james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
Where's your explanation. I provided mine. You sound like a LOSER, too. No explanation.Wow. Just wow.
You insult your God with this kind of stupid crap.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where's your explanation. I provided mine. You sound like a LOSER, too. No explanation.Wow. Just wow.
You insult your God with this kind of stupid crap.
Which should have been your first clue that you got fooled somehow.It's a funny thing, I do not now, nor have I ever cared what other people think. I have never seen an "alien", I have however observed UAP's doing things that defy physics. Twice.
You are wrong and proven so.I'm right and you LOSE. The closest thing that can be created in experiments was RNA. It ISN'T life. Thus, life cannot be created.
You're not very impressive with science as you can't explain your POV. All you can do is ad hominem attacks. Why don't you explain how life happened instead of impossible this and not impossible that lol?
You can't LOSER.
No you did not.Where's your explanation. I provided mine. You sound like a LOSER, too. No explanation.
Which should have been your first clue that you got fooled somehow.
You are so desperate that you are now making up things ad nauseam .Rock refllects light
Picking up gravitational asists from objects from objects such as trhe sun accelerates other opjects.
I have done research you have not,.
I made up nothingYou are so desperate that you are now making up things ad nauseam .
As for your spelling and precise meaning -- bring on a translator for an alien language .
Not so much DYOR as first do a spell check at minimum.
I agree you are DESPERATE now. I guess you agree life cannot be created; thus God. The closest was RNA, but that isn't life (scientists agree).I made up nothing
I am still correct and you are proven wrong
It cannot be created NOW.I agree you are DESPERATE now. I guess you agree life cannot be created; thus God. The closest was RNA, but that isn't life (scientists agree).
This is S&T, not the Rubber Room. As usual, you are delusional.It cannot be created NOW.
Which is irrelevant.
You know you are owned and defeated
No I am correct and you would not know.This is S&T, not the Rubber Room. As usual, you are delusional.
lolI agree you are DESPERATE now. I guess you agree life cannot be created; thus God. The closest was RNA, but that isn't life (scientists agree).
You didn't talk any science. You are BORING AF with S&T. Go to the Rubber Room you nutgoober.No I am correct and you would not know.
You are clueless about science, what it is and how it works
You didn't talk any science. You are BORING AF with S&T. Go to the Rubber Room you nutgoober.
Until I find a less flammable thread ...Possible this thread has degenerated far from what the OP/Title would suggest, so FWIW:
Hundreds more UFO sightings included in latest report
The office tracking reports of UFOs has added nearly 400 additional sightings to its catalog over the last year, either because of new sightings or older sightings discovered in existing files, bringing the total number of UFO sightings to over 500.
...
On Thursday, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released an unclassified version of its annual report on UFOs, or what the government calls unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).
The assessment revealed that the office tracking UAPs has had a total of 510 sightings since 2004. This is significantly up from the 144 sightings included in the initial report in 2021.
...
Hundreds more UFO sightings included in latest report
I corrected you and the gave you a time out for ad hominems. You didn't even know scientists can create RNA, but it isn't life.I did indeed.
I corrected you with hard core facts which are supported by science and which prove you to be ignorant and a fool.
you displayed massive ignorance of science and got owned by me
I did know RNA is not life and I know they have come to understand how it forms. It is irrelevant.I corrected you and the gave you a time out for ad hominems. You didn't even know scientists can create RNA, but it isn't life.
Today, some scientists claim they have made an artificial "baby" by programming their DNA, but they started with a living cell and modified its DNA to form an organ. It's artificial biology and the "baby" looks like a mess. They shouldn't do this as they're building a Frankenstein. It prolly looks like you Soupnazi630 .
No way to fake what I saw.
I don't wanna know you're a fag. Get down on your knees and I'll kick you in the head haha.I did know RNA is not life and I know they have come to understand how it forms. It is irrelevant.
You did not correct me. My original statement stands unchallenged.
I corrected you and your ignoranxe of science and words like POSSIBLE
At this point you are spinning like a fag on a dick trying to save face but you cannot