Unless you want to destroy SS, Medcare, foodstamps, and unempolyment why vote GOP?

[alan1]

Unless you like taking food from the mouths of poor children, and unless you like throwing the elderly out in the street, and unless you like taking away women's rights, and unless you like the idea of destroying the minimum wage so corporations can pay you $2.00 an hour, and unless you like the rich buying the government, and unless you like America's wealth being given to the pentagon for more war, you better vote against the republicans.

You forgot homophobia and racism. Try to stay current on all the talking points, yer looking uninformed when you miss a couple.

 

[initforme]

"It's a Ponzi Scheme which has cost this nation trillions, has hurt the free market, was raided by greedy politicians over 60 years ago, and which is insolvent. It is the very definition of lose-lose. It's another typical Dumbocrat failure."

Call it what you want. I call it a success. I collect mine that I am entitled too. ENTITLED TO. I paid in. I didn't hurt the free market whatsoever collecting it.

 

[initforme]

If you are going to get rid of it what needs to be done is to find a way to help people invest and guarantee them their benefit. My parents worked hard. Never collected one ounce of unemployment. They lived on their SS. It was no fault of their own.

 

[zeke]

SS is one of the greatest things we have ever done for our citizens. Most retired people depend upon it to survive during retirement. At least the hard working ones who worked for peanuts their whole lives. Most of the construction workers that retired from my business(carpenters) have earned and are entitled to their SS. That must be protected at all costs. Even tinkering with SS equals a loss in the election. Its a win win for the whole country.

• 
  [*]Why should "we" do anything for our citizens? That is not the roll of government. There is a word for that "we do for" mentality - it's called communism and it never works.
  
  
• Why am I supposed to care that "most retired people depend on it"? Their failure to properly plan for their retirement is not societies problem.
  
  
• Social Security is, and has always been, a lose-lose for the entire country. It's the world's worst Ponzi Scheme and it is insolvent.

I will agree, however, that anyone who has paid into it has earned it and it must be provided to them at all costs.

E pluribus unum
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


E Pluribus Unum included in the Great Seal of the United States, being one of the nation's mottos at the time of the seal's creation.
E pluribus unum (/ˈiː ˈplʊərɨbəs ˈuːnəm/; Latin: [ˈeː ˈpluːrɪbʊs ˈuːnũː])—Latin for "Out of many, one"[1][2] (alternatively translated as "One out of many"[3] or "One from many")[4]—is a phrase on the Seal of the United States, along with Annuit cœptis (Latin for "He approves (has approved) of the undertaking") and Novus ordo seclorum, (Latin for "New Order of the Ages") and adopted by an Act of Congress in 1782.[2] Never codified by law, E pluribus unum was considered a de facto motto of the United States[citation needed] until 1956 when the United States Congress passed an act (H. J. Resolution 396), adopting "In God We Trust" as the official motto


Dog, they put it right on the seal of the United States. Out of many, one.
They should of had you around then dog. You would have set them straight. None of that many one shit. We don't need to all be looking out for one another. That helping each other out is for pussies. They needed you dog.

But why did they (the 1782 Congress) put that motto on the seal?

Later the "In God We Trust" was for the religious/commie hating folk. Hell maybe when In God We Tryst came to be, people were already down the road of looking out just for yourself. 1956 was when the commie witch hunts were going on. Couldn't trust anybody then either.

 

[P@triot]

"It's a Ponzi Scheme which has cost this nation trillions, has hurt the free market, was raided by greedy politicians over 60 years ago, and which is insolvent. It is the very definition of lose-lose. It's another typical Dumbocrat failure."

Call it what you want. I call it a success. I collect mine that I am entitled too. ENTITLED TO. I paid in. I didn't hurt the free market whatsoever collecting it.

Perhaps you should read? I already stated above clearly the anyone who paid into it deserves everything they are owed. Everything. What part if that didn't you understand?

But that being said, everything else I said was 100% accurate. It's a failed Ponzi Scheme. It's insolvent. And it hurt the free market (as every unconstitutional Dumbocrat program has).

 

[P@triot]

SS is one of the greatest things we have ever done for our citizens. Most retired people depend upon it to survive during retirement. At least the hard working ones who worked for peanuts their whole lives. Most of the construction workers that retired from my business(carpenters) have earned and are entitled to their SS. That must be protected at all costs. Even tinkering with SS equals a loss in the election. Its a win win for the whole country.

• 
  [*]Why should "we" do anything for our citizens? That is not the roll of government. There is a word for that "we do for" mentality - it's called communism and it never works.
  
  
• Why am I supposed to care that "most retired people depend on it"? Their failure to properly plan for their retirement is not societies problem.
  
