USSC head in the ground

[okfine]

The Constitution trumps Democrat machinations.


Gads, you are a corrupt bunch.

Expanding dates to return ballots is not "corrupt" by any stretch of the word.

What should we call trying to change the rules after the election because you lost?

You can keep lying, but the Constitution, the law of the land, is quite specific.

Don't bother reading it.....your indoctrination will prevent comprehension of its import.

As I said before, the Pennsylvania determined their electors would be chosen by popular vote. No one changed that.

You’re confusing means and methods.

You lied before, and you've lied again.

Democrats lie about everything.

You should right a book on it.

"Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

townhall.com

And twice as many said otherwise.

Only Democrats deny the validity of the Constitution.

Democrats lie about everything.

Raise your paw.

1- So keep your head buried in the ground.
2- The case is on against Trump.
3- Here is a good "cut and paste" for you to absorb:

"Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Monday, Weissmann noted that Manhattan prosecutor Cy Vance, Jr. will get all financial documents from former President Donald Trump's accounting firm."

"It will be the taxes and all accounting records," he explained. "It will be whatever the Mazars have, which should be a wealth of information, internal emails, communications with the Trump Organization, accounting spreadsheets, all sorts of notations as to how they're valuing things. And mechanically what happens is the Manhattan D.A.'s office calls up and says, 'Okay, now that this has been decided, you need to turn them over by X date.'"

There is much more than Trumpâs tax returns that prosecutors will get: Top Mueller prosecutor

Andrew Weissmann, former senior prosecutor for special counsel Robert Mueller, explained that there is a lot more to the tax return documents than a simple PDF of the former president's income. Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Monday, Weissmann noted that Manhattan prosecutor Cy Vance, Jr...

www.rawstory.com

Impossible To Justify A Biden Win

1. To me, the clearest indication of a stolen election is that none of the Biden serfs....voters.....can say what they voted for. Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda brought in that 'landslide.'? The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism...

www.usmessageboard.com

C'mon. Face the defeat, would you?

 

[progressive hunter]

sure about what??

you do know you cant sue until harm is done dont you??

You sure the case was rejected because of lack of harm?

Cite the ruling.

back to your word games I see,,,,

so youre saying you can sue before harm has been done???

Yes.

Cite the ruling.

heres avideo of one of the guys involved,, its well worth the watch cause it gives a first hand accounting of events



and regardless it doesnt change the fact the people that changed the rules didnt have authority to change them,,
that makes all those votes null an void,,,

I don’t have time to watch a two and a half hour video.

Cite the ruling.

refusing to here the words of the people involved makes you unqualified to continue discussing this topic

I’ll read court cases, not a two and a half hour podcast.

Cite the case, or just admit you can’t.

I never said I could,,

best you not discuss this topic further due to your disadvantage of lack of knowledge,,,

And now we know you can’t.

Your understanding is incorrect.

cant what??

 

[Mac1958]

The conservative Supreme Court at that.

It's a conspiracy. It's all a big, huge conspiracy. Trump is a big ol' victim. Poor Trump, he's just a victim of a huge conspiracy.

It's a conspiracy, I tell you. Even Trump judges are in on it. A big fucking conspiracy, I tell you.

 

[Lastamender]

The conservative Supreme Court at that.

It's a conspiracy. It's all a big, huge conspiracy. Trump is a big ol' victim. Poor Trump, he's just a victim of a huge conspiracy.

It's a conspiracy, I tell you. Even Trump judges are in on it. A big fucking conspiracy, I tell you.

There was massive fraud due to a massive conspiracy. Now there is a massive cover up by the same people. You are lying and failing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Constitution trumps Democrat machinations.


Gads, you are a corrupt bunch.

Expanding dates to return ballots is not "corrupt" by any stretch of the word.

What should we call trying to change the rules after the election because you lost?

You can keep lying, but the Constitution, the law of the land, is quite specific.

Don't bother reading it.....your indoctrination will prevent comprehension of its import.

As I said before, the Pennsylvania determined their electors would be chosen by popular vote. No one changed that.

You’re confusing means and methods.

You lied before, and you've lied again.

Democrats lie about everything.

You should right a book on it.

"Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

townhall.com

And twice as many said otherwise.

Only Democrats deny the validity of the Constitution.

Democrats lie about everything.

Raise your paw.

1- So keep your head buried in the ground.
2- The case is on against Trump.
3- Here is a good "cut and paste" for you to absorb:

"Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Monday, Weissmann noted that Manhattan prosecutor Cy Vance, Jr. will get all financial documents from former President Donald Trump's accounting firm."

"It will be the taxes and all accounting records," he explained. "It will be whatever the Mazars have, which should be a wealth of information, internal emails, communications with the Trump Organization, accounting spreadsheets, all sorts of notations as to how they're valuing things. And mechanically what happens is the Manhattan D.A.'s office calls up and says, 'Okay, now that this has been decided, you need to turn them over by X date.'"

There is much more than Trumpâs tax returns that prosecutors will get: Top Mueller prosecutor

Andrew Weissmann, former senior prosecutor for special counsel Robert Mueller, explained that there is a lot more to the tax return documents than a simple PDF of the former president's income. Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Monday, Weissmann noted that Manhattan prosecutor Cy Vance, Jr...

www.rawstory.com

Impossible To Justify A Biden Win

1. To me, the clearest indication of a stolen election is that none of the Biden serfs....voters.....can say what they voted for. Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda brought in that 'landslide.'? The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism...

www.usmessageboard.com

C'mon. Face the defeat, would you?

Why are you so worried?

 

[okfine]

The Constitution trumps Democrat machinations.


Gads, you are a corrupt bunch.

Expanding dates to return ballots is not "corrupt" by any stretch of the word.

What should we call trying to change the rules after the election because you lost?

You can keep lying, but the Constitution, the law of the land, is quite specific.

Don't bother reading it.....your indoctrination will prevent comprehension of its import.

As I said before, the Pennsylvania determined their electors would be chosen by popular vote. No one changed that.

You’re confusing means and methods.

You lied before, and you've lied again.

Democrats lie about everything.

You should right a book on it.

"Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

townhall.com

And twice as many said otherwise.

Only Democrats deny the validity of the Constitution.

Democrats lie about everything.

Raise your paw.

1- So keep your head buried in the ground.
2- The case is on against Trump.
3- Here is a good "cut and paste" for you to absorb:

"Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Monday, Weissmann noted that Manhattan prosecutor Cy Vance, Jr. will get all financial documents from former President Donald Trump's accounting firm."

"It will be the taxes and all accounting records," he explained. "It will be whatever the Mazars have, which should be a wealth of information, internal emails, communications with the Trump Organization, accounting spreadsheets, all sorts of notations as to how they're valuing things. And mechanically what happens is the Manhattan D.A.'s office calls up and says, 'Okay, now that this has been decided, you need to turn them over by X date.'"

There is much more than Trumpâs tax returns that prosecutors will get: Top Mueller prosecutor

Andrew Weissmann, former senior prosecutor for special counsel Robert Mueller, explained that there is a lot more to the tax return documents than a simple PDF of the former president's income. Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Monday, Weissmann noted that Manhattan prosecutor Cy Vance, Jr...

www.rawstory.com

Impossible To Justify A Biden Win

1. To me, the clearest indication of a stolen election is that none of the Biden serfs....voters.....can say what they voted for. Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda brought in that 'landslide.'? The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism...

www.usmessageboard.com

C'mon. Face the defeat, would you?

Why are you so worried?

With Trump's losing record why worry?

 

[PoliticalChic]

the Constitution that says state legislatures make election law

The Supreme Court has construed the term “Legislature” extremely broadly to include any entity or procedure that a state’s constitution permits to exercise lawmaking power. Thus, laws regulating congressional elections may be enacted not only by a state’s actual legislature, but also directly by a state’s voters through the initiative process or public referendum, in states that allow such procedures.

The Court also has held that a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials. A few states have chosen to transfer power to draw congressional district lines from their respective legislatures to non-partisan or bipartisan “independent redistricting commissions.”

Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

Democrats.......they lie about everything.

