Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Means tested welfare is for complex poverty. Not my fault you are that ignorant, Right-Winger.What about complex poverty? Fuck those people?Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation can solve simple poverty.
You regurgitate garbage that absolutely crumbles under logical scrutiny.
You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
― Anatole France
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument
I only have a problem with unequal protection of the law.Some do, some don't. If you have a problem with the social safety hammock, just say so.Because you turn around and collect government benefits to make up for the fact you didn't make a livable wage.If someone asks me to perform a task for $5 an hour, and I agree to do it, why is it anyone else's business?
I am superior to you in every way and have proven you an ignorant liar.You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
― Anatole France
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument
Yes, it does. For-cause criteria for only Labor as the least wealthy in our at-will employment States is repugnant to Intent and express law regarding equal protection.Which does not exist
StewNazis have more substantial arguments.I am superior to you in every way and have proven you an ignorant liar.You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
― Anatole France
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument
I bet you never watch Friends. What country taught you English. You ain't American.StewNazis have more substantial arguments.I am superior to you in every way and have proven you an ignorant liar.You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
― Anatole France
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument
You have no substantial argujmentsStewNazis have more substantial arguments.I am superior to you in every way and have proven you an ignorant liar.You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
― Anatole France
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument
No it does not.Yes, it does. For-cause criteria for only Labor as the least wealthy in our at-will employment States is repugnant to Intent and express law regarding equal protection.Which does not exist
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
Why do you believe that? It should be more profitable for them to keep their best employees, ceteris paribus.Most employers don't want to keep their best workers. This is a fact.
He was arguing that employers don't want to keep their best employees.The fact is some of these people do not deserve better pay…