Valerie Plame....Idiot Bimbo Or Scheming Witch?

I don't take him to seriously. He told me to STFU and get out of his thread over a hundred post ago. Sometime yesterday afternoon.

And you scurried off like the rodent you are.....probably to shoot up...take the edge off being a coward does it, Loretta?
 
Nice try to take the spot lights off the lying president who took us to war fighting THE WRONG NATION!

You're muttering about Willy Clinton, right? I agree....what a piece of dog shit that sucker is...

It was GW Bush and his sidekick...DICK....who decided that a "war of choice" was the way to go. So he decided to attack THE WRONG FRIGIN COUNTRY....and you RW loons will be defending the recovering alcoholic for years to come.
 
Nice try to take the spot lights off the lying president who took us to war fighting THE WRONG NATION!

You're muttering about Willy Clinton, right? I agree....what a piece of dog shit that sucker is...

It was GW Bush and his sidekick...DICK....who decided that a "war of choice" was the way to go. So he decided to attack THE WRONG FRIGIN COUNTRY....and you RW loons will be defending the recovering alcoholic for years to come.

All wars come as a result of a choice. For instance, when President Hussein made the choice on dozens of distinct occasions to use International Islamic Terrorism as proxy fighters to attack the United States, her interests and allies over the decades prior to International Islamic Terrorism making the choice to attack the United States on 9-11, the US would not have had to make the choice to invade Iraq to remove President Hussein and his socialist government from power.

It's very much like the Ideological Left's choices that it is making in attacking the American Culture, which are leading up to a point where, we, the Americans will choose to erase the Ideological Left from the United States.
 
Nice try to take the spot lights off the lying president who took us to war fighting THE WRONG NATION!

You're muttering about Willy Clinton, right? I agree....what a piece of dog shit that sucker is...

It was GW Bush and his sidekick...DICK....who decided that a "war of choice" was the way to go. So he decided to attack THE WRONG FRIGIN COUNTRY....and you RW loons will be defending the recovering alcoholic for years to come.

All wars come as a result of a choice. For instance, when President Hussein made the choice on dozens of distinct occasions to use International Islamic Terrorism as proxy fighters to attack the United States, her interests and allies over the decades prior to International Islamic Terrorism making the choice to attack the United States on 9-11, the US would not have had to make the choice to invade Iraq to remove President Hussein and his socialist government from power.

It's very much like the Ideological Left's choices that it is making in attacking the American Culture, which are leading up to a point where, we, the Americans will choose to erase the Ideological Left from the United States.

It must be delightful living in make believe land. Bush attacked Iraq because he wanted revenge for the plot to kill his daddy and because DICK wanted to make his former company some big bucks. He did not have the gonads to go after the Saudis, the real financiers of 9/11.
 
Wilson was correct and still proven correct, in all these years....

And Plame DID NOT get her husband the job to go to Niger...

That's a fact, jack....

Both claims are wrong.

A Cia Task force chose Wilson for the job in a meeting they were having about it and then they called Plame in to this meeting for about 5 minutes to ask her if she would ask her husband if he would do it, and then she left the task force meeting on this.... All present at this meeting has said this....Plame was not in any way part of their decision to ask Wilson to go there.

But THAT is the LIE the Vice President wanted his cronies to spread in the media....to try to discredit the facts that Wilson uncovered when down there.

READ THE COURT HEARINGS on this....The link has been posted a few times.

Plame s Input Is Cited on Niger Mission washingtonpost.com

Former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, dispatched by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate reports that Iraq sought to reconstitute its nuclear weapons program with uranium from Africa, was specifically recommended for the mission by his wife, a CIA employee, contrary to what he has said publicly.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Administration officials told columnist Robert D. Novak then that Wilson, a partisan critic of Bush's foreign policy, was sent to Niger at the suggestion of Plame, who worked in the nonproliferation unit at CIA. The disclosure of Plame's identity, which was classified, led to an investigation into who leaked her name.
so you go and use the very newspapers that the administration tried to use to promote their propaganda through 'unnamed administrative officials' and I use the congressional hearings and court documents where officials had to testify under oath....

hmmmm, who to believe?

Wilson told the truth, Saddam did not purchase yellowcake from Niger...Saddam did not have nukes and Saddam was not trying to develope his nuclear program. PERIOD

You mean the Congressional hearings where Republicans weren't allowed to cross examine Plame? Yeah, those were informative.

Plame isn't capable of telling the truth, and neither are you.

It's a hearing, not a trial. There is no such thing as a cross examination in a hearing.

The next thing Republicans are going to claim is Plume was never in the CIA and it was an Obama-Kenyan plot to take over the White House. I guess I just gave Breitbart it's lead story for the next week.
 
Wilson was correct and still proven correct, in all these years....

And Plame DID NOT get her husband the job to go to Niger...

That's a fact, jack....

Both claims are wrong.

