Unemployment benefits aren't causing a labor shortage. Low wages are. What if, and this may sound wild, businesses paid low wage workers more

[danielpalos]

@danielpalos is confused. He thinks quitting a job qualifies someone for UC. I know all about UC. When I drove school bus, summer of 2018 I got laid off because of no work. so I put in for UC and worked charters. Suffice it to say I made half of what I would make during the school year. And that's with four schools and one afterschool program. Point being, what danielpalos wants is for everyone to sit on their asses collecting money they never earned. Did he know that UC is taxed? Oh yes. And one of the conditions for receiving UC is you have to be either actively seeking employment or awaiting recall on your existing job.

lol. Those of the Opposing View are the ones confused. I am saying that for-Cause requirements for unemployment compensation in any at-Will employment State are repugnant to express Constitutional laws regarding equal protection. Those of the Opposing View are Always Wrong even though they are on the right.

No they are not. Just because a state is an at-will employment does not mean you qualify for every benefit. UC is not part of the at-will employment law.

It means you can quit on an at-will basis since that is the law. That means the State via EDD can't require Cause for benefits.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

My neighbor is a veteran. I am a veteran. He draws a full disability check from the VA. Should I demand a check too? Even though I am not disabled?

You are engaging in a fallacy of composition. Employment at-will is a contractual obligation in any at-will employment State.

And volunteer military service is a contractual obligation. Both my neighbor and I completed our obligated contract. Yet he gets a check and I do not it. That is the same inequality you are claiming applies to employment.

You repeated the same thing. We are discussing at-will employment. You both qualified for unemployment compensation.

 

[GMCGeneral]

@danielpalos is confused. He thinks quitting a job qualifies someone for UC. I know all about UC. When I drove school bus, summer of 2018 I got laid off because of no work. so I put in for UC and worked charters. Suffice it to say I made half of what I would make during the school year. And that's with four schools and one afterschool program. Point being, what danielpalos wants is for everyone to sit on their asses collecting money they never earned. Did he know that UC is taxed? Oh yes. And one of the conditions for receiving UC is you have to be either actively seeking employment or awaiting recall on your existing job.

lol. Those of the Opposing View are the ones confused. I am saying that for-Cause requirements for unemployment compensation in any at-Will employment State are repugnant to express Constitutional laws regarding equal protection. Those of the Opposing View are Always Wrong even though they are on the right.

No they are not. Just because a state is an at-will employment does not mean you qualify for every benefit. UC is not part of the at-will employment law.

It means you can quit on an at-will basis since that is the law. That means the State via EDD can't require Cause for benefits.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

My neighbor is a veteran. I am a veteran. He draws a full disability check from the VA. Should I demand a check too? Even though I am not disabled?

You are engaging in a fallacy of composition. Employment at-will is a contractual obligation in any at-will employment State.

And volunteer military service is a contractual obligation. Both my neighbor and I completed our obligated contract. Yet he gets a check and I do not it. That is the same inequality you are claiming applies to employment.

You repeated the same thing. We are discussing at-will employment. You both qualified for unemployment compensation.

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states. This is an issue that we've tried to get through your thick far Left skull. Just because a person quits his job, he is NOT entitled to unemployment compensation. If OTOH it is a seasonal job, like in my case when I drove school bus, or you are fired from your job, then yes, you do qualify.

 

[danielpalos]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Inflation happens anyway. Labor must be able to afford our first world economy, regardless therefore wages should outpace inflation.

/---/ The sole purpose of business is to create profit for the owners at the lowest possible cost. It is not a social jobs program.

Your point? That is why we have Government instead of true free market capitalism.

/——/ That is not why we have government.

Yet, it is. Capitalism is not the social-ism of Government.

Socialism is not government you idiot. It is only one form of government

Fact, deal with it .

Social-ism is Government. You can't have Government without it.

