Inaccurate ... he negligently shot himself in the yarbles. You can't accidentally discharge a firearm.
Yeah? All firearm discharges are intentional? It would appear all accidents are actually incidents of negligence.
Modern firearms (anything designed and built after 1900) doesn't discharge accidentally. It can't go off unless you pull the trigger. It can be discharged through negligence, different from intentional, but not accidentally.
Not exactly true. There have been a few design issues. The Remington 700 has a rather sordid history as one well known example. The original design was flawed. The trigger bar was two pieces of metal layered, and in some cases could separate, causing the rifle to discharge the instant the weapon was taken off of safe. The original design would not allow the bolt to be moved if the safety was on, so you had to take the safety off to unload the rifle.
This problem was again to resurface at Remington with the X-Mark trigger on the same series of rifles.
REMINGTON RECALLS MODEL 700 AND MODEL SEVEN RIFLES
Taurus had an interesting issue with the Millennium series of pistols. If the trigger was back just a fraction of an inch, and I’m talking less than 1/8th of an inch, and you engaged the manual safety, the safety was not actually on. The weapon could and would fire. Even placing it into a holster could cause enough friction to move the trigger to fire the weapon, despite the safety being on.
Taurus pistol recall: Firearms company voluntary recalls nearly 1 million pistols
I don’t think either of these flaws could be considered negligent discharges. Taking the rifle off of safe in preparation to fire, and having it go off is not negligence on the part of the shooter. When you put the safety on, you expect it to be on, and prevent the weapon from firing. We can argue until the cows come home that the smart thing to do is not have the weapon pointed at anything important before taking the safety off, but some of those events were Police Sharpshooters or Snipers who were observing/participating in real and training situations where sniping at the baddie was part of the deal, and inevitably the situation was fluid, with a lot of people moving around.
Again, these are just two of the design and manufacturing flaws that have cropped up. There have been others, things that just weren’t known. Some companies acted swiftly to address the issue. Some delayed and caused more harm. But blaming the shooter for a failure of a weapon is IMO erroneous. Hell one guy went to prison because the sear on his weapon became worn, and became a runaway rifle.
Drill instructor convicted after rifle jams - WND - WND
A malfunction sent a man to prison thanks to our Government. Tell me again why I should trust the LEO’s? Because I’ve never see it.