Zone1 Very few people want to know the Truth

[ding]

What proof does it prove?

That it popped into existence in an improbable manner not being created from existing matter implausibly predestined to produce life. In other words, it proves it was intentional and not accidental happenstance.

 

[otto105]

That it popped into existence in an improbable manner not being created from existing matter implausibly predestined to produce life.

The fossil record shows otherwise.

 

[ding]

The fossil record shows otherwise.

How does the fossil record show that the universe didn't pop into existence in an improbable manner not being created from existing matter?

 

[otto105]

How does the fossil record show that the universe didn't pop into existence in an improbable manner not being created from existing matter?

The Big Bang.

Just ask Einstein

 

[ding]

The Big Bang.

Just ask Einstein

Exactly. The universe popped into existence - in an improbable manner (i.e. paired particle production that was not equal parts matter and anti-matter) - not being created from existing matter.

 

[ding]

The Big Bang.

Just ask Einstein

How is the big bang related to the fossil record?

 

[otto105]

Exactly. The universe popped into existence - in an improbable manner (i.e. paired particle production that was not equal parts matter and anti-matter) - not being created from existing matter.

You don’t understand it do you.

You however think a god that existed in a void just wished a universe from nothing.

Right

 

[ding]

You don’t understand it do you.

You however think a god that existed in a void just wished a universe from nothing.

Right

I do understand it. You are the one who doesn't have a clue, dummy.

The Early Universe

 

[ding]

Why is it that atheists are the least knowledgeable about matters of science?

 

[otto105]

I do understand it. You are the one who doesn't have a clue, dummy.

The Early Universe

Dude, you just posted the first thing you found on the internet.

 

[otto105]

Why is it that atheists are the least knowledgeable about matters of science?

What do you base that opinion on?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Google "Drugs and alcohol". Report back.

Google "People who can't make their own arguments". Don't bother reporting back.

 

[frigidweirdo]

That is ridiculous. It's ironic how unscientific the "proof is required for religious belief" people are. It's just amazingly ironic.

Walk in my shoes and you will u/stand Catholicism. You likely can't begin to do that. The next best thing is to

OMG

study what Catholics believe (NOT speaking of the garbage that comes out of the Vatican, taken over 65 years ago by unChristian people).

Few people study TRUE Catholicism as I have

Few people make it to Heaven also

(says Jesus.. Mt 7.. Lk 13, etc)

I have no idea what you're going on about.

 

[frigidweirdo]

can't change anyone but yourself, and you can't even change yourself most of the time because of all the resistance you get.. from within, from without.. Following Truth is often very painful
and guess what?

Humans reject pain, even if they believe it may pan out for them in the end to endure it.. Understandable.. but Jesus said that the Way is narrow.

Jesus knew what to do about this human tendency to avoid pain and seek comfort. That is why he set up His Church as He did. That is why it is so different from non-Catholic "churches" so called------(There is only ONE Church)

Still don't know what you're going on about.

 

[ding]

Dude, you just posted the first thing you found on the internet.

Nope. Been studying the origin of the universe for over 10 years. You are in way over your head here.

 

[ding]

What do you base that opinion on?

People like you and every atheist I've had discussions with. I've yet to meet one that knows science. Yet they all worship science. It's funny.

 

[Woodznutz]

Google "People who can't make their own arguments". Don't bother reporting back.

Why do you think the phrase "drugs and alcohol" is used universally when talking about substance abuse? Why not just use the term "drugs" to cover both? Could it be that there is a substantial distinction, the distinction that I made? Report back.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Why do you think the phrase "drugs and alcohol" is used universally when talking about substance abuse? Why not just use the term "drugs" to cover both? Could it be that there is a substantial distinction, the distinction that I made? Report back.

The difference is one is ACCEPTED and the other isn't.

Who cares.

 

[Woodznutz]

The difference is one is ACCEPTED and the other isn't.

Who cares.

I think the major difference is that alcohol is a legal 'drug'.

 

[rightwinger]

See what I mean?

You don't even bother to investigate the "proof" that I have presented

wow.. hope you don't call yourself Scientific any time soon... Scientists actually investigate the claims of others before dismissing them. But oh well.. Jesus did say that Few find the Way...

You have no proof
Just faith you present as truth