Unemployment rates were made worse by Bush, not Obama!

[Faun]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now **** off

That you can look at that chart of unemployment rates and claim the unemployment rate was 5.8% in June, 2008 when it was actually 5.6% is more evidence of how stupid you are, rightie.

 

[Dan Daly]

Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.

Enjoy working menial part time jobs, that is the legacy of the BushBama twins.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now **** off

That you can look at that chart of unemployment rates and claim the unemployment rate was 5.8% in June, 2008 when it was actually 5.6% is more evidence of how stupid you are, rightie.

Excuse me July 2008 dumb ass is that better?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now **** off

You are showing a larger PERCENT of th population in the labor force, not larger number of people.
In July 2008 (not June) when the UE rate was 5.8%, there were 8,937,000 unemployed, 154,464 ,000 in the labor force, and a population of 233,864,000
So 8 937,000/154,464,000 = 5.8% and 154,464,000/233,864,000=66.1%

For September, unemployment was 9,262,000, labor force was 155,862,000, and population was 248,446,000
9,262,000/155,862,000=5.9% and 155,862,000/248,446,000=62.7%

The number of people in the labor force is higher, but as a percent of the population, it's lower.

"a larger PERCENT of th population in the labor force, not larger number of people"
Do you drink before you post? Do you even think before you comment to defend the **** up in the white house?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

When Bush had 5.8% unemployment more people were in the workforce so spin that shit somewhere else.

Yet another lie!!!

When Bush had a fake 5.8% UE rate, the "real" rate was much higher , there were 154,469,000 in the workforce. There are 155,862,000 now.

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Nope doesn't pass the shit smell dumb ****.

 

[Faun]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now **** off

That you can look at that chart of unemployment rates and claim the unemployment rate was 5.8% in June, 2008 when it was actually 5.6% is more evidence of how stupid you are, rightie.

Excuse me July 2008 dumb ass is that better?

What makes you think that's better? You already proved you can't read a chart. But that's expected from a Bush voter.

 

[Faun]

Yet another lie!!!

When Bush had a fake 5.8% UE rate, the "real" rate was much higher , there were 154,469,000 in the workforce. There are 155,862,000 now.

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Nope doesn't pass the shit smell dumb ****.

You don't pass the smell test, Bush voter. Hell, you can't even tell June from July on a chart ... so there's no hope you can figure out 156 million is greater than 154 million.

 

[The Rabbi]

When Bush had 5.8% unemployment more people were in the workforce so spin that shit somewhere else.

Yet another lie!!!

When Bush had a fake 5.8% UE rate, the "real" rate was much higher , there were 154,469,000 in the workforce. There are 155,862,000 now.

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now **** off

That you can look at that chart of unemployment rates and claim the unemployment rate was 5.8% in June, 2008 when it was actually 5.6% is more evidence of how stupid you are, rightie.

Excuse me July 2008 dumb ass is that better?

What makes you think that's better? You already proved you can't read a chart. But that's expected from a Bush voter.

I wrote the wrong month which was next to the month I was pointing out, so sue me dumb ass. That does not mean I cannot read a simple chart you on the other hand are incapable of doing such a task.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Nope doesn't pass the shit smell dumb ****.

You don't pass the smell test, Bush voter. Hell, you can't even tell June from July on a chart ... so there's no hope you can figure out 156 million is greater than 154 million.

Dude only a dumb ass would vote for obama twice and an imbecile would continue to support him.

 

[Faun]

Yet another lie!!!

When Bush had a fake 5.8% UE rate, the "real" rate was much higher , there were 154,469,000 in the workforce. There are 155,862,000 now.

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

Yet another lie!!!

When Bush had a fake 5.8% UE rate, the "real" rate was much higher , there were 154,469,000 in the workforce. There are 155,862,000 now.

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

156 million is still more than 154 million. You can defend that idiot all you want, he still lied. And it didn't cost $7 trillion. Yet more idiocy from the forum jester.

 

[Faun]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now **** off

That you can look at that chart of unemployment rates and claim the unemployment rate was 5.8% in June, 2008 when it was actually 5.6% is more evidence of how stupid you are, rightie.

Excuse me July 2008 dumb ass is that better?

What makes you think that's better? You already proved you can't read a chart. But that's expected from a Bush voter.

I wrote the wrong month which was next to the month I was pointing out, so sue me dumb ass. That does not mean I cannot read a simple chart you on the other hand are incapable of doing such a task.

Yes, it means exactly that. If you knew how to read a chart, you would have known the unemployment rate for June, 2008, was 5.6%, not 5.8%, as you idiotically claimed. And why on Earth would I sue you for being a dumb ****? You're a Bush voter, it's expected.

 

[Faun]

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Nope doesn't pass the shit smell dumb ****.

