US/Israeli Missile Strike on Girls' School was a Double Tap

Which is a pretty good reason for not attacking another country. Especially one that posed no danger to us. Bibi got trump Epstein tapes from Putin, then we had no choice.
And then there was the Russian collusion, OMG omg omg!
 
Iran killed 35,000 people in a weekend.

Oh...you bad United States
1772933097748.webp
 
For a left-leaner you don't seem as dull as the rest so I'll try......There was a naval installation close by that was also struck.....While it's a shame it happened it happens in war all the time.
It does.
It's certainly regretable but the selective outrage of the Left never ceases to puzzle and piss me off.
 
What's your personal understanding of the term terrorism?

Does it include this?

GoogleAI Overview:

"Casualties and Aftermath
  • "Death Toll: Iranian state media reported that 165 to 181 people were killed, the vast majority being schoolgirls aged 7 to 12.
  • The 'Double-Tap' Tactic: Witnesses and Red Crescent medics reported an initial strike hit the school building, prompting teachers to move surviving students to the prayer hall for safety.
  • Second Strike: A second missile reportedly hit the prayer hall area shortly after, killing the sheltering students, their teachers, and parents who had arrived to collect them."
Just awful.
 
Do you honestly believe the U.S. government would purposely target a school filled with children?
Yes, of course. They said "no more restrictions" and what could be better to illustrate their point of view?

 
I don't know if we hit it. My only point is I don't believe for a second that we would target a children's school. If we hit it, then it was by accident, or we had bad info of what it was.
Some of those guys are "Satan's Angels" aren't they? And what can please Satan more than intentional sacrifice of dozens of innocent girls?
 
We do not PURPOSELY bomb schools filled with children, and shame on you for believing we would.
Why not? If you believe that Iranians are Untermenchen (and you definitely do) you don't have a lot of moral restrictions to kill their children, do you?
 
You believe what Iranian state media says ?
I believe (more or less) what POTUS and minister of war says. And they did say "No more moral restrictions". And it means that there is no restriction for intentional human sacrifice in some religions rite or just as act of demonstration of determination and terror.
 
I believe (more or less) what POTUS and minister of war says. And they did say "No more moral restrictions". And it means that there is no restriction for intentional human sacrifice in some religions rite or just as act of demonstration of determination and terror.
They never said that.
 
Why not? If you believe that Iranians are Untermenchen (and you definitely do) you don't have a lot of moral restrictions to kill their children, do you?
The US is not at war with the Iranian people.
 
The US is not at war with the Iranian people.
The USA are not in war at all, as far as I know. But some high ranked Americans do kill people (both in the USA and abroad) to achieve their political, economical or religious goals.
 
They never said that.


Is it a fake?

Didn't Trump said that he doesn't need international law?

If Trump's moral allows him to trade (and, may be, rape and kill) Ukrainian girls, what can prevent him from killing Iranian girls?
 
Last edited:
15th post
Which is a pretty good reason for not attacking another country. Especially one that posed no danger to us. Bibi got trump Epstein tapes from Putin, then we had no choice.
The leftist slobs are always quick with their goofy conspiracy theories.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom