They've killed more Russians (including Ukrainians) than anyone in recent 40 years. I believe they count it as a "success". Meaningless murders is their thing, after all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
China will buy your oil for 30 bucks or even less, they know how to do business, and of course they won't 'give' you anything. Usually they sell.Lowering oil prices is a) barely possible without harming US economy. b) US oil-production would kill him for it. c) its simply useless - China will buy more oil and will give Russia more weapons.
What's really matters in the escalation games is ability to escalate. To reliable, deterrence should be believable, and to be believable it shouldn't be suicidal. So, either the USA has a trump in their sleeve, or they will stop escalation on the level "a limited nuclear war in Europe".
'Sell' is good enough. We sell them oil, they sell parts for UAVs. Low taxes, good cooperation and the price of Upyr' anti-tank UAV is 40 thousand roubles, a bit lesser than $400. And what is the price of a new, build from scratch American tank? Oh, wait a moment, the USA lost ability to build new tanksChina will buy your oil for 30 bucks or even less, they know how to do business, and of course they won't 'give' you anything. Usually they sell.
No problem. Trump, possibly, have very few ways to decrease the prices (like increasing suggestion or decreasing consumption). Most of them would be more devastating for the USA rather to Russia. And anyway, it doesn't really matter what is the oil price on the international markets if Russia simply exchange say, five barrels of oil for one UAV.Yes, it is impossible to lower these prices by simply clicking the fingers. Who knows, maybe this won't ever happen. But anyway, it would be interesting to see your shitty empire in this case.
No. Should I? I believe money must work.Have you took back all your bank deposits, btw?
I think that the price is ridiculously high, indeed. Though, I don't know how much such a tank costs. It is my guess.'Sell' is good enough. We sell them oil, they sell parts for UAVs. Low taxes, good cooperation and the price of Upyr' anti-tank UAV is 40 thousand roubles, a bit lesser than $400. And what is the price of a new, build from scratch American tank? Oh, wait a moment, the USA lost ability to build new tanks
By sharply increasing oil production. And should it devastate the US? Lowering prices was one of his promises, as far as I know. Cheap fuel is good for the economy (if it is not oil-dependent, of course).No problem. Trump, possibly, have very few ways to decrease the prices (like increasing suggestion or decreasing consumption). Most of them would be more devastating for the USA rather to Russia. And anyway, it doesn't really matter what is the oil price on the international markets if Russia simply exchange say, five barrels of oil for one UAV
Maybe you shouldn't, who knows. I read in some Russian Telegram-channels about possible 'freezing' of deposits.No. Should I? I believe money must work
Actually, scratch new US tanks are literally priceless, because the the USA can't build them anymore.I think that the price is ridiculously high, indeed. Though, I don't know how much such a tank costs. It is my guess.
To simply increase oil production, with the prices lower than $60/barrel, the US government should sponsor oil production with printing additional money (which cause dollar inflation and destroy American economy). And, if you simply increase oil production and sell it on the world's markets, it basically means that you sell it to China and India. And it will be good for their economies. So, it will be good mostly for China and bad mostly for Americans (especially poor working ones).By sharply increasing oil production. And should it devastate the US? Lowering prices was one of his promises, as far as I know. Cheap fuel is good for the economy (if it is not oil-dependent, of course).
I doubt they actually will. Anyway, they will unfreeze them after our victory.Maybe you shouldn't, who knows. I read in some Russian Telegram-channels about possible 'freezing' of deposits.
Maybe by printing additional money, maybe economic stimulus (like tax cuts) will be enough. Actually, the US did a pretty good job in the last 10 years in expanding its oil production. Any guesses who is now the top 1 oil producer in the world? Yes, your guess is right.To simply increase oil production, with the prices lower than $60/barrel, the US government should sponsor oil production with printing additional money (which cause dollar inflation and destroy American economy). And, if you simply increase oil production and sell it on the world's markets, it basically means that you sell it to China and India. And it will be good for their economies. So, it will be good mostly for China and bad mostly for Americans (especially poor working ones
I see, you don't have deposits.Anyway, they will unfreeze them after our victory
It depends on what do you call "oil". And no, when they sell oil cheaper than its cost price, you just support chinese economy on expence of American taxpayers.Maybe by printing additional money, maybe economic stimulus (like tax cuts) will be enough. Actually, the US did a pretty good job in the last 10 years in expanding its oil production. Any guesses who is now the top 1 oil producer in the world? Yes, your guess is right.
