U.S.: Root cause of violence is settlement building.

Such a pity that your source is an islamonazi boiler room group that are editing Wiki articles to meet with islamonazi propaganda



User:Daniel575 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
50px-Puppeter_template.svg.png

This account may need to be blocked due to abusive use of multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)
I notice a few other odd bits on some newly added wiki info.
Tell me what did the Jews do before 1 AD, besides spill blood. The Muslims had a golden age, and built a large university in Egypt which is still there, Jews never did much till they got some education in German and American schools.

You might try reading the Prophets and Writings...Nah!
The Muslim Golden Age WAS cool because they enforced people of all religions to adhere to their religion or convert/die.
So WTF happened? Oil?

the Mongol invasion and no they did not force anyone to convert or die . I have read and studied the OT and to be truthful, none is prophetic , anymore than to say WWIII is looking like its on the horizon. That does not make me a prophet.

You have demonstrated endless times that you read nothing.

By nothing , you mean??

You read the OT?
When you were moving your bowels.
You must have read a version published by an Islamic publishing firm.

What would you like to know about the OT, is there a specific book? or just a verse and here and there, you have memorized.
 
Racist apartheid occupation supporters like you never ask yourselves the question: If Mexicans successfully migrated to Texas and set up a state for themselves there, claiming their right of return to their homeland (Texas was Mexico) and subsequently evicted most Texans of non-Hispanic origin. Do you think the non-Hispanic Texans that remained would peacefully accept second-class citizen status and occupation in Texas?
Ha ha ha ha ha. What a load of crap.

you don't expect anything else from the anti-Semite terrorist supporters, do you?

You mean the Zionist, no.
 
I guess People react when invaded and occupied by Immigrants
"So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population." Winnie Churchill
Anyone would react to such invasion, indeed.
Into which country was that?
The british mandate palestine, of course. See, jewish development has such effect of luring arab losers from the hood.
 
The not so cool thing about Zionist is they are brought up to think they are the "chosen ones".
Once the media stops its babbling and driveling of choice about jews it'll pass, of course.
From what I understand is the Zionist are speaking Hebrew now, and that make them Hebrews, not Israelites.
Funny, palistanians speak various dialects, that makes them settlers and squatters from various homelands in the hood.
 
I guess People react when invaded and occupied by Immigrants
"So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population." Winnie Churchill
Anyone would react to such invasion, indeed.
The fact. From 1920 to 194, 346,415 European Jews invaded Palestine compared to only 38,041 non-Jewish immigrants.View attachment 52641
Yeah, yeah, and palistanians were all saudi sheiks to own 99.9% of the mandate palestine. We read that garbaggio, indeed.
 
Palestinians do not speak various dialects. The Jews are from Europe and are squatting colonists. What's funny is how easily you are made a fool of. LOL

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times
nyt.jpg

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”


Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin
 
I guess People react when invaded and occupied by Immigrants
"So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population." Winnie Churchill
Anyone would react to such invasion, indeed.
Into which country was that?
The british mandate palestine, of course. See, jewish development has such effect of luring arab losers from the hood.
In previous posts you would have us believe Palestine never existed
 
I guess People react when invaded and occupied by Immigrants
"So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population." Winnie Churchill
Anyone would react to such invasion, indeed.
The fact. From 1920 to 194, 346,415 European Jews invaded Palestine compared to only 38,041 non-Jewish immigrants.View attachment 52641
Yeah, yeah, and palistanians were all saudi sheiks to own 99.9% of the mandate palestine. We read that garbaggio, indeed.

You mean you read the facts and ignore them because they don't fit the brainwashing you have undergone. It's called cognizant dissonance, get some help.

Land Ownership.

land ownership only.webp
 
There will be No peace until Palestinians have equal rights in the country of their birth
Unfortunately, neighboring Islamist nations will not repatriate the beggars and squatters posing as Pal'istanians so future generations of Pali welfare cheats will need to continue the fraud of their invented identity with an invented nationality.
 
