Universal background checks... really?

[Rustic]

Your pejorative aside, it's amusing to see a person who can't comprehend a definition talk about thesauruses.

Sellers, merchants, dealers, brokers, etc... your arguing that a deranged lunatic going to a gun show and buying a weapon no questions asked is fine if the one selling the firearm is called a different name that means the same thing is hilarious. It’s the same tactics the Catholic Church used to excuse priests who raped kids.

What a stupid thing to say. I accept your surrender.

You just keep getting more and more side sportingly hilarious.

Why you have gotten more and more pathetic as you weakly try to defend your ignorance.

You’re the one using euphemisms to justify selling firearms without a background check.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You need gun control to make treason easy. Sin Loi Victor Charlie.

BINGO

These fuckers give not one single shit about public safety.

.

 

[M14 Shooter]

In other cases like Lanza….his mother had the arsenal in the house with a diagnosed mentally ill individual and the result was 26 people were killed.

"Arsenal"?
How many guns did she have,and what kind?
Oh... You don't know?
Other than your intellectual dishonesty, why did you choose to use the term "arsenal"?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Universal background checks...yes really...and NOW

Said no rational, reasoned person, ever.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Universal background checks infringe no one's rights

Neither does a police officer, absent probable cause or reasonable suspicion, stopping people as they walk down the street and restraining them while he checks for arrest warrants and citizenship/legal immigration status.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You’re the one using euphemisms to justify selling firearms without a background check.

No one needs to justify this.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

You just keep getting more and more side sportingly hilarious.

Why you have gotten more and more pathetic as you weakly try to defend your ignorance.

You’re the one using euphemisms to justify selling firearms without a background check.

The government has NO AUTHORITY to require any American to undergo a background check as a prerequisite to exercising an unalienable Right guaranteed under the Bill of Rights and specifically guaranteed under the Fourth Amendment.

Any "search" (background check) as a prerequisite to exercising any Right is unreasonable by any metric. If you disagree, try applying your suggestion to any other unalienable Right you have.

BS. It can be done as long as it's done within the "Due Process" under the 14th Amendment. The 4th Amendment doesn't apply here. Here is the 4th amendment and it has nothing to do with prior aquitision of any firearms "Within Reason". And the "Within Reason" falls under "Due Process". For those that don't know what the 4th amendment says....

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Notice the phrase, "Probable Cause". And who makes the determination what probable cause is? The Voters, the Legislature and the Courts. You, the individual, don't make up the determination in a Federal Republic. You certainly believe you are much more important than you really are.

Now, for the 14th Amendment....

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Now we must look at what Due Process is.

I won't go into it because it's complicated. But to put in simply, the voter, Law Enforcement and Legislature cannot take what is considered a right from a citizen. It takes a judicial ruling or Writ to accomplish this and that can be taken to a higher court up to and including the Supreme Court. Each person is guaranteed their day in court and the right to face their accuser. In each step, if the law or the ruling goes uncontested, the law or ruling stands and becomes due process and binding.

Now, if Universal Background Checks are upheld in the Court Systems what part of the 4th, 5th and 14th amendment will have been violated? BTW, it's already been upheld in the Federal Courts for Colorado and California and 7 other states using the court rulings of Colorado.

Sounds to me like you are trying to get an Armed Revolution started where you and your bunch is going to try and overthrow the legally elected government. Last time I checked, that was treason.

What an illiterate bunch of B.S. !!! In reality, there is NO probable cause to search one's papers (which today would include your records) as prerequisite to exercising constitutional Rights.

I want everyone to notice that to give teeth to an illogical understanding of the Constitution, you fell back on the illegally ratified 14th Amendment, which was intended to nullify the Bill of Rights.

You just made my point. Since the 14th that was legally ratified gets in your way of your rant and your Revolution, you just want to discard it. Does that mean you want to discard the 4th and the 5th while your at it? Why not throw the whole thing out while you are at it. It just gets in your way anyway.