The fact that one needs government for socialism does not mean all government is socialism you uneducated fool

Socialism is only one form of government that is fact now stop lying like a childish bitch

 

[Soupnazi630]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No you are ignorant and no one appeals to you. You state nothing except fallacies and lies you are being corrected with facts

 

[WinterBorn]

@danielpalos is confused. He thinks quitting a job qualifies someone for UC. I know all about UC. When I drove school bus, summer of 2018 I got laid off because of no work. so I put in for UC and worked charters. Suffice it to say I made half of what I would make during the school year. And that's with four schools and one afterschool program. Point being, what danielpalos wants is for everyone to sit on their asses collecting money they never earned. Did he know that UC is taxed? Oh yes. And one of the conditions for receiving UC is you have to be either actively seeking employment or awaiting recall on your existing job.

lol. Those of the Opposing View are the ones confused. I am saying that for-Cause requirements for unemployment compensation in any at-Will employment State are repugnant to express Constitutional laws regarding equal protection. Those of the Opposing View are Always Wrong even though they are on the right.

No they are not. Just because a state is an at-will employment does not mean you qualify for every benefit. UC is not part of the at-will employment law.

It means you can quit on an at-will basis since that is the law. That means the State via EDD can't require Cause for benefits.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

My neighbor is a veteran. I am a veteran. He draws a full disability check from the VA. Should I demand a check too? Even though I am not disabled?

You are engaging in a fallacy of composition. Employment at-will is a contractual obligation in any at-will employment State.

And volunteer military service is a contractual obligation. Both my neighbor and I completed our obligated contract. Yet he gets a check and I do not it. That is the same inequality you are claiming applies to employment.

You repeated the same thing. We are discussing at-will employment. You both qualified for unemployment compensation.

No we did not. Anyone who voluntarily quits their job does not qualify for unemployment. That is expressly part of the rules of UC. And UC is independent of the at-will employment laws.

 

[danielpalos]

Inflation happens anyway. Labor must be able to afford our first world economy, regardless therefore wages should outpace inflation.

/---/ The sole purpose of business is to create profit for the owners at the lowest possible cost. It is not a social jobs program.

Your point? That is why we have Government instead of true free market capitalism.

/——/ That is not why we have government.

Yet, it is. Capitalism is not the social-ism of Government.

Socialism is not government you idiot. It is only one form of government

Fact, deal with it .

Social-ism is Government. You can't have Government without it.

The fact that one needs government for socialism does not mean all government is socialism you uneducated fool

Socialism is only one form of government that is fact now stop lying like a childish bitch

Government is social-ism, applied.

 

[danielpalos]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No you are ignorant and no one appeals to you. You state nothing except fallacies and lies you are being corrected with facts

You have nothing but fallacies and lies, Right-Winger. How typical. Vote blue not red!

 

[danielpalos]

@danielpalos is confused. He thinks quitting a job qualifies someone for UC. I know all about UC. When I drove school bus, summer of 2018 I got laid off because of no work. so I put in for UC and worked charters. Suffice it to say I made half of what I would make during the school year. And that's with four schools and one afterschool program. Point being, what danielpalos wants is for everyone to sit on their asses collecting money they never earned. Did he know that UC is taxed? Oh yes. And one of the conditions for receiving UC is you have to be either actively seeking employment or awaiting recall on your existing job.

lol. Those of the Opposing View are the ones confused. I am saying that for-Cause requirements for unemployment compensation in any at-Will employment State are repugnant to express Constitutional laws regarding equal protection. Those of the Opposing View are Always Wrong even though they are on the right.

No they are not. Just because a state is an at-will employment does not mean you qualify for every benefit. UC is not part of the at-will employment law.

It means you can quit on an at-will basis since that is the law. That means the State via EDD can't require Cause for benefits.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

My neighbor is a veteran. I am a veteran. He draws a full disability check from the VA. Should I demand a check too? Even though I am not disabled?

You are engaging in a fallacy of composition. Employment at-will is a contractual obligation in any at-will employment State.

And volunteer military service is a contractual obligation. Both my neighbor and I completed our obligated contract. Yet he gets a check and I do not it. That is the same inequality you are claiming applies to employment.

