- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
- 2,280
My point is he is an opportunist. He was shunned by Republicans when he wanted to run for president, and suddenly he couldn't turn fast enough. He has aspirations, and I believe he will do and say whatever it takes that he considers will get him there, no matter who he has to step on and sully. In other words I don't believe a word he says and think he is a fraud.
What's your point?China Fraud Accusations Wesley Clark s Ex-Firm Faces Questions - ABC News Wesley Clark?
Why would you think current events in the Middle East represent a failure of US foreign policy?hen the failing foreign policy reaches the breaking point and the fight moves to the states, imo the liberals will change their tunes
"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat.
"'Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran." [1
Wesley Clark - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Clark's 2003 revelation has nothing to do with any recent missteps in China.