US and Israel Launch Preemptive Attacks on Iran

Hey MAGA:

Remember how gross it was, when we learned, AFTER THE FACT, that Bush took us to war on a lie?

Remember how you frauds spent the next decade calling him a neocon and pretending you didn't support the war, after learning this lie AFTER THE FACT?

Well, in this case, we learned BEFORE THE FACT that Trump is lying about Iran's weapons capabilities.

And here you are, grabbing your ankles again.

Pathetic.
 
Last edited:
And where did some of those Nazis look for inspiration?

GoogleAI Overview:

"Nazi Germany’s legal system in the 1930s drew significant, documented inspiration from American racial policies, specifically the Jim Crow laws of the American South, to create its own framework for discrimination.

"While Nazi ideology was driven by antisemitism and eventually led to genocide, Nazi lawyers and leaders carefully studied how the United States classified, disenfranchised, and separated races to draft the 1935 Nuremberg Laws."

This is very true. Hitler was genuinely inspired by the expansions of European settlers in the USA and the subjugation of the existing population.
 
It leads to things like the Holocaust, if that's not a problem to you then I can't really say much.

In fact Darwinism led to Eugenics, a favorite talking point among intellectual Nazis in the 1930s, you'd have loved it.
So you are making a moral argument. Morals are in short supply. Wish for morality in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first. Life is unfair. Expect to make sacrifices.
 
Awkward Pentagon! Where did that little boy Hegseth take a dump? lol. :)

OutOfService.webp



Poo poo problems: The USS Gerald R. Ford has some serious toilet problems for the 4,500 sailors on board.

source:

 
So you are making a moral argument. Morals are in short supply. Wish for morality in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first. Life is unfair. Expect to make sacrifices.
If you'd been in Germany in 1941 would you have participated in the Holocaust? rounding up impoverished Jews, separating parents and children, making sure they got disposed of, I guess you would have loved it, after all don't let morals cloud your judgement.
 
If you'd been in Germany in 1941 would you have participated in the Holocaust? rounding up impoverished Jews, separating parents and children, making sure they got disposed of, I guess you would have loved it, after all don't let morals cloud your judgement.
People can claim anything but until they are actually in it, who knows what they will do. I love it when people who believe morals are relative make moral arguments. Does that sound like it could be you?
 
People can claim anything but until they are actually in it, who knows what they will do.
Oh, I know, I know I'd rather fight my fellow officers than slaughter hapless Jews.
I love it when people who believe morals are relative make moral arguments. Does that sound like it could be you?
If you'd been in Germany in 1941 would you have participated in the Holocaust? rounding up impoverished Jews, separating parents and children, making sure they got disposed of?

You could have answered "No" but I guess in your case you really don't know how you'd behave.

Anyway you forgot to answer me, I love it when a coward on the backfoot hopes I won't notice he's a coward, sound like you?
 
If you'd been in Germany in 1941 would you have participated in the Holocaust? rounding up impoverished Jews, separating parents and children, making sure they got disposed of?

You forgot to answer me, I love it when a coward on the backfoot hopes I won't notice he's a coward, sound like you?
I did answer you. What part of "People can claim anything but until they are actually in it, who knows what they will do," did you not understand. So, no, I didn't forget to answer you. Now what about my question... I love it when people who believe morals are relative make moral arguments. Does that sound like it could be you?
 
I did answer you. What part of "People can claim anything but until they are actually in it, who knows what they will do," did you not understand. So, no, I didn't forget to answer you. Now what about my question... I love it when people who believe morals are relative make moral arguments. Does that sound like it could be you?
Very well so you don't know what you would have done to Jews if you'd been a soldier in Nazi Germany, well that's what makes us different I guess because I know exactly what I'd do, help the ******* victims.
 
Very well so you don't know what you would have done to Jews if you'd been a soldier in Nazi Germany, well that's what makes us different I guess because I know exactly what I'd do, help the ******* victims.
No, you only think you do. You might have been a coward like the rest. You can't even bring yourself to say whether or not you believe morals are relative or not. So until you can, you have no business making moral arguments.
 