 

[Oddball]

the Constitution that says state legislatures make election law

The Supreme Court has construed the term “Legislature” extremely broadly to include any entity or procedure that a state’s constitution permits to exercise lawmaking power. Thus, laws regulating congressional elections may be enacted not only by a state’s actual legislature, but also directly by a state’s voters through the initiative process or public referendum, in states that allow such procedures.

The Court also has held that a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials. A few states have chosen to transfer power to draw congressional district lines from their respective legislatures to non-partisan or bipartisan “independent redistricting commissions.”

Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

Pure wind...

 

[Mac1958]

There was massive fraud due to a massive conspiracy. Now there is a massive cover up by the same people. You are lying and failing.

Sure thing, Q.

Here are the conspirators so far:

1. The FBI
2. The CIA
3. The Justice Department
4. The Attorney General
5. The United States Supreme Court
6. Trump-Appointed Judges
7. MSNBC
8. CNN
9. Fox News
10. The Chinese
11. The Russians
12. The Jews
13. Pedophiles
14. Vice President Mike Pence
15. Local Television News
16. State Republican election officials
17. State election workers
18. State Supreme Courts
19. Republican Governors
20. Republican Congresspeople
21. Joe Biden
22. Newsmax
23. George Soros
24. SmartMatic
25. Dominion Software
26. Hugo Chavez
27. Venezuela
28. DHS Cybersecurity Office

Did I miss anyone?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

There was massive fraud due to a massive conspiracy. Now there is a massive cover up by the same people. You are lying and failing.

Sure thing, Q.

Here are the conspirators so far:

1. The FBI
2. The CIA
3. The Justice Department
4. The Attorney General
5. The United States Supreme Court
6. Trump-Appointed Judges
7. MSNBC
8. CNN
9. Fox News
10. The Chinese
11. The Russians
12. The Jews
13. Pedophiles
14. Vice President Mike Pence
15. Local Television News
16. State Republican election officials
17. State election workers
18. State Supreme Courts
19. Republican Governors
20. Republican Congresspeople
21. Joe Biden
22. Newsmax
23. George Soros
24. SmartMatic
25. Dominion Software
26. Hugo Chavez
27. Venezuela
28. DHS Cybersecurity Office

Did I miss anyone?

Q.....BOO!

 

[BlindBoo]

the Constitution that says state legislatures make election law

The Supreme Court has construed the term “Legislature” extremely broadly to include any entity or procedure that a state’s constitution permits to exercise lawmaking power. Thus, laws regulating congressional elections may be enacted not only by a state’s actual legislature, but also directly by a state’s voters through the initiative process or public referendum, in states that allow such procedures.

The Court also has held that a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials. A few states have chosen to transfer power to draw congressional district lines from their respective legislatures to non-partisan or bipartisan “independent redistricting commissions.”

Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

Democrats.......they lie about everything.

Gov. Abbot extended the dates for absentee voters in Texas without going through the Texas legislature.

Guess who came out on top when the legislature sued him?

 

[AZrailwhale]

The Pennsylvania determined the method of appointing electors. It's done by popular state vote.

Nothing that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania did or didn't do changed that fact.

The precedent cited is irrelevant.

The state Supreme Court altered the number of ballots eligible to be counted by extending the deadline. If the deadline needed to be altered, it was the responsibility of the legislature NOT the state Supreme Court. The extension was invalid.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The state Supreme Court altered the number of ballots eligible to be counted by extending the deadline. If the deadline needed to be altered, it was the responsibility of the legislature NOT the state Supreme Court. The extension was invalid.

Argued Oct. 11, 1892 Decided Oct. 17, 1892



“The validity of a state law providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having been drawn in question before the highest tribunal of a state as repugnant to the laws and Constitution of the United States, and that court having decided in favor of its validity, this Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment under Rev.Stat. § 709. Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.



Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

McPherson v. Blacker

supreme.justia.com

 

[AZrailwhale]

Argued Oct. 11, 1892 Decided Oct. 17, 1892



“The validity of a state law providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having been drawn in question before the highest tribunal of a state as repugnant to the laws and Constitution of the United States, and that court having decided in favor of its validity, this Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment under Rev.Stat. § 709. Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.



Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

McPherson v. Blacker

supreme.justia.com

Yes the legislature, NOT a court. If the legislature had changed the deadline, I would have no problem with the change.