And, according to this, they are screwing up all the models used to determine what's going on – to include human participation in the changes.
I'm certain we'll see at least five charts trying to refute this but read the story @ Undersea Volcanoes May Be Impacting Climate Change
Sounds like a bunch of scientific mumbo jumbo. You volcano warming cultists hate America.
And, according to this, they are screwing up all the models used to determine what's going on – to include human participation in the changes.
I'm certain we'll see at least five charts trying to refute this but read the story @ Undersea Volcanoes May Be Impacting Climate Change
And, according to this, they are screwing up all the models used to determine what's going on – to include human participation in the changes.
I'm certain we'll see at least five charts trying to refute this but read the story @ Undersea Volcanoes May Be Impacting Climate Change
Clearly, the underseas volcanoes are caused by FRACKING.
I've never felt the WARMING...period.I never felt that the warming was man-made.
Here, lemme apply some to the back side of yer noggin'I've never felt the WARMING...period.I never felt that the warming was man-made.
Since you did not bother to read the article, and chose to make completely ignorant comments on it, why should anybody at all listen to your opinions?
And, according to this, they are screwing up all the models used to determine what's going on – to include human participation in the changes.
I'm certain we'll see at least five charts trying to refute this but read the story @ Undersea Volcanoes May Be Impacting Climate Change
Would that not be GOOD news for the algoreists crowd? It explains their erroneous forecasts. BUT it also explains why you can't mess with MOTHER NATURE which actually controls the climate. Not humans. IDIOTS...
Since you did not bother to read the article, and chose to make completely ignorant comments on it, why should anybody at all listen to your opinions?
And, according to this, they are screwing up all the models used to determine what's going on – to include human participation in the changes.
I'm certain we'll see at least five charts trying to refute this but read the story @ Undersea Volcanoes May Be Impacting Climate Change
Would that not be GOOD news for the algoreists crowd? It explains their erroneous forecasts. BUT it also explains why you can't mess with MOTHER NATURE which actually controls the climate. Not humans. IDIOTS...
Sounds like a bunch of scientific mumbo jumbo. You volcano warming cultists hate America.
And, according to this, they are screwing up all the models used to determine what's going on – to include human participation in the changes.
I'm certain we'll see at least five charts trying to refute this but read the story @ Undersea Volcanoes May Be Impacting Climate Change
Since you did not bother to read the article, and chose to make completely ignorant comments on it, why should anybody at all listen to your opinions?
And, according to this, they are screwing up all the models used to determine what's going on – to include human participation in the changes.
I'm certain we'll see at least five charts trying to refute this but read the story @ Undersea Volcanoes May Be Impacting Climate Change
Would that not be GOOD news for the algoreists crowd? It explains their erroneous forecasts. BUT it also explains why you can't mess with MOTHER NATURE which actually controls the climate. Not humans. IDIOTS...
Poor little hairball fucktard... It fails to read and makes lies in an effort to discredit and make itself feel better about lying.....As soon as I saw those two studies, I knew some deniers would eventually look at a headline, fail to read any of the articles, fail to understand that the articles contradicted them and supported AGW science, and run off to the message boards with it. They didn't disappoint.
At a minimum, deniers need to get their conspiracy theories sorted out so they don't contradict each other. A week ago, they were all declaring it was impossible for climate to affect volcanic eruptions. Here, they suddenly do a complete about-face.
Seafloor volcano pulses may alter climate Strikingly regular patterns from weeks to eons -- ScienceDaily
Volcanically active mid-ocean ridges crisscross earth's seafloors like stitching on a baseball, stretching some 37,000 miles. They are the growing edges of giant tectonic plates; as lavas push out, they form new areas of seafloor, which comprise some 80 percent of the planet's crust. Conventional wisdom holds that they erupt at a fairly constant rate--but Tolstoy finds that the ridges are actually now in a languid phase. Even at that, they produce maybe eight times more lava annually than land volcanoes. Due to the chemistry of their magmas, the carbon dioxide they are thought to emit is currently about the same as, or perhaps a little less than, from land volcanoes -- about 88 million metric tons a year. But were the undersea chains to stir even a little bit more, their CO2 output would shoot up, says Tolstoy.
Some scientists think volcanoes may act in concert with Milankovitch cycles--repeating changes in the shape of earth's solar orbit, and the tilt and direction of its axis -- to produce suddenly seesawing hot and cold periods. The major one is a 100,000-year cycle in which the planet's orbit around the sun changes from more or less an annual circle into an ellipse that annually brings it closer or farther from the sun. Recent ice ages seem to build up through most of the cycle; but then things suddenly warm back up near the orbit's peak eccentricity. The causes are not clear.
Enter volcanoes. Researchers have suggested that as icecaps build on land, pressure on underlying volcanoes also builds, and eruptions are suppressed. But when warming somehow starts and the ice begins melting, pressure lets up, and eruptions surge. They belch CO2 that produces more warming, which melts more ice, which creates a self-feeding effect that tips the planet suddenly into a warm period. A 2009 paper from Harvard University says that land volcanoes worldwide indeed surged six to eight times over background levels during the most recent deglaciation, 12,000 to 7,000 years ago. The corollary would be that undersea volcanoes do the opposite: as earth cools, sea levels may drop 100 meters, because so much water gets locked into ice. This relieves pressure on submarine volcanoes, and they erupt more. At some point, could the increased CO2 from undersea eruptions start the warming that melts the ice covering volcanoes on land?
So what this article is stating is that, by contributing CO2 when the sea levels are low, the rift volcanos may be part of the Milankovic Cycles, switching the Earth into and out of glaciations. In other words, CO2, the big control button.
As soon as I saw those two studies, I knew some deniers would eventually look at a headline, fail to read any of the articles, fail to understand that the articles contradicted them and supported AGW science, and run off to the message boards with it. They didn't disappoint.
At a minimum, deniers need to get their conspiracy theories sorted out so they don't contradict each other. A week ago, they were all declaring it was impossible for climate to affect volcanic eruptions. Here, they suddenly do a complete about-face.
