I’m addressing one point only, I don’t much care what the “establishment” or “mass media” are doing regarding this footage. It is irrelevant.If the establishment and mass media didn't think it was a big deal when they did it to Sandmann, and threw out the case then?
. . . then clearly the establishment is just playing politics with this now.
It has nothing to do with Trump, other than the establishment believes he is a threat to the warfare/welfare system.
I'm not the one that has double standards.
Just because you didn't agree with what they did to Sandmann, does not mean you aren't excusing the mass media's behavior NOW, after I point out the clear hypocrisy.
You just don't care. Anything to get orange man bad, right? End justify the means and all that nonsense?
First Amendment be damned.
Sorry, I respectfully disagree,. Trump and his VP can go to hell for all I care. The only thing that matters are the people's civil rights and civil liberties, and as there is no lawsuit on this stoopid controversy, no one's are being violated. That you WANT to violate and destroy the Constitution just to get orange man bad?
meh, whatever. I'm more concerned with the rights of Americans, not the behavior of certain individuals. I'm fully aware of what I am defending, THE FIRST AMENDMENT!
View attachment 1005544
U.S. Constitution - First Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
The original text of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.constitution.congress.gov
The OP hates America, Americans, and their bill of rights. This isn't up for debate.
He continually calls America and Americans, "the colonists."
Like this piece of shit isn't aware of history.
View attachment 1005545
I continually find this rhetoric hateful and disrespectful.
We now have this rule;
"USMB is not a "hate" site and we will not condone such behavior. We do not allow posts that include racial slurs, pejoratives, or religiously bigoted statements.
Such offenses will receive a first time warning and a second offense will result in an extended, if not permanent, ban."
I find whenever these commonwealth subversives use the tern, "colonists," on a message board devoted to Americans, who discuse their freedom and liberty, it is disrespectful of ever American who fought and died for the principles in the Constitution.
He might as well just call every American on this forum the "N" word. I AM SICK OF IT, and if we are now going to have hate-speech codes, he should not be allowed to do it!
IMO? This asshole needs a warning and a banning for every time he uses the pejorative; "colonists."
Which is many many times, like all the crown subversives on here that hate Americans.
I know what this thread is about. . . YOU apparently haven't the first clue.
What is relevant is this.
You don’t think it is ethically wrong to use a video clip of someone not involved in politics, caught in an embarrassing moment when she was a kid as part of a national campaign add. You got a zillion excuses justifying it (a justification that seems to only apply when it is the rightwing).
I disagree. It isn’t illegal, true. But that doesn’t make it right and justifying it rather than saying yes, it was a bad idea, just makes it look worse.
With Sandmann, I made my arguments on that long ago and they are consistent with ones I’m making here so you don’t need to make up crap just to justify your position.
