US signs anti-abortion declaration with group of largely authoritarian governments

Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?
They don't rip a fetus out of the womb.


what did they do during your abortions honey?

And your medical history, I want to know!!

You answer a question with a question - clearly you went to public schools.


relevance honey - I have had no abortions and no lady I was ever with did. I know how to be responsible and act like and adult.

Will you answer my questions?
I want to know if you use medical enhancement for your penises. Are you on Viagra?


You answer a question with a question - clearly you went to public schools.

Changing and ignoring the subject is a sure sign of defeat.

Sad really sugar.
 

The “core supporters” of the declaration are Brazil, Egypt, Hungary, Indonesia and Uganda, and the 27 other signatories include Belarus (where security forces are currently trying to suppress a women-led protest movement), Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Sudan, South Sudan, Libya.

Most of the signatories are among the 20 worst countries to be a woman according to the Women, Peace and Security Index established by Georgetown University.


The list of Americas new friends must make sobering reading. Not to worry. In a fortnight President Joe will consign this to the bin.







Authoritarian is where countries FORCE you to have abortions. You know, like your heroes the chinese.

so true-----abortion is far too COMPLICATED an issue to distill down to "CONTROL OF WOMEN" In fact---
way back----before Roe VS Wade came about----the issue of abortion on demand ALWAYS included the
charge that it is meant as a TOOL FOR GENOCIDE AGAINST BLACK AMERICANS. -----or the other baseless charge-----that it is a NAZI MACHINATION
-----invented by Darwin (???) My personal opinion is------first trimester abortion on demand is fine-----forcing catholic organizations to pay for them----is
abusive. Abortion, medically indicated, is fine with the consent of the owner of the womb. ----also---planned
parenthood does a fine job and should be PROTECTED
from molestation which includes jerks with placards
showing the blood spattered products of the procedure. As to the COST-----I see no reason to force institutions that are "anti-abortion" to be forced
to fund them or for the taxpayer to be forced to fund them. First trimester according to cyberspace costs
about $500.
 
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?

Attn. cyber-buddies. Meet penny. She is a health care worker and is obsessed with Israel. Her "Israel
obsession" is a perversion that she sucked, in infancy,
from the teat of her catechism whore. If she were
REALLY a health care worker, she would have some idea as to the Israeli policy on abortion-----in short---
it is available for REASON-----like any medical indication. The possible "medical indication" is so
liberal that the policy amounts to abortion on
demand. A woman can obtain an abortion on the
grounds that giving birth will render her very unhappy, or she already has lots of kids, or----just about any
other reason. As the 'international agreement'---there is, absolutely, no reason for Israel to take part
since its existing policy is already excellent.
FURTHERMORE----anyone claiming that it is an agreement to OUTLAW abortion----is a liar.
In some countries---abortion is FORCED or used as
a sick substitution for birth control. <<<<these
policies are BOTH grossly abusive. I have interviewed women from communist countries who have had as many as 5 or even ten abortions------having been COERCED into unwanted sex or denied simple birth
control devices. Abortion is not an ENTIRELY benign
procedure. It induces hormonal imbalances, sometimes physical damage and---VERY COMMONLY, EMOTIONAL DAMAGE to the secondary victim.
 
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.

Are you a male? You sound like one.

Does it matter? What does that picture of a 12 week fetus show you....? Is that a toaster? is it a Buick?

Looks like a human to me....
This fails as a red herring fallacy.

The only issue is that the state has no authority to compel a woman to give birth against her will through force of law.
 
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.

Are you a male? You sound like one.

Does it matter? What does that picture of a 12 week fetus show you....? Is that a toaster? is it a Buick?

Looks like a human to me....
This fails as a red herring fallacy.

The only issue is that the state has no authority to compel a woman to give birth against her will through force of law.
If you're so confident that Americans approve of abortion, then why have they never passed a law ?
 
This is what Poland — presumably one of the more “civilized” countries signing the new anti-abortion “declaration” — is now doing on its home turf:

Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal ruled on Thursday that abortions due to FETAL DEFECTS are unconstitutional, banning one of the last common legal grounds for terminating a pregnancy. Prior to the decision, Poland already had some of the strictest anti-abortion laws in Europe. This will forbid approximately 1,000 abortions a year that women (and families) previously chose to have legally in Poland.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/poland-court-abortion-law-1.5773722
 
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?

