UK stops sharing intel with the US while crimes being committed in the Caribean

[Concerned American]

America has accused him of being a drug dealer, i believe it was Miss Lindsey Graham.

Don't 'believe'---Link it.

 

[westwall]

So what is he Moses ?

Better

 

[westwall]

He is just a head of executive branch. He is not a judge, you know.
And Venezuela is not his authority anyway. If he declare it is - ok, other guys might declare himself as an agressor.

He is the commander in chief of the US military. Now is not a good time to be a narco terrorist.

 

[Deadstick]

He is the commander in chief of the US military. Now is not a good time to be a narco terrorist.

Hitler was the commander of the German army so what?

 

[Deadstick]

Don't 'believe'---Link it.

That's the problem with you clowns you don't believe anything that doesn't fit your narrative.

 

[Concerned American]

Hitler was the commander of the German army so what?

What happened to Hitler when he challenged the US commander in chief?

 

[westwall]

Hitler was the commander of the German army so what?

Did the Royal Navy board the Bismarck?

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/11/politics/uk-suspends-caribbean-intelligence-sharing-us

I cant see any other option. Sharing intelligence is an important task but not to facilitate murder.
British civil servants must not be implicated in war crimes. When the US starts arresting these people and putting them in court we can resume cooperation.
Maybe in 3 years.

Is the US interrupting Starmer from getting his regular supply of Fentanyl and other illicit drugs?

 

[Zavulon]

Please link to any action that has been taken in Venezuela or Venezuelan waters. Educate yourself.

High seas and ships under flag of Venezuela (or property of Venezuela's citizens). Activity in high seas is regulated by the Sea Convention. If you kill citizens of Venezuela - people or Venezuela and allies of Venezuela see it as an act of aggression. If your military ships attack unarmed civilian ships (whatever, exept slaves, is it cargo) - all sea-trading countries see it as a threat to their freedom of sea-trading.
If you allow your soldiers and sailors kill civilians during peace time - in the best case all civilised countries see you as evil barbarians, in the worst - they are starting to kill civilians, too. Like, you know, sinking civilian ships under US flag. You don't like cocaine, they, say, won't like alcohol and pork or porno in passengers' smartphones.

What is, may be, more important, most of people see, that you are not after drug traders (given that your soldiers don't kill your drug dealers on the streets), you are after Venezuela's oil, and just lie as you usually do. And countries who buy oil see it as a threat, too. Yesterday, Britain halted giving you information. Tomorrow - they will give information and unmanned antiship boats and cruise missiles to Venezuela.

 

[westwall]

High seas and ships under flag of Venezuela (or property of Venezuela's citizens). Activity in high seas is regulated by the Sea Convention. If you kill citizens of Venezuela - people or Venezuela and allies of Venezuela see it as an act of aggression. If your military ships attack unarmed civilian ships (whatever, exept slaves, is it cargo) - all sea-trading countries see it as a threat to their freedom of sea-trading.
If you allow your soldiers and sailors kill civilians during peace time - in the best case all civilised countries see you as evil barbarians, in the worst - they are starting to kill civilians, too. Like, you know, sinking civilian ships under US flag. You don't like cocaine, they, say, won't like alcohol and pork or porno in passengers' smartphones.

The boats are flying no flags

 

[Zavulon]

He is the commander in chief of the US military. Now is not a good time to be a narco terrorist.

Why he didn't started from American streets? There are a lot of much easier targets.

 

[Concerned American]

High seas and ships under flag of Venezuela (or property of Venezuela's citizens). Activity in high seas is regulated by the Sea Convention. If you kill citizens of Venezuela - people or Venezuela and allies of Venezuela see it as an act of aggression. If your military ships attack unarmed civilian ships (whatever, exept slaves, is it cargo) - all sea-trading countries see it as a threat to their freedom of sea-trading.
If you allow your soldiers and sailors kill civilians during peace time - in the best case all civilised countries see you as evil barbarians, in the worst - they are starting to kill civilians, too. Like, you know, sinking civilian ships under US flag. You don't like cocaine, they, say, won't like alcohol and pork or porno in passengers' smartphones.

What is, may be, more important, most of people see, that you are not after drug traders (given that your soldiers don't kill your drug dealers on the streets), you are after Venezuela's oil, and just lie as you usually do. And countries who buy oil see it as a threat, too. Yesterday, Britain halted giving you information. Tomorrow - they will give information and unmanned antiship boats and cruise missiles to Venezuela.

Maduro is aware and he is cooperating in his own country. Bark up another tree.

 

[Zavulon]

The boats are flying no flags

They have some kind of registration, they have owners. If those boats are not American, they are not under America's authority in the first place. Those are high seas, and no one's Navy has right to kill not threatening civilians.

 

[Concerned American]

They have some kind of registration, they have owners. If those boats are not American, they are not under America's authority in the first place. Those are high seas, and no one's Navy has right to kill not threatening civilians.

Ask them which country they belong to. LOL

 

[Zavulon]

Did the Royal Navy board the Bismarck?

Was it peace time and was Bismark an unarmed civilian ship?

 

[Zavulon]

Ask them which country they belong to. LOL

You have legal right to do it. Any military ship has right to stop a civilian ship and ask them about what country they belong to, if they has resonable doubts about it. And if they got an answer: "We are Venezuela's cocaine clipper "Bonito Caballito" heading directly to the USA" all what US sailors have legal right to do is to say: "Buen viaje, Caballeros" and transmit information about them to Coastal Guard.
They don't have right to kill non-threating civilians in high seas on the ship under not US flag.

 

[westwall]

Was it peace time and was Bismark an unarmed civilian ship?

The narco terrorists are armed. The narco terrorists killed tens of thousands of Americans last year.

That's a war.

 

[westwall]

Why he didn't started from American streets? There are a lot of much easier targets.

Nope. Collateral damage in the streets.

Sinking boats far out at sea you have none of that.

 

[Zavulon]

The narco terrorists are armed. The narco terrorists killed tens of thousands of Americans last year.

That's a war.

If this is a war against drugs (or any other criminal activity), you'd better to start it on your own streets. If this is a war against Venezuela - you'd better declare it officially, but even official declaration of war, and establishing official blocade, don't give you a right to sink unarmed civilian ships.
Anyway, cocaine has no use in military and hardly can be a matter of military contrabanda. Unlimited war against trade routes is a war crime. Dönitz got ten years of prison for it, you know.

 

[Zavulon]

Nope. Collateral damage in the streets.

But those are your streets. It is your own business. Nobody cares.

Sinking boats far out at sea you have none of that.

Those violations of the basic rules of the freedom of sea trading is what can turn even your "best allies" (like Britain) against you. They might even "sell" a lot of unmanned boats with explosives to Venezuelan Navy and start to sink your own ships.