You don't pass the smell test, Bush voter. Hell, you can't even tell June from July on a chart ... so there's no hope you can figure out 156 million is greater than 154 million.

Dude only a dumb ass would vote for obama twice and an imbecile would continue to support him.

Cries a Bush voter who's so embarrassed for voting for him, he won't even admit how many times he did.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now **** off

That you can look at that chart of unemployment rates and claim the unemployment rate was 5.8% in June, 2008 when it was actually 5.6% is more evidence of how stupid you are, rightie.

Excuse me July 2008 dumb ass is that better?

What makes you think that's better? You already proved you can't read a chart. But that's expected from a Bush voter.

I wrote the wrong month which was next to the month I was pointing out, so sue me dumb ass. That does not mean I cannot read a simple chart you on the other hand are incapable of doing such a task.

Yes, it means exactly that. If you knew how to read a chart, you would have known the unemployment rate for June, 2008, was 5.6%, not 5.8%, as you idiotically claimed. And why on Earth would I sue you for being a dumb ****? You're a Bush voter, it's expected.

You're a stupid **** you do realize this don't you? You are incapable of comprehending the simplest of charts

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

156 million is still more than 154 million. You can defend that idiot all you want, he still lied. And it didn't cost $7 trillion. Yet more idiocy from the forum jester.

only a dumb ass obama supporter would believe that lie.

 

[Faun]

That you can look at that chart of unemployment rates and claim the unemployment rate was 5.8% in June, 2008 when it was actually 5.6% is more evidence of how stupid you are, rightie.

Excuse me July 2008 dumb ass is that better?

What makes you think that's better? You already proved you can't read a chart. But that's expected from a Bush voter.

I wrote the wrong month which was next to the month I was pointing out, so sue me dumb ass. That does not mean I cannot read a simple chart you on the other hand are incapable of doing such a task.

Yes, it means exactly that. If you knew how to read a chart, you would have known the unemployment rate for June, 2008, was 5.6%, not 5.8%, as you idiotically claimed. And why on Earth would I sue you for being a dumb ****? You're a Bush voter, it's expected.

You're a stupid **** you do realize this don't you? You are incapable of comprehending the simplest of charts

Spits the idiot who just misread a chart and lied about another.

 

[Faun]

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

156 million is still more than 154 million. You can defend that idiot all you want, he still lied. And it didn't cost $7 trillion. Yet more idiocy from the forum jester.

only a dumb ass obama supporter would believe that lie.

I would show you the chart but you're clearly not able to read it anyway. What a Bush voter you are.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.

ROFLMNAO!

Sweet MOTHER that is hysterical. The Unemployment rate in the US remains well over 15%.

The International Financial Markets were crashed by the catastrophic failure of socialist policy, wherein Leftists in the US Legislature coerced the US lending markets to set aside sound, actuarial lending principle, and replaced with an irrational notion of "FAIRNESS", in the name of the great unfairness, OKA: Socialist Justice.

This treachery occurred over the latter decades of the 20th, finally culminating in the last half of the first decade of the 21st Century, in what will forever be known as The Greatest Depression.

The above post is a lie, known to the individual bringing it as Deceit, despite their claiming it as truth, advanced through Fraudulent means, for the purpose of influencing the Ignorant.

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance: The Three Fundamental Elements of Socialism.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Excuse me July 2008 dumb ass is that better?

What makes you think that's better? You already proved you can't read a chart. But that's expected from a Bush voter.

I wrote the wrong month which was next to the month I was pointing out, so sue me dumb ass. That does not mean I cannot read a simple chart you on the other hand are incapable of doing such a task.

Yes, it means exactly that. If you knew how to read a chart, you would have known the unemployment rate for June, 2008, was 5.6%, not 5.8%, as you idiotically claimed. And why on Earth would I sue you for being a dumb ****? You're a Bush voter, it's expected.

You're a stupid **** you do realize this don't you? You are incapable of comprehending the simplest of charts

Spits the idiot who just misread a chart and lied about another.

Dumb ass writing june 2008 when I meant july 2008 does not mean I cannot read the chart you are incapable of understanding the difference since you have a problem reading it. and no I did not lie the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact
But do continue to openly lie.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

Bull shit puck ass ***** I unlike you don't lie go ******* die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever. And it only cost us $7T to get there.
thats like a success for brain dead Democrats.

156 million is still more than 154 million. You can defend that idiot all you want, he still lied. And it didn't cost $7 trillion. Yet more idiocy from the forum jester.

only a dumb ass obama supporter would believe that lie.

I would show you the chart but you're clearly not able to read it anyway. What a Bush voter you are.

Your problem is you are a fucked up dumb ass obama supporter To stupid to grasp that should be considered an insult. Hell some democrat politicians are trying to hide the fact they voted for obama,