US Military's Knee on the Throat of the World

America treated the Indians badly

But no less so than how humans were being treated all over the planet at that time
The US was built on white supremacy.
Genocide and chattel slavery were fundamental to its founding and survival.
There's no way of responding to today's unrest without acknowledging that reality.
sure --sure
.....US built on the INTELLIGENCE/brains of the whites--which was supreme --not white supremacy--intelligence supremacy
 
They would have won because the communists would murder anyone who voted against them
Korean communists had no reason to kill opposing voters between 1945 and 1950 because they were in the majority. US forces, on the other hand, resorted to killing their political opponents frequently and without any regard for"democracy" or human rights:

Autumn Uprising of 1946 - Wikipedia

"The 10.1 Daegu Uprising of 1946 (hangul: 대구 10·1 사건; hanja: 大邱 10·1 事件) in Korea was a peasant uprising throughout the southern provinces of Korea against the policies of the United States Army Military Government in Korea headed by General John R. Hodge and in favor of restoration of power to the people's committees that made up the People's Republic of Korea..."

"According to the conditions the United States Military Government responded in different ways, including mobilizing strikebreakers, the police, right-wing youth groups, sending in U.S. troops and tanks, and declaring martial law, and succeeded in putting down the uprising.

"The uprising resulted in killing of 38 policemen, 163 civil workers, and 73 civilians.[2]

"Some analysts say that the uprising, which was in part a reaction to the October elections for the South Korean Interim Legislative Assembly, organized by the United States Military Government, is a better indicator of public opinion than the election itself."

Korean communists had no reason to kill opposing voters between 1945 and 1950 because they were in the majority.

if that were true then the soviets would not object to international supervision of the elections

which the communists never agreed to

the only internationally supervised election were held in the south
 
The US was built on white supremacy.
so?

whites built the country

but have since agreed to share the greatest nation on eath that they created with people who are not white

though we have little choice about that where blacks are concerned because of slavery
 
That was dramatic and silly.
When, in all of history, have the rich existed without war?

Did Bill Gates need war to get rich?
Warren Buffett? Jeff Bezos? Larry Ellison?

Please, explain how they needed war.


He is just talking shit. I have challenged him and he has been pushed to the point where he has to admit the real reasons for his actions, or get vague and evasive.


Like nearly all far lefties, he does not want to admit his true motives or goals.

He's a commie, so all the rich must be evil.
It's the only reason a swell fellow, such as himself, has been such a failure.
The evil rich did it to him.
 
"Hungarian journalist Tibor Meray further commented on the bloodshed: 'I saw destruction and horrible things committed by American forces...Everything which moved in North Korea was a military target, peasants in the fields often were machine gunned by pilots who I, this was my impression, amused themselves to shoot targets which moved.'

Wait, a commie journalist wrote about American atrocities?
I wonder if he'd have repeated his claims in 1957, after fleeing commie awesomeness?
 
A war started by north korea
In 1950.

Five years AFTER the US Army prevented free elections.

How did South Koreans initially respond to the "invasion"?


"DECEMBER 31, 2002
A Pop Quiz on Korea
by GARY LEUPP
(Choose the best answer. 3 points each. Answers at the end.)"


"9. In June 1950 North Korean forces attacked the South and by September controlled all but the southeastern region around Pusan. What was the reaction of South Koreans?

"a. stiff resistance, in support of the popular U.S.-backed Syngman Rhee regime

"b. little resistance, and initially much cooperation

c. general apathy"
 
A war started by north korea
In 1950.

Five years AFTER the US Army prevented free elections.

How did South Koreans initially respond to the "invasion"?


"DECEMBER 31, 2002
A Pop Quiz on Korea
by GARY LEUPP
(Choose the best answer. 3 points each. Answers at the end.)"


"9. In June 1950 North Korean forces attacked the South and by September controlled all but the southeastern region around Pusan. What was the reaction of South Koreans?

"a. stiff resistance, in support of the popular U.S.-backed Syngman Rhee regime

"b. little resistance, and initially much cooperation

c. general apathy"
None of the above

the north had heavy tanks and artillery that the south koreans lacked

no military force can stand up to a blitzkrieg without equal weapons
 
Yea we had no right to stop those considerate nazies
This thread is about US foreign policy since 1945:

Hegemony or Survival - Wikipedia

"Chomsky's primary argument in Hegemony or Survival is that the United States government has pursued an 'Imperial Grand Strategy' in order to maintain its status as the world's foremost superpower since at least the end of the Second World War."
 
LOl, keep digging a bigger hole you Maoist dickhead.
MAGA?
https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F200630135559-hp-only-20200630-daily-cases-us-v-eu-cht.png

Moron.
 