Palestinians do not speak various dialects. The Jews are from Europe and are squatting colonists. What's funny is how easily you are made a fool of. LOL

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times
nyt.jpg

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”


Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin
Holy Muhammud (swish). The Zionists™ were looking to purchase land in their ancestral homelands?

What's next, an infidel pebble-chucker in Mecca?
 

"Blood in the Middle East, the USA (states): The new colonies (settlements are considered colonies in Europe, ed.) are the cause.


New wave of attacks in the region while U.S. diplomacy enters the fray. John Kerry explains: the conflict with the Palestinians has been fueled by the "enormous growth of the colonies".
Nope....it's bigotry.

The UN gives them land......then the rags attack them....they expand into the areas the rags lost during the war....and the rags complain to the UN about it. The rags can't muster a force to defeat them.

******* camel-jockey wimps.
 
The chosen are those who follow the Commandments regardless of their religion. Hatred begets more hatred. That is not to say that a nation is not expected to protect its citizens.

Well that leaves the Zionist out. Thanks





And you muslims as you don't have any of the commandments in your religion

Goes to show how much you know Phoney...





More than you as the koran teaches muslims to steal, murder and covet what others have. Or will you deny these even when the verses are produced.

No it doesn't LIAR...

Produce the verses!




The Quran:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.



Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."



Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.



Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."



Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').


Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.



Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"


Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."



Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward " This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle). According to the verse, Allah will allow the disabled into Paradise, but will provide a larger reward to those who are able to kill others in his cause.



Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?



Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"


Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.



Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."



Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah" Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."



Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."



Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."



Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."



Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."



Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.



Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.



Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war.



Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.



Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"



Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.



Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).



Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.



Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."



Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the Quran define a true believer?



Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."



Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).



Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)



Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"



Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.



Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.



Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.



Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"



Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.



Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..



Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.



Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.


Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

The Qur'an:

Qur'an (5:38) - "As to the thief, Male or female, cut off his or her hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and Allah is Exalted in power." Keep in mind that the Qur'an promises the most severe of punishments for those who believe in one part of the Qur'an, but not the other (2:85). There is no such thing as moderate Islam. Those Muslims who reject cutting off hands for theft are not only disregarding their own religion, but are subject to punishment from true believers for it, since they are hypocrites by definition (see 66:9).
Qur'an (8:69) - "So enjoy what you took as booty; the spoils are lawful and good."
Qur'an (48:20) - "Allah promised you many acquisitions which you will take, then He hastened on this one for you and held back the hands of men from you, and that it may be a sign for the believers and that He may guide you on a right path." Allah promises Muslims that they will profit materially in their war against unbelievers. It isn't stealing when it's taken from an unbeliever.
Qur'an (33:27) - "And He caused you to inherit their land and their houses and their wealth, and land ye have not trodden. Allah is ever Able to do all things." Referring again to the property of unbelievers, which is given to those Muslims who defeat them.
 
Palestinians do not speak various dialects. The Jews are from Europe and are squatting colonists. What's funny is how easily you are made a fool of. LOL

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times
nyt.jpg

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times depicts how the Conference sought to “colonize Palestine” and discussed the purchasing of land with English Zionists.
World Bulletin/News Desk

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”


Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin
Holy Muhammud (swish). The Zionists™ were looking to purchase land in their ancestral homelands?

What's next, an infidel pebble-chucker in Mecca?


What it says is that they planned to colonize Palestine in 1899. You can't change the words, they are in plain English. And, you can't change the meaning of the verb "colonize".

A few decades later they announce even more ambitious colonization. Quit while you're ahead bozo.

"Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
July 25, 1926



London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)

The various phases of the present situation in Palestine and in the Zionist movement throughout the world, and plans of Zionist leadership for the immediate future, were submitted for consideration at the Zionist Actions Committee which opened its session here yesterday.

The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered.

