US womens soccer star declines to join US womens national team over pandering to homosexuals

[EvilCat Breath]

I remember quite well. I was walking my dog through the park. It was being used as a staging area for a parade. A band was preparing to march in the parade and played the anthem. I stopped walking, faced the flag and put my right hand over my heart.

How interesting. Are flags normally flown in parks there?

As I said the park was being used as a staging area for a parade. It was awash in flags.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

When a leftist says we should have more freedom it is patently untrue. They really must have far less freedom. The left is all about rigid conformity to leftist ideals.

 

[frigidweirdo]

She plays in a team.

Team work is all about working with people who are different. In soccer you have strikers, defenders, midfielders, goalkeepers.

Now all of a sudden she can't cope playing with people who are different?

Then **** her.

She has no problem playing on a team with different people. She won't advertise being gay by wearing a gay friendly jersey.

Good for her. It is time that nomal people stood up for themselves. She's not gay and should not be forced into advertising that this is something she approves of.

So what happens if one of her teammates is gay?

How's that going to work?

She has no problem playing with homosexuals. She has a problem using her body to advertise a cause she does not support. Her body, her choice, IMO. They can play without her and everybody wins.

Sure, she can make some kind of protest if she wants. What she doesn't realize is that her protest is rather contradictory.

If she plays for the US, she represents ALL AMERICAN GAY PEOPLE regardless of whether there's a rainbow on her shirt or not.

Please. Does she play for or represent American axe murderers? She plays a sport. She is apparently selective about what clothes she puts on HER body. Her body, her choice. She seems to be aware of the potential consequences, just like kneeling athletes, and has made her choice.

If she plays soccer for the national team, then yes, she plays for all Americans.

Murder is illegal in the US. Therefore this is something that she represents when she goes onto the pitch. Being gay is not illegal, and this is something she represents.

Yes, she's made her choice. Another person who makes a choice without thinking too hard about what the **** she's doing.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Yes, if you put rubbish on the floor, you pick it up.

If your kids aren't achieving the standards in education, you improve the standards.

If the police are treating people brutally, you stop the brutality.

You said that if something goes wrong, you leave. Now you've changed 180 degrees.

I never said that.

If kids aren't r

Yes, you did.

If someone objects to the government that much, perhaps they shouldn't be here. If someone objects to what a team requires of them, they need another team to belong to.

If someone objects to the government that much perhaps they shouldn't be here.

That doesn't mean if something goes wrong. It means if you are driven to devoting your time to protest, maybe you would be happier somewhere else.

Your view is a little twisted here.

Is the government there to do the bidding of the government, or is it there to do the bidding of the people?

If you object to what the government does, surely you should try and change that. Running away doesn't work, as you pointed out with the rubbish analogy.

If you want to protest, maybe it's because you want to change things.

You can't have it both ways, you can't have freedoms and then demand that the govt can do whatever it likes.

In fact the US should have MORE FREEDOM with a better way of electing those politicians, who are, in the US, rather ridiculous in the way they look after their own interests far, far more than the interests of the people.

Or do you support getting rid of voting?

Vote. Stop making a show of idiotic protests and vote. Run for office. Have a platform of criminalizing the anthem and the pledge. Stop being a fool.

If the US had more freedom there would be no team jerseys, gay wouldn't be a demand and bakers could sell cakes to whoever they wanted.

I'm not sure I get anything you said here.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I never said that.

If kids aren't r

Yes, you did.

If someone objects to the government that much, perhaps they shouldn't be here. If someone objects to what a team requires of them, they need another team to belong to.

If someone objects to the government that much perhaps they shouldn't be here.

That doesn't mean if something goes wrong. It means if you are driven to devoting your time to protest, maybe you would be happier somewhere else.

Your view is a little twisted here.

Is the government there to do the bidding of the government, or is it there to do the bidding of the people?

If you object to what the government does, surely you should try and change that. Running away doesn't work, as you pointed out with the rubbish analogy.