A Cia Task force chose Wilson for the job in a meeting they were having about it and then they called Plame in to this meeting for about 5 minutes to ask her if she would ask her husband if he would do it, and then she left the task force meeting on this.... All present at this meeting has said this....Plame was not in any way part of their decision to ask Wilson to go there.

But THAT is the LIE the Vice President wanted his cronies to spread in the media....to try to discredit the facts that Wilson uncovered when down there.

READ THE COURT HEARINGS on this....The link has been posted a few times.

Plame s Input Is Cited on Niger Mission washingtonpost.com

Former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, dispatched by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate reports that Iraq sought to reconstitute its nuclear weapons program with uranium from Africa, was specifically recommended for the mission by his wife, a CIA employee, contrary to what he has said publicly.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Administration officials told columnist Robert D. Novak then that Wilson, a partisan critic of Bush's foreign policy, was sent to Niger at the suggestion of Plame, who worked in the nonproliferation unit at CIA. The disclosure of Plame's identity, which was classified, led to an investigation into who leaked her name.
so you go and use the very newspapers that the administration tried to use to promote their propaganda through 'unnamed administrative officials' and I use the congressional hearings and court documents where officials had to testify under oath....

hmmmm, who to believe?

Wilson told the truth, Saddam did not purchase yellowcake from Niger...Saddam did not have nukes and Saddam was not trying to develope his nuclear program. PERIOD

You mean the Congressional hearings where Republicans weren't allowed to cross examine Plame? Yeah, those were informative.

Plame isn't capable of telling the truth, and neither are you.

It's a hearing, not a trial. There is no such thing as a cross examination in a hearing.

Of course there is, numskull. Normally both sides get to ask questions of any witness.

The next thing Republicans are going to claim is Plume was never in the CIA and it was an Obama-Kenyan plot to take over the White House. I guess I just gave Breitbart it's lead story for the next week.

Yeah, right, and we like to eat babies.
 
Wilson was correct and still proven correct, in all these years....

And Plame DID NOT get her husband the job to go to Niger...

That's a fact, jack....

Both claims are wrong.

A Cia Task force chose Wilson for the job in a meeting they were having about it and then they called Plame in to this meeting for about 5 minutes to ask her if she would ask her husband if he would do it, and then she left the task force meeting on this.... All present at this meeting has said this....Plame was not in any way part of their decision to ask Wilson to go there.

But THAT is the LIE the Vice President wanted his cronies to spread in the media....to try to discredit the facts that Wilson uncovered when down there.

READ THE COURT HEARINGS on this....The link has been posted a few times.

Plame s Input Is Cited on Niger Mission washingtonpost.com

Former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, dispatched by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate reports that Iraq sought to reconstitute its nuclear weapons program with uranium from Africa, was specifically recommended for the mission by his wife, a CIA employee, contrary to what he has said publicly.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Administration officials told columnist Robert D. Novak then that Wilson, a partisan critic of Bush's foreign policy, was sent to Niger at the suggestion of Plame, who worked in the nonproliferation unit at CIA. The disclosure of Plame's identity, which was classified, led to an investigation into who leaked her name.
so you go and use the very newspapers that the administration tried to use to promote their propaganda through 'unnamed administrative officials' and I use the congressional hearings and court documents where officials had to testify under oath....

hmmmm, who to believe?

Wilson told the truth, Saddam did not purchase yellowcake from Niger...Saddam did not have nukes and Saddam was not trying to develope his nuclear program. PERIOD

You mean the Congressional hearings where Republicans weren't allowed to cross examine Plame? Yeah, those were informative.

Plame isn't capable of telling the truth, and neither are you.

It's a hearing, not a trial. There is no such thing as a cross examination in a hearing.

Of course there is, numskull. Normally both sides get to ask questions of any witness.

The next thing Republicans are going to claim is Plume was never in the CIA and it was an Obama-Kenyan plot to take over the White House. I guess I just gave Breitbart it's lead story for the next week.

Yeah, right, and we like to eat babies.
You just don't know the difference between asking questions and a cross examination. Look in the mirror to see the numskull.
 
Have you been living in a hole? Sheesh....

No you and your cohorts here are the burrowing type (rodents)....what's funny is that trash like Plame and Wilson were put in place over the years to complete the job on your kind....people you thought couldn't ever be challenged on their schemes end up outing themselves....Plame by exposing a genuine CIA operative, Hillary caught in dozens of lies, Obozo's mind-boggling stupidity....it's all coming apart and all you freaks can do is lie and deny it.....must really suck to be a prog when reality slaps the shit outta you. :itsok:
 
Have you been living in a hole? Sheesh....

No you and your cohorts here are the burrowing type (rodents)....what's funny is that trash like Plame and Wilson were put in place over the years to complete the job on your kind....people you thought couldn't ever be challenged on their schemes end up outing themselves....Plame by exposing a genuine CIA operative, Hillary caught in dozens of lies, Obozo's mind-boggling stupidity....it's all coming apart and all you freaks can do is lie and deny it.....must really suck to be a prog when reality slaps the shit outta you. :itsok:
change the subject much...?