You repeated the same thing. We are discussing at-will employment. You both qualified for unemployment compensation.

No we did not. Anyone who voluntarily quits their job does not qualify for unemployment. That is expressly part of the rules of UC. And UC is independent of the at-will employment laws.

Yes, you both qualified for uc.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Inflation happens anyway. Labor must be able to afford our first world economy, regardless therefore wages should outpace inflation.

/---/ The sole purpose of business is to create profit for the owners at the lowest possible cost. It is not a social jobs program.

Your point? That is why we have Government instead of true free market capitalism.

/——/ That is not why we have government.

Yet, it is. Capitalism is not the social-ism of Government.

Socialism is not government you idiot. It is only one form of government

Fact, deal with it .

Social-ism is Government. You can't have Government without it.

The fact that one needs government for socialism does not mean all government is socialism you uneducated fool

Socialism is only one form of government that is fact now stop lying like a childish bitch

Government is social-ism, applied.

Wrong.

Socialism is only one form of government which is inherently evil and always fails. You are uninformed uneducated and a fool

 

[Soupnazi630]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No you are ignorant and no one appeals to you. You state nothing except fallacies and lies you are being corrected with facts

You have nothing but fallacies and lies, Right-Winger. How typical. Vote blue not red!

I have facts you are the only one posting lies and fallacies and that has been CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN

 

[danielpalos]

Inflation happens anyway. Labor must be able to afford our first world economy, regardless therefore wages should outpace inflation.

/---/ The sole purpose of business is to create profit for the owners at the lowest possible cost. It is not a social jobs program.

Your point? That is why we have Government instead of true free market capitalism.

/——/ That is not why we have government.

Yet, it is. Capitalism is not the social-ism of Government.

Socialism is not government you idiot. It is only one form of government

Fact, deal with it .

Social-ism is Government. You can't have Government without it.

The fact that one needs government for socialism does not mean all government is socialism you uneducated fool

Socialism is only one form of government that is fact now stop lying like a childish bitch

Government is social-ism, applied.

Wrong.

Socialism is only one form of government which is inherently evil and always fails. You are uninformed uneducated and a fool

You can't have Government without socialism. Modadishu proved it.

 

[danielpalos]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No you are ignorant and no one appeals to you. You state nothing except fallacies and lies you are being corrected with facts

You have nothing but fallacies and lies, Right-Winger. How typical. Vote blue not red!

I have facts you are the only one posting lies and fallacies and that has been CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN

You have no facts, right-winger. We could power the World with right-wing gaslighting.

 

[Soupnazi630]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No you are ignorant and no one appeals to you. You state nothing except fallacies and lies you are being corrected with facts

You have nothing but fallacies and lies, Right-Winger. How typical. Vote blue not red!

I have facts you are the only one posting lies and fallacies and that has been CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN

You have no facts, right-winger. We could power the World with right-wing gaslighting.

Yes I have facts proving your claims to be fallacies.

FACT Socialism is not government it is only one form of government and it is evil and always fails. You lack the intelligence to argue against that fact it is in youtr face and proves you to be a liar

 

[GMCGeneral]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No, they are NOT extraconstitutional, or whatever bullshit you believe. Haven't you ever heard of Amendment X? That puts labor laws SQUARELY in the States' purview, and that includes Unemployment! You are nothing but a thoroughly brainwashed slave of the Left who think you are entitled to get money just for existing.

 

[WinterBorn]

@danielpalos is confused. He thinks quitting a job qualifies someone for UC. I know all about UC. When I drove school bus, summer of 2018 I got laid off because of no work. so I put in for UC and worked charters. Suffice it to say I made half of what I would make during the school year. And that's with four schools and one afterschool program. Point being, what danielpalos wants is for everyone to sit on their asses collecting money they never earned. Did he know that UC is taxed? Oh yes. And one of the conditions for receiving UC is you have to be either actively seeking employment or awaiting recall on your existing job.

lol. Those of the Opposing View are the ones confused. I am saying that for-Cause requirements for unemployment compensation in any at-Will employment State are repugnant to express Constitutional laws regarding equal protection. Those of the Opposing View are Always Wrong even though they are on the right.