If you want to protest, maybe it's because you want to change things.

You can't have it both ways, you can't have freedoms and then demand that the govt can do whatever it likes.

In fact the US should have MORE FREEDOM with a better way of electing those politicians, who are, in the US, rather ridiculous in the way they look after their own interests far, far more than the interests of the people.

Or do you support getting rid of voting?

Vote. Stop making a show of idiotic protests and vote. Run for office. Have a platform of criminalizing the anthem and the pledge. Stop being a fool.

If the US had more freedom there would be no team jerseys, gay wouldn't be a demand and bakers could sell cakes to whoever they wanted.

I'm not sure I get anything you said here.

That's because you believe in the freedom to only do what you want. Not everyone gets to have freedom. Real freedom would mean that there are no team jerseys. Players choose their own clothing. Pride or actual advertising "I'm ashamed of Pride month." Real freedom would leave the bakers free to tell gays to take a hike when they demand their cakes. That's real freedom when it belongs to everyone. You don't like that kind of freedom.

This woman did not want to wear a shirt. In a better world she would not have to let herself be used to promote a pride she never had.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Now Lefties are hating on blacks and women.

Eating their own must not be very filling, because they're devouring each other faster than they can kill themselves off in the womb.

 

[rightwinger]

Half the team is lesbian anyway

 

[Tresha91203]

She has no problem playing on a team with different people. She won't advertise being gay by wearing a gay friendly jersey.

Good for her. It is time that nomal people stood up for themselves. She's not gay and should not be forced into advertising that this is something she approves of.

So what happens if one of her teammates is gay?

How's that going to work?

She has no problem playing with homosexuals. She has a problem using her body to advertise a cause she does not support. Her body, her choice, IMO. They can play without her and everybody wins.

Sure, she can make some kind of protest if she wants. What she doesn't realize is that her protest is rather contradictory.

If she plays for the US, she represents ALL AMERICAN GAY PEOPLE regardless of whether there's a rainbow on her shirt or not.

Please. Does she play for or represent American axe murderers? She plays a sport. She is apparently selective about what clothes she puts on HER body. Her body, her choice. She seems to be aware of the potential consequences, just like kneeling athletes, and has made her choice.

If she plays soccer for the national team, then yes, she plays for all Americans.

Murder is illegal in the US. Therefore this is something that she represents when she goes onto the pitch. Being gay is not illegal, and this is something she represents.

Yes, she's made her choice. Another person who makes a choice without thinking too hard about what the **** she's doing.

I disagree. People, even public people, can be individuals. Just because I am an American doing my thing, does not mean I represent all Americans. We are not lemmings. We do not have to follow the herd. We make our individual choices, and the chips fall where they fall. -shrug-

I do not represent American women just because I am one. I represent me. You represent you. She represents her beliefs. It's all good. This is still America.

 

[Rustic]

Hinkle's refusal to play for USWNT over Pride Month jersey offers opportunity for different kinds of understanding

Looking on twitter she is being attacked by the leftists with their usual whining. Its hilarious to read. So I got a question would you rather her have taken the spot and then complained about the jersey or should she have taken it and just shut the hell up about her views? Obviously she did right thing in not taking a spot that someone else can get but may not be as good as she is and well that's the slippery slope this cultural marxism drags us down! The best and brightest get pushed out in favor of those willing to shut the hell up and toe the libtard line.

She plays in a team.

Team work is all about working with people who are different. In soccer you have strikers, defenders, midfielders, goalkeepers.

Now all of a sudden she can't cope playing with people who are different?

Then **** her.

She has no problem playing on a team with different people. She won't advertise being gay by wearing a gay friendly jersey.

Good for her. It is time that nomal people stood up for themselves. She's not gay and should not be forced into advertising that this is something she approves of.

So what happens if one of her teammates is gay?

How's that going to work?