Figures. Your whole argument falls apart when we take the whole COTUS and present it as usual.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Making Murders illegal doesn't stop all murders either. But putting extreme penalties on them along with extreme social pressures against it certainly has an affect in minimizing them.

If that were true, people in this country wouldn't even take an aspirin out of fear of what cops would do them. We have more people in prison than any country on the globe. There is only one answer to both firearms deaths and drugs - prevent the problem without infringing on everyone elses Rights.

You do know that you said exactly nothing in your post, don't you. Try again.

Making Murders illegal doesn't stop all murders either. But putting extreme penalties on them along with extreme social pressures against it certainly has an affect in minimizing them.

If that were true, people in this country wouldn't even take an aspirin out of fear of what cops would do them. We have more people in prison than any country on the globe. There is only one answer to both firearms deaths and drugs - prevent the problem without infringing on everyone elses Rights.

You do know that you said exactly nothing in your post, don't you. Try again.

I know that you don't know how to read.

I know you don't know jackshit about the Constitution, the Bill of Rights nor unalienable Rights.

I know the Fourth Amendment is beyond your comprehension and something that makes you tremble in fear.

I know you believe so much in a government - god that you mistake power for authority.

I know that you are committed to control, not Liberty

I know that you follow change agents around that say the "want to "keep guns out of the hands of criminals." This, of course is one of the mind control games of tyrants. Ayn Rand wrote:

"There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system … that’s the game…"

— Ayn Rand in “Atlas Shrugged“

I know that you have ZERO interest in preventing firearm violence and SAVING LIVES.

I know there is a difference between saving lives and disarming a free nation

I know that you will say anything to appear to be relevant in this thread and the only people backing you up are woefully stupid.

I know that you are a seditionist, a traitor and that you deserve to be arrested, tried for treason by a jury of your peers, found guilty, then executed by a firing squad.

What else do I need to know about this thread?

Funny, that's exactly (except for the execution) that I think of you. You ignore the 4th, 1st and 14th amendment when it suits you and then preach armed insurrection. When you get caught with your hands in the cookie jar, you say the other person is doing it. Standard Rumpster line of reasoning. You hate speech is noted and the fact you support the White Nationals, KKK and others is also noted. Then you have the voracity to call yourself a "Patriot". More like a violent Parrot.

So if you are preaching to make me afraid, I wrote my butt off decades ago like many others like me have. So if you do go through with your threats, things will not go the way your dreams will predict. While we won't instigate them, we won't shy away from them either. You honestly believe that moderates aren't armed well enough to defend against you domestic terrorists? Well, JBC, there are a whole hell of a lot more of us than there are of you and most of us are well armed and many of us are Veterans and enough of us are Retired Military that you Domestic Terrorists won't succeed in your fondest wet dreams.

What you have accomplished is to show that universal background checks are more important than ever before.

You're a liar and a ******* idiot. I'm despised equally by the extremists of both sides. Furthermore, I've had to put my life on the line to defend people that I did not agree with, did not like, and found to be repulsive. You just don't like the truth because even the white supremacists are like a broken clock - they have the potential to be right twice a day.

I don't know what JBC means, but I'm sure in your ramblings, you might be able to enlighten us one day. I doubt that you could show us a DD214 unless it was your grand-dad's and FWIW, the man that trained me was the most decorated veteran of the Vietnam era. There are vets I know that would not tolerate you in a face to face setting.

You need gun control to make treason easy. Sin Loi Victor Charlie.

Cun Yet Moi, Nuhi Quya

 

[Porter Rockwell]

If that were true, people in this country wouldn't even take an aspirin out of fear of what cops would do them. We have more people in prison than any country on the globe. There is only one answer to both firearms deaths and drugs - prevent the problem without infringing on everyone elses Rights.

You do know that you said exactly nothing in your post, don't you. Try again.

If that were true, people in this country wouldn't even take an aspirin out of fear of what cops would do them. We have more people in prison than any country on the globe. There is only one answer to both firearms deaths and drugs - prevent the problem without infringing on everyone elses Rights.

You do know that you said exactly nothing in your post, don't you. Try again.