No they are not. Just because a state is an at-will employment does not mean you qualify for every benefit. UC is not part of the at-will employment law.

It means you can quit on an at-will basis since that is the law. That means the State via EDD can't require Cause for benefits.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

My neighbor is a veteran. I am a veteran. He draws a full disability check from the VA. Should I demand a check too? Even though I am not disabled?

You are engaging in a fallacy of composition. Employment at-will is a contractual obligation in any at-will employment State.

And volunteer military service is a contractual obligation. Both my neighbor and I completed our obligated contract. Yet he gets a check and I do not it. That is the same inequality you are claiming applies to employment.

You repeated the same thing. We are discussing at-will employment. You both qualified for unemployment compensation.

No we did not. Anyone who voluntarily quits their job does not qualify for unemployment. That is expressly part of the rules of UC. And UC is independent of the at-will employment laws.

Yes, you both qualified for uc.

UC is only a few months of money. My neighbor got money the remainder of his life. That is not equal protection under the law!!!

 

[danielpalos]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No you are ignorant and no one appeals to you. You state nothing except fallacies and lies you are being corrected with facts

You have nothing but fallacies and lies, Right-Winger. How typical. Vote blue not red!

I have facts you are the only one posting lies and fallacies and that has been CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN

You have no facts, right-winger. We could power the World with right-wing gaslighting.

Yes I have facts proving your claims to be fallacies.

FACT Socialism is not government it is only one form of government and it is evil and always fails. You lack the intelligence to argue against that fact it is in youtr face and proves you to be a liar

All Governments rely on social-ism.

The word “social” means: “relating to society or its organization.”
--https://www.google.com/search?q=social+definition&sxsrf=ALeKk021WllNKLYVmbstaptsc-ZSpxsrjA%3A1624710191526&source=hp&ei=LxzXYIr4HIPc-gTRo7-QBg&iflsig=AINFCbYAAAAAYNcqP8FLrwZuEavYEuTD5K2Ba4cM52hR&oq=social+definition&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyCAgAELEDEJECMgUIABCRAjICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAOgcIIxDqAhAnOgQIIxAnOggIABCxAxCDAToFCAAQsQM6DgguELEDEIMBEMcBEKMCOgQILhBDOgsILhCxAxDHARCjAjoNCC4QsQMQxwEQowIQQzoECAAQQ1DvGVjMPmC2QmgDcAB4AIABvASIAZkNkgELNS4yLjAuMS4wLjGYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6sAEK&sclient=gws-wiz&ved=0ahUKEwjKy82OpbXxAhUDrp4KHdHRD2IQ4dUDCAk&uact=5

Our own Constitutions enumerate our social Organization.

The term "socialism", used from the 1830s onwards in France and the United Kingdom, was directly related to what was called the social question. In essence, early socialists contended that the emergence of competitive market societies did not create "liberty, equality and fraternity" for all citizens, requiring the intervention of politics and social reform to tackle social problems, injustices and grievances (a topic on which Jean-Jacques Rousseau discourses at length in his classic work The Social Contract).--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social

 

[danielpalos]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No, they are NOT extraconstitutional, or whatever bullshit you believe. Haven't you ever heard of Amendment X? That puts labor laws SQUARELY in the States' purview, and that includes Unemployment! You are nothing but a thoroughly brainwashed slave of the Left who think you are entitled to get money just for existing.

You must believe gun laws are constitutional as well. Thanks.

 

[danielpalos]

@danielpalos is confused. He thinks quitting a job qualifies someone for UC. I know all about UC. When I drove school bus, summer of 2018 I got laid off because of no work. so I put in for UC and worked charters. Suffice it to say I made half of what I would make during the school year. And that's with four schools and one afterschool program. Point being, what danielpalos wants is for everyone to sit on their asses collecting money they never earned. Did he know that UC is taxed? Oh yes. And one of the conditions for receiving UC is you have to be either actively seeking employment or awaiting recall on your existing job.

lol. Those of the Opposing View are the ones confused. I am saying that for-Cause requirements for unemployment compensation in any at-Will employment State are repugnant to express Constitutional laws regarding equal protection. Those of the Opposing View are Always Wrong even though they are on the right.