She doesn't have to be proud of a teammates gayness. She is refusing to wear a gay pride jersey. She would be forced to advertise that she is proud of homosexuality when she clearly is not. Even as bad and as corrupt as our courts are, I doubt if they would demand someone take such a personal way of advertising an approval they don't have.

I can't envision black people demanding that white players wear a jersey that says proud to be black when they clearly aren't.

Okay, so, the right think that football players should be FORCED to stand for the national anthem, but don't think soccer players should be forced to wear the team jersey..... Is that about right?

The shirt doesn't say the player is proud to be gay. The shirt looks like this

It has a rainbow on it. Oh, wow.

That's the colors of the shirt.

It looks like dog shit smells... I would decline too.

 

[Rustic]

People have to hate I guess.

Sad

Lol
Says a control freak...

 

[Rustic]

The best and brightest get pushed out in favor of those willing to shut the hell up and toe the libtard line.

You should take her place.

Why should gays be discriminated against because someone can't get over their butt hurt. If you hate you are hurting yourself and that is all.

It is stupid to hate gays.

Lol
Shit for brains, Keep your political correctness to yourself… And shut the **** up

 

[Ame®icano]

She has no problem playing on a team with different people. She won't advertise being gay by wearing a gay friendly jersey.

Good for her. It is time that nomal people stood up for themselves. She's not gay and should not be forced into advertising that this is something she approves of.

So what happens if one of her teammates is gay?

How's that going to work?

She has no problem playing with homosexuals. She has a problem using her body to advertise a cause she does not support. Her body, her choice, IMO. They can play without her and everybody wins.

Sure, she can make some kind of protest if she wants. What she doesn't realize is that her protest is rather contradictory.

If she plays for the US, she represents ALL AMERICAN GAY PEOPLE regardless of whether there's a rainbow on her shirt or not.

The rainbow shirt is a pride shirt no matter who she plays for if she doesn't want to promote the pride message she shouldn't have to. Instead she quite fairly quit the team.

Look.

The US shirt below represents all Americans. It represents gay Americans. It represents black Americans. It represents female Americans and male Americans. It represents Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Communists, Fascists, Nazis, independents. It represents children, old people.

It represents every single living American.

Now, if she has a problem representing every single American, she should never have worn the shirt in the first place.

Does gay pride jersey represent every American?

 

[Aba Incieni]

Half the team is lesbian anyway

They should be forced to wear hetero patches.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Yes, you did.

If someone objects to the government that much perhaps they shouldn't be here.

That doesn't mean if something goes wrong. It means if you are driven to devoting your time to protest, maybe you would be happier somewhere else.

Your view is a little twisted here.

Is the government there to do the bidding of the government, or is it there to do the bidding of the people?

If you object to what the government does, surely you should try and change that. Running away doesn't work, as you pointed out with the rubbish analogy.

If you want to protest, maybe it's because you want to change things.

You can't have it both ways, you can't have freedoms and then demand that the govt can do whatever it likes.

In fact the US should have MORE FREEDOM with a better way of electing those politicians, who are, in the US, rather ridiculous in the way they look after their own interests far, far more than the interests of the people.

Or do you support getting rid of voting?

Vote. Stop making a show of idiotic protests and vote. Run for office. Have a platform of criminalizing the anthem and the pledge. Stop being a fool.

If the US had more freedom there would be no team jerseys, gay wouldn't be a demand and bakers could sell cakes to whoever they wanted.

I'm not sure I get anything you said here.

That's because you believe in the freedom to only do what you want. Not everyone gets to have freedom. Real freedom would mean that there are no team jerseys. Players choose their own clothing. Pride or actual advertising "I'm ashamed of Pride month." Real freedom would leave the bakers free to tell gays to take a hike when they demand their cakes. That's real freedom when it belongs to everyone. You don't like that kind of freedom.

This woman did not want to wear a shirt. In a better world she would not have to let herself be used to promote a pride she never had.

I have no problem with her not playing for the national team, if she doesn't want to.