The "yellowcake from Africa/Niger...." is the 16 words of fame, (THE LIE) that Bush made in his State of the Union address....silly one, now get out of your rabbit hole and face up to it... Wilson was CORRECT, the CIA was correct...there was no proof of Saddam acquiring yellowcake from Niger, and the supposed document that stated such from Italy was a blatant and obvious FORGERY as well....

this has been proven, it is FACT...so stop living in the yester year of multiple lies that the previous administration perpetrated.
 
Both claims are wrong.

Plame s Input Is Cited on Niger Mission washingtonpost.com

Former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, dispatched by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate reports that Iraq sought to reconstitute its nuclear weapons program with uranium from Africa, was specifically recommended for the mission by his wife, a CIA employee, contrary to what he has said publicly.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Administration officials told columnist Robert D. Novak then that Wilson, a partisan critic of Bush's foreign policy, was sent to Niger at the suggestion of Plame, who worked in the nonproliferation unit at CIA. The disclosure of Plame's identity, which was classified, led to an investigation into who leaked her name.
so you go and use the very newspapers that the administration tried to use to promote their propaganda through 'unnamed administrative officials' and I use the congressional hearings and court documents where officials had to testify under oath....

hmmmm, who to believe?

Wilson told the truth, Saddam did not purchase yellowcake from Niger...Saddam did not have nukes and Saddam was not trying to develope his nuclear program. PERIOD

You mean the Congressional hearings where Republicans weren't allowed to cross examine Plame? Yeah, those were informative.

Plame isn't capable of telling the truth, and neither are you.

It's a hearing, not a trial. There is no such thing as a cross examination in a hearing.

Of course there is, numskull. Normally both sides get to ask questions of any witness.

The next thing Republicans are going to claim is Plume was never in the CIA and it was an Obama-Kenyan plot to take over the White House. I guess I just gave Breitbart it's lead story for the next week.

Yeah, right, and we like to eat babies.
You just don't know the difference between asking questions and a cross examination. Look in the mirror to see the numskull.

There is no difference, you fucking numskull.
 
Well, this thread has clearly shown that despite the fact that those who claim Plame wasn't covert and insist on it based on absolutely no facts, this exposed who are easily manipulated.
To Plame being covert, facts by posters clearly show Plame was covert, it's undeniable. Yet, the small-minded chose to believe talking points that have been clearly and soundly debunked. Is there a better example of people being so controlled that they have the complete inability to see the light?
It amazes me that people like this are able to go through life unattended.
 
Well, this thread has clearly shown that despite the fact that those who claim Plame wasn't covert and insist on it based on absolutely no facts, this exposed who are easily manipulated.
To Plame being covert, facts by posters clearly show Plame was covert, it's undeniable. Yet, the small-minded chose to believe talking points that have been clearly and soundly debunked. Is there a better example of people being so controlled that they have the complete inability to see the light?
It amazes me that people like this are able to go through life unattended.

It's interesting to observe the way left-wingers delude themselves. It's like they live in a parallel universe where the events that you just observed never happened, and visa-versa.
 
change the subject much...?

The "yellowcake from Africa/Niger...." is the 16 words of fame, (THE LIE) that Bush made in his State of the Union address....silly one, now get out of your rabbit hole and face up to it... Wilson was CORRECT, the CIA was correct...there was no proof of Saddam acquiring yellowcake from Niger, and the supposed document that stated such from Italy was a blatant and obvious FORGERY as well....

this has been proven, it is FACT...so stop living in the yester year of multiple lies that the previous administration perpetrated.

This is my thread....I can talk about anything I please. Why you're still here baffles me....I already proved you know nothing about the CIA and it's protocols, employee classifications, or types of activity.....Now you say Wilson was "right"? About what....what he couldn't find? I've already proven Wilson was a political operative not a spy....he had no training, no skills, no contacts in Niger.....they laughed at his clumsy questions and he fled home to his bimbo...You source nothing and when you do it's meaningless.....like Congressional testimony....anybody can say anything before Congress....who ever gets charged with perjury? Nobody...not Holder, not Lerner, not the old creep from the IRS...nobody.
 
Well, this thread has clearly shown that despite the fact that those who claim Plame wasn't covert and insist on it based on absolutely no facts, this exposed who are easily manipulated.
To Plame being covert, facts by posters clearly show Plame was covert, it's undeniable. Yet, the small-minded chose to believe talking points that have been clearly and soundly debunked. Is there a better example of people being so controlled that they have the complete inability to see the light?
It amazes me that people like this are able to go through life unattended.

Plame herself couldn't prove she was "covert" you dithering asshole....
 

Forum List

Back
Top