No they are not. Just because a state is an at-will employment does not mean you qualify for every benefit. UC is not part of the at-will employment law.

It means you can quit on an at-will basis since that is the law. That means the State via EDD can't require Cause for benefits.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

My neighbor is a veteran. I am a veteran. He draws a full disability check from the VA. Should I demand a check too? Even though I am not disabled?

You are engaging in a fallacy of composition. Employment at-will is a contractual obligation in any at-will employment State.

And volunteer military service is a contractual obligation. Both my neighbor and I completed our obligated contract. Yet he gets a check and I do not it. That is the same inequality you are claiming applies to employment.

You repeated the same thing. We are discussing at-will employment. You both qualified for unemployment compensation.

No we did not. Anyone who voluntarily quits their job does not qualify for unemployment. That is expressly part of the rules of UC. And UC is independent of the at-will employment laws.

Yes, you both qualified for uc.

UC is only a few months of money. My neighbor got money the remainder of his life. That is not equal protection under the law!!!

It wasn't unemployment compensation for him. And, your disingenuous diversions are duly noted.

 

[Soupnazi630]

If you quit your job, you do NOT qualify for unemployment compensation. It's the law in all 50 states.

Those laws are extra-Constitutional. You simply appeal to ignorance like usual for the right-wing.

No you are ignorant and no one appeals to you. You state nothing except fallacies and lies you are being corrected with facts

You have nothing but fallacies and lies, Right-Winger. How typical. Vote blue not red!

I have facts you are the only one posting lies and fallacies and that has been CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN

You have no facts, right-winger. We could power the World with right-wing gaslighting.

Yes I have facts proving your claims to be fallacies.

FACT Socialism is not government it is only one form of government and it is evil and always fails. You lack the intelligence to argue against that fact it is in youtr face and proves you to be a liar

All Governments rely on social-ism.

The word “social” means: “relating to society or its organization.”
--https://www.google.com/search?q=social+definition&sxsrf=ALeKk021WllNKLYVmbstaptsc-ZSpxsrjA%3A1624710191526&source=hp&ei=LxzXYIr4HIPc-gTRo7-QBg&iflsig=AINFCbYAAAAAYNcqP8FLrwZuEavYEuTD5K2Ba4cM52hR&oq=social+definition&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyCAgAELEDEJECMgUIABCRAjICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAOgcIIxDqAhAnOgQIIxAnOggIABCxAxCDAToFCAAQsQM6DgguELEDEIMBEMcBEKMCOgQILhBDOgsILhCxAxDHARCjAjoNCC4QsQMQxwEQowIQQzoECAAQQ1DvGVjMPmC2QmgDcAB4AIABvASIAZkNkgELNS4yLjAuMS4wLjGYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6sAEK&sclient=gws-wiz&ved=0ahUKEwjKy82OpbXxAhUDrp4KHdHRD2IQ4dUDCAk&uact=5

Our own Constitutions enumerate our social Organization.

The term "socialism", used from the 1830s onwards in France and the United Kingdom, was directly related to what was called the social question. In essence, early socialists contended that the emergence of competitive market societies did not create "liberty, equality and fraternity" for all citizens, requiring the intervention of politics and social reform to tackle social problems, injustices and grievances (a topic on which Jean-Jacques Rousseau discourses at length in his classic work The Social Contract).--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social

We are not discussing SOCIAL you uneducated imbecile we are discussing Socialism,

Socialism is one form of government which is inherently evil and always fails. It is not government in general or all forms of government and your lame attempt to spin that is a proven massive failure. You are a verys tupoid person of low intellect and a childish brat. You are childish becaiuse you KNOW you are proven wrong but like any six year old simply go on repeating the same crap because you are a brat.