This isn't me telling her what she HAS TO DO. This is me telling her she's a ******* retard for making the choice she made because it's contradictory to other choices she's made in her life.

 

[theHawk]

Hinkle's refusal to play for USWNT over Pride Month jersey offers opportunity for different kinds of understanding

Looking on twitter she is being attacked by the leftists with their usual whining. Its hilarious to read. So I got a question would you rather her have taken the spot and then complained about the jersey or should she have taken it and just shut the hell up about her views? Obviously she did right thing in not taking a spot that someone else can get but may not be as good as she is and well that's the slippery slope this cultural marxism drags us down! The best and brightest get pushed out in favor of those willing to shut the hell up and toe the libtard line.

She plays in a team.

Team work is all about working with people who are different. In soccer you have strikers, defenders, midfielders, goalkeepers.

Now all of a sudden she can't cope playing with people who are different?

Then **** her.

She has no problem playing on a team with different people. She won't advertise being gay by wearing a gay friendly jersey.

Good for her. It is time that nomal people stood up for themselves. She's not gay and should not be forced into advertising that this is something she approves of.

So what happens if one of her teammates is gay?

How's that going to work?

Probably the same as she has probably already had gay team mates. That’s not even the issue.

 

[frigidweirdo]

So what happens if one of her teammates is gay?

How's that going to work?

She has no problem playing with homosexuals. She has a problem using her body to advertise a cause she does not support. Her body, her choice, IMO. They can play without her and everybody wins.

Sure, she can make some kind of protest if she wants. What she doesn't realize is that her protest is rather contradictory.

If she plays for the US, she represents ALL AMERICAN GAY PEOPLE regardless of whether there's a rainbow on her shirt or not.

Please. Does she play for or represent American axe murderers? She plays a sport. She is apparently selective about what clothes she puts on HER body. Her body, her choice. She seems to be aware of the potential consequences, just like kneeling athletes, and has made her choice.

If she plays soccer for the national team, then yes, she plays for all Americans.

Murder is illegal in the US. Therefore this is something that she represents when she goes onto the pitch. Being gay is not illegal, and this is something she represents.

Yes, she's made her choice. Another person who makes a choice without thinking too hard about what the **** she's doing.

I disagree. People, even public people, can be individuals. Just because I am an American doing my thing, does not mean I represent all Americans. We are not lemmings. We do not have to follow the herd. We make our individual choices, and the chips fall where they fall. -shrug-

I do not represent American women just because I am one. I represent me. You represent you. She represents her beliefs. It's all good. This is still America.

But you're not playing for the national team. So.....

Which is the whole point here. Which you seemed to miss.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Hinkle's refusal to play for USWNT over Pride Month jersey offers opportunity for different kinds of understanding

Looking on twitter she is being attacked by the leftists with their usual whining. Its hilarious to read. So I got a question would you rather her have taken the spot and then complained about the jersey or should she have taken it and just shut the hell up about her views? Obviously she did right thing in not taking a spot that someone else can get but may not be as good as she is and well that's the slippery slope this cultural marxism drags us down! The best and brightest get pushed out in favor of those willing to shut the hell up and toe the libtard line.

She plays in a team.

Team work is all about working with people who are different. In soccer you have strikers, defenders, midfielders, goalkeepers.

Now all of a sudden she can't cope playing with people who are different?

Then **** her.

She has no problem playing on a team with different people. She won't advertise being gay by wearing a gay friendly jersey.

Good for her. It is time that nomal people stood up for themselves. She's not gay and should not be forced into advertising that this is something she approves of.

So what happens if one of her teammates is gay?

How's that going to work?

Probably the same as she has probably already had gay team mates. That’s not even the issue.

Well in men's soccer in Europe, it's notorious for gay people not to come out, they're too afraid. Hence why more needs to be done in improve this situation.

 

[Tresha91203]

She has no problem playing with homosexuals. She has a problem using her body to advertise a cause she does not support. Her body, her choice, IMO. They can play without her and everybody wins.

