Very interesting pattern

[Billy_Bob]

Did you realize, Billy Boy, that the United States and the Planet Earth are not the same thing?

Apparently not.

Is there any rational reason to suspect that should the USCRN be extended to cover the globe that it would not show the same thing? Is there something unique about the continental US which makes the global climate here behave differently than elsewhere on the globe? Any reason at all?

Does the standard surface temperature product not show the US as warming right along with the rest of the earth?

He has no cognitive ability. The lower 48 is large enough in size that it represents 5 of 18 zones and is therefore capable of showing the general trend. The fact that the data shows a marked divergence from their modeling crap is indicative of modeling failure of massive proportions. The actual divergence from reality is almost 3.2 deg C. Over 5 standard deviations.. The model they are using is CRAP!

 

[Crick]

Data are available for the globe. Data for the continental US show less warming. That would be cherry-picking Billy Boy.

 

[SSDD]

Data are available for the globe. Data for the continental US show less warming. That would be cherry-picking Billy Boy.

Yeah..the US data is available...not that you would ever bother to look at it....Do these look the same to you skid mark? GISS is clearly wrong here in the US...and it is wrong everywhere else as well......

 

[Crick]

You haven't answered the query. Why present US temperature data when global temperature data are available?

 

[skookerasbil]

Data are available for the globe. Data for the continental US show less warming. That would be cherry-picking Billy Boy.

Yeah..the US data is available...not that you would ever bother to look at it....Do these look the same to you skid mark? GISS is clearly wrong here in the US...and it is wrong everywhere else as well......

Well just as I figured...…….

Not a single climate crusading phony had the balls to define "warmer". Ghey…… but SSDD steps up ad defines these "warmer" temps and pwns the climate nutters in the process! That's second graph tells all......displays clearly what a ruse "warmer" is as conveyed by the climate crusaders. These posts by the AGW crowd should read, "Barely warmer" as in about 0.13 degrees

 

[SSDD]

You haven't answered the query. Why present US temperature data when global temperature data are available?

the difference between the GISS for the US and the USCRN for the US demonstrate that the GISS record is terribly flawed.....there is no reason to think that if the USCRN were extended across the globe, it would point out the same error across the globe...

 

[Billy_Bob]

You haven't answered the query. Why present US temperature data when global temperature data are available?

the difference between the GISS for the US and the USCRN for the US demonstrate that the GISS record is terribly flawed.....there is no reason to think that if the USCRN were extended across the globe, it would point out the same error across the globe...

A +3.2 deg C Error is no small matter.. This is gross malfeasance in science. All of the alarmist warming is a ruse.. A lie....

 

[mamooth]

A +3.2 deg C Error is no small matter..

So how did you end up making such an error? My guess is that you got that number through the fraud of comparing different baselines, but I'd like you to confirm that.

This is gross malfeasance in science.

Now that you've admitted to your fraud, your next step should be to cease your fraud. Will you pledge to abstain from fraud in the future?

 

[mamooth]

And meanwhile, the real USA data. It's hotter in the USA now than it was in the 1930s.

Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature | US EPA

 

[skookerasbil]

And meanwhile, the real USA data. It's hotter in the USA now than it was in the 1930s.

Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature | US EPA

And meanwhile, the real USA data. It's hotter in the USA now than it was in the 1930s.

Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature | US EPA

By 1.2 degrees s0n.....only those who tend to the hysterical care!

Not to mention that SSDD and Billy will likely call bs on the graph!

 

[skookerasbil]

Denver Weather: Coldest Early March Temps In Nearly 60 Years
By Chris SpearsMarch 3, 2019 at 7:00 am

Denver Weather: Coldest Early March Temps In Nearly 60 Years

 

[Billy_Bob]

And meanwhile, the real USA data. It's hotter in the USA now than it was in the 1930s.

Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature | US EPA

More Karl Et Al bull shit...

I have to laugh every time this highly adjusted set is used. Do you like playing with broken models?

 

[SSDD]

And meanwhile, the real USA data. It's hotter in the USA now than it was in the 1930s.

Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature | US EPA

Only in blatantly modified, homogenized, and infilled records...you know...the stuff that is good enough to fool warmest dupes...

 

[SSDD]

And meanwhile, the real USA data. It's hotter in the USA now than it was in the 1930s.

Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature | US EPA

More Karl Et Al bull shit...

I have to laugh every time this highly adjusted set is used. Do you like playing with broken models?

It is all they have.....any decent model doesn't show warming so it is of no use to them.

 

[Billy_Bob]

A bit of snow this morning, just below freezing. The rest of the northern hemisphere is rather warmer than normal.

Yes it is a very interesting that YOU fall apart over a SINGLE DAY, by saying it is an interesting pattern!

Bwahahahahahaahahahahhhaahhhaaaaa!!!!

A SINGLE day makes a pattern, according to you!!!

The level of stupid is amazing isn't it..

 

[SSDD]

A bit of snow this morning, just below freezing. The rest of the northern hemisphere is rather warmer than normal.

Yes it is a very interesting that YOU fall apart over a SINGLE DAY, by saying it is an interesting pattern!

Bwahahahahahaahahahahhhaahhhaaaaa!!!!

A SINGLE day makes a pattern, according to you!!!

The level of stupid is amazing isn't it..

Ever note how the hottest places on earth are invariably places where there is no instrumental coverage? When ever they need to infill data, it is always record breaking warmth...

 

[mamooth]

More Karl Et Al bull shit...

Did you see the lines for UAH and RSS? Even your precious satellite models show the strong warming over the USA. Did you lie about that out of stupidity, or was the dishonesty deliberate?

I have to laugh every time this highly adjusted set is used.

So you're saying that your favorite UAH model is "highly adjusted" and thus useless? Interesting. Deniers used to adore UAH. Now that they've rejected it, so there are now no temperature records that they accept. They've abandoned even a pretense of caring about science, and will now only talk about their religious beliefs.

Do you like playing with broken models?

Check it out, Billy actually thinks that surface temperatures come from models. Satellite measurements certainly do, but the surface temperatures don't. There doesn't seem to be any science that Billy, skook and SSDD don't fail at completely.

 

[skookerasbil]

More Karl Et Al bull shit...

Did you see the lines for UAH and RSS? Even your precious satellite models show the strong warming over the USA. Did you lie about that out of stupidity, or was the dishonesty deliberate?

I have to laugh every time this highly adjusted set is used.

So you're saying that your favorite UAH model is "highly adjusted" and thus useless? Interesting. Deniers used to adore UAH. Now that they've rejected it, so there are now no temperature records that they accept. They've abandoned even a pretense of caring about science, and will now only talk about their religious beliefs.

Do you like playing with broken models?

Check it out, Billy actually thinks that surface temperatures come from models. Satellite measurements certainly do, but the surface temperatures don't. There doesn't seem to be any science that Billy, skook and SSDD don't fail at completely.

Like I give a shit about the science? Nothing on the debate has changed over the last decade with the possible exception that there are clearly more skeptics than ever before. The AGW contingent haven't moved the football a single yard going back to the early Bush 43 years. As long as renewable energy is in the shitter in the United States, skeptics win. The science isn't mattering for dick outside the science.

 

[Billy_Bob]

More Karl Et Al bull shit...

Did you see the lines for UAH and RSS? Even your precious satellite models show the strong warming over the USA. Did you lie about that out of stupidity, or was the dishonesty deliberate?

I have to laugh every time this highly adjusted set is used.

So you're saying that your favorite UAH model is "highly adjusted" and thus useless? Interesting. Deniers used to adore UAH. Now that they've rejected it, so there are now no temperature records that they accept. They've abandoned even a pretense of caring about science, and will now only talk about their religious beliefs.

Do you like playing with broken models?

Check it out, Billy actually thinks that surface temperatures come from models. Satellite measurements certainly do, but the surface temperatures don't. There doesn't seem to be any science that Billy, skook and SSDD don't fail at completely.

Where to start with you're hyperbole..

You do realize that all of the graphs you used have been adjusted, don't you?

 

[Crick]

They have been made more accurate. If you disagree, show us some professional climate science researchers who agree with you.