I know that you don't know how to read.

I know you don't know jackshit about the Constitution, the Bill of Rights nor unalienable Rights.

I know the Fourth Amendment is beyond your comprehension and something that makes you tremble in fear.

I know you believe so much in a government - god that you mistake power for authority.

I know that you are committed to control, not Liberty

I know that you follow change agents around that say the "want to "keep guns out of the hands of criminals." This, of course is one of the mind control games of tyrants. Ayn Rand wrote:

"There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system … that’s the game…"

— Ayn Rand in “Atlas Shrugged“

I know that you have ZERO interest in preventing firearm violence and SAVING LIVES.

I know there is a difference between saving lives and disarming a free nation

I know that you will say anything to appear to be relevant in this thread and the only people backing you up are woefully stupid.

I know that you are a seditionist, a traitor and that you deserve to be arrested, tried for treason by a jury of your peers, found guilty, then executed by a firing squad.

What else do I need to know about this thread?

Funny, that's exactly (except for the execution) that I think of you. You ignore the 4th, 1st and 14th amendment when it suits you and then preach armed insurrection. When you get caught with your hands in the cookie jar, you say the other person is doing it. Standard Rumpster line of reasoning. You hate speech is noted and the fact you support the White Nationals, KKK and others is also noted. Then you have the voracity to call yourself a "Patriot". More like a violent Parrot.

So if you are preaching to make me afraid, I wrote my butt off decades ago like many others like me have. So if you do go through with your threats, things will not go the way your dreams will predict. While we won't instigate them, we won't shy away from them either. You honestly believe that moderates aren't armed well enough to defend against you domestic terrorists? Well, JBC, there are a whole hell of a lot more of us than there are of you and most of us are well armed and many of us are Veterans and enough of us are Retired Military that you Domestic Terrorists won't succeed in your fondest wet dreams.

What you have accomplished is to show that universal background checks are more important than ever before.

You're a liar and a ******* idiot. I'm despised equally by the extremists of both sides. Furthermore, I've had to put my life on the line to defend people that I did not agree with, did not like, and found to be repulsive. You just don't like the truth because even the white supremacists are like a broken clock - they have the potential to be right twice a day.

I don't know what JBC means, but I'm sure in your ramblings, you might be able to enlighten us one day. I doubt that you could show us a DD214 unless it was your grand-dad's and FWIW, the man that trained me was the most decorated veteran of the Vietnam era. There are vets I know that would not tolerate you in a face to face setting.

You need gun control to make treason easy. Sin Loi Victor Charlie.

Cun Yet Moi, Nuhi Quya

You're also a poseur. With you standing against the principles our forefathers fought, bled and died for, you and I probably don't have much to discuss.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

You do know that you said exactly nothing in your post, don't you. Try again.

You do know that you said exactly nothing in your post, don't you. Try again.

I know that you don't know how to read.

I know you don't know jackshit about the Constitution, the Bill of Rights nor unalienable Rights.

I know the Fourth Amendment is beyond your comprehension and something that makes you tremble in fear.

I know you believe so much in a government - god that you mistake power for authority.

I know that you are committed to control, not Liberty

I know that you follow change agents around that say the "want to "keep guns out of the hands of criminals." This, of course is one of the mind control games of tyrants. Ayn Rand wrote:

"There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system … that’s the game…"

— Ayn Rand in “Atlas Shrugged“

I know that you have ZERO interest in preventing firearm violence and SAVING LIVES.

I know there is a difference between saving lives and disarming a free nation

I know that you will say anything to appear to be relevant in this thread and the only people backing you up are woefully stupid.

I know that you are a seditionist, a traitor and that you deserve to be arrested, tried for treason by a jury of your peers, found guilty, then executed by a firing squad.

What else do I need to know about this thread?

Funny, that's exactly (except for the execution) that I think of you. You ignore the 4th, 1st and 14th amendment when it suits you and then preach armed insurrection. When you get caught with your hands in the cookie jar, you say the other person is doing it. Standard Rumpster line of reasoning. You hate speech is noted and the fact you support the White Nationals, KKK and others is also noted. Then you have the voracity to call yourself a "Patriot". More like a violent Parrot.