Sure, she can make some kind of protest if she wants. What she doesn't realize is that her protest is rather contradictory.

If she plays for the US, she represents ALL AMERICAN GAY PEOPLE regardless of whether there's a rainbow on her shirt or not.

Please. Does she play for or represent American axe murderers? She plays a sport. She is apparently selective about what clothes she puts on HER body. Her body, her choice. She seems to be aware of the potential consequences, just like kneeling athletes, and has made her choice.

If she plays soccer for the national team, then yes, she plays for all Americans.

Murder is illegal in the US. Therefore this is something that she represents when she goes onto the pitch. Being gay is not illegal, and this is something she represents.

Yes, she's made her choice. Another person who makes a choice without thinking too hard about what the **** she's doing.

I disagree. People, even public people, can be individuals. Just because I am an American doing my thing, does not mean I represent all Americans. We are not lemmings. We do not have to follow the herd. We make our individual choices, and the chips fall where they fall. -shrug-

I do not represent American women just because I am one. I represent me. You represent you. She represents her beliefs. It's all good. This is still America.

But you're not playing for the national team. So.....

Which is the whole point here. Which you seemed to miss.

I didn't miss it. I disagree that a political statement should be on a national team jersey. It wasn't something she could wear, in good faith. What is a gay pride emblem doing on our national team jerseys?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Sure, she can make some kind of protest if she wants. What she doesn't realize is that her protest is rather contradictory.

If she plays for the US, she represents ALL AMERICAN GAY PEOPLE regardless of whether there's a rainbow on her shirt or not.

Please. Does she play for or represent American axe murderers? She plays a sport. She is apparently selective about what clothes she puts on HER body. Her body, her choice. She seems to be aware of the potential consequences, just like kneeling athletes, and has made her choice.

If she plays soccer for the national team, then yes, she plays for all Americans.

Murder is illegal in the US. Therefore this is something that she represents when she goes onto the pitch. Being gay is not illegal, and this is something she represents.

Yes, she's made her choice. Another person who makes a choice without thinking too hard about what the **** she's doing.

I disagree. People, even public people, can be individuals. Just because I am an American doing my thing, does not mean I represent all Americans. We are not lemmings. We do not have to follow the herd. We make our individual choices, and the chips fall where they fall. -shrug-

I do not represent American women just because I am one. I represent me. You represent you. She represents her beliefs. It's all good. This is still America.

But you're not playing for the national team. So.....

Which is the whole point here. Which you seemed to miss.

I didn't miss it. I disagree that a political statement should be on a national team jersey. It wasn't something she could wear, in good faith. What is a gay pride emblem doing on our national team jerseys?

You don't want political statements on a national team jersey huh? A bit late for that. It says "USA" on it.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Please. Does she play for or represent American axe murderers? She plays a sport. She is apparently selective about what clothes she puts on HER body. Her body, her choice. She seems to be aware of the potential consequences, just like kneeling athletes, and has made her choice.

If she plays soccer for the national team, then yes, she plays for all Americans.

Murder is illegal in the US. Therefore this is something that she represents when she goes onto the pitch. Being gay is not illegal, and this is something she represents.

Yes, she's made her choice. Another person who makes a choice without thinking too hard about what the **** she's doing.

I disagree. People, even public people, can be individuals. Just because I am an American doing my thing, does not mean I represent all Americans. We are not lemmings. We do not have to follow the herd. We make our individual choices, and the chips fall where they fall. -shrug-

I do not represent American women just because I am one. I represent me. You represent you. She represents her beliefs. It's all good. This is still America.

But you're not playing for the national team. So.....

Which is the whole point here. Which you seemed to miss.

I didn't miss it. I disagree that a political statement should be on a national team jersey. It wasn't something she could wear, in good faith. What is a gay pride emblem doing on our national team jerseys?

You don't want political statements on a national team jersey huh? A bit late for that. It says "USA" on it.