U.S. weighs sending special forces to seize Iran's nuclear stockpile

What does USMB think? Admin is debating sending US forces into Iran to attempt to seize nuclear materials, etc.​

U.S. weighs sending special forces to seize Iran's nuclear stockpile​

The U.S. and Israel have discussed sending special forces into Iran to secure its stockpile of highly enriched uranium at a later stage of the war, according to four sources with knowledge of the discussions.

Why it matters: Preventing Iran from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon is one of President Trump's stated war objectives. The regime's 450 kilograms of 60%-enriched uranium — convertible to weapons grade within weeks — is one key to that goal.

The big picture: Any operation to seize the material would likely require U.S. or Israeli troops on Iranian soil, navigating heavily fortified underground facilities in the middle of a war.

It remains unclear whether it would be an American, Israeli or joint mission.
It would likely only take place after both countries are confident Iran's military can no longer mount a serious threat to the forces involved.
Behind the scenes: At a congressional briefing Tuesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio was asked whether Iran's enriched uranium would be secured. "People are going to have to go and get it," he said, without specifying who.
What stockpile? Wasn’t it irretrievably buried and their ability it make more eliminated? Trump wouldn’t have lied would he? Say it ain’t so, Joe.
 
What’s different from other times is this time an ugly job gets finished ugly or not
 
So you believe Iran is not trying to build a nuclear weapon?
Didn't the Trumpster promise that he hit all the right targets the first time Israel ordered him to bomb Iran? Did he lie? No ... Trump would NEVER lie:

 
Nothing is going to get finished by this but a bunch of lives.
 
Ok, then Iran lied, because THEY SAID they had 22,000lbs of enriched uranium and they weren't giving it up.



You probably believe the "dry cleaned Hamas" are/were real.

Anytime there is a video on Fox News, you parrot it. Fox News controls what you believe.


Can a 757 fly at 600 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground?
 
We never heard that in the UK. We heard the facilities had been bombed/damaged, not the uranium, setting their nuclear plans back two years.



Do you have a link to say the uranium was blown to bits?


No, but let's be serious, we bombed the #### out of those sites. If there was radioactive material there, it would have leaked. Apparently it didn't.

We have heard this "Iran is just about to get a nuke bomb" narrative for 40 years. The evidence so far is that Tulsi was right, they don't have a nuke bomb program and never did. The Soviets set them up with power plants and primitive centrifuges good to produce fuel, not weapons grade. There is no evidence so far they ever went beyond that. And "videos" and "quotes from Iranian officials" from Fox News does not count as "evidence" of anything except a tutorial on just how much "news" on Fox is manufactured Zionist Fascist treasonous bullshit.
 
57 max speed is around 571 mph @ about 45000 not 8 feet.


correct, a 757 cannot go over like 250 mph until it is 5k feet up...

hence, what hit the Pentagon on 911 was NOT a 757, not even close...
 
No, but let's be serious, we bombed the #### out of those sites. If there was radioactive material there, it would have leaked. Apparently it didn't.

We have heard this "Iran is just about to get a nuke bomb" narrative for 40 years. The evidence so far is that Tulsi was right, they don't have a nuke bomb program and never did. The Soviets set them up with power plants and primitive centrifuges good to produce fuel, not weapons grade. There is no evidence so far they ever went beyond that. And "videos" and "quotes from Iranian officials" from Fox News does not count as "evidence" of anything except a tutorial on just how much "news" on Fox is manufactured Zionist Fascist treasonous bullshit.
Yes - but don't you think that this changed dramatically after June 2025?
 



Well WHERE IS IT??

We've been told for 40 years "Iran is just right about to get a nuke bomb," decade after decade.

There is ZERO ACTUAL EVIDENCE Iran has a nuke bomb or even a nuke bomb program/attempt.
 
Yes - but don't you think that this changed dramatically after June 2025?


We were told after the first attack on Iran that their nuke program had been set back "years."


It hasn't even been one year.... and the same excuse is used to hit Iran again, and still NO EVIDENCE AT ALL that Iran either has/had a nuke bomb or a program to develop one.
 
15th post
We were told after the first attack on Iran that their nuke program had been set back "years."
TACO loves to spread lies or "exaggerated" statements.

He wouldn't state: we have likely succeeded to set back their program for a year or two.
Or even better: I fuc..ed it up - we didn't succeed, and now they are pissed and will push their program even more.
It hasn't even been one year.... and the same excuse is used to hit Iran again, and still NO EVIDENCE AT ALL that Iran either has/had a nuke bomb or a program to develop one.
It isn't about evidence, neither was it the case for the MWD story about Iraq - but that the chance of Iran pursuing nukes (especially after June 2025) is extremely high. And Israel certainly doesn't want that to happen. right?
 
Last edited:
or do a fudged Mossad video of it, complete with Israel's enriched uranium, to provide "some" "evidence" that Iran had nukes...
We were never trying to “prove Iran has nukes”

The whole point is to make sure they don’t get them

Fanatical Muslim theocratic governments with nukes = bad thing
 
TACO loves to spread lies or "exaggerated" statements.

He wouldn't state: we have likely succeeded to set back their program for a year or two.
Or even better: I fuc..ed it up - we didn't succeed, and now they are pissed and will push their program even more.

It isn't about evidence, neither was it the case for the MWD story about Iraq - but that the chance of Iran pursuing nukes (especially after June 2025) is extremely high. And Israel certainly doesn't want that to happen. right?



Israel wants Iran exterminated and annexed.

Nuke is 80 year old tech. If Iran wanted to have a nuke, they would have had one decades ago. Here we are crediting Iran for being super tech savvy, and the reality is just the opposite.
 
We were never trying to “prove Iran has nukes”

The whole point is to make sure they don’t get them

Fanatical Muslim theocratic governments with nukes = bad thing


"We" = Zionist Fascism

We've heard the "we can't let Iran get a nuke" for 40 years, and there is still no evidence they have one, or ever did, or were ever trying to build one.

"Fanatical theocratic governments" are bad period, which includes Israel.
 
Back
Top Bottom