U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson Orders White House to Turn Over Ukraine Emails Being Withheld from the Public

[the other mike]

Then why did she rule AGAINST Obama and make him turn over Fast & Furious evidence in 2016?

Because the evidence was overwhelming and she wanted to
keep her kushy job.( In the eastern district of Virginia )

 

[colfax_m]

The House had the opportunity to call the witnesses.

The House did call witnesses who declined to show up.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because the evidence was overwhelming and she wanted to
keep her kushy job.( In the eastern district of Virginia )

You really are a nutball.

 

[the other mike]

Because the evidence was overwhelming and she wanted to
keep her kushy job.( In the eastern district of Virginia )

You really are a nutball.

You're denying fast and furious happened now ?
Are you ever not wrong in your life ?
For sure you're always wrong here at USMB about everything.

 

[Nostra]

This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.

Roger Stone Judge Orders White House to Turn Over Ukraine Emails Being Withheld from the Public

Amy Berman Jackson - appointed by Barack Obama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Berman_Jackson.

See my last post. And she ruled against Barack Obama.

I didn't comment one way or another.

Just making sure the info is clear to everyone.



.

Yeah, Bootney. No inference there by mentioning who appointed her.
lol

Only noting that she is an Obama appointee, who may have an agenda. There is nothing wrong with pointing out potential bias.

Should we have kept that a secret?

.

Appointees have an agenda? You think Barr does?

Yes. His agenda is to undue and expose the rampant corruption of the Barry Hussein regime.

You have a problem with corruption being exposed?

Not in the least. Please link to his mandate.

Are you really so fucking stupid you don't know that the mandate of the Attorney General of the United States is to go after corruption?

Really?

Please tell us you aren't that idiotic? Please.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're denying fast and furious happened now ?

Obviously not, and your pathetic bait and switch is pathetic.

You know, you charlatans all use the same playbook.

 

[the other mike]

You're denying fast and furious happened now ?

Obviously not, and your pathetic bait and switch is pathetic.

You know, you charlatans all use the same playbook.

You're the one who misquoted me in the first place.
I rest my case dude. Lay off the crack pipe and try to clear up your mind some.

 

[the other mike]

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're the one who misquoted me in the first place.

Well that's a blatant lie. As anyone can see for themselves.

Good god stop your incessant whining already. You are a grown man.

 

[the other mike]

Then why did she rule AGAINST Obama and make him turn over Fast & Furious evidence in 2016?

Because the evidence was overwhelming and she wanted to
keep her kushy job.( In the eastern district of Virginia )

Shut up indiana.

 

[OldLady]

Then why did she rule AGAINST Obama and make him turn over Fast & Furious evidence in 2016?

Because the evidence was overwhelming and she wanted to
keep her kushy job.( In the eastern district of Virginia )

And I hope she finds against Trump's bullshit the same way. For whatever reason. Thank goodness the President has no authority to fire judges.

 

[mamooth]

You cannot point to one instance of such from Trump,

Of course we can. For example, Trump has threatened over 20 people with prosecution. That's a standard authoritarian fascist tactic, common to banana republics. No other president has ever done that. Trump is alone in that kind of Orwellian corruption.

I can paste tens of thousands of such examples from Obama, Clinton, and the democratic party!

Nah. You can't even post one, because you're just parroting stupid conspiracy theories that TheParty fed you. Try to remember that you can't gaslight rational people. You can only gaslight your fellow cult morons. Normal people know you're just making stupid shit up.

Let me guess, you admire the shit out of ANTIFA, don't you?

For a death-ninja, you sure frighten easily.

It's hilarious. FOX News fed you non-stop insane stories how ANTIFA was out to get you, and you soiled yourself, just as they wanted. You've been terrified into abject obedience. That's a very common way that conservatives are created.

This is why I advocate for free testosterone supplements for conservative men. If we could inject a little spine into the whimpering betas of the right, we could almost instantly wipe out the pathology of conservatism.

 

[lennypartiv]

The House did call witnesses who declined to show up.

Why should the House of Representatives control the White House?

 

[Nostra]

That ship has sailed.

IRS Scandal: On September 8, 2017, the Trump Justice Department declined to reopen the criminal investigation into Lois Lerner, a central figure in the controversy.

Fast & Furious:
Obama relents in fight over Fast and Furious documents

By JOSH GERSTEIN

04/08/2016 04:59 PM EDT

Updated 04/08/2016 05:24 PM EDT

Four years after asserting executive privilege to block Congress from obtaining documents relating to a controversial federal gun trafficking investigation, President Barack Obama relented Friday, turning over to lawmakers thousands of pages of records that led to unusual House votes holding Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt in 2012.

In January, a federal district court judge rejected Obama's executive privilege claim over records detailing the Justice Department and White House's response to Operation Fast and Furious, a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives investigation that may have allowed as many as 2,000 firearms to pass into the hands of Mexican drug cartels.

