US Supreme Court : Agrees with the President : MS13 gangster Kilmar Abrego Garcia must stay in El Salvador's SuperMax

Don’t you think this makes sense?

I mean you people are notorious for not believing in the power of the state.

Why would you be unquestioning regarding this?
 
Don’t you think this makes sense?

I mean you people are notorious for not believing in the power of the state.

Why would you be unquestioning regarding this?
Due Process - Translation: Lets flood the US with illegals, then rely on the benevolence of the American people to slow the process of deporting them down to the point of where trying to do it is useless.
 
That’s not what the court ruled

They didn't specify where or what duration the hearing needs to be.

Democrats have no problem finding judges who will write a warrant for Trump in the middle of the night via Zoom. It should be equally easy to get judges to do hearings at the airport remotely.
 
Due Process - Translation: Lets flood the US with illegals, then rely on the benevolence of the American people to slow the process of deporting them down to the point of where trying to do it is useless.
Habeas corpus
Translation

Rule of law
 
Or Congress can appropriately fund an increase in judges to handle this.
Nope. Sorry.

We’ve spent enough of our hard earned money catering to Biden and Harris’ flood of illegals.

Expedited Removal is the due process requirement that Congress passed in 1998, and this president will FOLLOW THE LAW!
 
Habeas corpus
Translation

Rule of law
"You have the body"

Which sets up the Catch-22.

Plaintiff's must file a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the location where they are detained, which means the individual appears in court and gets to hear the charged and evidence against them.

But now the individuals are not in the country and can't appear before the Judge to plead their habeas case. Therefore Habeas Corpus is not an avenue open to them to attempt to right a wrong.

WW
 
Which sets up the Catch-22.

Plaintiff's must file a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the location where they are detained, which means the individual appears in court and gets to hear the charged and evidence against them.

But now the individuals are not in the country and can't appear before the Judge to plead their habeas case. Therefore Habeas Corpus is not an avenue open to them to attempt to right a wrong.

WW
Yes!

And that is some catch, that Catch-22!
 
Plaintiff's must file a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the location where they are detained, which means the individual appears in court and gets to hear the charged and evidence against them.
If I understand your question, the hearing is held in US territory.
 
15th post
If I understand your question, the hearing is held in US territory.

Such hearings have to be before a US Judge. Judges only function on US territory.

The detainees aren't in the US therefore can't appear before the Judge.

WW
 
Which sets up the Catch-22.

Plaintiff's must file a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the location where they are detained, which means the individual appears in court and gets to hear the charged and evidence against them.

But now the individuals are not in the country and can't appear before the Judge to plead their habeas case. Therefore Habeas Corpus is not an avenue open to them to attempt to right a wrong.

WW
Yeah, you assholes are trying to Catch-22 this country to death. But Trump outsmarted you.

And he will continue to do so.
 
Such hearings have to be before a US Judge. Judges only function on US territory.

The detainees aren't in the US therefore can't appear before the Judge.

WW
Its done before they are deported. What I don't get are the cases where they are adjudicated but remain in the US after.
 
Back
Top Bottom