US Navy members blocked from getting Fox News

Do people still actually think Socialists/Progressives believe in Free Speech? All i can say is...Wake the F*CK up people!
 
Why you interloping on KrustyFranks turf? He staked out the hack lying thingy a long time ago.

Your lame "libtard" name calling is a bit late and out of focus also.

I am a third(ormore) generation Republican looking back and up to Eisenhower and Goldwater. You on the other hand are a fruit fly.


Did someone ask what you are or are you that pathetic and self-absorbed that you feel compelled to offer details about yourself to people who didn't ask and couldn't care less?

Writer and inventor? Isn't that web-speak for unemployed alcoholic?
 
And Fox (WTVT) never sued for the right to lie. The court decision in the whistle-blower/wrongful termination suit the couple brought against the Tampa station included a list of reasons why the suit had no merrit.


Their argument was that they didn't get whistle blower status because it's into a crime to lie in the news.

Their entire argument was that it's okay for Fox to lie, therefore they aren't blowing the whistle on any crime and are not protected.

I posted the decision in another thread back when you idiots tried to spin your way out if this.
 
And Fox (WTVT) never sued for the right to lie. The court decision in the whistle-blower/wrongful termination suit the couple brought against the Tampa station included a list of reasons why the suit had no merrit.


Their argument was that they didn't get whistle blower status because it's into a crime to lie in the news.

Their entire argument was that it's okay for Fox to lie, therefore they aren't blowing the whistle on any crime and are not protected.

I posted the decision in another thread back when you idiots tried to spin your way out if this.

It's not a crime to lie in the news. ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN have all been doing it for decades!!!!
 
Why you interloping on KrustyFranks turf? He staked out the hack lying thingy a long time ago.

Your lame "libtard" name calling is a bit late and out of focus also.

I am a third(ormore) generation Republican looking back and up to Eisenhower and Goldwater. You on the other hand are a fruit fly.


Did someone ask what you are or are you that pathetic and self-absorbed that you feel compelled to offer details about yourself to people who didn't ask and couldn't care less?

Writer and inventor? Isn't that web-speak for unemployed alcoholic?

Did I ask you a question ccocroach? Did I single you out? When I want to see yor lips flapping you will know because I will offer it in a reply or your loggon name. My statement could be applied to several idiots on this thread. You are not the spokespeson for the idiots...Are You????
 

How about you find out and let us know the truth.

The fact is, if we have a USAF ISP, we could get just about anything. On Navy and USMC ISP's they block anything they feel like.

Correct. The boobs at ANOC determine what gets seen on the Navy/USMC ISP on a daily basis. They have programs like "Webwasher" and "SquidGuard" that they tweak whenever it suits their fancy.
 
It amazez me how many contributors miss little details like...YOU LOST THE ELECTION ..Fuckwits. Obama made it clear publicly that he believes Fox is a component of the GOP. It is totally and rightfully his call seing as he is commander and chief. Get over it or win a friggin election.... PUUUULLEEEZZZZ!
 
Apparently Barak Hussein is confused. He still thinks he was annointed dictator, and that Americans no longer have freedom.

If anyone deserves to hear any news organziation they wish it's the people who fight for America's freedom.

It's disturbing, how some posters think America now should be a dictatorship, because their dictator is in office.
 
Apparently Barak Hussein is confused. He still thinks he was annointed dictator, and that Americans no longer have freedom.

If anyone deserves to hear any news organziation they wish it's the people who fight for America's freedom.

It's disturbing, how some posters think America now should be a dictatorship, because their dictator is in office.

Get a grip fuckwit. Obama is the CIC. You want to dismantle the chain of command on what authority exactly?
 
Apparently Barak Hussein is confused. He still thinks he was annointed dictator, and that Americans no longer have freedom.

If anyone deserves to hear any news organziation they wish it's the people who fight for America's freedom.

It's disturbing, how some posters think America now should be a dictatorship, because their dictator is in office.

Get a grip fuckwit. Obama is the CIC. You want to dismantle the chain of command on what authority exactly?

Both of you are wrong. Obama hasn't got jack shit to do with what ANOC lets pass through their web filters and onto government computers. Get a grip on reality.
 
Apparently Barak Hussein is confused. He still thinks he was annointed dictator, and that Americans no longer have freedom.

If anyone deserves to hear any news organziation they wish it's the people who fight for America's freedom.

It's disturbing, how some posters think America now should be a dictatorship, because their dictator is in office.

Get a grip fuckwit. Obama is the CIC. You want to dismantle the chain of command on what authority exactly?

Both of you are wrong. Obama hasn't got jack shit to do with what ANOC lets pass through their web filters and onto government computers. Get a grip on reality.

I conceed no expertise on these matters. Can you provide some information excluding the commander in chief from making a determination that Fox could be detrimental to his authority and act on that assumtion?
 
Get a grip fuckwit. Obama is the CIC. You want to dismantle the chain of command on what authority exactly?

Both of you are wrong. Obama hasn't got jack shit to do with what ANOC lets pass through their web filters and onto government computers. Get a grip on reality.

I conceed no expertise on these matters. Can you provide some information excluding the commander in chief from making a determination that Fox could be detrimental to his authority and act on that assumtion?

No. Acting on assumptions makes one out to be an ASS. I speak from personal experience as I'm still currently employed by DoD. We have access to the internet on government computers for the conduct of business and to check our email when it's allowed. Several times websites like grainger, mcmaster-carr etc. are blocked for a while due to some code or java app that is being exploited by hackers. Instead of letting the hackers in they block the sight until they develope a security patch and install it. Fox news' website relies heavily on java apps and therefore it's blocked many times as hackers attack that website.
 
Both of you are wrong. Obama hasn't got jack shit to do with what ANOC lets pass through their web filters and onto government computers. Get a grip on reality.

I conceed no expertise on these matters. Can you provide some information excluding the commander in chief from making a determination that Fox could be detrimental to his authority and act on that assumtion?

No. Acting on assumptions makes one out to be an ASS. I speak from personal experience as I'm still currently employed by DoD. We have access to the internet on government computers for the conduct of business and to check our email when it's allowed. Several times websites like grainger, mcmaster-carr etc. are blocked for a while due to some code or java app that is being exploited by hackers. Instead of letting the hackers in they block the sight until they develope a security patch and install it. Fox news' website relies heavily on java apps and therefore it's blocked many times as hackers attack that website.


That seems like a lot of tap dancing...most of it backwards or sideways. Am I being an ass suggesting that the OP is in regards as to wether the POTUS has the unchallenged right to determine if Fox gets played or not irregardless of any technical mumbo jumbo?

Do you or do you not conceed that Obama can remove Fox from using armed forces media access to his troops? Yes or no? If not can you state the law or regulation denying him that option?

Try not to get lost opaqueing the question with hackers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top