  
• Social Security is, and has always been, a lose-lose for the entire country. It's the world's worst Ponzi Scheme and it is insolvent.

I will agree, however, that anyone who has paid into it has earned it and it must be provided to them at all costs.

E pluribus unum
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


E Pluribus Unum included in the Great Seal of the United States, being one of the nation's mottos at the time of the seal's creation.
E pluribus unum (/ˈiː ˈplʊərɨbəs ˈuːnəm/; Latin: [ˈeː ˈpluːrɪbʊs ˈuːnũː])—Latin for "Out of many, one"[1][2] (alternatively translated as "One out of many"[3] or "One from many")[4]—is a phrase on the Seal of the United States, along with Annuit cœptis (Latin for "He approves (has approved) of the undertaking") and Novus ordo seclorum, (Latin for "New Order of the Ages") and adopted by an Act of Congress in 1782.[2] Never codified by law, E pluribus unum was considered a de facto motto of the United States[citation needed] until 1956 when the United States Congress passed an act (H. J. Resolution 396), adopting "In God We Trust" as the official motto

Dog, they put it right on the seal of the United States. Out of many, one.
They should of had you around then dog. You would have set them straight. None of that many one shit. We don't need to all be looking out for one another. That helping each other out is for pussies. They needed you dog.

But why did they (the 1782 Congress) put that motto on the seal?

Later the "In God We Trust" was for the religious/commie hating folk. Hell maybe when In God We Tryst came to be, people were already down the road of looking out just for yourself. 1956 was when the commie witch hunts were going on. Couldn't trust anybody then either.

Please cite where they stated that communism was the official economic system of the U.S.? Please cite for me where they stated that government would take money from its citizens at the barrel of a gun?

I know you liberals are unaware of this, but the federal government didn't even tax citizens when this nation was first formed. That did not happen until Abraham Lincoln did it to pay for the Civil War. Funny how you failed to add a Wikipedia link to that piece of history...

Income tax in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Clementine]

here's comes the dishonest fear mongering by the Democrats

right on cue they baaaaa

They don't understand that the kindest thing government can do is get out of the way and stop killing jobs. Encourage all people to complete school. Encourage all people to reach their potential. Remind people how great they can be, not how helpless they are.

But, some would rather just entice people to the polls with offers of freebies.

Who started taxing SS?
Who got their grubby little paws on SS money by borrowing from the fund?
Who opted to give SS to those who never paid into it?
Who allowed food stamps to be spent on stupid shit, like tattoos, casinos, etc?
Who allowed illegals access to the welfare system? That is one thing that never threatens to go bankrupt. The libs would deny old people a SS check, but never would deny an illegal alien welfare.
Obamacare has been the biggest job killer ever.
Why would anyone in the military vote Dem when they take from veterans and give to illegal aliens? Dems hold invaders in higher regard than those who risk their lives for this country.

The current administration doubled the welfare rolls, increased the number of illegals pouring in and is overseeing the slowest recovery ever. Why would anyone vote for that shit?

 

[bripat9643]

"It's a Ponzi Scheme which has cost this nation trillions, has hurt the free market, was raided by greedy politicians over 60 years ago, and which is insolvent. It is the very definition of lose-lose. It's another typical Dumbocrat failure."

Call it what you want. I call it a success. I collect mine that I am entitled too. ENTITLED TO. I paid in. I didn't hurt the free market whatsoever collecting it.

You aren't entitled to it anymore than I'm entitled to help myself to the contents of your refrigerator. SS is funding by looting current taxpayers who owe you nothing. How does the simple fact of getting born obligate anyone to write you a check?

 

[bripat9643]

"It's a Ponzi Scheme which has cost this nation trillions, has hurt the free market, was raided by greedy politicians over 60 years ago, and which is insolvent. It is the very definition of lose-lose. It's another typical Dumbocrat failure."

Call it what you want. I call it a success. I collect mine that I am entitled too. ENTITLED TO. I paid in. I didn't hurt the free market whatsoever collecting it.

Perhaps you should read? I already stated above clearly the anyone who paid into it deserves everything they are owed. Everything. What part if that didn't you understand?

But that being said, everything else I said was 100% accurate. It's a failed Ponzi Scheme. It's insolvent. And it hurt the free market (as every unconstitutional Dumbocrat program has).

I disagree. They are owed nothing, especially when you consider the fact that they voted for the scheme. They refused to allow anyone to reform it. So **** them. Live by the sword, die by the sword. That's what I say.

 

[P@triot]

"It's a Ponzi Scheme which has cost this nation trillions, has hurt the free market, was raided by greedy politicians over 60 years ago, and which is insolvent. It is the very definition of lose-lose. It's another typical Dumbocrat failure."