The deliberations took place under the chairmanship of Dr. Leon Motzkin, chairman of the Actions Committee, in the presence of nearly all the members of the Committee. Six delegates from Poland could not arrive for the opening session, being occupied in the present session of the Polish Sejm, to which they are deputies. They are expected to arrive here on Sunday.

The Committee’s sessions, which will last about a week, were declared closed to press representatives. In his opening remarks, Dr. Motzkin expressed regret at the absence of Nahum Sokolow, chairman of the Zionist World Executive, who is now on a tour of South Africa. Dr. Motzkin welcomed Chaim Nachman Bialik, Hebrew poet, to the Actions Committee meeting.

It was learned from authoritative sources that in his report submitted to the Actions Committee. Dr. Weizmann summarized his impressions of his recent visit to Palestine, during which he studied the economic and political situation there. His views on the situation were expressed in his memorandum to the League of Nations and in his detailed letter to the British government, Dr. Weizmann stated All the documents pertaining to the matter were submitted to the Actions Committee.

The relations with the mandatory power have improved considerably especially with regard to questions pertaining to the colonization work. The proposals submitted by the Zionist Executive were favorably considered by the British government, emphasis was laid on the allocation of land for Jewish colonization in Beisan and in Southern Palestine.

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
 
Really, I know its from Wiki so read the link


After World War II many Jewish refugees found themselves in Displaced person camps. The Zionists controlled a camp for Jewish refugee children near Haifa, Israel where they operated an anti-religious policy in an effort to cut off Haredi children from their spiritual roots. To a large extent they were successful, and many children from Haredi homes were "poisoned against religion".[33]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haredim_and_Zionism

link 33 leads you to here.

The History of the ‘Status Quo’ Agreement - Hamodia

Zionist are not jews, how much more evidence do you need???





Such a pity that your source is an islamonazi boiler room group that are editing Wiki articles to meet with islamonazi propaganda



User:Daniel575 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
50px-Puppeter_template.svg.png

This account may need to be blocked due to abusive use of multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)
I notice a few other odd bits on some newly added wiki info.




A quick search soon shows who is editing the entries, and when they are reported they get banned
 
There will be No peace until Palestinians have equal rights in the country of their birth
Unfortunately, neighboring Islamist nations will not repatriate the beggars and squatters posing as Pal'istanians so future generations of Pali welfare cheats will need to continue the fraud of their invented identity with an invented nationality.
 
So the Arabs lost the West Bank in their various wars. Well.....wars have consequences.....and the Arabs were losers. Is this hard for anyone to understand?

The Jews illegally invaded Palestine from Europe and evicted many of the Christians and Muslims that were living there. Now the Christians and Muslims that the Jews were unable to evict are fighting to get their land back. Is that just too difficult to understand. And, they know that demographically time is on their side. Unfortunately, the young are impatient and are causing disturbances that they hope will accelerate the process, as the disturbances in white-ruled South Africa accelerated the process.




More of your off topic spamming and trolling
 
15th post
The Jews lived in Europe and invaded Palestine. Spain might be the spiritual home of the world's Hispanics, but it doesn't mean that they can go to Catalonia and take it over. LOL





Just as Catholics invaded and stole the lands of the South Americans, displacing or mass murdering them in the process
 
There will be No peace until Palestinians have equal rights in the country of their birth
Unfortunately, neighboring Islamist nations will not repatriate the beggars and squatters posing as Pal'istanians so future generations of Pali welfare cheats will need to continue the fraud of their invented identity with an invented nationality.





I can see a monk, 2 Turks and a Jew
 
Palestine violated 5 cease fires during the last conflict.
Those were phony negotiations between Israel and Egypt. They didn't include Hamas, which was the other party to the conflict. You can't have a ceasefire unless the two parties involved in the conflict come to an agreement.

And they did that back in 2008. For almost 4 months, there were no rockets. Then, in early December, the IDF launched a commando raid into Gaza to kill members of Hamas. Then they got rockets in return.