Oil (crude oil in this context) is a certain substance that can be processed and 'turned' into a source of energy - diesel and gasoline, as prime examples.It depends on what do you call "oil". And no, when they sell oil cheaper than its cost price, you just support chinese economy on expence of American taxpayers.
![]()
Ukraine receives €3 billion from frozen Moscow imperial assets. Under the G7 ERA program, Ukraine has formally received the first tranche
Perfect! But I believe that the amount to be paid by Moscow ulus (empire) , in the end, will be much more than 50 billion...www.usmessageboard.com
![]()
BREAKING : Serbian "bratuški" (did it again :) cancels Moscow arms deals amid Ukraine war, Our sanctions WORK ! Serbian ammunition FOR Ukraine
WHO WILL BE Next NATO member, Serbia, Moldova, or Armenia ? https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/moscows-gru-paid-tens-of-millions-of-dollars-to-the-taliban-to-target-american-coalition.1142691/page-2#post-36036001 BREAKING : Serbian "bratuški" (did it again :) cancels Moscow arms deals amid...www.usmessageboard.com
If you are pro-![]()
Moscow you are anti-humanity...
The Russian federation repeatedly stated for years, that if NATO continues to expand eastward, situating NATO military bases along the border, some with US nuclear weapons, then it would eventually react as a defensive measure. This is all a matter of record, I've read those records.
Ukraine started the war and the west have fanned the flames, the dead soldiers Russian and Ukrainian are the result of NATO not Russia.
Russia said before it invaded, that it wanted Ukraine/NATO to assert that Ukraine would never ever be offered NATO membership, it asked for that for months and it was rejected out of hand, so Russian made a preemptive attack and that surprised nobody, least of all NATO and the US.
The West wanted this war, Russia did not.
I support finding for Ukraine![]()
U.S. announces nearly $6 billion in funding for Ukraine - UPI.com
The United States on Monday announced nearly $6 billion in funding for Ukraine as it continues to fend off the Russian invasion that is now approaching its third year.www.upi.com
Dec. 30 (UPI) -- The United States on Monday announced nearly $6 billion in funding for Ukraine as it continues to fend off the Russian invasion that is now approaching its third year.
President Joe Biden announced on Monday nearly $2.5 billion in security assistance for Ukraine, saying the assistance, which includes weapons, will go to giving Kyiv "the support it needs to prevail" against the larger and better-equipped Russian forces.
Biden said the assistance includes a $1.25 billion drawdown package for the Ukrainian military and a $1.22 billion Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative package.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said another $3.4 billion in "direct budget support" funds from her office are the final disbursement appropriated under the bipartisan Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriation Act 2024.
Remember when Trump could not even get 7 Billion to build a border wall?
Happy New Year Chumps!
Ukraine isn’t going to win, they aren’t getting their land back, and they will never push the Russians out, that is a pipe dream.
Russia was wrong, the west was wrong, and Putin is an asshole, but none of those things are going to change the outcome.
Ukraine is nothing more than money pit......Unless you stand to make money.
BlackRock and JPMorgan are backing a $15 billion investor fund to rebuild Ukraine.
Profit from the war, profit from the rebuilding, own Ukraine at the end.
BlackRock and JPMorgan are backing a $15 billion investor fund to rebuild Ukraine
Russia invaded Ukraine, retard.Ukraine started the war and the west have fanned the flames, the dead soldiers Russian and Ukrainian are the result of NATO not Russia.
Russia does not get to dictate which alliances sovereign nations enter into.Russia said before it invaded, that it wanted Ukraine/NATO to assert that Ukraine would never ever be offered NATO membership, it asked for that for months and it was rejected out of hand, so Russian made a preemptive attack and that surprised nobody, least of all NATO and the US.
So they just invaded for no reason? and a Country doesn't have the right to belong to a military alliance that presents a critical threat to it's neighbours, that was a red line for Russia and NATO crossed it, you were warned what the response would be and you thought Putin was bluffing, and Ukraine ceased to be a sovereign Nation in 2014 after the coup.Russia invaded Ukraine, retard.
Russia does not get to dictate which alliances sovereign nations enter into.