Call it what you want. I call it a success. I collect mine that I am entitled too. ENTITLED TO. I paid in. I didn't hurt the free market whatsoever collecting it.

Perhaps you should read? I already stated above clearly the anyone who paid into it deserves everything they are owed. Everything. What part if that didn't you understand?

But that being said, everything else I said was 100% accurate. It's a failed Ponzi Scheme. It's insolvent. And it hurt the free market (as every unconstitutional Dumbocrat program has).

I disagree. They are owed nothing, especially when you consider the fact that they voted for the scheme. They refused to allow anyone to reform it. So **** them. Live by the sword, die by the sword. That's what I say.

Dude - I didn't vote for this shit. But you damn well better believe I'm going to insist on getting back as much as I can of every dime that these assholes stole from me. I want a FULL refund on what was taken from me or at least every penny of my Social Security.

 

[deltex1]

Unless you like taking food from the mouths of poor children, and unless you like throwing the elderly out in the street, and unless you like taking away women's rights, and unless you like the idea of destroying the minimum wage so corporations can pay you $2.00 an hour, and unless you like the rich buying the government, and unless you like America's wealth being given to the pentagon for more war, you better vote against the republicans.

Does unempolyment happen when you take your condom off?

 

[Harry Dresden]

The passion and compassion of the OP is bringing me to tears.


...of laughter.

...And your post confirms the con desire to make the elderly and children suffer. Thanks for exposing republican cruelty.

hey are you not the lowlife who was making fun of men who need stuff like Viagra because they have a physical Sexual Problem?....and you are calling them cruel?....you are a ******* Asshole....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Unless you like taking food from the mouths of poor children, and unless you like throwing the elderly out in the street, and unless you like taking away women's rights, and unless you like the idea of destroying the minimum wage so corporations can pay you $2.00 an hour, and unless you like the rich buying the government, and unless you like America's wealth being given to the pentagon for more war, you better vote against the republicans.

First of all, let's establish this before we go a step farther.

Yours is a false dichotomy and you know it. That makes you a lying ass troll.

Secondly, even though your assertion is laughably, absurdly false, I'd ask what good are entitlement programs if the nation is asunder and the government is an Obama Police state?

he has already been proven to be a phony in a few threads here.....he will do to this one like he did to the others.....disappear.....

 

[Two Thumbs]

Unless you like taking food from the mouths of poor children, and unless you like throwing the elderly out in the street, and unless you like taking away women's rights, and unless you like the idea of destroying the minimum wage so corporations can pay you $2.00 an hour, and unless you like the rich buying the government, and unless you like America's wealth being given to the pentagon for more war, you better vote against the republicans.

How did people feed their hungry kids before welfare?

They took any job they could find and worked hard to keep it.


How did the elderly keep their homes before SS?

Their families took care of them. oh and, fyi; to get more gov help, the elderly have to sell their homes.

Minimum wage never helped anyone, moron


The rich were declared to be the owners of the dnc just last week. Or did you miss that?

War?

pfft

WW1 (D)
WW2 (D)
Korea (D)
VN (D)
Bay of Pigs (D)
Cuban Missile crises (D)
Cold War (D)

You murderous ***** don't catch a break until Somalia (R)

 

[Harry Dresden]

Unless you like taking food from the mouths of poor children, and unless you like throwing the elderly out in the street, and unless you like taking away women's rights, and unless you like the idea of destroying the minimum wage so corporations can pay you $2.00 an hour, and unless you like the rich buying the government, and unless you like America's wealth being given to the pentagon for more war, you better vote against the republicans.

First of all, let's establish this before we go a step farther.

Yours is a false dichotomy and you know it. That makes you a lying ass troll.

Secondly, even though your assertion is laughably, absurdly false, I'd ask what good are entitlement programs if the nation is asunder and the government is an Obama Police state?

I can answer that - greedy asshat Dumbocrats like hangover don't care about freedom. They care about freebies. They will trade freedom for government table scraps any day.

Hungover told us in another thread a while back he is a "Independent".....he just happens to be an "Independent" who never finds anything wrong with the Democrats....the guys a phony...

 

[P@triot]

First of all, let's establish this before we go a step farther.

Yours is a false dichotomy and you know it. That makes you a lying ass troll.

Secondly, even though your assertion is laughably, absurdly false, I'd ask what good are entitlement programs if the nation is asunder and the government is an Obama Police state?

I can answer that - greedy asshat Dumbocrats like hangover don't care about freedom. They care about freebies. They will trade freedom for government table scraps any day.