Israel violated a cease fire after they discovered new tunnels into Israel from Gaza, and they pushed into Gaza to find and destroy as many tunnels as possible.
End the blockade and they wouldn't need tunnels to bring in goods and services.


They violated another cease fire because the Palestinians were using the cease fire to bring in more rockets, and Israel struck the rockets during the cease fire.
Why can't they have rockets? Are you saying they have no right to defend themselves? You need weapons to do that.


Then you have cases like what is going now, Palestinians coming into Israel and perpetrating this mass wave of stabbings.
That is a direct result of the mosque closing and the occupation in general. End the occupation and blockade, people won't get stabbed.


You remember back before Israel handed over Gaza, due to pressure from the rest of the world, to the Palestinians? You remember what Israel warned the rest of the world Palestinians would do if they did turn the strip over to them? They warned it would not be long after they turned the Gaza Strip over to them that they would begin to fire rockets from Gaza into Israel. The UN and several other nations disagreed with Israel and PROMISED Israel they would make sure that did not happen. WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW / HAS BEEN HAPPENING SINCE ISRAEL HANDED GAZA OVER? Yeah, that's right - Palestinians have been using the Gaza Strip as a launching pad for rockets into Israel...and where is the help the UN promised, where is the prevention promised?
You can't give what you don't have. Gaza wasn't Israel's to give. Gaza was under the belligerent occupation by a foreign force. The only thing you do with an occupation, is to end it.


In the last conflict, Obama wrote an editorial praising the leader of HAMAS for his 'tolerance', during a period in which HAMAS fired 100 rockets in 1 month into Israel, and placed it in an Israeli newspaper. On top of it he snubbed Netenyahu by not mentioning him, the leader of the nation being shelled by HAMAS' 100 rockets.
The occupation had been going on for 34 years before the first rocket flew. That's pretty tolerant.

If you tried to build a fence across my front lawn, you would hear from me before the sun set that day.


Anti-semites like yourself never do answer this question when it is posed to you, but maybe you will:
Why would I hate Jews?


If Mexico attacked the US, launching rockets into Texas, how long do you think the United States would put up with it, exhibit the same type of 'tolerance' Obama and the rest of the world demands of Israel?
I've already answered this question, fuckhead. How many more times you going to ask it? As I corrected you before, the premise of your question, is wrong.

The correct scenario to preface your question with, is...

If the US launched a military invasion into Mexico and took over part of the country, then started sending down its white, trailer trash citizens to live in abandoned homes after the military drove off the residents, then, after 34 years...

...Mexico attacked the US, launching rockets into Texas, how long do you think the United States would put up with it, exhibit the same type of 'tolerance' Obama and the rest of the world demands of Israel?

There, consider yourself corrected............again!
 
Why can't they have rockets? .... !

HAMAS' charter, which they refuse to change, calls for the genocide of the Jews. They fired HUNDREDS of rockets into the Israeli civilian population, an act which YOU claim is 'defending themselves'.

They fire these rockets from rocket launchers placed on the tops of their own people's hospitals, in their housing communities, and schools - to include a U.N. school during this last conflict, to use their own people as human shields and 'martyr propaganda'. They were caught killing their own people who tried to flee these ares to avoid being used as human shields.....

...and you ask WHY they shouldnt have the right to have rockets IN GAZA, where the U.N. promised Israel it would NEVER allow HAMAS to have offensive weapons like these rockets?!

Your argument in favor of allowing HAMAS to have rockets, which are NOT 'defensive', in GAZA is equivalent to arguing how Chicago Gangs and criminals, who have and continue to grow every day the new gun violence / murder record there this year, should have the right to have as many weapons of any kind as long as they claim they are only using them for 'self-defense'.

Like I said, you can't fix 'stupid' ... or change the hearts and minds of terrorist supporters and anti-semites. Haters gonna hate, and, as you proved, say stupid stuff.
 
Back
Top Bottom