There was plenty of evidence at the time that Fast and Furious was an illegal operation, thus they did have legal reason for those documents.

With Trump temporarily holding Concessional aid (not illegal) , with no illegal activity behind it, he released them soon, within the fiscal year of the aid (no illegal activity behind it) there are no legal reasons to demand 20 e-mails.

You should stop here now, you are getting sillier and sillier....

What is silly---no, criminal--is IGNORING the fact that this withholding of aid coincided with Trump asking for a "favor" and then repeatedly asking the Ambassador if Zelensky had scheduled a TV announcement that he was investigating Biden. Trump released the funds ONLY AFTER HE WAS CAUGHT. And he did it quick, too, because he knew it was wrong.

It was clearly unethical and a huge abuse of his power as President. If there is a single oversight case where the Congress has the shoe on the right foot, it is this one. I'm not sure where they get off "oversighting" their own impeachment proceeding, but hey--politics in D.C. are complex. Are they out to get Trump for this one? Yeah, and they should be.

Every president that ever lived(and Vice President as you patently choose to ignore) has used the leverage of money and aid to extract concessions from those receiving the aid. Trump is the Only chief executive under the microscope for this. And now that Biden and the whole Obama administration has been revealed to be corrupt and treasonous there is even more reason for the investigations into his activities and his sons in Ukraine.

Durham and Barr haven't gotten to the Ukraine mess yet.

You expanding Durham's mandate?

So you know what his mandate is?

Are you expanding it?

What a fucking dumbass question. Why would you be so stupid to think I have the power to expand on the mandate?

What a fucking moron you are.

 

[Dick Foster]

Oh

This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.

Roger Stone Judge Orders White House to Turn Over Ukraine Emails Being Withheld from the Public

I'm quite sure that the Trump whitehouse is jumping through it's ass to comply with that no name pip squeak judge too. LOL

 

[Dick Foster]

The House did call witnesses who declined to show up.

Why should the House of Representatives control the White House?

Now let me think, oh yeah there's some little ditty in the constitution about separation of powers or some silly shit like that I think.

 

[Kilroy2]

These heavily redacted emails are hiding what? What is so secret with dealing with Ukraine when the whole issues is money which was in the budget for Ukraine to get this money. Trump held it up which is a violation of a law that requires the president to spend that money which was appropriated by Congress. The president cannot stop it and he cannot hold it. This is why they want to hide the emails because they have nothing to explain why they are holding it other than as a carrot for Ukraine to do Trumps bidding. Trump using the power of the president to classify document as secret because it is an embarrassment to him. The judge should get these document for her to make the correct ruling. They will still be classified but she can make a ruling even if others will blame who appointed her. Yet all trump has to do is change the classification and let other determine if she is so biased or just doing her job.

Yet Trump appointed Barr, and we are to assume Barr is unbiased.

 

[Hossfly]

These heavily redacted emails are hiding what? What is so secret with dealing with Ukraine when the whole issues is money which was in the budget for Ukraine to get this money. Trump held it up which is a violation of a law that requires the president to spend that money which was appropriated by Congress. The president cannot stop it and he cannot hold it. This is why they want to hide the emails because they have nothing to explain why they are holding it other than as a carrot for Ukraine to do Trumps bidding. Trump using the power of the president to classify document as secret because it is an embarrassment to him. The judge should get these document for her to make the correct ruling. They will still be classified but she can make a ruling even if others will blame who appointed her. Yet all trump has to do is change the classification and let other determine if she is so biased or just doing her job.

Yet Trump appointed Barr, and we are to assume Barr is unbiased.

We want Barr to be biased because the traitors on the left deserve it. The Obama bitch judge should appeal to the SCOTUS. That should take a couple years.

 

[Kilroy2]

These heavily redacted emails are hiding what? What is so secret with dealing with Ukraine when the whole issues is money which was in the budget for Ukraine to get this money. Trump held it up which is a violation of a law that requires the president to spend that money which was appropriated by Congress. The president cannot stop it and he cannot hold it. This is why they want to hide the emails because they have nothing to explain why they are holding it other than as a carrot for Ukraine to do Trumps bidding. Trump using the power of the president to classify document as secret because it is an embarrassment to him. The judge should get these document for her to make the correct ruling. They will still be classified but she can make a ruling even if others will blame who appointed her. Yet all trump has to do is change the classification and let other determine if she is so biased or just doing her job.

Yet Trump appointed Barr, and we are to assume Barr is unbiased.

We want Barr to be biased because the traitors on the left deserve it. The Obama bitch judge should appeal to the SCOTUS. That should take a couple years.

interesting, so you want Barr to be biased and then other complain of liberal bias in the judicial system. So liberal judges are bias and conservative judges are bias. Who can you trust in such a dire predicament.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Now let me think, oh yeah there's some little ditty in the constitution about separation of powers or some silly shit like that I think.

And then along came the Reagan memo....