Hungover told us in another thread a while back he is a "Independent".....he just happens to be an "Independent" who never finds anything wrong with the Democrats....the guys a phony...

What drives me crazy is that these assholes can have their communist utopia at the local level. They can all migrate to San Francisco and vote for socialized medicine, vote for splitting the wealth, etc.

But they don't. Instead they try to force all of us into it at the federal level. Why? Because they know it would all collapse at the local level because they are all too lazy produce. They have to force the producers (ie conservatives) into it to provide for them.

 

[Two Thumbs]

I can answer that - greedy asshat Dumbocrats like hangover don't care about freedom. They care about freebies. They will trade freedom for government table scraps any day.

Hungover told us in another thread a while back he is a "Independent".....he just happens to be an "Independent" who never finds anything wrong with the Democrats....the guys a phony...

What drives me crazy is that these assholes can have their communist utopia at the local level. They can all migrate to San Francisco and vote for socialized medicine, vote for splitting the wealth, etc.

But they don't. Instead they try to force all of us into it at the federal level. Why? Because they know it would all collapse at the local level because they are all too lazy produce. They have to force the producers (ie conservatives) into it to provide for them.

bzzzz, wrong


communism works at the local level. If you don't do your part for the commune, they will toss you eventually.

Thing is, everyone knows, from history, that government control of our lives don't work, on a large scale.

So the only question that remains is; Why are they doing it, knowing the country will fail?

 

[P@triot]

Hungover told us in another thread a while back he is a "Independent".....he just happens to be an "Independent" who never finds anything wrong with the Democrats....the guys a phony...

What drives me crazy is that these assholes can have their communist utopia at the local level. They can all migrate to San Francisco and vote for socialized medicine, vote for splitting the wealth, etc.

But they don't. Instead they try to force all of us into it at the federal level. Why? Because they know it would all collapse at the local level because they are all too lazy produce. They have to force the producers (ie conservatives) into it to provide for them.

bzzzz, wrong


communism works at the local level. If you don't do your part for the commune, they will toss you eventually.

Thing is, everyone knows, from history, that government control of our lives don't work, on a large scale.

So the only question that remains is; Why are they doing it, knowing the country will fail?

You really have to ask? Because they want everything provided for them so they don't have to work.

 

[hangover]

Here's a clue for the OP. Those programs are already on the path to collapse due to demographic changes.

Nope, they won't unless cons don't pay back the $2.5 trillion they stole from the SS fund. And unless cons keep diverting trillions to the pentagon. And unless millionaires and corporations keep getting Tax welfare.

KNB-Will Republicans vote to repeal the USAPATRIOT Act since Obama uses it to implement big government Marxist Sharia law?

Only nut job con propaganda. Even most cons know "Marxist Sharia law" is a crock of bullshit. It's shows how desperate the cons are. But it doesn't help in getting any votes.

Uh, bub. It was ALGORE who bragged about the SS funds being safe in a Lock Box.

Good luck with that.

Yep, liberals made the lock box, and cons picked the lock and stole the money.

 

[oreo]

Unless you like taking food from the mouths of poor children, and unless you like throwing the elderly out in the street, and unless you like taking away women's rights, and unless you like the idea of destroying the minimum wage so corporations can pay you $2.00 an hour, and unless you like the rich buying the government, and unless you like America's wealth being given to the pentagon for more war, you better vote against the republicans.

Oh brother--another uninformed voter making comments. We have had a safety net in this country since the 1930's or after the great depression--to take care of the truly needy.

What we have today--are a lot of free loaders that are much more intent on sitting on the couch watching their soaps--getting fat--than have any interest what-so-ever in providing for their own families. Unfortunately today-- there are way too many of them. Social Security disability. How many people that are perfectly capable of working are on that right now? LOTS including those in their younger years--30's and 40's. A lifetime government--taxpayer fed--hand-out. 3rd generation welfare families--where no one works or contributes to the tax base of this country. We currently have 49 MILLION people in this country that are receiving food stamps--the largest in this nations history.

These democrat policies--of the "buy your vote" handouts are killing this country. Today we borrow 44.7 cents on every dollar the government spends.

This is one trillion dollars. $100.00 dollar bills stacked together on pallets. We are currently over 17 trillion dollars in red ink. One day because of this run-a-way borrowing and spending--there will be no safety net. No social security--no Medicare--No Medicaid--No Welfare-No unemployment--No food stamps--because other foreign countries will no longer lend us money--fearing that they won't get paid back, because our debt in relation to GDP is too high. Now imagine the interest we already pay on this debt. which currently is around 48 BILLION dollars a year.

No one can BORROW and SPEND their way to PROSPERITY.