So if you are preaching to make me afraid, I wrote my butt off decades ago like many others like me have. So if you do go through with your threats, things will not go the way your dreams will predict. While we won't instigate them, we won't shy away from them either. You honestly believe that moderates aren't armed well enough to defend against you domestic terrorists? Well, JBC, there are a whole hell of a lot more of us than there are of you and most of us are well armed and many of us are Veterans and enough of us are Retired Military that you Domestic Terrorists won't succeed in your fondest wet dreams.

What you have accomplished is to show that universal background checks are more important than ever before.

You're a liar and a ******* idiot. I'm despised equally by the extremists of both sides. Furthermore, I've had to put my life on the line to defend people that I did not agree with, did not like, and found to be repulsive. You just don't like the truth because even the white supremacists are like a broken clock - they have the potential to be right twice a day.

I don't know what JBC means, but I'm sure in your ramblings, you might be able to enlighten us one day. I doubt that you could show us a DD214 unless it was your grand-dad's and FWIW, the man that trained me was the most decorated veteran of the Vietnam era. There are vets I know that would not tolerate you in a face to face setting.

You need gun control to make treason easy. Sin Loi Victor Charlie.

Cun Yet Moi, Nuhi Quya

You're also a poseur. With you standing against the principles our forefathers fought, bled and died for, you and I probably don't have much to discuss.

Since you entered into a name calling phase, let's take it to the next step and let you enjoy your award just before I thin out the gene pool.

And here it is. Wear it in good health.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

Why you have gotten more and more pathetic as you weakly try to defend your ignorance.

You’re the one using euphemisms to justify selling firearms without a background check.

The government has NO AUTHORITY to require any American to undergo a background check as a prerequisite to exercising an unalienable Right guaranteed under the Bill of Rights and specifically guaranteed under the Fourth Amendment.

Any "search" (background check) as a prerequisite to exercising any Right is unreasonable by any metric. If you disagree, try applying your suggestion to any other unalienable Right you have.

BS. It can be done as long as it's done within the "Due Process" under the 14th Amendment. The 4th Amendment doesn't apply here. Here is the 4th amendment and it has nothing to do with prior aquitision of any firearms "Within Reason". And the "Within Reason" falls under "Due Process". For those that don't know what the 4th amendment says....

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Notice the phrase, "Probable Cause". And who makes the determination what probable cause is? The Voters, the Legislature and the Courts. You, the individual, don't make up the determination in a Federal Republic. You certainly believe you are much more important than you really are.

Now, for the 14th Amendment....

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Now we must look at what Due Process is.

I won't go into it because it's complicated. But to put in simply, the voter, Law Enforcement and Legislature cannot take what is considered a right from a citizen. It takes a judicial ruling or Writ to accomplish this and that can be taken to a higher court up to and including the Supreme Court. Each person is guaranteed their day in court and the right to face their accuser. In each step, if the law or the ruling goes uncontested, the law or ruling stands and becomes due process and binding.

Now, if Universal Background Checks are upheld in the Court Systems what part of the 4th, 5th and 14th amendment will have been violated? BTW, it's already been upheld in the Federal Courts for Colorado and California and 7 other states using the court rulings of Colorado.

Sounds to me like you are trying to get an Armed Revolution started where you and your bunch is going to try and overthrow the legally elected government. Last time I checked, that was treason.

What an illiterate bunch of B.S. !!! In reality, there is NO probable cause to search one's papers (which today would include your records) as prerequisite to exercising constitutional Rights.

I want everyone to notice that to give teeth to an illogical understanding of the Constitution, you fell back on the illegally ratified 14th Amendment, which was intended to nullify the Bill of Rights.

You just made my point. Since the 14th that was legally ratified gets in your way of your rant and your Revolution, you just want to discard it. Does that mean you want to discard the 4th and the 5th while your at it? Why not throw the whole thing out while you are at it. It just gets in your way anyway.