The fanaticism was there even then, the extremism and the inherent belief that they have a God given right to do anything they want, anywhere they want to anyone they want still permeates the politics in Israel today.
That raises the subject (at least in my mind) for why "the world's longest hatred" came into existence and why it is still on full display today:

Timeline of antisemitism - Wikipedia

"This timeline of antisemitism chronicles events in the history of antisemitism, hostile actions or discrimination against Jews as members of a religious and ethnic group."

Some of the loudest, most effective voices against the terror inflicted by the Jewish state are, in fact, Jews themselves.
https://x.com/MaxBlumenthal

After two thousand years of enduring atrocities like the Holocaust across thousands of miles of geography, one would think more Jews would recognize that Jewish supremacy is no more viable than Hitler's Master Race or White South Africa, or Jim Crow.

Or not.
 
...one would think more Jews would recognize that Jewish supremacy
In Judaism, being "chosen" historically refers to a responsibility to uphold a covenant with God, not a belief in ethnic or racial superiority over others. The term "Jewish supremacy" is sometimes used by critics and human rights organizations to describe Israeli policies they argue promote Jewish domination over Palestinians. Jewish perspectives are diverse, ranging from religious to secular, and the vast majority of Jews worldwide do not adhere to supremacist ideologies. While the vast majority of Jews reject the notion of racial or ethnic supremacy, it is a term used by critics to describe specific political actions and stances.
 
This is like a Monty Python script:

1772490660675.webp


"We knew Iran would react if it got bombed so we bombed it before it got bombed"

I mean, people actually voted for this stuff?

:auiqs.jpg:
 
If your hyper-partisan hatred prevents you from recognizing the possibility of a school next to a military base being accidentally bombed, it doesn't matter since a U.S. Central Command spokesperson has acknowledge that they are taking the reports seriously.
Dont put them next to a base then
 
15th post
In Judaism, being "chosen" historically refers to a responsibility to uphold a covenant with God, not a belief in ethnic or racial superiority over others. The term "Jewish supremacy" is sometimes used by critics and human rights organizations to describe Israeli policies they argue promote Jewish domination over Palestinians. Jewish perspectives are diverse, ranging from religious to secular, and the vast majority of Jews worldwide do not adhere to supremacist ideologies. While the vast majority of Jews reject the notion of racial or ethnic supremacy, it is a term used by critics to describe specific political actions and stances.
What ever definition of "chosen" dominates among global Jewry, in the Jewish supremacist state "chosen" means domination:

A Threshold Crossed

"Intent to Maintain Domination​

"A stated aim of the Israeli government is to ensure that Jewish Israelis maintain domination across Israel and the OPT.

"The Knesset in 2018 passed a law with constitutional status affirming Israel as the 'nation-state of the Jewish people,' declaring that within that territory, the right to self-determination 'is unique to the Jewish people,' and establishing 'Jewish settlement' as a national value.

"To sustain Jewish Israeli control, Israeli authorities have adopted policies aimed at mitigating what they have openly described as a demographic 'threat' that Palestinians pose.

"Those policies include limiting the population and political power of Palestinians, granting the right to vote only to Palestinians who live within the borders of Israel as they existed from 1948 to June 1967, and limiting the ability of Palestinians to move to Israel from the OPT and from anywhere else to Israel or the OPT.
 
Awkward Pentagon! Where did that little boy Hegseth take a dump? lol. :)

View attachment 1225841


Poo poo problems: The USS Gerald R. Ford has some serious toilet problems for the 4,500 sailors on board.

source:

Some dumb ass engineer tried to save flushing water and designed a crap system.

Retard probably went to Berkley.
 
What ever definition of "chosen" dominates among global Jewry, in the Jewish supremacist state "chosen" means domination:
I'm guessing they see it different. I'm guessing they see it as doing what they need to do for their survival. How is that not Darwinian? Is the wolf evil for eating the lamb?
 
Back
Top Bottom