How could they have even organized elections when the occupations only started in August of 1945, and they still had to disarm and remove the Japanese troops and administrators?
Preparations for reunification elections in Korea had been underway for at least year before the war ended, and the US didn't invade Korea until September of '45.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_Korea#Establishment

" On 15 August 1945, the Japanese Empire was defeated by the Allies.

"The Imperial Japanese authorities requested that a government be established to ensure the safety of their persons and property after the occupation ended..."

"Under the leadership of Lyuh Woon-Hyung, the newly formed Committee for the Preparation of Korean Independence (CPKI) organized people's committees throughout the country to coordinate the transition to independence.

"On 28 August 1945 the CPKI announced that it would function as the temporary national government of Korea.[2]:p.64 On 12 September, CPKI activists met in Seoul and established the PRK."

Korea had existed for thousands of years before the USA; the last thing they needed in 1945 was another military occupation especially by white supremacists.
 
How could they have even organized elections when the occupations only started in August of 1945, and they still had to disarm and remove the Japanese troops and administrators?
Preparations for reunification elections in Korea had been underway for at least year before the war ended, and the US didn't invade Korea until September of '45.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_Korea#Establishment

" On 15 August 1945, the Japanese Empire was defeated by the Allies.

"The Imperial Japanese authorities requested that a government be established to ensure the safety of their persons and property after the occupation ended..."

"Under the leadership of Lyuh Woon-Hyung, the newly formed Committee for the Preparation of Korean Independence (CPKI) organized people's committees throughout the country to coordinate the transition to independence.

"On 28 August 1945 the CPKI announced that it would function as the temporary national government of Korea.[2]:p.64 On 12 September, CPKI activists met in Seoul and established the PRK."

Korea had existed for thousands of years before the USA; the last thing they needed in 1945 was another military occupation especially by white supremacists.

"preparations" by an underground group, during an occupation.

Lots of plans, no evidence it could ever actually occur.

The Soviets were never going to allow open elections in the area they controlled, just like Eastern Europe.

That you continuously ignore that fact and reality just shows what a cum-slurping commie twat you are.
 
You don't have to be apart of NATO to buy U.S. military equipment. NATO's existence has no impact on U.S. arm sales.
NATO is a cash cow for US arms dealers.
bc30071801.jpg

NATO Is a Goldmine for US Weapons’ Industries

"Countries of the NATO military alliance have been ordered by President Trump to increase their spending on weapons, and the reasons for his insistence they do so are becoming clearer.

"It’s got nothing to do with any defence rationale, because, after all, the Secretary General of the US-NATO military alliance, Jens Stoltenberg, has admitted that 'we don’t see any imminent threat against any NATO ally' and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute recorded in its 2018 World Report that 'at $66.3 billion, Russia’s military spending in 2017 was 20 per cent lower than in 2016.'

"Even Radio Free Europe, the US government's anti-Russia broadcaster, records that Russia has reduced its defence spending."

"
Within European NATO, the biggest spenders on US arms, thus far, are Poland, Romania, Britain and Greece, and the amounts involved are colossal.

"Poland, whose economy is booming, has signed an agreement to buy Patriot missile systems for $4.75 billion, adding to the purchase of Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles for $200 million, Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles, costing $250 million, and High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems for the same amount.

"Delivery of its 48 F-16 multi-role strike aircraft ($4.7 billion) began in 2006, and Warsaw has proved a loyal customer ever since. Who knows what exotic new piece of US hardware will be ordered as a result of Mr Trump’s encouragement?"
 
There is no such thing as the near-abroad. What the Russians or others refer to as the "near-abroad" are independent countries that are allowed to make their own choices about whether to join a particular economic block or Defensive Alliance. The Russians have no right, to stop any other independent country from joining an Economic Union or Defensive Alliance.
Would you apply the same logic to the Monroe Doctrine?
5298ca3622c37.image.jpg

‘Abandoned’ Monroe Doctrine Guided U.S. Policy for 190 Years
 
Did Bill Gates need war to get rich?
Warren Buffett? Jeff Bezos? Larry Ellison?
Did Gates and the others prosper in a US capitalist economy that's been at war for decades, or not?
Don%E2%80%99t-believe-the-hype-about-the-%E2%80%98rules-based-order%E2%80%99-capitalism-is-perpetual-war.jpg

MR Online | Don’t believe the hype about the ‘rules-based order’, capitalism is perpetual war

Gates and the others had a useful product or skill, freely sought out by those willing to spend money to purchase it. War or not.

If you were useful, or had a skill, you wouldn't be such a whiney Commie twat.
 

Forum List

Back
Top