Figures. Your whole argument falls apart when we take the whole COTUS and present it as usual.

You're a double talking dumb ass. As you pointed out, before switching gears, you relied on the 14th Amendment which was illegally ratified. The 14th Amendment nullified the Bill of Rights - WHICH IS WHY I DO NOT RECOGNIZE THE 14TH.

Without that, you have no case, sir. You have no basis to ignore the Second Amendment guarantee not infringe on the individual's Right to keep and bear Arms; no basis for doing warrant less searches as a prerequisite to someone exercising a constitutional Right. YOU are a lying son of a *****. You are the one who insists on perverting the Constitution and ignoring the Bill of Rights.

"The Constitution shall never be construed...to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." (Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87)

“The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.”
– Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824

 

[jc456]

Progressives want Background checks on all private sales. Why? Who pays for that? Paying for an right?
That is definitely unconstitutional and absolutely ridiculous.

Any type of waiting period on an right? I don’t think so, definitely unconstitutional and absolutely ridiculous.
No one should have to wait more than seconds to purchase their firearms.

Obviously universal background checks I have nothing to do with firearms… Like always... it’s always been about control.
The ******* spineless gun grabbers can pound sand... lol

No, you're right. Background checks won't do the trick. Ban and confiscate assault rifles and mags over 10 rounds. Insist on safety courses and licensing, including a clean mental health evaluation, every five years, for any gun. Clean up the NICS data base so it actually contains the information needed to make an informed decision on a potential buyer's appropriateness for a gun.
Americans are stupid mental cases.

why would someone ban an object that isn't related to the mass shootings? I don't understand why you would do that, can you explain?

 

[Porter Rockwell]

I know that you don't know how to read.

I know you don't know jackshit about the Constitution, the Bill of Rights nor unalienable Rights.

I know the Fourth Amendment is beyond your comprehension and something that makes you tremble in fear.

I know you believe so much in a government - god that you mistake power for authority.

I know that you are committed to control, not Liberty

I know that you follow change agents around that say the "want to "keep guns out of the hands of criminals." This, of course is one of the mind control games of tyrants. Ayn Rand wrote:

"There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system … that’s the game…"

— Ayn Rand in “Atlas Shrugged“

I know that you have ZERO interest in preventing firearm violence and SAVING LIVES.

I know there is a difference between saving lives and disarming a free nation

I know that you will say anything to appear to be relevant in this thread and the only people backing you up are woefully stupid.

I know that you are a seditionist, a traitor and that you deserve to be arrested, tried for treason by a jury of your peers, found guilty, then executed by a firing squad.

What else do I need to know about this thread?

Funny, that's exactly (except for the execution) that I think of you. You ignore the 4th, 1st and 14th amendment when it suits you and then preach armed insurrection. When you get caught with your hands in the cookie jar, you say the other person is doing it. Standard Rumpster line of reasoning. You hate speech is noted and the fact you support the White Nationals, KKK and others is also noted. Then you have the voracity to call yourself a "Patriot". More like a violent Parrot.

So if you are preaching to make me afraid, I wrote my butt off decades ago like many others like me have. So if you do go through with your threats, things will not go the way your dreams will predict. While we won't instigate them, we won't shy away from them either. You honestly believe that moderates aren't armed well enough to defend against you domestic terrorists? Well, JBC, there are a whole hell of a lot more of us than there are of you and most of us are well armed and many of us are Veterans and enough of us are Retired Military that you Domestic Terrorists won't succeed in your fondest wet dreams.

What you have accomplished is to show that universal background checks are more important than ever before.

You're a liar and a ******* idiot. I'm despised equally by the extremists of both sides. Furthermore, I've had to put my life on the line to defend people that I did not agree with, did not like, and found to be repulsive. You just don't like the truth because even the white supremacists are like a broken clock - they have the potential to be right twice a day.

I don't know what JBC means, but I'm sure in your ramblings, you might be able to enlighten us one day. I doubt that you could show us a DD214 unless it was your grand-dad's and FWIW, the man that trained me was the most decorated veteran of the Vietnam era. There are vets I know that would not tolerate you in a face to face setting.