Attn. cyber-buddies. Meet penny. She is a health care worker and is obsessed with Israel. Her "Israel
obsession" is a perversion that she sucked, in infancy,
from the teat of her catechism whore. If she were
REALLY a health care worker, she would have some idea as to the Israeli policy on abortion-----in short---
it is available for REASON-----like any medical indication. The possible "medical indication" is so
liberal that the policy amounts to abortion on
demand. A woman can obtain an abortion on the
grounds that giving birth will render her very unhappy, or she already has lots of kids, or----just about any
other reason. As the 'international agreement'---there is, absolutely, no reason for Israel to take part
since its existing policy is already excellent.
FURTHERMORE----anyone claiming that it is an agreement to OUTLAW abortion----is a liar.
In some countries---abortion is FORCED or used as
a sick substitution for birth control. <<<<these
policies are BOTH grossly abusive. I have interviewed women from communist countries who have had as many as 5 or even ten abortions------having been COERCED into unwanted sex or denied simple birth
control devices. Abortion is not an ENTIRELY benign
procedure. It induces hormonal imbalances, sometimes physical damage and---VERY COMMONLY, EMOTIONAL DAMAGE to the secondary victim.

Yes its is as a matter of birth control, that is how it originally started here, for population control.

Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Its none of your fucking business.

If I am the biological father then yes it is my fucking business Tommy!
Its the women who is having it, its really not your business. She might not think you are husband material or boyfriend material for that matter.

Are you on Viagra?
 
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?

Attn. cyber-buddies. Meet penny. She is a health care worker and is obsessed with Israel. Her "Israel
obsession" is a perversion that she sucked, in infancy,
from the teat of her catechism whore. If she were
REALLY a health care worker, she would have some idea as to the Israeli policy on abortion-----in short---
it is available for REASON-----like any medical indication. The possible "medical indication" is so
liberal that the policy amounts to abortion on
demand. A woman can obtain an abortion on the
grounds that giving birth will render her very unhappy, or she already has lots of kids, or----just about any
other reason. As the 'international agreement'---there is, absolutely, no reason for Israel to take part
since its existing policy is already excellent.
FURTHERMORE----anyone claiming that it is an agreement to OUTLAW abortion----is a liar.
In some countries---abortion is FORCED or used as
a sick substitution for birth control. <<<<these
policies are BOTH grossly abusive. I have interviewed women from communist countries who have had as many as 5 or even ten abortions------having been COERCED into unwanted sex or denied simple birth
control devices. Abortion is not an ENTIRELY benign
procedure. It induces hormonal imbalances, sometimes physical damage and---VERY COMMONLY, EMOTIONAL DAMAGE to the secondary victim.

Yes its is as a matter of birth control, that is how it originally started here, for population control.

Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Its none of your fucking business.

If I am the biological father then yes it is my fucking business Tommy!
Its the women who is having it, its really not your business. She might not think you are husband material or boyfriend material for that matter.

Are you on Viagra?

What the fuck does Viagra have to do with anything!

If you believe a man should pay for the Child after it born but has no right in the way of the abortion then you are a sick individual, but everyone know you are sick already with all your Jew hating threads!
 
Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?
They don't rip a fetus out of the womb.


what did they do during your abortions honey?

And your medical history, I want to know!!

You answer a question with a question - clearly you went to public schools.


relevance honey - I have had no abortions and no lady I was ever with did. I know how to be responsible and act like and adult.

Will you answer my questions?
I want to know if you use medical enhancement for your penises. Are you on Viagra?


You answer a question with a question - clearly you went to public schools.

Changing and ignoring the subject is a sure sign of defeat.

Sad really sugar.

Sad, what is your medical history, are you on Viagra? I want to know? If its your business, its mine.
 
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?

Attn. cyber-buddies. Meet penny. She is a health care worker and is obsessed with Israel. Her "Israel
obsession" is a perversion that she sucked, in infancy,
from the teat of her catechism whore. If she were
REALLY a health care worker, she would have some idea as to the Israeli policy on abortion-----in short---
it is available for REASON-----like any medical indication. The possible "medical indication" is so
liberal that the policy amounts to abortion on
demand. A woman can obtain an abortion on the
grounds that giving birth will render her very unhappy, or she already has lots of kids, or----just about any
other reason. As the 'international agreement'---there is, absolutely, no reason for Israel to take part
since its existing policy is already excellent.
FURTHERMORE----anyone claiming that it is an agreement to OUTLAW abortion----is a liar.
In some countries---abortion is FORCED or used as
a sick substitution for birth control. <<<<these
policies are BOTH grossly abusive. I have interviewed women from communist countries who have had as many as 5 or even ten abortions------having been COERCED into unwanted sex or denied simple birth
control devices. Abortion is not an ENTIRELY benign
procedure. It induces hormonal imbalances, sometimes physical damage and---VERY COMMONLY, EMOTIONAL DAMAGE to the secondary victim.

Yes its is as a matter of birth control, that is how it originally started here, for population control.

Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Its none of your fucking business.

If I am the biological father then yes it is my fucking business Tommy!
Its the women who is having it, its really not your business. She might not think you are husband material or boyfriend material for that matter.

Are you on Viagra?

