We're being emotional? OK, maybe if you include laughing at you as "emotion." We're explaining hiring to you and you're getting upset. You are lecturing to people who actually hire and manage people something about which you have no actual experience in at all. But hey, you heard it on MS-NBC, it must be true.
the new health care law will “shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits, but destroy the foundation of the 40-hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class.” -
when Cons said that we were fear mongers
“When you and the president sought our support for the Affordable Care Act, you pledged that if we liked the health plans we have now, we could keep them. Sadly, that promise is under threat,” said the letter. “We have been strong supporters of you. In campaign after campaign we have put boots on the ground, gone door-to-door to get out the vote, run phone banks and raised money to secure this vision. Now this vision has come back to haunt us.”
Again, we ******* warned you.
AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka echoed those concerns on Thursday, telling reporters during a breakfast event that the administration and Congress made some serious blunders in drafting the legislation that must be fixed to quiet the growing union discontent. -
From labor’s perspective, arguably the biggest problem is that the law – when fully implemented – will create an incentive for employers to keep their workers’ hours below 30 hours a week.
The Affordable Care Act will eventually penalize firms employing 50 or more people that don’t offer health insurance – or that offer coverage below minimum standards. This is the so-called “employer mandate.” The White House this summer put that provision on hold until 2015 to give medium and large employers the opportunity to better prepare and plan for the changes and reporting requirements. But once that provision finally takes hold, union leaders say that companies will cut the hours of workers below 30 hours per week to get under the 50-worker threshold for providing health care coverage.
With salaries remaining relatively static during this tepid economic recovery, a cutback in hours would be tantamount to a substantial pay cut for many union and other workers who are struggling to make ends meet.
Yeah, we were all ******* racist for TELLING you this was going to happen.
I'd like to say; "I hate to tell you we told you so."
but
We Told You So!!!
What a GREAT opportunity for Repubs. Just think. Now that unions are mad at Obamacare, you Rethugs will be able to show the unions the Rethug plans for healthcare, and seeing as how I am sure they are much superior to the current plan, all those union members will now vote for Rethugs.
Oh happy days oh happy days.
the new health care law will “shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits, but destroy the foundation of the 40-hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class.” -
when Cons said that we were fear mongers
“When you and the president sought our support for the Affordable Care Act, you pledged that if we liked the health plans we have now, we could keep them. Sadly, that promise is under threat,” said the letter. “We have been strong supporters of you. In campaign after campaign we have put boots on the ground, gone door-to-door to get out the vote, run phone banks and raised money to secure this vision. Now this vision has come back to haunt us.”
Again, we ******* warned you.
AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka echoed those concerns on Thursday, telling reporters during a breakfast event that the administration and Congress made some serious blunders in drafting the legislation that must be fixed to quiet the growing union discontent. -
From labor’s perspective, arguably the biggest problem is that the law – when fully implemented – will create an incentive for employers to keep their workers’ hours below 30 hours a week.
The Affordable Care Act will eventually penalize firms employing 50 or more people that don’t offer health insurance – or that offer coverage below minimum standards. This is the so-called “employer mandate.” The White House this summer put that provision on hold until 2015 to give medium and large employers the opportunity to better prepare and plan for the changes and reporting requirements. But once that provision finally takes hold, union leaders say that companies will cut the hours of workers below 30 hours per week to get under the 50-worker threshold for providing health care coverage.
With salaries remaining relatively static during this tepid economic recovery, a cutback in hours would be tantamount to a substantial pay cut for many union and other workers who are struggling to make ends meet.
Yeah, we were all ******* racist for TELLING you this was going to happen.
I'd like to say; "I hate to tell you we told you so."
but
We Told You So!!!
What a GREAT opportunity for Repubs. Just think. Now that unions are mad at Obamacare, you Rethugs will be able to show the unions the Rethug plans for healthcare, and seeing as how I am sure they are much superior to the current plan, all those union members will now vote for Rethugs.
Oh happy days oh happy days.
***** boy....LOL, I've never
hidden it
Nebraska...the same State that finished number 2 in job creation.....
You poor little wet back.
Pure Scot and English, Pubtroll- well, put your locale in your sig fcs- SO- you think NE Pubs HAVEN'T delayed your exchange LOL...AND how are people going to like no federally funded care for your poor...you're quite a joker LOL...AND NOW the corn picking will end lol...