You need gun control to make treason easy. Sin Loi Victor Charlie.

Cun Yet Moi, Nuhi Quya

You're also a poseur. With you standing against the principles our forefathers fought, bled and died for, you and I probably don't have much to discuss.

Since you entered into a name calling phase, let's take it to the next step and let you enjoy your award just before I thin out the gene pool.

And here it is. Wear it in good health.

View attachment 280786

You want to troll people to the point that name calling is an insult to the names hurled at you. You don't have a case, yet you want to keep the argument going. Look, dude, if you don't like it here, get on a plane, train, or bus and get the Hell out of the United States.

With over 400 million people owning firearms, you will not win in any gun control debate. Pass all the laws you want and the people will ignore them. They are unconstitutional. Period. If you want to talk about how to keep dangerous people away from guns, start with the drug problem - not the illegal ones, but the LEGAL ones.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

We could prevent 99% of all crime simply by locking up every person in solitary confinement.

We could prevent all rapes by chopping all dicks. No dicks, no rape.

We could prevent child abandonment, child hunger, and abortions by (in addition to chopping dicks) ripping out pussies.

We could stop all slander by ball-gagging everyone.

We could prevent 40,000 deaths a year if we banned cars and forced everyone to use public transit or walk.

We could do all kinds of "good" by taking a fat dump on all sorts of liberties.

Is that the society you people want? Really?

Isn't it better for individuals to take responsibility for their own safety and security? It the only practical way to live police-state free.

Why do so many immediately dismiss and give ZERO thought to liberty?

.

 

[jc456]

We could prevent 99% of all crime simply by locking up every person in solitary confinement.

We could prevent all rapes by chopping all dicks. No dicks, no rape.

We could prevent child abandonment, child hunger, and abortions by (in addition to chopping dicks) ripping out pussies.

We could stop all slander by ball-gagging everyone.

We could prevent 40,000 deaths a year if we banned cars and forced everyone to use public transit or walk.

We could do all kinds of "good" by taking a fat dump on all sorts of liberties.

Is that the society you people want? Really?

Isn't it better for individuals to take responsibility for their own safety and security? It the only practical way to live police-state free.

Why do so many immediately dismiss and give ZERO thought to liberty?

.

California's new gun control is to let felons out of jail.

 

[candycorn]

Sellers, merchants, dealers, brokers, etc... your arguing that a deranged lunatic going to a gun show and buying a weapon no questions asked is fine if the one selling the firearm is called a different name that means the same thing is hilarious. It’s the same tactics the Catholic Church used to excuse priests who raped kids.

What a stupid thing to say. I accept your surrender.

You just keep getting more and more side sportingly hilarious.

Why you have gotten more and more pathetic as you weakly try to defend your ignorance.

You’re the one using euphemisms to justify selling firearms without a background check.

The government has NO AUTHORITY to require any American to undergo a background check as a prerequisite to exercising an unalienable Right guaranteed under the Bill of Rights and specifically guaranteed under the Fourth Amendment.

Any "search" (background check) as a prerequisite to exercising any Right is unreasonable by any metric. If you disagree, try applying your suggestion to any other unalienable Right you have.

So there should be no barrier to a 5 year old buying an Uzi? Or do rights have limits?

 

[M14 Shooter]

So there should be no barrier to a 5 year old buying an Uzi? Or do rights have limits?

 

[candycorn]

So there should be no barrier to a 5 year old buying an Uzi? Or do rights have limits?

Well...are rights inalienable or not?

 

[Rustic]

So there should be no barrier to a 5 year old buying an Uzi? Or do rights have limits?

Well...are rights inalienable or not?

Lol
Enforce the current laws... that’s Not happening now.

 

[M14 Shooter]

So there should be no barrier to a 5 year old buying an Uzi? Or do rights have limits?

Well...are rights inalienable or not?

It does not surprise me at all to discover you do not understand that not everyone has the right to keep and bear arms.