What the fuck does Viagra have to do with anything!

If you believe a man should pay for the Child after it born but has no right in the way of the abortion then you are a sick individual, but everyone know you are sick already with all your Jew hating threads!

Answer me. You are not in control of a female's body , no matter what you think.
 
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?
So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

I read the Guardian article. It does NOT include the actual "AGREEMENT"-----just the details that abortion
is not a guaranteed right at the EXPENSE of the state.
I cannot say if it includes other details which might
restrict RIGHT TO ABORTION----the article just does not include that information. Perhaps TAINTED could find the words of the actual agreement.
The Guardian is hardly a SOURCE----it is a sensationalist rag
The Trump Administration signed an anti-abortion declaration with 32 member states in the United Nations on Thursday, many of which are authoritarian regimes or seen as flawed democracies, a move which drastically reframes U.S. foreign policy ahead of the presidential election.

---------------------------------------
is Israel going to sign up?

Attn. cyber-buddies. Meet penny. She is a health care worker and is obsessed with Israel. Her "Israel
obsession" is a perversion that she sucked, in infancy,
from the teat of her catechism whore. If she were
REALLY a health care worker, she would have some idea as to the Israeli policy on abortion-----in short---
it is available for REASON-----like any medical indication. The possible "medical indication" is so
liberal that the policy amounts to abortion on
demand. A woman can obtain an abortion on the
grounds that giving birth will render her very unhappy, or she already has lots of kids, or----just about any
other reason. As the 'international agreement'---there is, absolutely, no reason for Israel to take part
since its existing policy is already excellent.
FURTHERMORE----anyone claiming that it is an agreement to OUTLAW abortion----is a liar.
In some countries---abortion is FORCED or used as
a sick substitution for birth control. <<<<these
policies are BOTH grossly abusive. I have interviewed women from communist countries who have had as many as 5 or even ten abortions------having been COERCED into unwanted sex or denied simple birth
control devices. Abortion is not an ENTIRELY benign
procedure. It induces hormonal imbalances, sometimes physical damage and---VERY COMMONLY, EMOTIONAL DAMAGE to the secondary victim.

Yes its is as a matter of birth control, that is how it originally started here, for population control.

Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Its none of your fucking business.

If I am the biological father then yes it is my fucking business Tommy!
Its the women who is having it, its really not your business. She might not think you are husband material or boyfriend material for that matter.

Are you on Viagra?

What the fuck does Viagra have to do with anything!

If you believe a man should pay for the Child after it born but has no right in the way of the abortion then you are a sick individual, but everyone know you are sick already with all your Jew hating threads!

Answer me. You are not in control of a female's body , no matter what you think.

Yes we do control your body, whether you like it or not. You want to stand on the street corner and sell your pussy? No. You can't do that.

You want to shoot up meth? Nope again. You can't do that.

You want to slash your wrists with razor blades? No, you can't do that.

You want to cut out one of your kidneys and sell it on the black market? Nope again. You can't do that.

You want to smoke, drink, and eat everything you want without paying the "sin" taxes? Once again, no.

It's not your body and you can't do anything you want with it. It's God's body, and you didn't create it.
 
Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?
They don't rip a fetus out of the womb.


what did they do during your abortions honey?

And your medical history, I want to know!!

You answer a question with a question - clearly you went to public schools.


relevance honey - I have had no abortions and no lady I was ever with did. I know how to be responsible and act like and adult.

Will you answer my questions?
I want to know if you use medical enhancement for your penises. Are you on Viagra?


You answer a question with a question - clearly you went to public schools.

Changing and ignoring the subject is a sure sign of defeat.

Sad really sugar.

Sad, what is your medical history, are you on Viagra? I want to know? If its your business, its mine.


Murdering babies is not big deal right?

It is your choice and your body correct?

Share with us all your happy stories of good times at Planned Abortionhood?
 
They don't rip a fetus out of the womb.
I suppose they didn't commit adultery to have all these unwanted babies, and they're not cutting around the baby's private parts and performing routine hysterectomies on the mothers, either?

No wonder then, that Mary the mother of Jesus remained a Virgin all her life and eternally! It was truly miraculous in those days that a young woman -- conceived by the Holy Spirit and not involved in a paternity child support alimony case -- could have given birth to a child and still have her womb intact, without being defiled by a Pap smear or cut up by a Cæsarean section in the days of Cæsar Augustus and King Herod who ordered all the fetuses in the district to be aborted as a preventive measure, lest a child be born in a filthy manger without proper medical care and genital surgery.
 
Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Its none of your fucking business.


So, your "index" is based on assuming that your opinions are "natural law" and any deviation is thus oppression?

Great way to create the illusion of... credibility? a point?

Whatever. No one believes you.


Abortion is not a civil right, you moron.
 

Forum List

Back
Top