slave who was hiding four other slaves owned by a man named Edward Gorsuch. Gorsuch wanted his slaves returned, and according to the Fugitive Slave Act, he had every right to use any means necessary to get them back. Gorsuch and his raiders then descended on Christiana, Pennsylvania, to recapture his slaves. If Gorsuch could speak to us today, he would tell us he made the wrong decision. Gorsuch and his raiders attacked the house and ran into bullets returned by the escaped slaves inside the house. The life of Edward Gorsuch ended on September 11, 1851, as a result of his decision. This is known as The Christiana Resistance.

On this Day in History: The Christiana Resistance – first battle of the Civil War

On this day—September 11, 1851—a deputy U.S. marshal led a raid in Christiana to recover four enslaved people in accordance with the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Free Blacks and freedom seekers in the surrounding area met this raid with a successful but deadly armed resistance. Some historians...

unchartedlancaster.com

This is one of many examples of blacks fighting slavery, jim crow or modern forms iof injustice. Only the most IGNORANT moron makes the comments you have made

 

[IM2]

Successful at what? sniveling bout Whitey is just an industry, and it hires people to scam the public like any other PR campaign.

White grievance is the industry and it made a multi millionaire out of a guy who flunked out of college named Rush Limbaugh.

 

[IM2]

The lack of 'effective measures' was of course the resistance of black countries to abolishing slavery. African countries are still the world's biggest slave trading region, as always throughout its history.

Also see slavery in modern Africa.

Slavery in contemporary Africa - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

These losers like Newsvine wouldn't be caught dead doing anything about that stuff; no money in it for them, no rich white leftwingers to hide behind, no Bling awards.

Incorrect. And there is slavery in Europe today..

Modern slavery is a reality also in Europe

Even rich Western countries like Iceland, Ireland and the United Kingdom cannot be considered to be free of modern slavery. It is estimated, for example, that there are as many as four thousand modern slaves in the UK – and more could be done to help them, writes Nick Grono.

www.euractiv.com

Losers like you keep diverting the topic to slavery when this thread is about things occurring in America after slavery ended. It's because your white fragility won't let you face the truth that WHITES LIKE YOU ARE STILL PRACTICING RACISM IN AMERICA RIGHT NOW.